Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cheating on College Campuses 83% of students cheat in some form 60% cheat on homework and see nothing wrong with it 19% cheat on exams Most likely to cheat:
Advertisements

Academic Integrity: A Guide for Instructors Presenters: Christy D. Moran, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students Tine Reimers, Director CETaL.
Academic Integrity “Just do what’s right.” GTA Presentation Dan Schwab, Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards Shannon Quihuiz, Title IX Investigator.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY University of Arkansas at Little Rock Presented by: Darryl K. McGee, M.S. Office of the Dean of Students.
Academic Integrity at Trinity and Across the Nation A Report Prepared for the Trinity Community* March 15, 2002 by C. Mackenzie Brown Chair of Academic.
Mitigating Cheating A Cliff’s Notes version. What is cheating? The expectations change Faculty vs. Students vs. administration.
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 400 Seminar Fall 2012.
The Case of the Keystroke Logger Presented by Michael Votava, Director of Student Conduct & Ethical Development February 21, 2014.
The Aggie Code of Honor and the Aggie Honor System Office
 Introduction › Importance of “creativity”  Intellectual Property › Why is Intellectual Property important for us? › Definition › Copyright  Academic.
Plagiarism and Cheating
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Honor System.
New Student Orientation Module 4: Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
Dr. Jennifer Buchanan Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement Academic Honor Policy.
What is it? How can you avoid it?. What is plagiarism?  Plagiarism comes from the Latin word plagiarius which means “kidnapper.”  Plagiarism is literary.
Academic Integrity. What is integrity? What do you think “academic integrity” means?
College of Engineering & Architecture Honor System Honesty Self- Governance Integrity Ethics.
Academic Integrity ASU 101. Academic Integrity Objectives  Differentiate between instances of academic honesty and dishonesty  List potential consequences.
Department of Curriculum & Instruction Faculty and Teaching Assistant Orientations Guidelines for Teaching.
Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
Academic Integrity GSAS TA Orientation Fall 2014.
Trouble in the Classroom Disruptive Behavior, Dangerous Behavior, Students in Distress, Plagiarism & Prevention.
Academic Integrity and Non-Academic Student Misconduct Gabriel A. Slifka, Director Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities.
Lassen Community College NEW STUDENT ORIENTATION Introduction Lassen Community College is an academic community dedicated to providing an agreeable atmosphere.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Academic Washington State University Adam Jussel Director Office of Student Standards & Accountability.
The Chattahoochee Way Academic Integrity (Don’t cheat.)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland Diane.
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Dr. Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY VIOLATIONS OFFENSES, PENALTIES, AND PROCEDURES.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
ACADEMIC HONOR POLICY AND GRADE APPEALS SYSTEM Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement Jennifer N.
1 ACADEMIC SENATE POLICY ON ACADEMIC DISHONESTY History: Approved by the Academic Senate, 2/16/88 Approved.
Using another person’s idea without giving them proper credit. Stealing someone else’s work and presenting it as your own. Using information from an outside.
The Aggie Code of Honor and the Aggie Honor System Office Timothy C. Powers Director, Aggie Honor System Office
IMPORTANT SMU POLICIES (and some general resources)
Academic Honor Policy Survey Results Amy Guerette, Jennifer Buchanan and Ann DelRossi On behalf of the Academic Honor Policy Committee.
Sources for definitions and explanations of the term plagiarism and the consequences of plagiarism: I.Class Syllabus, p. 3 “Academic Dishonesty” II. Student.
Academic Integrity Guidelines for Reporting Violations of Academic Integrity.
Academic Misonduct 1. Definition: Any act that compromises the academic integrity of the University or the educational process. 2.
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
1 Academic Integrity. 2 What is academic integrity?
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Academic integrity Forum and Discussion
University of Miami Undergraduate Honor Council
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY TASK FORCE
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Avoiding Academic Misconduct
Academic Honor Policy Dr. Jennifer Buchanan Associate Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
College of Engineering
Academic Integrity Student Guide
Academic Integrity Mike Scott Lecturer, CS Dept.
Academic Integrity at Sinclair
Academic Integrity integrity = making choices based on
Academic integrity Collaboration
Mohammad A. Rob Management Information Systems
Welcome to the University of Alberta
Academic Integrity.
Academic Integrity Policy (AIP)
Trustees and Curriculum streamlining
Rowan University Academic Integrity Skills Workshop
A Guide for International Students Presented by - Mahitha Rao
Florida State University New Faculty Orientation 2019
Presentation transcript:

Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement

Academic Honor Policy and Academic Integrity Why is this important?

Purpose Show how survey information gathered from FSU students can inform us about student and instructor attitudes and behaviors Discuss how you can prevent academic dishonesty in your class

Purpose continued Show you the highlights of the Academic Honor Policy and the Grade Appeals process Introduce Ms. Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Coordinator in the Office of Faculty Development and Advancement

Academic Integrity Survey Students today report cheating less than those in 2003, with the exception of one behavior. Instructors play a central role! Students rely on you to know and uphold the Academic Honor Policy! (

Florida State University Academic Honor Policy (AHP)

Charges Plagiarism Cheating Unauthorized group work Fabrication, falsification, & misrepresentation

Charges continued Multiple Submission Abuse of academic materials Complicity in academic dishonesty Attempting to commit an offense

Graduate Student Issues Prelims, comps, thesis or dissertation treated as egregious and sent to Step 2 Charging decision made by committee comprised of department chair, outside member, and faculty member appointed by dean

Policy Specifics Instructors play central role Procedural Notes (check for prior record)

Ways Students Reported Cheating Now vs Working on assignments together (28% v. 65%) Receiving requests to copy homework (26%) Working on an assignment with others using digital means (24%)

Ways Students Reported Cheating in 2015 vs continued Copying a few sentences from internet without citation (23% v. 39%) Getting questions or answers about test beforehand (22% v. 29%) Receiving unpermitted help on an assignment (20% v. 19%)

Ways Students Reported Cheating in 2015 vs continued Copying a few sentences from written source without citation (17% v. 34%) Copying (by hand or in person) another student’ s homework (16%) Copying (digitally) someone’s homework (12%)

Online Courses 2015 Survey Results – frequency of reported cheating behaviors (from an average of 5% of all types of cheating during f-t-f exams to 22% collaborating with others, 25% getting unauthorized help, and 62-65% consulting unauthorized materials during online exams). Resources – Testing Center offers proctored services to students who are both on and off campus: exams. Support for online course development from ODL at:

Facebook Instructors have discovered instances of students creating course-based Facebook groups and using them to collaborate on homework and/or quizzes. If you assign individual work outside of class, please articulate your policy regarding collaboration clearly and be explicit about how it applies to study groups on Facebook and elsewhere online. For more information, see: Survey Results

Faculty-Student Opinion Differences Students rated the severity of penalties as higher (63% high/very high) than did faculty (21% high/very high) Students overestimate instructors’ understanding of policies (79% high/very high) compared to the level of understanding reported by faculty (35% high/very high)

Faculty-Student Opinion Differences Students see most cheating behaviors as less serious than do faculty members, especially when they involve collaboration that hasn’t been authorized by the instructor.

Honor Code Assumptions Only 34% of students agree that they should be responsible for monitoring others’ integrity Students more likely to report fellow students in 2015 than in 2003 (63% vs. 80% very unlikely/unlikely to report) They are less likely to report close friends (96% very unlikely/unlikely)

Preventing Academic Dishonesty How do we do this? How do we make cheating more difficult? Build a professional relationship with your student!

Preventing Academic Dishonesty Teaching meaning of plagiarism, esp. paraphrasing versus quoting “Turn-it-in.com,” “SafeAssign” and other resources – make available Mutual respect between student and instructor and confident verbal reinforcement Syllabus:

Preventing Test Cheating Making cheating more difficult Following through (learn policy) Have a plan for test-time (verify independently) Emphasize “Complicity” charge Confident verbal reinforcement

Conclusions and Themes Today’s students are acting with more integrity in the classroom than those in Make clear your expectations regarding unauthorized collaboration, especially between friends (FB or otherwise), who don’t believe that doing homework together is wrong. Students assume you know more than you do about academic integrity. Learn the policy.

Conclusions and Themes continued Students look to you for cues about whether cheating will be tolerated and don’t want you to! Students will hesitate to inform you Prevention is important Our involvement is critical Important to address use of social media (esp. FB) and online testing issues

Academic Honor Policy By Academic Year (Since New Policy Effective Fall 2005) Number of Cases

Cases and Outcomes Through July 28, 2014

Grade Appeals System Also involves integrity Emphasizes centrality of instructor judgment in grading process Grade must be imposed in an arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory manner to be overturned

Grade Appeals System continued Starts with evaluation (grading) standards expressed in syllabus Minimize exposure through consistency

Grade Appeals System

Resources in your Department Your supervising faculty member should always be informed about any allegations that arise in your class. Your department chair should also be informed by either your supervising faculty member or by you. Either of them can inform you of typical penalties in the department and can sit in when you meet with students.

University Resources Office of Faculty Development and Advancement: under Academics – Academic Honor Policy, Grade Appeals System, annual Important Policies and Procedures Memo, or at (Ann DelRossi, Ameko Dillard, Andrea White) Students should be referred to the Dean of Students Department at

University Resources continued Important Policies and Procedures memo contains important information for instructors. Found on under Academics. ODL resources at: