A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Wake Fields and Beam Dynamics Kai Meng Hock. 2 Overview Research Interests –Wake fields Electromagnetic fields are induced by charged particles interacting.
Advertisements

1 Resistive wall wake field and extraction jitter in the ILC damping ring Kai Hock and Andy Wolski 5 th Wakefield Interest Group Meeting, 24 July 2008.
CLIC TeamMAD-X Day, September 4, 2003 MAD-X for CLIC H. Braun, R. Corsini, T.d’Amico, A. Faus-Golfe, M. Korostelev, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, D. Schulte,
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Frank Zimmermann, CLIC “Away Day” 28 March 2006  x * Limitations and Improvements Paths Damping Rings Maxim Korostelev, Frank Zimmermann.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Coupler Short-Range Wakefield Kicks Karl Bane and Igor Zagorodnov Wake Fest 07, 11 December 2007 Thanks to M. Dohlus; and to Z. Li, and other participants.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
X-band Based FEL proposal
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
CLIC 09 Workshop - C. Biscari C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, F. Stulle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
IHEP-CLIC Collaboration (Beam Dynamics)
The CLIC Decelerator Beam Dynamics
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
sx* Limitations and Improvements Paths
The Strong RF Focusing:
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long range wakes ● Some results

A. Aksoy Introduction ● Work is based on finding best linac optics in order to transfer the beam to the delay loop (-combiner ring) in required tolerance. – The lattice has to prevent amplification of any jitter of the incoming beam. – It should also have a large energy acceptance and allow easy correction of the beam line. (strong focusing weaker focusing) – The final energy of the beam must be very stable since the energy acceptance of the Combiner Ring is limited. Energy spread should be less than about 1%. ● CLIC 2008 parameters and PLACET have been used for all calculations

A. Aksoy Basic Lattice Layout F. QuadDF. QuadAccel. Struc.Some add. Space for pickup ● Currently only FODO and triplet lattices was taken into account ● Both lattice cells have about 17 m length consist of 4 accelerating structure ● Accelerating structure has 3.75 m length (CLIC 2008 parameter list) ● There are 10 cm space between accelerators, distance between acc. and quads about 20 cm, quad lengths are 25 cm

A. Aksoy Accelerating Structure ● CLIC 2008 parameter list – 1 GHz SICA consist of 33 cell – Total length of accelerating structure 3.75 m – Gaps are equal for all cells although it differs for first and last cell a=54.4 mm b=118.5 mm L=99.96 mm g=80.76 mm

A. Aksoy Main effect; Wakes Due to fully loaded operation wakes are dominant ● The longitudinal kick experienced by the test particle per unit distance, divided by q 1, defines the longitudinal wake W L, ● and the transverse kick experienced by the test particle per unit distance, divided by q 1 x 1, defines the transverse wake W x. ● Distinguish between 2 regime; – Transient regime due to short range wakes – Resonant regime due to long range wakes v=c s x1x1 x2x2 q2q2 q1q1 The particles move near the axis are kicked by the field of first bunch thus; ● longitudinal kick is dominated by monopole fields (azimuthally indept.) ● and the transverse kick by dipole fields.

A. Aksoy Short Range Wakes in PLACET ● Short range wake expressions taken from ● Karl Bane, “Short-range Dipole Wakefields in Accelerating Structures for the NLC”, SLAC, for 206 cell Damped, Detuned Structure (DDS) ● This functions has the correct slope only for s=0 +, ● They are also similar for CTF3 3 GHz structure

A. Aksoy Short Range Wakes in PLACET ● Wakes for rms σ=2.5 mm bunch ● a) Gaussian bunch ● b) Longitudinal wake ● c) Transverse wake a)a) b)b) c)

A. Aksoy Long Range Wakes ● Dominant on emittance growth and causes BBU ● The model for CTF3 was taken into account for simulation – Q1=11 – Q2=400 – f=1GHz Long range wake at bunch position

A. Aksoy PLACET Results ● Initial beam parameters are same for both lattice type. Assumed that the beam injected drive linac at 50 MeV ● After matching beam the cell repeated till 2.3 GeV ● Total length of beamline about 1400 m consist of 326 accelerating structure ● Three times more quad for triplet than the FODO FODOTRIPLET

A. Aksoy Jitter Amplification for constant offset ● For tracking the jitter an offset was given to injected beam. ● long-range wakefields of first several bunches force the subsequent bunches to make growing oscillations. ● Subsequently offsets of accelerating structures or other beam line elements gives transverse deflecting kick to leading bunches. ● Sum of these effects bring a limit for jitter amplification. D. Schulte, PAC09 z c rrrr TRIPLET FODO

A. Aksoy Jitter Amplification for sinusoidal and random offsets z c ri z c FODO TRIPLET

A. Aksoy Emittance variation ● Emittance growth tracking through beamline for FODO and TRIPLET for different offsets ● Triplet lattice yields lower emittance growth for random and sine offsets.. FODOTRIPLET

A. Aksoy Conclusion and future plan ● This preliminary study shows that the performance of triplet lattice is better than FODO about multi bunch effects. ● Wake models should be revised and corrected (if necessary) ● Simulations will be renewed in details for different lattice types including doublet and different quad strengths. ● Acceptance parameters will also be simulated ● A magnetic bunch compressor will be studied as well at about 500 MeV energy