Make a Move: An Intervention to Reduce Childhood Obesity Kimberly Nerud, PhD, RN International Rural Nursing Conference Rapid City, South Dakota July 19,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parent Connectors: An Evidence-based Peer-to-Peer Support Program Albert J. Duchnowski, Ph.D. Krista Kutash, Ph.D. University of South Florida Federation.
Advertisements

3 High expectations for every child
Program purpose: American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN) have the lowest rates of college retention and graduation in the United States. These students.
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Demographic Factors, Social Supports, and Quality of Life of HIV infected Persons in Ghana Presentation by Tina Abrefa-Gyan, PhD Tina Abrefa-Gyan, PhD.
A Weighty Proposition What is Known Regarding Childhood Obesity Learning Session #1.
Meal Time/Family Time: An Evaluation of a Nutrition Education Program Sondra M. Parmer, MS Alabama Cooperative Extension System Auburn University.
FCS Program Focus Area – Healthy Eating/Active Lifestyles Dr. Virginie Zoumenou UMES/ Maryland Cooperative Extension 11/01/07.
Reducing Child Welfare Involvement: The Promise and Limitations of Early Intervention Deborah Daro.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
V v Generating Rural Options for Weight-Healthy Kids and Communities: Examining the rural family home nutrition and physical activity environment Carolyn.
Dr. Albrecht Research Team EXAMPLE of EVALUATIO N RESEARCH SERVICE LEARNING
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Fruit Juice Linked to Childhood Obesity? Evaluation of juice intake and BMI in Ontario preschoolers June 4, 2010 Northern Health Research Conference Sudbury,
Linking Primary Care, Communities, and Families to Prevent Obesity Among Preschool Children Jerica M. Berge, PhD, MPH, LMFT Collaborative Family Healthcare.
Title: A study… Name Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei ABSTRACT We discuss how a research-based model of the parental involvement.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
The MEND Programme: Healthy lifestyles for the whole family Dr. Gordon MacMillan.
Literature Review. –Protective Factors Self-awareness Family cohesion Perception of risk Age of first use –Intervention Programs Substance abuse Prevention.
The Partnership for a Healthy Mississippi: A Comprehensive Prevention Program for the Washington County and Greenville, Mississippi, School District Teddy.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Color Me Healthy.
. Relationship between Types of Sex Education and High Risk Sexual Behavior Andrea M. Anderson & Kaitlyn Harlander Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University.
Program Evaluation Dr. Ruth Buzi Mrs. Nettie Johnson Baylor College of Medicine Teen Health Clinic.
Childhood Overweight & Obesity DANA BURNS APRIL 7, 2014.
Evaluation of a Kindergarten-based Nutrition Education Intervention for Pre-school Children in China Abela, Benjamin III; De Castro, Ricardo; Hernandez,
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Alison Skellenger, R.N. Amanda Sprague, R.N. Childhood Obesity.
Contact: Kirstie Cooper Tel: The School Readiness Programme What is School Readiness? The Incredible.
©2016 MFMER | slide-1 Elementary School-based Obesity Intervention Utilizing an Educational Curriculum Natalie Gentile, MD PGY-2 Family Medicine Mayo Clinic.
Testing the Feasibility and Impact of the Res-Care-CI Elizabeth Galik, MSN, CRNP University of Maryland School of Nursing AMDA 30th Annual Symposium March.
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Improving the School Nutrition Environment in South Central Pennsylvania By Sophia I. Allen A Tool for Educators and Parents.
Presented by Kara Viggiano, MPH Choose to Change
Dawn Owen PhD Student Centre for Evidence Based Early Intervention
Maintaining your health and well-being
A Regional Project of the RHP Medicaid Transformation Waiver 2016 Southern Obesity Summit Presentation Julie Gardner Extension Specialist.
Implementing Color Me Healthy in Jackson County Mississippi Head Start Centers: Successes, Struggles, and Future Implications (Year Two Results) Danielle.
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
Access to Dental Care Pre and Post Enrollment in a State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) Beverly Mulvihill, PhD,1 Anita Jackson, BS,1 Alice.
Health Promotion & Aging
Giving kids options: Georgia Recreation and Park Association adopts resolution to make more healthy foods available to patrons Session , Health Promotion:
An evaluation of the online universal COPING parent programme:
Evaluation of The Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Program in a Norwegian school setting: Changes in children’s behavior (preliminary results)
Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate public health education interventions Presented by: Louise C. Palmer
Nursing Journal Clubs Enhance Evidence-Based Practice
Nicolette Roman* & Adele Grosse INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Brotherson, S., Kranzler, B., & Zehnacker, G.
Manoj Sharma Shakeyrah Elmore
Monica Parsai, Ph.D., Aimee Sitzler, MSW, & Thera Wolven, MPH
Jonathan W. Decker, PhD, ARNP, FNP-BC Assistant Professor
An Integrative Literature Review
Community and Population Assessment
Kelsey Keel, MPH Director, Childhood obesity initiative
Examination of the Relationship Between Nutrition Media Literacy and Soft Drink Consumption Among Adolescents – Preliminary Findings Martin H. Evans*,
Management of Type II Diabetes
Social Change Implications
Building Support Systems for Post-Screening Intervention
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Comprehensive Group-Based Parenting Support
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Family Functioning and Social Life Regulation among Adolescents
Understanding a Skills-Based Approach
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Home, School, and Community Influences on Children’s Lives
Building Stronger Families Protective Factors framework
Population Assessment Online Presentation Presented By:
Nursing Implications/Conclusion
Are School Wellness Policies Associated with Weight
Presentation transcript:

Make a Move: An Intervention to Reduce Childhood Obesity Kimberly Nerud, PhD, RN International Rural Nursing Conference Rapid City, South Dakota July 19, 2016

Objectives Identify significance of need for early interventions to reduce childhood obesity Define intervention process used Discuss results and implications for rural areas Identify recommendations for future studies in rural and underserved areas

Introduction One-third of children in the US are obese Low-income children account for the largest number Parents are key controllers Effective interventions are needed to safeguard against the continued epidemic of childhood obesity

Significance A child 2-5 years of age is considered at risk for overweight if they are in the ≥ 85 th percentile Parents need guidance to become the agents of change By strengthening parental understanding of balanced nutrition and adequate physical activity, more effective parent role-modeling can evolve

Conceptual Framework Conceptual framework guiding this study was based on the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) –Personal, behavioral, and environmental factors influence one another –People have an agency or ability to influence their own behavior and the environment in a purposeful, goal directed manner –SCT assumes that learning involves not just the acquisition of new behaviors, but also of knowledge, cognitive skills, concepts, and values that can affect attitudes.

Literature Review Socioeconomic Factors Parental Perception Obesity Promoting Behaviors Parental Attitudes and Role Modeling Community Adapted Interventions

Purpose of the Study The purpose of this pilot was to study the influences of “Make a Move”, a face to face provider-led family intervention targeting parents with children 3-5 years of age.

Study Aims Aim 1: To compare the experimental intervention to a control intervention in producing changes on the primary outcomes (knowledge, attitude and behavior specific to physical activity and healthy eating). Aim 2: To examine the feasibility of, and participant satisfaction with, “Make a Move”, a family-based, childhood obesity intervention.

Hypotheses Aim 1 1a: The intervention group will report an increased parental knowledge of healthy eating compared to the control group. 1b: The intervention group will report an increased parental knowledge of physical activity compared to the control group. 1c: The intervention group will report a greater improvement in attitude toward healthy eating compared to the control group. 1d: The intervention group will report a greater improvement in attitude of physical activity compared to the control group. 1e: The intervention group will report a greater improvement in behavior toward healthy eating compared to the control group. 1f: The intervention group will report a greater improvement in behavior of physical activity compared to the control group.

Hypotheses Aim 2 2a: At least half (50%) of the experimental group participants will complete 100% of the intervention sessions. 2b: The experimental group participants (80%) report that they were somewhat to very satisfied with the intervention.

Method Design –Randomized controlled trial - pilot study –Intervention group and control group –Pre- and post- test surveys Sample –Head Start parent participants with children aged 3-5 years in a Mid-western area –n = 27 participants (n=13) intervention group, (n=14) control group

Intervention Process Cultivate parent’s skill-building to improve –Family’s healthy food choices –Family’s physical activity level Protocol –Provider-led sessions with group interaction –Written material and demonstrations –4 sessions, offered weekly for 4 weeks ~ 1 hour –Pre- and post-test data collection

“Make a Move” Intervention Parents were encouraged through four sessions to: –Increase healthy foods in home –Understand portion size –Understand energy in and energy out –Increase physical activity of family –Reduce screen time

Control Group Participants will be contacted personally to complete Parent Curriculum Questionnaire (PCQ) prior to the first intervention session (pre-test) Participants will be contacted personally to complete PCQ after the last intervention session (post-test)

Instruments Parent Curriculum Questionnaire (PCQ) –Pre- and post-test both groups –Measures variables relevant to “Make a Move” –Focused on constructs of SCT –Demographic data, 51 line items with true/false and 1-5point scale questions Make a Move Satisfaction Survey –5 questions –For post-test intervention group only

Hypotheses Findings 1a: Knowledge of Healthy Eating : z = 1.99, p = 0.05* PretestIntervention groupMdn = 2Control GroupMdn = 2 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 3Control GroupMdn = 2.5 1b: Knowledge of Physical Activity : z = 0.44, p = 0.66 PretestIntervention groupMdn = 5Control GroupMdn = 5 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 5Control GroupMdn = 5 *statistically significant

Hypotheses Findings 1c: Attitude of Healthy Eating : z = 1.14, p = 0.25 PretestIntervention groupMdn = 17Control GroupMdn = 17 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 17Control GroupMdn = d: Attitude of Physical Activity : z = 2.72, p < 0.01* PretestIntervention groupMdn = 38Control GroupMdn = 38 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 41Control GroupMdn = 38 *statistically significant

Hypotheses Findings 1e: Behavior of Healthy Eating : z = 1.37, p = 0.17 PretestIntervention groupMdn = 42Control GroupMdn = 45.5 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 43Control GroupMdn = 45 1f: Behavior of Physical Activity : z = 2.03, p = 0.04* PretestIntervention groupMdn = 35Control GroupMdn = 42 PosttestIntervention groupMdn = 36Control GroupMdn = 40.5 *statistically significant

Hypotheses 2a & 2b Findings 2a: 77% of participants completed all 4 sessions, 23% of participants completed 3 sessions 2b: 100% reported mostly to very satisfied with intervention –70% very satisfied –30% mostly satisfied

Limitations Study population and setting Recruitment Contamination Duration of study Retention Nature of data

Implications for Rural Areas Utilization of one consistent provider Written and interactive material designed for ease of use Populations and settings Supports Healthy People 2020 objectives

Recommendations Provider-led sessions, face-to-face and group contact Retention strategies Measurement tools Self reported data Larger, more diverse sample

Future Research Plans Submitted for publication Grant proposal submitted Community project using 4-H youth Collaboration with WIC program

"The physical and emotional health of an entire generation and the economic health and security of our nation is at stake. This isn't the kind of problem that can be solved overnight, but with everyone working together, it can be solved”. Let's Move Launch Announcement, 2/9/2010