Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rick Schlegel Agricultural Engineer USDA - NRCS OKLAHOMA
Advertisements

All Rights Reserved Dr. David P. Echevarria 1 Cash Flow Estimation Risk Analysis CHAPTER 12 Conceptual Considerations Analytical Methodology Decision Metrics.
IRRIGATION Rick Schlegel Agricultural Engineer USDA - NRCS OKLAHOMA.
Capital Budgeting. Cash Investment opportunity (real asset) FirmShareholder Investment opportunities (financial assets) InvestPay dividend to shareholders.
Hospitality Financial Management By Robert E. Chatfield and Michael C. Dalbor ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
© Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Farm Management Chapter 17 Investment Analysis.
Chapter 4. Economic Factors in Design The basis of design decisions will be economics. Designing a technically safe and sound system will be only part.
Chapter 17 Investment Analysis
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Probabilistic Cash Flow Analysis Lecture No. 47 Chapter 12 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
ENGR 300 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering University of Bridgeport, CT
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Planning Investments: Capital Budgeting.
Corrected for Discount Rate.
Vision Guy Fipps Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Texas A&M University College Station.
INFLATION AND CAPITAL BUDGETING INFLATION IS THE INCREASE IN THE GENERAL LEVEL OF PRICES FOR ALL GOODS AND SERVICES IN AN ECONOMY.
Chapter 11: Cash Flows & Other Topics in Capital Budgeting  2000, Prentice Hall, Inc.
Chapter 10.
FINANCE 7. Capital Budgeting (2) Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2007.
Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc.All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis Relevant cash flows Incorporating inflation.
Capital Budgeting Methods AGEC Spring 2010.
Chapter 10 – More Capital Budgeting Key Sections: Guidelines for cash flows Classifications of cash flows –Explain why interest and depreciation not included.
Economic Concepts Related to Appraisals. Time Value of Money The basic idea is that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow Why? – Consumption.
Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 2/e ROBERT PARRINO, PH.D. DAVID S. KIDWELL, PH.D. THOMAS W. BATES, PH.D.
Intro to Financial Management Cash Flow and Risk in Capital Budgeting.
I am sure you have heard about the farmer in Sidell, Illinois. After that fiasco with the cheese being left standing alone taking the blame for the failure.
Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization Nov Orlando, Florida The Economic Feasibility of Bio-energy Generation for Peak Demand.
Cotton is the major field crop produced in Texas, accounting for approximately 11.2% of all Texas agricultural commodity cash receipts in 2005 (TASS).
Study Unit 10 Investment Decisions. SU – The Capital Budgeting Process Definition – Planning and controlling investment for long-term projects.
1 Managerial Economics Fundamental Economic Concepts Marginal analysis: Analyse the additional (marginal) benefit of any decision and compare it with additional.
CHAPTER 12 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis Relevant cash flows Incorporating inflation Types of risk.
Jeff Stroburg, CEO West Central Cooperative Ralston, Iowa Executing Difficult Strategies Sixth Annual Farmer Cooperative Conference October 30, 2003.
PLANNING PROCESS 1.GOALS 2.PREPARE PAST FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 3.PRICE PROJECTIONS 4.MARKETING PLAN 5.OPTIMAL COMBINATION OF INPUTS 6.OPTIMAL WHOLE-FARM.
Sub-surface Drip Irrigation and Modern Agriculture Elliott W. Rounds April 18, 2008 SOIL 4213.
XYZ Corp. Is considering investing in a project (shoe factory) that cost the company $300,000 today. This project can be depreciated using straight line.
Comparison of Costs and Returns for Alternative Cotton Harvest Methods in the Texas High Plains Jay Yates Extension Program Specialist - Risk Management.
+ Parkview Personal Care Home Micheline Gaudet. + Welcome Home.
MAKING PRECISION AGRICULTURE PAY ! Frannie Rogers BIOEN/SOIL 4213.
Modeling Economic Systems Aaron Salls Pd. 3 January 26, 2006.
AGEC 407 Investment Analysis Time value of money –$1 received today is worth more than $1 received in the future Why? –Earning potential –Risk –Inflation.
Capital Budgeting Decision-making Criteria
Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Raj Yabaji, Kevin Bronson, Cary Green, Eduardo Segarra, and Adi Malapati.
Decision Analysis & Decision Support Systems: DADSS Lecture 2: Introduction to Time Value of Money John Gasper.
Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc.All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis Relevant cash flows Incorporating inflation.
Financial and Practical Considerations of Selecting Zero Runoff Subirrigation Systems Wen-fei L. Uva Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial.
Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton Kevin F. Bronson Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX.
Materials for Lecture 20 Financial Models Finish Scenario Ranking Lecture New Material for Lecture 15 –Read Chapters 13 and 14 –Lecture 20 Pro Forma.xlsx.
A21 Business Studies (Investment Appraisal)
Cost Benefit Evaluation Techniques
Chapter 19 Investment Decisions: NPV and IRR
Texas Alliance for Water Conservation
Investment Appraisal – Discounted Cash Flow (NPV)
CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES
Investment Decision Under Certainty
Introduction to Economics of Water Resources Lecture 5
Investment Decision Under Certainty
Chapter 7 Cash Flow of Capital Budgeting
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Presented by Kody Bessent with Plains Cotton Growers, Inc.
Modeling Economic Systems
Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA
Intro to Financial Management
Elements of Slide Show MA 664 May 2007.
CHAPTER 12 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis
Time Value of Money & Cash Flow Estimation Prepared By Toran Lal Verma
Investment Decision Under Certainty
FINA1129 Corporate Financial Management
Multinational Capital Budgeting
Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis
Risk and Uncertainty Uncertainty
Precision Irrigation in Oklahoma
Evaluating Capital Returns
Presentation transcript:

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Curtis Wilde, Jeff Johnson, James Bordovsky Texas Tech University and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station - Lubbock The Effects of Relaxing Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) Design Uniformity Standards on Returns on Investment and Net Present Values of the Irrigation System Beltwide Cotton Conference New Orleans, Louisiana January 9-12, 2007

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Background Efficient in-season water application High water use efficiencies High initial cost to install Installation design uniformity standards -Not to exceed Flow Variation of 20% (USDA – NCRS)

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Objective Apply NPV and ROI analysis to installation of SDI systems with varying design uniformities Can design uniformity standards be reduced to decrease the initial cost of the SDI system

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Methods and Procedures  Study looks at: -Returns on investment (ROI) and Net Present Value (NPV) for:  Two irrigation levels BI Level (80% of the evapotranspiration demand of the crop) BI Level (60% of the 1.0 BI Level)  Three designs with different uniformities - 5.0% Flow Variation % Flow Variation % Flow Variation

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX P = annual profits IC = initial cost of the system Methods and Procedures IC = initial cost of the system ATCF = after tax cash flows for year i TV = terminal value of the system in year n n = number of years considered in the analysis

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Methods and Procedures 7 year simulation analysis Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) show the probability of a NPV occurring Allows the system designs to be ordered based on risk

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX SDI Designs 1.0FV 5.0 Design layout0.6FV 5.0 Design layout 1.0FV 16.7 & 1.0FV 37.1 Design layout0.6FV 16.7 & 0.6FV 37.1 Design layout

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX ROI Results for 1.0BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX ROI Results for 0.6BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX NPV Results for 1.0 BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX NPV Results for 0.6BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX CDF Results for 1.0BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX CDF Results for 0.6BI Level

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX CDF Results (cont.) Cost share programs (EQIP) increase NPVs

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX CDF Results for 1.0BI Level w/ EQIP

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX CDF Results for 1.0BI Level w/ EQIP

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX Conclusions SDI design uniformity standards could be relaxed under certain conditions to reduce the initial cost of installation When a lower irrigation level is used system uniformity can be decreased without an detriment to NPV At lower irrigation levels ROI and NPV could be greater for lower design uniformities

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Lubbock, TX The Effects of Relaxing Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) Design Uniformity Standards on Returns on Investment and Net Present Values of the Irrigation System