Lecture 2 Introduction to Inherent Optical Properties (IOPs) and Radiative Transfer Apparent Optical Properties (AOPs) C. Roesler 3 July 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
Advertisements

Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
Copyright © 2014 by Curtis D. Mobley Curtis Mobley Vice President for Science and Senior Scientist Sequoia Scientific, Inc. Belleue, WA 98005
Aerosol and climate Chul Eddy Chung ( 정 철 ) GIST, Korea.
Oscar Schofield x 548, you are better off just walking in if you need help, if I can’t I will.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Review of EMR & Radiative Processes Electromagnetic Radiation - remote.
RADIOSITY Submitted by CASULA, BABUPRIYANK. N. Computer Graphics Computer Graphics Application Image Synthesis Animation Hardware & Architecture.
Radiometry. Outline What is Radiometry? Quantities Radiant energy, flux density Irradiance, Radiance Spherical coordinates, foreshortening Modeling surface.
Radiometric Concepts Remote Sensing ERAU Dr. Darrel Smith September 30, 2008 Remote Sensing ERAU Dr. Darrel Smith September 30, 2008.
Graphics Graphics Korea University cgvr.korea.ac.kr Illumination Model 고려대학교 컴퓨터 그래픽스 연구실.
1. 2 Definition 1 – Remote sensing is the acquiring of information about an object or scene without touching it through using electromagnetic energy a.
A novel concept for measuring seawater inherent optical properties in and out of the water Alina Gainusa Bogdan and Emmanuel Boss School of Marine Sciences,
Shree Nayar and Srinivasa Narasimhan Computer Science Columbia University ICCV Conference Korfu, Greece, September 1999 Sponsors: NSF Vision in Bad Weather.
Atmospheric scatterers
Representations of Visual Appearance COMS 6160 [Fall 2006], Lecture 2 Ravi Ramamoorthi
Stefano Soatto (c) UCLA Vision Lab 1 Homogeneous representation Points Vectors Transformation representation.
Appearance Models for Graphics COMS , Lecture 2 BRDFs and Radiometry Many slides courtesy Pat Hanrahan:
Introduction to Computer Vision CS / ECE 181B Tues, May 18, 2004 Ack: Matthew Turk (slides)
Light and Photosynthesis 1)Light in the Ocean I)Intensity II)Color III)Inherent Optical Properties IV)Apparent Optical Properties V)Remote Sensing 2)Photosynthesis.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
Astro 300B: Jan. 21, 2011 Equation of Radiative Transfer Sign Attendance Sheet Pick up HW #2, due Friday Turn in HW #1 Chromey,Gaches,Patel: Do Doodle.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
Radiative Transfer Theory at Optical and Microwave wavelengths applied to vegetation canopies: part 2 UoL MSc Remote Sensing course tutors: Dr Lewis
Predicting Engine Exhaust Plume Spectral Radiance & Transmittance
Inverting In-Water Reflectance Eric Rehm Darling Marine Center, Maine 30 July 2004.
Attenuation by absorption and scattering
Multiple Scattering in Vision and Graphics Lecture #21 Thanks to Henrik Wann Jensen.
The beam attenuation coefficient and its spectra* (also known as beam-c or extinction coefficient ). Emmanuel Boss, U. of Maine *Some of the graphic is.
1 EE 543 Theory and Principles of Remote Sensing Derivation of the Transport Equation.
AME Int. Heat Trans. D. B. Go Radiation with Participating Media Consider the general heat equation We know that we can write the flux in terms of.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
OU NanoLab/NSF NUE/Bumm & Johnson Spectrophotometry Key Concepts Lambert’s Law of Absorption Beer’s Law Beer-Lambert Law Absorption Cross-Sections Photometric.
Chlorophyll Results Ocean Optics 2004 Mike Sauer & Eric Rehm.
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Electromagnetic Radiation Most remotely sensed data is derived from Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). This includes: Visible light Infrared light (heat)
Using in-situ measurements of inherent optical properties to study biogeochemical processes in aquatic systems. Emmanuel Boss Funded by:
Optical Measurements & K d values Elizabeth Cox 29 November 2010.
Apparent Optical Properties (AOPs) Curtis D. Mobley University of Maine, 2007 (ref: Light and Water, Chapters 3 & 5)
ASSESSMENT OF OPTICAL CLOSURE USING THE PLUMES AND BLOOMS IN-SITU OPTICAL DATASET, SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA Tihomir S. Kostadinov, David A. Siegel,
Inverting In-Water Reflectance Eric Rehm Darling Marine Center, Maine 30 July 2004.
Scattering: What is it? Who does it? A few demos to get us going Why should you care about it? *includes materials by C. Roesler and C. Mobley.
Monday, Oct. 2: Clear-sky radiation; solar attenuation, Thermal nomenclature.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
The link between particle properties (size, composition, shape, internal structure) and IOP Emmanuel Boss.
Scattering and attenuation and tracking uncertainties for cal/val.
Predicting Engine Exhaust Plume Spectral Radiance & Transmittance Engineering Project MANE 6980 – Spring 2010 Wilson Braz.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
CSCE 641 Computer Graphics: Reflection Models Jinxiang Chai.
Controls on Suspended Particle Properties and Water Clarity along a Partially-Mixed Estuary, York River Estuary, Virginia Kelsey A. Fall 1, Carl T. Friedrichs.
SIO 210: Light and Optics Oct. 12, 2009 Uwe Send Reading: DPO chapter 3 J.R. Apel, Principles of Ocean Physics,
Chapter 3 Radiative transfer processes in the aquatic medium Remote Sensing of Ocean Color Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of.
Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Chapter 9 Stellar Atmospheres. Specific Intensity, I I ( or I ) is a vector (units: W m -2 Hz -1 sterad -1 )
CS552: Computer Graphics Lecture 33: Illumination and Shading.
Planck’s law  Very early in the twentieth century, Max Karl Ernest Ludwig Planck put forth the idea of the quantum theory of radiation.  It basically.
Micro-structural size properties of Saturn’s rings determined from ultraviolet measurements made by the Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Todd Bradley.
Lab 4 Scattering. Samples: Platymonas * Chaetoceros * Arizona 'Dust' *Wikipedia Damariscotta River Estuary.
Heat Transfer RADIATION HEAT TRANSFER FUNDAMENTALS.
Electromagnetic Radiation
Saturation Roi Levy. Motivation To show the deference between linear and non linear spectroscopy To understand how saturation spectroscopy is been applied.
UVIS spectrometry of Saturn’s rings
Timor Wienrib Itai Friedland
Optical Oceanography and Ocean Color Remote Sensing
Jian Wang, Ph.D IMCS Rutgers University
Radiometry (Chapter 4).
Simulation for Case 1 Water
Terminology.
Measurement of Absorption in Seawater
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 2 Introduction to Inherent Optical Properties (IOPs) and Radiative Transfer Apparent Optical Properties (AOPs) C. Roesler 3 July 2007

Readings Mobley (Light and Water) –section 1.4 Solid Angles –section 3.1 IOPs –section 3.2 AOPs –section 5.10 Divergence Law

Inherent Optical Properties inherent to the water dependent upon the composition and concentrations of the particulate and dissolved substances and the water itself independent of external properties such as the light field (i.e. should be the same if measured in situ or in discrete sample)

What are the IOPs? Absorption, a –Color –Darkens Scattering, b –Clarity –Brightens

What are the IOPs? Absorption, a Scattering, b Beam attenuation, c (transmission) a + b = c The IOPs tell us something (e.g. concentration, composition) about the particulate and dissolved substances in the aquatic medium; how we measure them determines what we can resolve

Review of IOP Theory oo Incident Radiant Flux No attenuation Transmitted Radiant Flux tt

Conservation of radiant flux  a Absorbed Radiant Flux  b Scattered Radiant Flux  o = tt oo Incident Radiant Flux Transmitted Radiant Flux

Beam Attenuation Theory Attenuance C = fraction of incident radiant flux attenuated  C = tt aa bb oo

Beam Attenuation Theory tt aa bb c = fractional attenuance per unit distance  c =  c  x =  c x =  c (m -1 ) = oo xx  0 c dx = xx  c(x-0) =  c x =

Beam Attenuation: The Measurement Reality aa  c = (-1/x)  ln(  t /  o ) Detected flux (  t ) measurement must exclude scattered flux detector oo tt bb x source

Beam Attenuation The Measurement Reality oo tt aa bb x  c = (-1/x)  ln(  t /  o ) The size of the detector acceptance angle (FOV) determines the retrieved value of c source The larger the detector acceptance angle,

Ex. transmissometer/c-meter FOV% b detected o <1 0.7 o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~18 Roesler and Boss 2004

Absorption Theory tt aa a = fractional absorptance per unit distance  a =  a (m -1 ) = oo xx  A = bb need to measure

Absorption Measurement Reality  a = (-1/x)  ln[(  t +  b )/  o ] Detected flux measurement must include scattered flux oo tt aa bb undetected scattered flux must be corrected for x sourcedetector diffuser

Currently the only commercially available absorption meter: WETLabs ac9

AC9 25 cm absorption tube optimized to collect scattered flux attenuation tube optimized to reject scattered flux

How much scattered light is detected? Theoretically Detector FOV ~ 40 o ~90% of scattered flux 10% of scatter can ~abs loss is in side and backward directions must correct for scattering losses

Scattering, b, has an angular dependence, E ↑  =d  1 dS  d  dSdr  o What is d  ? And b =  4   d  which is described by the volume scattering function,  (  ) = power per unit steradian emanating from a volume illuminated by irradiance = d  1 1 d  dV E dr dV = dS dr E =  /dS [  mol photon m -2 s -1 ] dS sin  d  d  =  1 d   o  drd 

So we can calculate scattering, b, from the volume scattering function,  b =  4   d  We define the phase function:   b ~ =  0   0  sin  d  d   22 b f = 2   0  sin  d  and b b = 2    /2  sin  d   /2  If there is azimuthal symmetry = 2   0  sin  d  

Summary of the IOPs Note: c = a + b  is not solid angle in this case  ≡ b/c single scattering albedo is related to a, r if 1) all scattered light detected 2) optical path = geometric path is related to c, r if 1) no scattered light detected toto r oo Then b = c - a

Apparent Optical Properties Derived from radiometric parameters Depend upon the light field Depend upon the IOPs Ratios or gradients of radiometric parameters “Easy” to measure Difficult to interpret

Apparent Optical Properties What is the color and brightness of the ocean? How does sunlight penetrate the ocean? How does the angular distribution of light vary in the ocean?

AOPs: Average Cosines Ratios of radiometric parameters L (  ) [  mol photons m -2 s -1 sr -1 ] E d =        L (  ) cos  E od =        L (  )   d =  u = E u. E ou  = E d - E u. E o

Example of isotropic light field L(  ) constant for all   d = E d =        L (  ) cos  sin  d  E od        L (  ) sin  d  d  and then the math happens… (i.e. you try it!)  d = in terms of degrees  = average cosines are not unique quantities

AOPs: Reflectance Ratios of radiometric parameters L (  ) [  mol photons m -2 s -1 sr -1 ] E d =        L (  ) cos  d  E od =        L (  ) d  R = E u. Irradiance E d Reflectance R RS = L u. Remote Sensing or E d Radiance Reflectance

Roesler et al 2003 Reflectance Ranges Roesler and Perry

AOPs: diffuse attenuation coefficients Radiometric Gradients L (  ) [  mol photons m -2 s -1 sr -1 ] E d =        L (  ) cos  d  E od =        L (  ) d  dE(z) = -K(z) E(z) dz E z K(z) dz = -1 dE E(z) z z K z = -ln(E(z o )) + ln(E(z))if K was constant with z K = -1 ln(E(z o )/E(z)) z E(z) = E(z o ) e -Kz

AOPs: diffuse attenuation coefficients Why would K vary with depth? generated from HL by Curt Zaneveld et al Opt Exp

AOPs: diffuse attenuation coefficients NOTE c  K c  beam attenuation K  diffuse attenuation < z K d1 K d2 E d1 E d2 constant c

Radiative Transfer Equation relates the IOPs to the AOPs

Radiative Transfer Equation Consider the radiance, L(  ), as it varies along a path r through the ocean, at a depth of z d L(  ), what processes affect it? dr absorption along path r scattering out of path r dz = scattering into path r

Radiative Transfer Equation Consider the radiance, L(  ), as it varies along a path r through the ocean, at a depth of z d L(  ), what processes affect it? dr cos  d L(  ) = -a L(z,  ) -b L(z,  ) +    (z,  ’,  ’ )L(  ’  ’ )d  ’ dz If there are sources of light (e.g. fluorescence, raman scattering, bioluminescence), that is included too: a( 1,z) L( 1,z,  ’  ’ ) →(quantum efficiency) → L( 2,z,  )

0 ∫ 2    ∫  [ 0    ∫   (z,  ’,  ’ ) sin  d  d  ] L(  ’  ’ ) sin  d  ’  d  ’ = An example of the utility of RTE cos  d L(  ) = -a L(z,  ) -b L(z,  ) +    (z,  ’,  ’ )L(  ’  ’ )d  ’ dz Divergence Law (see Mobley 5.10) Integrate the equation over all solid angles (4  ), d  dĒ = dz 0 ∫ 2    ∫  -c L(z,  ) sin  d  d  = 0 ∫ 2  0 ∫  d L(  ) cos  sin  d  d  = dz d(E d – E u ) = dz [ 0    ∫   (z,  ’,  ’ ) sin  d  d  ] 0 ∫ 2    ∫  [ 0    ∫   (z,  ’,  ’ ) L(  ’  ’ ) sin  d  ’  d  ’ ] sin  d  d  =

An example of the utility of RTE cos  d L(  ) = -a L(z,  ) -b L(z,  ) +    (z,  ’,  ’ )L(  ’  ’ )  ’ dz dĒ = -c E o + b E o dz -1 dĒ = a Eo Ē dz Ē a = K Ē  Gershun’s Equation K Ē = a.  divide both sides by E substitute AOPs

Readings for Lecture 3 (Absorption) Mobley –section 3.3 Optically significant constituents –section 3.7 Absorption