R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Measurement of the off-axis NuMI beam with MiniBooNE Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Outline of this Presentation.
05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
H. Ray, University of Florida1 MINIBOONE  e e .
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 7 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
First Results from MiniBooNE May 29, 2007 William Louis Introduction The Neutrino Beam Events in the MiniBooNE Detector Data Analysis Initial Results Future.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
Analysis of  and e events from NuMI beamline at MiniBooNE
MiniBooNE Update Since Last PAC Meeting (Nov 2007) Steve Brice (FNAL) PAC Meeting 27 March 2008.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
MiniBooNE Event Reconstruction and Particle Identification Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (for the MiniBooNE Collaboration) DNP06, Nashville,
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
1 MiniBooNE Update and Extension Request Richard Van de Water and Steve Brice for the MiniBooNE Collaboration Nov 2, 2007.
MiniBooNE : Current Status Heather Ray Los Alamos National Lab.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
DOE Review 3/18/03Steve Brice FNALPage 1 MiniBooNE Status Steve Brice Fermilab Overview Beam – Primary Beam – Secondary Beam Detector – Calibration – Triggering.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Recent results from SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments Žarko Pavlović Los Alamos National Laboratory Rencontres de Moriond 18 March 2011.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
Study of the ND Data/MC for the CC analysis October 14, 2005 MINOS collaboration meeting M.Ishitsuka Indiana University.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
4/19/2007Jonathan Link First Oscillation Results from the MiniBooNE Experiment Jonathan Link Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University April 19.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Some Thoughts on Analysis Blindness Steve Brice Ex-Analysis Coordinator for MiniBooNE.
Details of the MiniBooNE Oscillation Result Chris Polly, Indiana University.
Results from MiniBooNE NuFact 2007 Chris Polly Indiana University.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Details of the MiniBooNE Oscillation Results Chris Polly, Indiana University Penn State Seminar.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
R. Tayloe, Indiana University CPT '07 1 Neutrino Oscillations and and Lorentz Violation Results from MiniBooNE Outline: - LSND - signal for oscillations.
R. Tayloe, Indiana University Lepton-Photon '07 1 Neutrino Oscillation Results from MiniBooNE Outline: - motivation, strategy - experiment - analysis -
1 Quasielastic neutrino scattering: Low energy results (and interpretations) R. Tayloe, NuFact'09 Chicago, IL 7/09 Outline: - Overview of CCQE process.
EPS HEP 2007 M. Sorel – IFIC (Valencia U. & CSIC)1 MiniBooNE, Part 2: First Results of the Muon-To-Electron Neutrino Oscillation Search M. Sorel (IFIC.
Path forward: theory vs experiment needs, QE discussion input Comments/Observations: R. Tayloe, Nuint'09.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
5/31/2006Fermilab Users Meeting1 Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University MiniBooNE, NO A, MINER A.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
First Anti-neutrino results!
Title : SciBooNE -- Experimental study of neutrino cross-sections for a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment and the development of the detectors.
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The analysis is in final stages. Outline: - Goal of experiment - MB detector - status of the analysis

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 2 MiniBooNE goal: test the LSND result - Primary goal of MiniBooNE is a   e  search to test the LSND result. - LSND reports a (4  excess of  e events (87.9 ± 22.4 ±6.0) in    beam LSND  e events vs energy LSND oscillation parameters

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 3 MiniBooNE  beam MB flux - “horn-focussed” beam using 8 GeV protons on Be (p Be →   →     - ~ 0.7 GeV - detector located at L=550m for same L/E as LSND PRELIMINARY P   → e  sin   sin   m  L/E 

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP tons mineral oil (CH 2 ), viewed by ” PMTs (10% coverage) - veto to tag entering/exiting particles - Particle ID, energy, position, angle via Cerenkov and scintillation light MiniBooNE Detector

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 5 Oscillation analysis observed rate of e events in detector = P(  → e ) × flux (  ) × cross-section ( e ) × detector and reconstruction efficiency  backgrounds - A large sample of  -interaction events allow for measurements of many of these quantities (e.g. cross section,   background) - Many systematic errors on the measured e rate are reduced by measuring the   events.

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 6 neutrino flux - predominantly from pion decay (   →    ) - determined from pBe data from BNL GeV, 8.9 GeV - with a “Sanford-Wang” parameterization - similar procedure is used for Kaons GeV) fits to HARP data preliminary! red points : data, red lines: SW fit, blue lines: 1  errors p    for MB red box: production data coverage

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 7 cross section - measured via the large  CCQE  data sample in MB - data used to tune a fermi gas model (within NUANCE evevent generator) - binding energy, fermi momentum from e-scattering data on carbon - effective axial-mass (M A ) and Pauli-blocking parameter determined from MB data - cross section applies to e CCQE   W n p   charged-current quasielastic process (“CCQE”) PRELIMINARY MB  CCQE data

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 8 detector simulation - uses GEANT tuned to external and internal measurements - required extensive investigation of light propagation in detector - data/MC agreement is good as can be seen in this inclusive charged-current (CC) sample (tagged by muon decay). PRELIMINARY MB inclusive CC data

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 9 reconstruction algorithms - using a 2 different methods: 1) boosted decision trees, see NIM A543 (2005) 577 & NIM A555 (2005) ) likelihood-based analysis - NuMI data/MC shown here for each method boost_PI D PRELIMINARY boosting PID output for NuMI data likelihood PID output for NuMI data

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 10 backgrounds - intrinsic- e backgrounds (from e produced at source) -  → e : (indirectly) measured in  CCQE events -  → e : “ “ “ “ - K → e : measured in high-energy  CCQE (from Kaons), extrapolate to low-E - non- e backgrounds - Beam Off: measured, negligible - CC Inclusive: simulated, tied to data - NC   : measured (see next page) - NC  →N  : small, yet non-negligible, tied to data, handled in MC - NC Coherent  : calculated, negligible - NC Radiative  : calculated, negligible -  interactions outside tank (“dirt” events), simulated, checked in data - beam-unrelated events, determined from random triggers, neglibible

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 11 NC  0 production - Rate of NC  0 production is measured as function of  0 momentum - Used to estimate NC  0 background in oscillation sample -  0 reconstructed mass distribution is described well in MC simulation reconstructed  0 mass black points: data red line: MC PRELIMINARY

R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 12 Status - We are performing a “blind” analysis to avoid experimenter bias (signal region is kept in a “closed-box”) - Plot shows possible (LSND) signal with measured/calculated backgrounds - high-energy data overlaid - low-energy data (signal) in “closed-box” region - Currently in final stages of analysis - When finished, we will “open the box” on the low-E oscillation sample - And will report result for  → e  oscillations PRELIMINARY MB backgrounds and high-energy data