Kenya Evidence Forum - June 14, 2016 Using Evidence to Improve Policy and Program Designs How do we interpret “evidence”? Aidan Coville, Economist, World.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The World Bank Human Development Network Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund.
Advertisements

#ieGovern Impact Evaluation Workshop Istanbul, Turkey January 27-30, 2015 Measuring Impact 1 Non-experimental methods 2 Experiments Vincenzo Di Maro Development.
The World Bank Human Development Network Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund.
Lecture 3 Outline: Thurs, Sept 11 Chapters Probability model for 2-group randomized experiment Randomization test p-value Probability model for.
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 5 Quality of Evidence Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
AADAPT Workshop Latin America Brasilia, November 16-20, 2009 Non-Experimental Methods Florence Kondylis.
Measuring Impact: Experiments
Global Workshop on Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector Rio de Janeiro, June 6-10, 2011 Mattea Stein Quasi Experimental Methods.
Use of impact evaluation for operational research PREM Week 2007 Arianna Legovini, Africa Impact Evaluation Initiative (AFTRL)
The World Bank Human Development Network Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund.
Beyond surveys: the research frontier moves to the use of administrative data to evaluate R&D grants Oliver Herrmann Ministry of Business, Innovation.
Africa Impact Evaluation Program on AIDS (AIM-AIDS) Cape Town, South Africa March 8 – 13, Causal Inference Nandini Krishnan Africa Impact Evaluation.
Nigeria Impact Evaluation Community of Practice Abuja, Nigeria, April 2, 2014 Measuring Program Impacts Through Randomization David Evans (World Bank)
Applying impact evaluation tools A hypothetical fertilizer project.
What is randomization and how does it solve the causality problem? 2.3.
Africa Program for Education Impact Evaluation Dakar, Senegal December 15-19, 2008 Experimental Methods Muna Meky Economist Africa Impact Evaluation Initiative.
Psychometrics. Goals of statistics Describe what is happening now –DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Determine what is probably happening or what might happen in.
Bilal Siddiqi Istanbul, May 12, 2015 Measuring Impact: Non-Experimental Methods.
m/sampling_dist/index.html.
What is Impact Evaluation … and How Do We Use It? Deon Filmer Development Research Group, The World Bank Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Education Workshop.
Africa Impact Evaluation Program on AIDS (AIM-AIDS) Cape Town, South Africa March 8 – 13, Randomization.
Impact Evaluation for Evidence-Based Policy Making Arianna Legovini Lead Specialist Africa Impact Evaluation Initiative.
Measuring causal impact 2.1. What is impact? The impact of a program is the difference in outcomes caused by the program It is the difference between.
Cross-Country Workshop for Impact Evaluations in Agriculture and Community Driven Development Addis Ababa, April 13-16, Causal Inference Nandini.
1 An introduction to Impact Evaluation (IE) for HIV/AIDS Programs March 12, 2009 Cape Town Léandre Bassolé ACTafrica, The World Bank.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence Section 8.1 Confidence Intervals: The.
Research designs Research designs Quantitative Research Designs.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Overview of probability and statistics
Impact Evaluation for Real Time Decision Making
Measuring Results and Impact Evaluation: From Promises into Evidence
Quasi Experimental Methods I
Quasi Experimental Methods I
Seminario Avaliacão de Impacto em Agricultura e Desinvolvimento Rural

Explanation of slide: Logos, to show while the audience arrive.
Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean,
INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Test Review: Ch. 7-9
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector
1 Causal Inference Counterfactuals False Counterfactuals
Significance Tests: The Basics
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Impact Evaluation Designs for Male Circumcision
Explanation of slide: Logos, to show while the audience arrive.
What are their purposes? What kinds?
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Applying Impact Evaluation Tools: Hypothetical Fertilizer Project
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
QUIZ #1 30 minutes.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Sample Sizes for IE Power Calculations.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Statistics and Probability-Part 5
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Type I and Type II Errors
Some Key Ingredients for Inferential Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Kenya Evidence Forum - June 14, 2016 Using Evidence to Improve Policy and Program Designs How do we interpret “evidence”? Aidan Coville, Economist, World Bank DIME

Impact of sewerage connections? Impact?

Is this the impact of providing sewerage? A.YES B.NO

Impact of DIME DIME started working with Nigerian Ministry of Health

Is this the impact of DIME? A.YES B.NO

Monitoring Collects data on treatment groups to: Track performance over time Tell us whether we’re moving in the right direction Describes what is happening, but not why or whether this is because of our intervention Impact Evaluation Assigns intervention to treatment and control groups to: Measure counterfactual: what would have happened? Establish causal link between intervention and outcome So we can measure impact of policy, compare instruments, make better decisions and improve policy over time Monitoring vs. impact evaluation

(+) Impact of the program?? (+) Impact of other (external) factors The Value of a Control Group

(+) Impact of the program (+) Impact of other (external) factors The Value of a Control Group

Counterfactual criteria Treated & comparison groups Have identical initial average characteristics (observed and unobserved) The only difference is the treatment Therefore the only reason for the difference in outcomes is due to the treatment We generate these equal groups through randomized allocation: on average control and treatment groups are the same

The production of useful research It needs to be rigorous and relevant It needs to be used

Tablet Questionnaire How can we produce evidence to more effectively inform policy? What are your beliefs about the effectiveness of particular interventions? What attributes of a study do think make the study most useful/relevant?

Imagine a roulette table

Now to make it simpler let’s imagine it has 100 numbers… (apparently this really exists…)

Question: what number do we think it will land on?

In this case all numbers are equally likely between 1 and 100

For each choice we make, we can estimate the chances / probability that the actual number lands below or above our choice

If we choose “75”, what is the probability that a number higher than 75 will come up?

What If we choose “50”? There is a 50% probability that a number higher than 50 will come up.

Finally, let’s try 25… what is the probability of a larger number being drawn?

You’ve just had the stats course you always wanted to avoid in university! The roulette example describes percentiles The median or 50 th percentile is the number where the true result has a 50% chance of being above or below that number The 75 th percentile is the number where the true result has a 25% chance of being above or a 75% chance of being below that number And… The 25 th percentile is the number where the true result has a 75% chance of being above or a 75% chance of being below that number And so on…

Estimating a program impact In reality, we make estimates (or best guesses) all the time… While gambling is pure luck, our estimates are based on informed guesses using our available knowledge. Let’s take a shot at estimating the impact of a program: Later you will learn about the impact of providing subsidies to rural households to connect to the electricity grid in Kenya. Let’s guess what the impact will be of reducing the cost of connection from 35,000 to KSh 25,000 ?

Median (50 th percentile): What is your median estimate of the program impact (the number where you think its equally likely to have been a larger or smaller impact)? A.10% connected B.20% connected C.30% connected D.40% connected E.50% connected F.60% connected G.70% connected

What is your estimate of the 75 th percentile of the program impact (the number where you think there’s a 25% chance that the TRUE impact is bigger and a 75% chance it is a smaller impact)? A.10% connected B.20% connected C.30% connected D.40% connected E.50% connected F.60% connected G.70% connected

What is your estimate of the 25 th percentile of the program impact (the number where you think there’s a 75% chance that the TRUE impact is bigger and a 25% chance it is a smaller impact)? A.10% connected B.20% connected C.30% connected D.40% connected E.50% connected F.60% connected G.70% connected

Now you’re ready to take this on your own… ONLINE OPTION: Note the capital and small letters