NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation of Rates for Water Utilities Oregon Public Utility Commission.
Advertisements

Federal Tax Hierarchies Paul D. Callister, JD, MSLIS Director of the Leon E. Bloch Law Library & Professor of Law University of Missouri-Kansas City School.
2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session The Application Process - The Hearing Process and What Happens at an Oral Hearing? July 9, 2012 Jennifer Lea Counsel,
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Regulatory-Utility Dispute Settlement Process Dennis J. Buckley Office of Administrative Law Judge Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
The FERC Review Process and Interaction with State Authorities Council of State Governments July 27, 2005 Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE (RUCO) PAT QUINN DIRECTOR
Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
File & Suspend Rate Cases Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
GENERAL RATE CASE SAM REID & MARK FROST KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Andrea McHugh Vermont.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Participation and Intervention before the FERC October 2007.
1 Adjudicatory Proceedings – no ex parte communications allowed with all Commissioners, all advisors and all hearing officers (20 CCR § 1216 incorporating.
MPSC Licensing Issues Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
The B.O.R. Process and The School District JILL THOMPSON, ATHENS COUNTY AUDITOR BOB DRAIN, TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC LISA ELIASON, ATHENS CITY LAW DIRECTOR.
HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE UTAH PUBLIC SEERVICE COMMISSION Ted Boyer Commissioner, Utah Public Service Commission August 9, 2005 Brasilia, Brazil.
1 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO)
Staff Assistance In Alternate Rate Setting Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Overview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Roland W. Wentworth Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates.
1 Regulatory Participation & Communication Workshop General Overview: The Regulator’s Public Information Process Steve Gaw Commissioner Missouri Public.
HORSE CREEK WATER SERVICES INC GENERAL RATE APPLICATION.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
1 Office of External Relations Dispute Process. 2 Customer must first contact the Company to allow the Company a chance to resolve problem. If the customer.
Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.
GETTING STARTED: Notices of appeal & the initial appellate documents.
Value Adjustment Board
Legal Services Public Information Policy Administration Board Services
Community Dialogue about The NuCLEus Project
Special Assessments John T. Shockley, Attorney Ohnstad Twichell, P.C.
TRIM for 2016 Presented by Citrus County Property Appraiser Chief Deputy Tonya Caldwell, CFE.
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Office of External Relations Dispute Process
Court Procedures for Negligence Cases
CMS and State Enforcement
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
NRC’s Decision Process: Judging The Safety Of A Proposed Repository
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
2016 National Conference of Regulatory Attorneys
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Who Wants to Be a Millionaire -
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
UNITED STATE AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID)
Effective Budgeting in County Government
Supreme Court at Work.
Rule Adoption Process Under IC 22-12, 22-13, 22-14, 22-15
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Alexander Hinz & Kasy Stinson Water Supply Division
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO) AND MINISTRY OF ENERGY OF GHANA (MOE) AND ENERGY COMMISSION OF GHANA (EC) AND PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF GHANA (PURC) Sponsored by: UNITED STATE AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID) SEPTEMBER 8-12, 2008 ACCRA, GHANA

DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES IN OHOIO Rate Case Process

Filing Notice 30 days prior to filing Filing made -- Day 1 Company Testimony Due -- Day 14 Commission Accepts/Rejects Filing and/or Notices Deficiencies – Day 30 Commission issues Entry establishing test year and procedural timelines – Day 60 Supplemental Filing or update due – Day 60

Months following filing: oStaff Investigation oData Requests and Responses oDiscovery oMotions by Parties to Intervene oIntervenor Testimonies oProcedural Rulings on Interventions, etc.

Staff Report Issued - Month 5 Objections by Company and Intervenors to Staff Report filed within 30 days (with additional supporting testimony) -Month 6 Local Public and Evidentiary hearings completed – Month 7 Briefs and Reply Briefs filed – Month 8 Commission Decision (275 days) - Month 9 Applications for Rehearing – 30 days from Decision Appeal to Ohio Supreme Court days from denial of rehearing

Rate Case Steps Staff investigates the company’s expenses, revenues and investment –Revenue Requirement – the amount of money that allows the company to cover expenses and earn a fair return on investment –Rate Design – how the revenue will be collected from the various classes? – residential, commercial, industrial. Based upon cost-of-service – the charge levied against a customer are proportional to the expense of service the customer

Parties to a Rate Case The State Attorney General’s office represents the Staff in the hearing and /or negotiations Office of Consumer’s Counsel (state agency representing residential consumers) Commercial customers Industrial customers Cities

After the Hearings Parties file briefs with the Commission within a time established by the Examiner. Usually file initial briefs and reply briefs Examiners write an order and circulate it to the Commissioners. The Commissioners provide input and vote on the order at a commission meeting. Order issued within 275 days of the filing of the applications. Company can put requested rates into effect subject to refund. Applications for Rehearing must be filed within 30 days. Any issue appealed to the Ohio Supreme court must be raised in the application for rehearing

Appeal of Commission Order Appealing party must file a notice of appeal with the Ohio Supreme Court within 60 days of the date of denial of the application for rehearing No deadline in which the Court must act; however, the Court must hear PUCO appeals. Most appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court are discretionary – the court chooses what it will hear. PUCO cases must be heard at the court. Master Commissioner to assist with the technical nature of the PUCO decisions. Court can affirm/agree with the order. Court can reverse the PUCO decision. Court can reverse and remand to the Commission

Ohio Power Siting Board Process

Pre-Application meetings and conferences Pre-Application Public Informational meetings Application submitted -- Two years prior to construction for generation; One year prior for transmission -- Day 1 Compliance Review -- up to Day 60 Letter of Completeness -- up to Day 60 Proof of Service

Process (cont.) Board Entry establishing Filing Date & Hearing schedule – no less than 60 nor more than 90 days Public Notice published by Applicant – within 7 days from accepted filing Staff Investigation -- Prior Day 1 up until day 45-75

Months prior to and following filing: oStaff Investigation oData Requests and Responses oDiscovery oMotions by Parties to Intervene oIntervenor Testimonies oProcedural Rulings on Interventions, etc.

Staff Report – Day 45 – 75 (15 days prior to public hearing Public Hearing Adjudicatory Hearing Board Decision Applications for Rehearing – 30 days from Decision Appeal to Ohio Supreme Court days from denial of rehearing