doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: TGad July 2012 Report July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 2 Meeting Protocol Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 3 Attendance 1.Register 2.Indicate attendance See document r0 for more details July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 4 Attendance, Voting & Document Status Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area –see Adrian Stephens – Cell Phones Silent or Off July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 5 Patent Policy Following 5 slides July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 6 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: –Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation –Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. –Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. –The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. –It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown) July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 7 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: –“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims –“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) –The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 8 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at Slide #2 If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 9 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: –Either speak up now or –Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or –Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. –Don ’ t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. –Don ’ t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. –Technical considerations remain primary focus –Don ’ t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. –Don ’ t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. –Don ’ t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Agenda Items for the Week Call for secretary Set agenda for the week Review from May Approve minutes from May Review conference calls Approve minutes from conference calls Planning for completion of TGad Request for conditional approval from EC Planning for September Other presentations Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 11 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Submissions ad-conditional-revcom-request-to- ec.pptx Any others? Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 12 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week Monday July 16 th, 13:30 – 15:30 –Call for secretary –Set agenda for the week –Review from May –Approve minutes from May –Review conference calls –Approve minutes from conference calls –Planning for completion of TGad –Request for conditional approval from EC –Planning for September Tuesday July 17 th, 13:30 – 15:30 –cancelled Wednesday July 18 th, 13:30 – 15:30 –cancelled Thursday July 19 th, 13:30 – 15:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 13 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Agenda for Monday July 16 th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary Set agenda for the week Review from May Approve minutes from May Review conference calls Approve minutes from conference calls Planning for completion of TGad Request for conditional approval from EC Planning for September Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 14 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Notes for Monday July 16 th, 13:30 – 15:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 15 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Review From Atlanta Comment resolution on second recirculation sponsor ballot completed Approved motion for third recirculation sponsor ballot on D8.0 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 16 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission May Minutes Motion to approve May 2012 TGad minutes as contained in r0 Move: James Second: Carlos Approved by unanimous consent Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 17 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Review since May (1/2) Third recirculation sponsor ballot on D8.0 –Ballot Opening Date: Friday June 01, :59 ET –Ballot Closing Date: Saturday June 16, :59 ET –BALLOT RESULTS: 214 eligible people are in this ballot group. 170 affirmative votes 6 negative votes with comments 0 negative vote without comments 12 abstention votes 96.6 % affirmative, 3.4% negative There were 47 ballot comments received. Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 18 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Review since May (2/2) Submissions to improve draft –James Gilb (Tensorcom), 12/0730r0, Various comment resolutions –Payam Torab (Broadcom), 12/732r0, BI structure recommendation –Carlos Cordeiro (Intel), 12/731r0, Multi-band element in GAS frames –Assaf Kasher (Intel), 12/0737r0, BF-corrections Comment Resolution on third recirculation sponsor ballot on D8.0 completed –Spreadsheet: 12/0745r4 Fourth recirculation sponsor ballot on D9.0 started on July 13 and closes on July 28. Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 19 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Review of Conference Calls Conference call minutes from 2012 contained in –12/0007r17 Comment resolution Motion to approve TGad conference call minutes as contained in r17 Move: James Second: Carlos Approved by unanimous consent Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 20 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Planning for completion of TGad (1/4) Sponsor Ballot Recirculation has to complete. –a ballot just started –changes were made to the draft –this will have to be recirculated at least one more time as an unchanged draft it may be that there will be more than one recirc ballots if further changes are made Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 21 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Planning for completion of TGad (2/4) 802 EC has to grant conditional approval –Friday July 20th, the Chair of TGad, will seek Conditional approval since an additional recirc of days can not be completed by the 20th. –Conditional Approval requires that the group complete conditions as documented in the LMSC 802 OM: Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 22 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Planning for completion of TGad (3/4) Conditions: –Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval. –After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes. –No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. –No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters. –If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor. –The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 23 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Planning for completion of TGad (4/4) Posting to RevCom Agenda –The deadline for RevCom Aug Meeting is July 20th (closing day of the Plenary) –Deadline for Continuous Processing in Oct is most likely Aug 31 –Deadline for the December Meeting is Oct 15th. Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 24 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Best Case Timeline Fourth Recirc of D9.0: July EC conditional approval for RevCom: July 20 Fifth recirc on unchanged D9.0: Aug Report to EC on meeting conditions to proceed to RevCom: Aug 24 Posting to RevCom Agenda: Aug 31 RevCom continuous processing: Oct Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 25 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Timeline w/ Additional Draft Fourth Recirc of D9.0: July EC conditional approval for RevCom: July 20 Fifth recirc on D10.0: Aug 17-Sept 1 Sixth recirc on unchanged D10.0: Sept EC approval for RevCom: 10 day EC letter ballot Posting to RevCom Agenda: Oct 15 RevCom meeting: Dec Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 26 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Request for conditional approval from EC ad-conditional-revcom-request-to- ec.pptx Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 27 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Goals for September Comment resolution on recirculation sponsor ballot Prepare for RevCom approval Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 28 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission Conference call times Previously approved conference calls –June 14, June 28, July 12, Aug 2 10:00 – 12:00 ET –June 21, July 5, July 26, Aug 9 20:00-22:00 ET New conference calls –Not overlap with TGac –Aug 16, Aug 30, Sept 13, Oct 4 10:00 – 12:00 ET –Aug 23, Sept 6, Sept 27, Oct 11 20:00-22:00 ET Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 29 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission TG Motion requesting conditional approval from EC Approve document 11-12/0885r1 as the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee on the requirements for conditional approval to forward P802.11ad D9.0 to RevCom, and Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to conditionally approve forwarding P802.11ad D9.0 to RevCom. Moved: Solomon Trainin, Seconded: Sai Nandagopalan, Result: Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 30 July 2012

doc.: IEEE /0882r1 Submission WG Motion requesting conditional approval from EC Approve document 11-12/0885r1 as the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee on the requirements for conditional approval to forward P802.11ad D9.0 to RevCom, and Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to conditionally approve forwarding P802.11ad D9.0 to RevCom. Moved by Eldad Perahia on behalf of TGad [TGad vote: Moved: Solomon Trainin, Sai Nandagopalan, Result: ] Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 31 July 2012