One More 162.5 RFQ Design Renewal ANL Design. Several 162.5 MHz RFQ Designs ANL-1LBNL-1LBNL-2ANL-2aANL-2b Vane modulation typeSinusoidal Sinusoidal +

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RFQ development for high power beams
Advertisements

The Front End Test Stand Collaboration ELECTROMAGNETIC DESIGN OF A RFQ FOR THE FRONT END TEST STAND AT RAL A. Kurup, A. Letchford The RAL front end test.
Tuning the Frequency of the RFQ High Energy End. What are the issues? Both input & output ends of RFQ must be independently tuned for 324 MHz Design of.
Effect of RFQ Modulations on Frequency and Field Flatness
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
SLAC is focusing on the modeling and simulation of DOE accelerators using high- performance computing The performance of high-brightness RF guns operating.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Ajit Kurup, C. Bontoiu, M. Aslaninejad, J. Pozimski, Imperial College London. A.Bogacz, V. S. Morozov, Y.R. Roblin Jefferson Laboratory K. B. Beard, Muons,
J. Rodnizki SARAF, Soreq NRC HB2008, August, 2008 Nashville TN Lattice Beam dynamics study and loss estimation for SARAF/ EURISOL driver 40/60 MeV 4mA.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
FETS RFQ Beam Dynamics Simulations for RFQSIM, CST and Comsol Field Maps Simon Jolly 2 nd June 2010.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
BBFP J. Wei’s Fokker-Planck solver for bunched beams November 21 st, 2007 CLIC Beam dynamics meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
THE MAFF IH-RFQ TEST STAND AT THE IAP FRANKFURT A. Bechtold, J. Fischbach, D. Habs, O. Kester, M. Pasini, U. Ratzinger, J. Rehberg, M. Reichwein, A. Schempp,
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Bunching system for SPES project
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Physics design on the main linac
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
Longitudinal Effects in Space Charge Dominated Cooled Bunched Beams
SPES-RFQ review Introduction, general aspects
1- Short pulse neutron source
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
The Strong RF Focusing:
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Parallel 3D Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Simulations with Pic3P*
ATF Fast Kicker R&D at LBNL ILCDR06, Cornell University
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Part2: Cavities and Structures
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
ICAP 2006, Chamonix Mont-Blanc
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Simon Jolly UKNFIC Meeting 25th April 2008
Presentation transcript:

One More RFQ Design Renewal ANL Design

Several MHz RFQ Designs ANL-1LBNL-1LBNL-2ANL-2aANL-2b Vane modulation typeSinusoidal Sinusoidal + trapezoidal Input energy, MeV Output energy, MeV Average radius, mm Aperture, mm Vane width, mm Voltage, kV Cell number RFQ length, mm Transverse phase I= Normalize transverse envelope1.29 – 1.33 Maximum field at vane surface, kV Norm. transverse acceptance, mm·mrad

Simulation results ANL-1LBNL-1LBNL-2ANL-2aANL-2b Particle loss inside structure, %  Transmission, %> >95>99 Transverse emittance growth, rms Transverse emittance growth, 99.5% Longitudinal emittance, rms, keV·nsec Longitudinal emittance, rms, keV·deg Results obtained with different simulation codes: ANL-1, ANL-2a – TRACK, LBNL-1, LBNL-2 – PAMTEQ, ANL-2b – TRANSIT.

What is new in This Design Calculation of 3D field distribution in RFQ cell Method of vane profile generation. Using combined vane modulation profile – sinusoidal for gentle buncher and trapezoidal for acceleration. Simulation code.

RFQ Cell (DESRFQ) L c i m i L c i+1 L c i+2 m i+1 m i+2 In DESRFQ cell is distance between cross sections with exact quadrupole symmetry. One half of cell is used for field calculation with periodic boundary conditions. This approach produces smooth vane profile but some step in field between cells.

RFQ Cell (PARMTEQ) L c i m i L c i+1 L c i+2 m i+1 m i+2 In PARMTEQ cell is space between cross sections with maximum and minimum distances from axis. This approach produces smooth field distribution but some step in vane profile between cells.

RFQ Cell (New) DESRFQ cell definition was used for current design. Vane profile for field calculation was constructed using adjacent half-cells. This approach produces smooth field distribution and smooth vane profile. L c i Profile for field calculation L c i+2 m i m i+1 m i+2

PRERFQ Code PRERFQ code solves Laplace equation for space limited by modulated vanes using finite difference method. with the following boundary conditions:

PRERFQ Simulation Domain with Sinusoidal Modulation Y VaneX Vane miaimiai Longitudinal profiles of RFQ vanes was created using file full-rfq-cells-data.dat a i+1 (Lc i + Lc i+1 ) / 2 aiai m i+1 a i+1 (Lc i + Lc i+1 ) / 2

Field for Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal Modulation CST Studio simulation was used for testing PRERFQ results. It was shown good coincidence.

Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal Modulation Sinusoidal modulation is most common but not most effective type of RFQ vane modulation. Trapezoidal modulation is more effective for long cells due to better field distribution that leads to higher transit time factor. This type of vane modulation was used in first RFQ. Sinusoidal modulation is preferable for initial RFQ part because it provides low field at electrode surface for short cells.

Accelerating Field at Sinusoidal and Trapezoidal Modulation Sinusoidal Modulation Trapezoidal Modulation

Maximum Field at Electrode Surface for Trapezoidal Modulation Field between Vanes at Exact Quadrupole Symmetry Cross Section Field between Flat Vanes Voltage, kV70 Exact quadrupole symmetry, kV/cm125.0 Flat vanes, kV/cm128.04

PRERFQ Simulation Domain with Trapezoidal Modulation x(z) y(z) z z miaimiai a i+1 (Lc i + Lc i+1 ) / 2 aiai m i+1 a i+1 (Lc i + Lc i+1 ) / 2 Y VaneX Vane Cell profile consists of straight parts with different distances from axis and sinusoidal part between them. Only straight part length is changed for higher energy cells. Sinusoidal part is constant for all cells. This profile provide 16% - 20% higher accelerating efficiency along RFQ part with constant modulation. It leads to about 10% shorter structure.

Field Components along RFQ

Summary Trapezoidal vane nodulation allows to increase RFQ acceleration efficiency and correspondingly reduce total RFQ length for given output energy. It leads to lower manufacture and operation cost. Total Project – X RFQ length can be reduced about 10%. Trapezoidal modulation causes only relatively small increase of maximum field at vane survace. All other RFQ parameters are kept the same to compare with conventional sinusoidal vane modulation.