Perturbation Approach to Derive Born Approximation, Frechet Derivative, and Migration Operator Bowen Guo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tsing Hua University, Taiwan Solar Acoustic Holograms January 2008, Tucson Dean-Yi Chou.
Advertisements

PH0101 UNIT 2 LECTURE 31 PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 3  Maxwell’s equations in free space  Plane electromagnetic wave equation  Characteristic impedance 
Ray theory and scattering theory Ray concept is simple: energy travels between sources and receivers only along a “pencil-thin” path (perpendicular to.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis beyond the Born approximation Paul Sava* Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin (UC.
Scattering: Raman and Rayleigh 0 s i,f 0 s 0 s i Rayleigh Stokes Raman Anti-Stokes Raman i f f nnn
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava* Stanford University Biondo Biondi Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin.
Surface wave tomography: part3: waveform inversion, adjoint tomography
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Body Waves and Ray Theory
Nanostructures Research Group CENTER FOR SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory David K. Ferry and Dragica Vasileska Arizona.
Scattering by particles
Forward modelling The key to waveform tomography is the calculation of Green’s functions (the point source responses) Wide range of modelling methods available.
Prestack Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
Introduction to Time dependent Time-independent methods: Kap. 7-lect2 Methods to obtain an approximate eigen energy, E and wave function: perturbation.
ELE 488 Fall 2006 Image Processing and Transmission ( )
Moment Tensor Inversion in Strongly Heterogeneous Media at Pyhasalmi Ore Mine, Finland Václav Vavryčuk (Academy of Sciences of the CR) Daniela Kühn (NORSAR)
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Seismology Part II: Body Waves and Ray Theory. Some definitions: Body Waves: Waves that propagrate through the "body" of a medium (in 3 dimensions) WRONG!
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2015 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
The acoustic Green’s function in 3D is the impulsive point source response of an acoustic medium. It satisfies the 3-D Helmholtz equation in the frequency.
PROCESSING FOR SUBSALT IMAGING: A NEW AND FIRST TWO WAY MIGRATION METHOD THAT AVOIDS ALL HIGH FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTIC ASSUMPTIONS AND IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
The acoustic Green’s function in 3D is the impulsive point source response of an acoustic medium. It satisfies the 3-D Helmholtz equation in the frequency.
The retarded potentials LL2 Section 62. Potentials for arbitrarily moving charges 2 nd pair of Maxwell’s equations (30.2) in 4-D.
7. Electromagnetic Waves 7A. Plane Waves Consider Maxwell’s Equations with no sources We are going to search for waves of the form To make things as general.
Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
Time and Depth Imaging Algorithms in a Hardware Accelerator Paradigm
Analytical Methods.
Finite Difference Methods
LSM Theory: Overdetermined vs Underdetermined
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
Inverse scattering terms for laterally-varying media
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Rigorous Derivation of LSM (& FWI)
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
HOCIGs and VOCIGs via Two-way Reverse Time Migration
Microwave Engineering
Notes 17 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
Multi-dimensional depth imaging without an adequate velocity model
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Quantum One.
Fang Liu, Arthur B. Weglein, Kristopher A. Innanen, Bogdan G. Nita
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
4D Interferometric Traveltime Tomography
Kristopher Innanen** and Arthur Weglein* *University of Houston
The Wave Equation Modeled
Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
Wave-Equation Migration Research at Los Alamos National Laboratory
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Initial asymptotic acoustic RTM imaging results for a salt model
Initial analysis and comparison of the wave equation and asymptotic prediction of a receiver experiment at depth for one-way propagating waves Chao Ma*,
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Tutorial on Green’s Theorem and Forward Modeling, SRME, Interferometry, and Migration ..
Microwave Engineering
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Notes 10 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
I.1 Diffraction Stack Modeling
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
I.1 Diffraction Stack Modeling
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Find the set of points (x, y) such that F(x, y) = 0 if F(x, y) = (r - 4)x, {image} , and r = |x|
Identifying Stationary Points
An optimized implicit finite-difference scheme for the two-dimensional Helmholtz equation Zhaolun Liu Next, I will give u an report about the “”
Prestack depth migration in angle-domain using beamlet decomposition:
Presentation transcript:

Perturbation Approach to Derive Born Approximation, Frechet Derivative, and Migration Operator Bowen Guo

Goal: to derive s 1.Born modeling equation Migration operator s

Starting point: Helmholtz equation  Specially, when the source is a harmonic point source, equation (1) becomes equation (2) Since, Thus: (1) (2)

Starting point Integrate over both sides (volume integration), Change volume integration to surface integration, Considering Equation (2) we get s V0,S0V0,S0 (3) The first term = 0, if there are only out-going wave and S 0 at infinity

Starting point: inverse operator to the Helmholtz equation Thus, under such assumption Compare with Helmholtz equation We can conclude (4)

Middle point: Lippmann-schwinger equation Assume the velocity is perturbed, Plugging into Helmholtz equation and neglecting the second order perturbation term: Considering equation (4) (5) Green’s function response of the background medium v v v v Background perturbated Change notation

Middle point: 1 st order Born approximation Similarly Only zero and first order term are kept (first order Born approximation). It is assumed that Taylor expansion at x=0 v v x Zero order term = First order term = Second order term = … is small … = …

Final point: 1 st order Born approximation Assuming: We can conclude Source to scatter Scatter to receiver s

Final point: Frechet derivative  For a single point scatter at x 0 background wave field term s s

Final point: matrix notation of Born modeling: d=Lm L m d Summation in model space ! Change notation,,, and sum over all frequency

Final point: a closer watch at d=Lm  d: scattered wave field, which only contains primary reflection and diffraction information, no multiples.  L: forward modeling operator, which requires prior information of G.  m: reflectivity-like model. Velocity Perturbation (reflectivity)

Extension: L T =migration operator  Matrix notation   L T operates on d, giving reflectivity-like image. Assume a 2-dimensional model is then m is a vector N x 1. Assume d is a vector M x 1 then L is a matrix M x N. Usually M > N, the system of equations is over-determined. Usually, because ?

Extension: L T = migration operator (L and L T )  ( giving perturbation m, what is scattered data ?)  (giving scattered data, where are perturbations ?) model space data space

Extension: physical interpretation of migration (using Kirchhoff migration as an example)   For illustration, background velocity is homogeneous. For a fixed s and g pair Where is the scatter? It must be in the place where is satisfied. sg

Extension: different migration methods  Different ways to calculate Green’s function 1.Kirchhoff migration: solve travel times to asymptotically represent Green’s function 2.Reverse time migration: 3.Generalized diffraction stack migration:  All require a good background velocity model (a good G)

Extension: different migration methods  Different ways to calculate Green’s function 1.Kirchhoff migration: solve travel times to asymptotically represent Green’s function 2.Reverse time migration: 3.Generalized diffraction stack migration:  All require a good background velocity model (a good G)

Extension: a re-look at Kirchhoff migration   velocity is heterogeneous ? Eikonal solver to For a fixed s and g pair Where is the scatter? It must be in the place where is satisfied. s g Smearing data in the model where match

Extension: different migration methods  Different ways to implement the following equation: 1.Kirchhoff migration: solve travel times to asymptotically represent Green’s function 2.Reverse time migration: 3.Generalized diffraction stack migration:  All require a good background velocity model (a good G)

Extension: Reverse Time Migration (RTM) Source side Receiver side       A migration image of a single pair of source and receiver Refraction+reflect ion Different combinations make different parts in the image. Smile Rabbit ear Cigar Background velocity

Extension: Reverse Time Migration Refraction Reflection Cigar Rabbit ear r 2 Smile r Rabbit ear r 2 velocity smoothly increase with depth abrupt velocity change n/a Smearing data in the model where match

Extension: L T = migration operator (gradient of L2 misfit function)  Misfit function:  To use a gradient optimization method to minimize the misfit function, the gradient: Since Thus

Summary  Born approximation (modeling):  Frechet derivative (single frequency):  Migration:  Matrix notation:  Different ways to implement migration (Kirchhoff, RTM, GDM)  A closer look at RTM (cigar, rabbit ear, smile)