Contract Management SB 20 Objective:  Provide basic overview of the contract process to employees  Give employees basic information on how to process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
SFSP Contracting for Vended Meals Virginia Department of Health Special Nutrition Programs 2014.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Subcontracts Procedures and Federal Regulations Susan Tompkins George Walueff.
PCard Program Roles and Responsibilities Review Karen Brookbanks, C.P.M., CPPB.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Office of Operations 2010 Fall Conference Contract Monitoring Elizabeth Bogdanowicz Joseph Morrissey, MBA, CGAP Roslyn Watrobski, CFE, CIA, CGAP.
UNC Charlotte Purchasing Card Training for Auditor Role Annette Heller.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
(Host Club) CLUB QUALIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE ROTARY FOUNDATION.
Department of Economic Opportunity WelcomeTo Contract Review Form Training.
How To Prepare For A Procurement Audit Shabrel Hoyt-Davis Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Procurement Review October 3, 2007.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
Financial Resource Management Recommended Best Practices Training for Volunteers and Support Groups.
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
ASA (FM&C) 1 Department of the Army Mass Transportation Benefit Program (MTBP) Outside the National Capital Region (NCR) Guidance for Program Points of.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
Health and Safety Policy
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
Finance and Administration Developed Using The CAP-USAF Pamphlet 12 and CAP ES materials 6/7/2016NESA 2012 phm1.
6/9/2016 Agenda Procedure Training Lori McWilliams, CMC Village Clerk.
Award Management Services Procurement Outreach Training Level II - Module C Specialized Agreements.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Under the new grants process, both districts and clubs assume greater responsibility for the management of grants. The Rotary Foundation has established.
Contract Compliance Training
Subrecipient Monitoring
Policies and Procedures
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Allen Independent School District November 7, 2016
District and Club Qualification
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Health and Safety Policy
Presented by Jean Fecteau OEO Fiscal Analyst
Multnomah Education Service District
Multnomah Education Service District
City of Norfolk Office of the Purchasing Agent
Department of Financial Services Bureau of Auditing
Contract Compliance Training
Contract Review and Processing
Implementation Plan for the Higher Education Sector
Department of Community Development
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
Subrecipient Monitoring
Role & Responsibilities
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
District and Club Qualification
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Roles and Responsibilities
SADC PPP Network PPPs in SADC
Presentation transcript:

Contract Management SB 20 Objective:  Provide basic overview of the contract process to employees  Give employees basic information on how to process contracts  Give employees an update on the new procedures and forms

What is Contract Management?  Contract management is the process of directing contract planning, formation, execution, and assessment through closeout to maximize financial and operational performance and minimize risk. Good contract management procedures are critical to the efficient and effective use of public funds for Midwestern State University (MSU) to achieve its mission.  The information contained in this Contract Management Handbook complies with Section of the Texas Government Code which requires MSU, as a state agency, to publish a contract management handbook that establishes consistent contracting policies and practices and contract review procedures to be followed by MSU and that is consistent with the State Comptroller’s contract management guide.  In addition, MSU is required under Section to develop and comply with a purchasing accountability and risk analysis procedure that must provide for:  assessing the risk of fraud, abuse, or waste in the contractor selection process, contract provisions, and payment and reimbursement rates and methods for the different types of goods and services for which the agency contracts;  identifying contracts that require enhanced contract monitoring or the immediate attention of contract management staff; and  establishing clear levels of purchasing accountability and staff responsibilities related to purchasing.

Contract Management Process Routing Sheet Plan: identify contracting objectives and contracting strategy Risk Assessment Matrix Sole Source if applicable: fairly and objectively select the most qualified contractors Log: keep a log for all major contracts and major purchase orders and monitoring contracts. Step 1 Initiating Dept Approval process: responsible for ensuring that approval by the appropriate department(s) and supervisor(s) Forward to Contract Management Office for review. They will assist the initiating department’s contract liaison with negotiating contract terms and conditions and the preliminary preparation and review of the contract. Will obtain signatures and return a fully executed agreement back to Liaison. Step 2 Contract Management Vendor Performance Forms Annual Review Proper Closeout with appropriate file contents Step 3 Completion

The Contract Liaison  The Contract review process starts with the initiating department’s Liaison  Contract Liaison responsibilities assisting in planning and developing contract objectives ensuring proper completion of the Risk Assessment Matrix (Appendix A) ensuring proper completion of the Contract Routing Sheet (Appendix B) monitoring progress and performance and ensuring proper completion of the Vendor/Contractor Performance Report (Appendix C) authorizing payments consistent with contract documents maintaining appropriate records.

Contract Management and the Routing Sheet New One A contract or agreement that creates a legally enforceable obligation and Midwestern State University must adhere to MSU Contract Administration Procedures. Examples of contracts include: Agreements Contracts Leases Letters of Intent Memorandums of Understanding Easements Licenses Purchase Orders Terms & Conditions Contracts must be reviewed and approved by the initiating department. The contract routing sheet captures this approval. Only specific University officers and employees are authorized to enter into an agreement (sign) on behalf of the University.

Risk Assessment Matrix  As a state agency, MSU is required to develop and comply with a purchasing accountability and risk analysis procedure that provides for:  assessing the risk of fraud, abuse, or waste in the contractor selection process, contract provisions, and payment and reimbursement rates and methods for the different types of goods and services for which MSU contracts;  identifying contracts that require enhanced contract monitoring or the immediate attention of contract management staff; and  establishing clear levels of purchasing accountability and staff responsibilities related to purchasing. Performing risk assessments helps to determine the level of oversight and participation MSU will need. Performing a risk assessment is an ongoing process throughout the life of the contract. The risk factors in MSU’s risk assessment matrix are:  Total Cost  Type of Contract Purchase;  Payment Type/Structure;  Essential MSU Function;  Percentage of Services Performed by Subcontractors;  Stability & Experience of Contractor Key Management;  Compliance History;  Past Programmatic Performance;  Audit Results;  Number of Years in Business;  Performance Measures;  Deliverables; and  Financial Reports Required

Risk Assessment Matrix

Risk Assessment & Liaisons  In addition to using the risk assessment matrix, contract liaisons should keep a log for all major contracts and major purchase orders. This log should identify all risks to their contracts, the mitigation plan or strategy for addressing the risk and the outcome.  Contracts must be reviewed and approved in advance by the initiating department head and the appropriate supervisor(s) (e.g., Dean / Associate Vice President and/or Vice President).  In addition, contracts should be reviewed and approved by any other department that will need to provide technical support, facilities, services, personnel, and/or security to carry out the MSU’s obligations under the contract. Examples: Information Technology (IT) Department review/approve any software.  The initiating department’s contract liaison is responsible for ensuring that approval by the appropriate department(s) and supervisor(s) are properly completed on the Contract Routing Sheet.  In sole source procurements (no-bid), the initiating department’s contract liaison is responsible for ensuring that a properly completed sole source procurement form is attached to the Contract Routing Sheet.

Monitoring Contracts  Appointment When a contract is executed in accordance with these procedures, the designated employee from the University department initiating the contract is appointed as the contract liaison and is responsible for monitoring the contract for proper execution and performance from the start date of the contract through completion and final payment.  Role and Responsibilities The contract liaison is responsible for monitoring that contract requirements are satisfied, goods and services are delivered in a timely manner, safety and risk issues are addressed, and required payments are made. The contract liaison is also responsible for striving to resolve discrepancies and timely reporting of any unresolved discrepancies and/or problems to the administrator who signed the contract and the Vice President for Administration and Finance.  Monitoring Procedures The procedures a contract owner uses will vary depending on the size, level of risk, and complexity of the contract. Contracts less than $10,000 should be monitored for performance to ensure goods and services conform to the contract requirements. The contract management coordinator will report to the applicable contract liaison the status on all open contracts less than $10,000 at the close of each fiscal year and/or upon completion of the contract. A higher degree of monitoring is required for contracts $10,000 and above. For these contracts, the contract liaison should review the contract to identify deliverables and develop a monitoring plan/checklist for each contract taking into account the level of risk.

Monitoring Contracts  At a minimum, the contract liaison should perform the following contract monitoring procedures: documenting required contractor visits, tests, and significant events; reviewing required reports submitted by the contractor demonstrating compliance; resolving disputes in a timely manner; verifying receipt of contract deliverables in accordance with the contract terms and maintaining detailed supporting documentation reviewing contract monitoring the contractor’s progress and performance to ensure goods and services conform to the contract requirements; depending on the nature of contract, the contract owner may need to conduct one or more site visits invoices and reconciling and verifying payments with the contract terms and maintaining proper documentation reviewing compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies and procedures and consulting with the applicable University department if there are any concerns prior to the closeout of a contract, completing and submitting to the Purchasing/Contract Management Office the Vendor/Contractor Performance Report.

Contract Poor Performance If a contract liaison determines that the contractor’s performance is not acceptable, the contract liaison should notify the responsible University administrator identified on the contract routing sheet. This administrator in consultation with the Vice President for Administration and Finance, the Director of the Office of Purchasing/Contract Management, and General Counsel will determine the appropriate action, which may include withholding some or all of payment. The University should impose adequate sanctions and spending restrictions on contractors who are identified as not meeting expectations. When contractors demonstrate repeated inability to meet expectations, they should be denied the privilege of contracting with the University.

Purchasing & Contract Management Website  The Purchasing and Contract Management website is your one stop link to everything purchasing and contract/agreement related. The website includes: Current Bid Opportunities Purchasing Resources & Forms Contract Management Information Warehouse and Surplus Inventory Procurement Card Information Preferred Vendors Purchasing Transparency Report Links to Purchasing Policies and Guidelines FAQ’s Purchasing Directory

Contract Management Contacts  Stephen Shelley – Director of Purchasing/Contract Management    Lori Case – Asst. Director of Purchasing/Contract Management    Tracy Nichols – Contract Coordinator  