Dynamic Impact Procedures Training Class Sled Test Demonstration July 2016 16 G 44 Ft/sec 10° Left Yaw (CCW) Deformed Floor Single Place Oblique Passenger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESULTS Spreadsheet for the WEB and printing if needed.
Advertisements

Office Ergonomics Slide Show Notes
Office Ergonomics Awareness
1 Modular Loadwall Side Impacts: Implications for Advanced Sensor Deflection Measures in Dummies John R. Humm N. Yoganandan Frank A. Pintar Department.
Motorcycle Rider Braking Simulator Study of Motorcycle Rider Braking Behavior NHTSA-Honda 11/16/09 P. Rau.
1 SAFETY TIPS IN COMPUTER USE. 2 Agenda of the Talk Importance of Computer Symptoms. Causes of Symptoms The incorrect and correct body positions during.
Vehicle Roof Structure Design Can Significantly Reduce Occupant Injury
Rotational Dynamics Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
Correct Use of Seatbelts and Child Car Seats Presented by:
1 Toyota Side Impact Protection for Out-of-Position Occupants Washington, DC October 25, 2001.
EQUILIBRIUM OF RIGID BODIES
Transportation Safety for Wheelchair Occupants Linda van Roosmalen, PhD Douglas Hobson, PhD Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology University.
GTR Head restraints ES Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
April 9, 2004 – 9:00 am NB Interstate 5 Kings County, California Crash Reconstruction Occupant Dynamics Injury Biomechanics Mauro v. Ford Motor Company.
Vehicle Safety.
ECE Regulation N°129 17/12/201354th Session GRSP December th session of GRSP December 2013 Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Applicability Each standard of this part applies to all motor vehicles or items of motor vehicle equipment manufactured.
Designing a Ergonomic Workstation Engineering Ergonomics Safety Training Office of Engineering Safety Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) & The.
Psy 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 19. Your workstation chair  Seat height:  Seat depth:  Seat width:  Backrest:  Seat back angle:  Lumbar.
Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 WorldSID Advanced Harmonised Dummy for Side Impact Martin Page C.E.E.S.A.R. (representing LAB) On behalf of the.
Euro NCAP 28 june 2005 Whiplash injury epidemiology and effectiveness of whiplash prevention systems. Maria Krafft Folksam Sweden.
GRSP December 2004 The Safety of Wheelchair Occupants in Road Transport Vehicles Donald Macdonald Head of Engineering and Research Mobility & Inclusion.
Wheelchair Crashworthiness
Scoliosis Curves. thoracolumbar Is longer than most and extends from the upper to the lower spine. It may curve either to the right or the left. Small.
1)Aileron 2)Elevator 3)Rudder Aileron Ailerons can be used to generate a rolling motion for an aircraft. LOCATION: Ailerons are small hinged sections.
Specialist PSI Exercise Module Posture & Postural Training Practical.
Safety Belts Save Lives Buckle Up Illinois!. Unrestrained Occupants in Frontal Crashes.
Comparative Performance of Racing Head and Neck Restraints Gregg S. Baker, P.E. General Technical Properties, LLC Orlando, Florida USA (SAE Paper # )
Cargas na Aterragem Cargas em Aviões ITA – Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica.
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE Crash Simulation of a Vertical Drop Test of a B737 Fuselage Section with Overhead Bins Karen E. Jackson and Edwin L. Fasanella.
FAA CRASHWORTHINESS RESEARCH PROGRAM
Group 1 Spine, Sacrum, Coccyx, Os Coxae (hip bone) and Pelvis By: Emma Collins, Caroline Valdes, John Reidy and Lauren Touhey.
Free Body Diagrams Free Body Diagrams Principles of EngineeringTM
Crashworthy Design of Military Rotorcraft Presented by:
SELF-MOTION PERCEPTION: ASSESSMENT BY REAL-TIME COMPUTER-GENERATED ANIMATIONS OVERALL GOAL: PERCEPTUAL TESTS FOR VESTIBULAR FUNCTION A NEW PROCEDURE FOR.
Side-facing wheelchair after a frontal impact test
Cargas em Operações no Solo Cargas em Aviões ITA – Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica.
Head Restraints Working Group Meeting Paris, France February 1-2, 2005 U.S. FMVSS No. 202 Final Rule Head Restraint IWG Document:HR-1-8.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
By: Nelaven Subaskaran Course Name: ICS Teacher: Mr. Krnic Date: 02/19/2016.
Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms.
Evaluation of ES-2 by the Occupant Safety Research Partnership of USCAR presented by Annette L. Irwin representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
Chapter 25 Wheel Alignment. Objectives Define the term “wheel alignment” Inspect tires, steering, and suspension systems before alignment Check and adjust.
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 37 th GRSP Session Geneva, May 23 rd -27 th, 2005 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
Private Pilot Ground School
Technical The Vigilant Tailwheel © Crown copyright No part of this presentation may be reproduced without the permission of the issuing authority.
Cervical and lumbar Range of Motion
Shafts and Shaft Components
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Vehicle Crash Testing Adam Hedges.
Comparison of Sensor Analysis for Swimming in Different Positions
M.A. Forero Rueda, M.D. Gilchrist  Forensic Science International 
AUTOMOBILE PARTS.
Design of a Biofidelic, Instrumented 2. 5 Kg Infant Dummy N
Vertical fall on the back
Measurement Capabilities of Biofidelic 3.4 Kg Infant Dummy
BioRIDII Repeatability on Production Seat
14 G 35 ft/sec 60°Pitch Three Place Passenger Seat Two Occupants
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Impact Procedures Training Class Sled Test Demonstration July G 44 Ft/sec 10° Left Yaw (CCW) Deformed Floor Single Place Oblique Passenger Seat 26.5° Installation Angle

Pre and Post Floor Deformation Achieved pitch = 10.2°, achieved roll = 10.1°

Floor Loads (High initial load Rear Left)

Test Videos See accompanying four (4) videos.

Head: HIC < 1000 or HIC15 < 700 Neck: Nij < 1.0 –Peak Upper neck Fz < 937 lbf tension, Fz < 899 lbf compression –Head rotation about vertical axis < 105° –No concentrated loading Oblique Policy Injury Criteria

Spine –Lumbar: Fz <1200 lbf in tension –Thorax: Concentrated load between pelvis and shoulders not acceptable during impact and rebound If there is contact for any rearward (X Direction) acceleration exceeding 20g must be less than 3 milliseconds as measured by the thoracic instrumentation –Thorax/Abdomen: No interaction with the armrest or other seat components in any manner significantly different than would be expected for a forward-facing seat installation Oblique Policy Injury Criteria

Pelvis: Any part of the load-bearing portion of the bottom of the ATD pelvis must not translate beyond the edges of the bottom seat cushion supporting structure Leg: Axial rotation of the upper-leg (femur) must be limited to 35 degrees in either direction from the nominal seated position Femur: Compressive force below 2250 lb Oblique Policy Injury Criteria

CriteriaLimitResult HIC HIC151000N/A (hit structure) N ij Neck Tension (lb) Neck Compression (lb)89957 Head Twist (°)105°~95° Lumbar Fz (lb) Left Leg Rotation (°)35°Minimal Right Leg Rotation (°)35°Minimal Femur Compression (lb)2250Not measured

Fz in All Legs

Attachment Resultant Loads

Right Rear Attachment Loads

Front Right Attachment - Offset

Front Right Mx (in-lb)

Head Rotation Estimate (Video) = 96° Nose

Angular Rate Sensor (ω z ) Estimate (ARS) = 91°

Witness Marks???

Head Contact

Thoracic Contact on Rebound?

Occupant Support - Pelvis

Video Screen Shroud

Femur Compression Femur appears to have contacted the forward monument. Femur injury assumed to be low via rational analysis. –Previous testing showed that the femur limit will not be exceeded in a 16g test –“Effect of Passenger Position on Crash Injury Risk in Transport-Category Aircraft” Taylor, DeWeese, Moorcroft. DOT/FAA/AM-15/17. – d_humanfacs/oamtechreports/2010s/2015/

Permanent Deformation “B” Dimension Pre-test = 20.8” “C” Dimension Post-test = 21.4” Seat Pan Angle Post-test = 0°

Any Questions?