1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STANDARD IIC LIBRARY AND LEARNING RESOURCES The little standard that could.
Advertisements

New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
September 8, /8/2014 Margarita Pillado -- Faculty Accreditation Coordinator -- Los Angeles Pierce College 1.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Barbara Beno, President Dr. Steve Maradian, Vice President 20 June 2008.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Mr. Jack Pond, Vice President Fall 2005.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
A Breakout Session - Fall 2009 ASCCC Plenary Presented by Scott Lee, Antelope Valley College & John Koetzner, Mendocino College.
2013 A CCREDITATION S ELF S TUDY K ICKOFF M AY 2, 2011 Presented by Chairs: Aimee Myers, Faculty Chair Laurie Thiers, Classified Chair Brian Haley, Management.
1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.
March 23, 2009 Accreditation and Trusteeship: What Every Board Should Know A Presentation for Rancho Santiago CCD By Barbara Beno, President ACCJC.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Meeting Accreditation Challenges. WASC Standards Standard I: Evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re- evaluation to verify and improve.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Accreditation Self-Study
Why is My College on warning? Understanding the Accreditation Process.
Communication Coordination Consolidation Collaboration
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Presented by: Corinna Evett
Accreditation and curriculum
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
Overview of accjc stanard IV
Reaccreditation and Illinois
February 21-22, 2018.
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics

2 The Purposes of Accreditation are:  Provide assurance to the public that education meets acceptable levels of quality  Promote continuous institutional improvement  Raise the quality of higher educational institutions

3 ACCJC encourages and supports institutional development through:  Establishing standards of quality based upon excellent practices in higher education  Evaluating institutions with these standards using a three-part process that entails Institutional Self Study Institutional Self Study Peer Review Peer Review Commission Review Commission Review

4   Necessary conditions for high - quality education   Reflect best practice in higher education, not common practice   Apply to diverse institutions Standards of Accreditation Standards of Accreditation:

5   Inclusive of every good practice in higher education   Representative of state or system regulations or used to enforce those regulations   The “standards” of other groups that purport to establish best practice or quality Standards are not:

6   Standards required basic structures and processes to be in place and minimal resources to be available (‘60s)   Standards added a requirement that colleges evaluate student achievement, evaluate program quality and improve both (’90’s) Evolution of Standards

7   Standards highlight the requirement that colleges evaluate student learning and link student learning to institutional assessment and improvement (2002) Evolution of the Standards

8 The ACCJC Standards   Mission and Effectiveness   Learning Programs and Services   Resources   Leadership and Governance

9 Standard I Institutional Mission and Effectiveness A. Mission – d A. Mission – defines the institution’s broad educational purposes, its intended student population, and its commitment to student learning. B. Improving Institutional Effectiveness – demonstrates a conscious effort to produce and support student learning, measures learning, assesses how well learning is occurring, makes changes to improve student learning.

10 Standard I B organizes key processes and allocates resources to effectively support student learning. provides evidence of the achievement of student learning outcomes and program performance. uses ongoing and systematic evaluation and planning to refine processes and improve student learning

11 Standard II Student Learning Programs & Services A. Instructional Programs – Offers high-quality instructional programs that culminate in identified student outcomes leading to degrees, certificates, employment, or transfer or programs consistent with its mission Instructional programs are systematically assessed to assure currency, improve teaching and learning strategies, and achieve stated student learning outcomes The provisions of this standard are broadly applicable to all instructional activities offered

12 Standard II B. Student Support Services – Recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent with its mission. Student support services address the identified needs of students and enhance a supportive learning environment. Entire student pathway through the institutional experience is characterized by a concern for student access, progress, learning, and success. Systematically assesses student support services using student learning outcomes, faculty and staff input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of these services.

13 Standard II C. Library and Learning Support Services Sufficient to support the institution’s instructional programs and intellectual, aesthetic, and cultural activities in whatever format and wherever they are offered Services include library services and collections, tutoring, learning centers, computer laboratories, and learning technology development and training The institution provides access and training to students so that library and other learning support services may be used effectively and efficiently

14 Standard II C Systematically assesses these services using student learning outcomes, faculty input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of the services. Systematically assesses these services using student learning outcomes, faculty input, and other appropriate measures in order to improve the effectiveness of the services.

15 Standard III Resources A. Human Resources – Employs qualified personnel to support student learning programs and services wherever offered and by whatever means delivered, and to improve institutional effectiveness. Employs qualified personnel to support student learning programs and services wherever offered and by whatever means delivered, and to improve institutional effectiveness. Personnel are treated equitably, are evaluated regularly and systematically, and are provided with opportunities for professional development. Personnel are treated equitably, are evaluated regularly and systematically, and are provided with opportunities for professional development. Commitment to the significant educational role played by persons of diverse backgrounds by making positive efforts to encourage such diversity. Commitment to the significant educational role played by persons of diverse backgrounds by making positive efforts to encourage such diversity. Human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning. Human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

16 Standard III Resources Standard III Resources B. Physical Resources – Facilities, equipment, land, and other assets, support student learning and services and improve institutional effectiveness. Physical resource planning is integrated with institutional planning. C. Technology Resources – Support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. Technology planning is integrated with institutional planning.

17 Standard III Resources D. Financial Resources – Sufficient to support student learning programs and services and to improve institutional effectiveness. Distribution of resources supports the development, maintenance, and enhancement of programs and services. The institution plans and manages its financial affairs with integrity and in a manner that ensures financial stability. The level of financial resources provides a reasonable expectation of both short-term and long-term financial solvency. Financial resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.

18 Standard IV Leadership and Governance A. Decision-Making Roles and Processes – Ethical and effective leadership throughout the organization enables the institution to identify institutional values, set and achieve goals, learn, and improve. B. Board and Administrative Organization – Institution recognizes the designated responsibilities of the governing board for setting policies and of the chief administrator for the effective operation of the institution Multi-college districts/systems clearly define the organizational roles of the district/system and the colleges.

19 The Reliance on Evidence Visiting teams must verify evidence offered by an institution supports the institution’s claim that it meets accreditation standards.

20 Schedule of Institutional Reviews  Comprehensive Evaluation & Visit – 6-year cycle  Midterm Report – 3 rd year Focused Midterm Report Focused Midterm Report Focused Midterm Report w/ Visit Focused Midterm Report w/ Visit  Progress Report – As needed Progress Report w/ Visit Progress Report w/ Visit  Special Reports – As needed Special Reports w/ Visit Special Reports w/ Visit

21 Timeline for ARC Fall 2007 ● Faculty Co-chair selected ● Identify & address potential gaps ● Select steering committee Spring 2008 ● Recruit & name self-study committees ● Self-study reference site created ● Student & staff surveys ● Begin collection of evidence ● Start self-study Fall 2008 ● Continue self-study ● College reviews Draft 1

22 Timeline for ARC Spring 2009 ● Self-study Draft 2 ● College reviews Draft 2 ● College reviews Draft 2 May 2009 ● Self-study report completed June 2009 ● LRCCD Board receives self-study September 2009 ● Accreditation team visit

23 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics