Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: The IETF plenary session The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices Any IETF working group or portion thereof Any Birds of a Feather (BOF) session The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) IETF 84, Vancouver, Canada Benson Schliesser Matthew Bocci

Administrivia Blue Sheets Note takers + Jabber Scribe Mailing List: General Discussion: To Subscribe: In Body: subscribe your_ _address Archive:

Meeting Objectives Progress the problem statement and framework drafts so that they can be adopted by the working group

Agenda - 1 Opening Intro min 5 mins - Blue sheets, Agenda bash, Status update – Chairs Problem Statement and Framework Discussion min 10 mins - VPN for Data Centers Problem Statement - draft-fang-vpn4dc- problem-statement-01 - Maria Napierala 10 mins - Problem Statement - draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problems- statement-03 - Thomas Narten 25 mins - Progressing the problem statement discussion - Chairs 10 mins - Framework - draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-03 - Marc Lasserre 25 mins - Progressing the framework - Chairs

Agenda - 2 Other Milestone-related Drafts min 10 mins - Data Plane Requirements - draft-bl-nvo3-dataplane- requirements - Marc Lasserre 5 mins - Issues of Mobility in DC Overlay network - draft-dunbar-nvo3- overlay-mobility-issues-00 - Linda Dunbar 10 mins - Using Signaling to Simplify Network Virtualization Provisioning - draft-kompella-nvo3-server2nve – Thomas Morin 10 mins - Requirements on TES-NVE interface and Additional requirements on control plane - Yingjie Gu draft-gu-nvo3-tes-nve-mechanism-00 draft-gu-nvo3-overlay-cp-arch mins - nvo3 operational requirements - draft-ashwood-nvo3- operational-requirement - Peter Ashwood Smith or Ali Sajassi

Agenda – 3 (If time allows) Other Drafts min 5 mins - Use Cases for DC Network Virtualization Overlays - draft- mity-nvo3-use-case-01 - Mehmet Toy 5 mins - Analysis of Security Threats, Security Requirements for nvo3 draft-wei-nvo3-security-framework-00 - Yinxing Wei 5 mins - Layer 3 address considerations for Network Virtualization Overlays draft-carpenter-nvo3-addressing-00 - Sheng Jiang 5 mins - Accessing Cloud Services - draft-stein-cloud-access-01 - Yaakov Stein

Milestones Dec Problem Statement submitted for IESG review Dec Framework document submitted for IESG review Dec Data plane requirements submitted for IESG review Dec Operational Requirements submitted for IESG review Mar Control plane requirements submitted for IESG review Mar Gap Analysis submitted for IESG review Apr Recharter or close Working Group

Document Status This is our first meeting as a working group after a successful BoF in Paris –Thanks to everyone involved! No RFCs or WG drafts, yet Call for adoption prior to this IETF: –draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problems-statement-03 –draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-03 –Too many comments to adopt before this IETF –Will try to make progress towards consensus on adoption in Vancouver

A Note on WG Adoption Is this document a reasonable base to start work on achieving a milestone? If not, what specific text changes are needed? Note: This is not a WG last call and the authors/editors must reflect WG consensus once the document is adopted

Virtualization and Ethernet Addressing IEEE RAC chair gave the following presentation to the IESG on impact of virtualization on Ethernet OUI/EUI space ualization_July2012.pdf Will also be presented in RTG area open meeting on Thursday at 9am

Problem Statement Draft(s) Who has read both drafts? Which draft is a better start? What are the specific open issues?

Framework Draft Who has read the draft? Is the revised draft ready for adoption? If not, what are the specific issues?