FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
FONT Meeting1 Charge normalisation and IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP-BPM Schedule Siwon Jang KNU. IP-BPM Schedule IP BPM schedule –Reference cavity (middle of October) Frequency tuning parts –Electronics (middle.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
ATF2 Tuning Summary Nov & Dec 2010 Glen White, SLAC 11 th ATF2 Project Meeting, SLAC Jan
CALIBRATIONS IPBPM FILTER TESTS Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich Friday, 1 May Talitha Bromwich, FONT Group Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Compton Gamma-ray Generation Experiment by Using an Optical Cavity in ATF POSIPOL 2007 Workshop at LAL Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University.
ATF Meeting1 IP BPM studies with Honda’s electronics Neven Blaskovic with Wunghoa Park Oscar Blanco Alexis Gamelin N. Blaskovic.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
D. BettATF Operations Meeting - 15 June IP C. Perry G. Christian Y. Kim D. Bett N. Blaskovic Kraljevic.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
ATF cable plan N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich & G. Christian
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
ATF2 Recent Wakefield (Beam size Intensity dependence) Studies
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
Summary of the ATF2 project meeting at LAL (Jan.13-15, 2016)
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
ATF2 Instrumentation Stewart T. Boogert
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Phase Monitor Electronics: Output vs
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Presentation transcript:

FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November

FONT Oxford Aims Friday, 27 November Find the source of the resolution-limiting static erratic feature in our IP BPM signals. Look at cavity cables, cavity reflections and possible phase sensitivity issues. (2 shifts) Set up FONT upstream feedback for IPBSM studies. (1 shift)

FONT Oxford Monday - day Friday, 27 November Check cable lengths from IPBPM dipole cavities inside the IP vacuum chamber to the hybrid prior to the processing electronics. Use TDR, with help from Naito-san and Tauchi-san, to look for mismatches, as cavities are inaccessible.

FONT Oxford Results Friday, 27 November Cable velocity x 10 8 m/s. Calculated from 100 waveforms on the TDR.  is the phase difference in length after removing integer wavelength differences. Cavity to hybrid(ns) Error (ns) Cavity to hybrid (m) Error (m)  Length (m) Error (m)  Length / Wavelength  (m) Error (m) IPA-X IPA-X IPB-X IPB-X IPC-X IPC-X IPA-Y IPA-Y IPB-Y IPB-Y IPC-Y IPC-Y

FONT Oxford Identify mismatch location We used the timing of small reflections at the feed-through into the vacuum chamber to deduce that the cable mismatches are between the cavity and the feed-throughs. Friday, 27 November O

FONT Oxford Tuesday – Swing Shift Try delaying the signal using 5.5 m delay cables before the hybrid to see if the static feature moves along the pulse, i.e. if there are reflections somewhere causing the static feature. Switch 180-degree hybrid for a splitter to observe monopole-like position- independent modes. Friday, 27 November

FONT Oxford Delay cable study 5.5 m delay cables  28 ns delay . 6.5 samples for the SIS digitiser frequency of 4.2 ns per sample. Signals delayed as expected. Static feature appears to be delayed by the same amount. Friday, 27 November Delay cables No delay cables

FONT Oxford Splitter study Normal set-up Friday, 27 November BPM CAVITY BPM CAVITY 180° HYBRID Splitter set-up BPM CAVITY BPM CAVITY SPLITTER Extracts anti-symmetric (position-dependent) modes. Cancel symmetric modes. e.g. monopole mode. Extract symmetric modes. Cancel anti-symmetric (position-dependent) modes. Cavity BPM image credit: M. Wendt. “BPM Instrumentation: A Short Introduction for Non-Experts” (September 2000). Introductory talk given at DESY lab.

FONT Oxford 0-degree hybrid study Replace 180 degree hybrid with a splitter. Allows us to analyse any symmetric mode, e.g. the monopole mode. Waveform observed (similar to static signal in usual mode of operation). Perform wide mover scan. Signals do change with position, which they shouldn’t, because with a splitter it should have no position dependence. Friday, 27 November

FONT Oxford Thursday – Owl Shift Try compensating for cable length mismatch using variable phase shifters. Diagnose any position sensitivity on phase by manually changing the LO phase using variable phase shifters. Friday, 27 November

FONT Oxford Mismatch compensation Static feature still present. Friday, 27 November With phase shifters to match cables on both ports No phase shifters

FONT Oxford Position vs Phase study 30dB with a beam offset 1.5um apparent change over 240 degrees. Friday, 27 November dB no beam offset 1.5um apparent change over 240 degrees.

FONT Oxford Friday, 27 November This wave-like pattern is only observed when sample number 52 is included in the sampling range, which is at the very beginning of the waveform – see further analysis presentation for correct sampling results

FONT Oxford Friday – Owl Shift Set up upstream feedback with Kano-san for IPBSM study. Friday, 27 November

FONT Oxford Friday, 27 November Jitter amplitude vs position jitter at FONTP2 (when feedback is on & off )

FONT Oxford Friday, 27 November Jitter amplitude vs position jitter at FONTP3 (when feedback is on & off )

FONT Oxford Conclusions Cable length measurement: 10cm mismatch in cable lengths from pairs of ports of IP BPM cavities. For the Y-ports the mismatch is equal to three wavelengths +/- 2mm. Long delay cable study: 5.5m delay cables did not move the static waveform. Splitter study: Addition of symmetric modes using a splitter shows waveform similar to that obtained using 180-degree hybrid in normal operation. Cable matching: Compensating cable mismatch to better than 1mm did not remove the static waveform. LO phase dependence study: Dependence of apparent position on LO phase measured at 30dB and 50dB by scanning LO phase more than 180 degrees. Friday, 27 November