E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Advertisements

Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Status and Plans for Geant4 Hadronics Dennis Wright (SLAC) SPENVIS & Geant4 Space Users' Workshop Leuven, Belgium 3-7 October 2005.
Recent Developments in Geant4 Hadronics Geant4/Spenvis Workshop at JPL 6 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
Neutron_hp/particle_hp: interpolation of double differential cross sections Pedro Arce Dubois CIEMAT.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
Geant4 Physics Verification and Validation Low Energy Neutron Related Efforts ~Microscopic Levels~ Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Simulation of βn Emission From Fission Using Evaluated Nuclear Decay Data Ian Gauld Marco Pigni.
Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Current Status of the NJOY Nuclear Data Processing Code System and Initial ENDF/B-VII Data Testing Results Presented.
Summary of Work Zhang Qiwei INFN - CIAE. Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases.
Hadronic schower models in geant4 The frameworks J.P. Wellisch, CERN/EP, CHEP J.P. Wellisch, CERN/EP, CHEP 2000.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
LLNL-PRES-?????? This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Low Energy Neutron Interactions in Geant4 Jacek M. Holeczek Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland [Adam Konefał’s results also.
Luiz Leal, Wim Haeck, GAIA : Nuclear data processing for transport and criticality safety calculations at IRSN Luiz.
Neutron capture in CHIPS low energy nA physics Mikhail Kosov, 14 th Geant4 Users and Collaboration Workshop, 2009.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
V.Ivanchenko Salamanca1 Geant4: Hadronic Processes 1  Cross sections  Secondary generators  Nuclear interactions at rest  CHIPS model.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
Neutrons in gases Mary Tsagri CERN PH / SFT Tuesday, 23 February 2010 RD51 mini week.
Neutron HP updates KOI, Tatsumi SLAC 9/19/20111Geant4 Collaboration Meeting.
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
NNDC Services B. Pritychenko National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY , USA.
Radiation Dr. Walker.
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Section 5: Radioactive Elements
Radiation Dr. Walker.
Biomedical tracers Smoke detectors Household cleaning agents
Decay Data for Fusion Applications: Status, Issues and Needs
One model CHIPS physics lists (under development)
Nuclear Chemistry.
½ - life The decay of a single nuclei is totally random
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
The G4ParticleHP package
Emilio Mendoza Cembranos Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
Radiation Applications
Complete description of the 12C(n,n'3a) and 12C(n,a)9Be reactions in the High Precision neutron model A. R. Garcia, E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott Nuclear.
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
A. R. Garcia, E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott
Two samples of radioactive substances X and Y have the same initial activity. The half-life of X is T and the half-life of Y is 3T. After a time of 3T.
Next Version of JENDL General Purpose File
II. Nuclear (Radioactive) Decay
Nuclear Chemistry.
Criteria for assessing adjustment methodologies
Hadronic Physics in Geant4
Neutron Detector Simulations for Fast Neutrons with GEANT4
CHAPTeR 18 Nuclear Chemistry
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation
Nuclear Chemistry.
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Neutron Detector Simulations for Fast Neutrons with GEANT4
Isotopes and Nuclear Chemistry
CHAPTER 22 Nuclear Chemistry
Nuclear Chemistry II. Radioactive Decay.
Unit 4 – Nuclear Reactions
Nuclear Radiation.
Nuclear Chemistry Radioactive Decay.
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Nuclear Chemistry Essential Question: What are the different types of radioactive decay? How does each type change the nucleus?
Nuclear Chemistry Vocabulary.
The nucleus of an atom contains two particles:
Presentation transcript:

E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT) Necessary improvements of G4NeutronHP for the new libraries. Resolved and open questions. E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)

Necessary implementations - For the use of the new generated neutron libraries it is necessary to include the possibility of reading capture photon data in MF=6 format. This can be done (and it has been done), by performing a very little modification in the GEANT4 code, since GEANT4 reads and interprets photon data in MF=6 format for other reactions (inelastic = all except elastic, capture and fission). - Same for neutrons in the fission process, but only for three isotopes: 232Th, 231Pa, 233Pa in ENDF_VII.0. The MF=6 format data has been translated into MF=4,5 (uncorrelated) data, but maybe for a future it would be better to use MF=6 format.

Neutron validation results In the GEANT4 comparison with MCNPX done up to now, three main differences have been found: 1- Thermal neutrons: include more thermal neutron libraries?. There are only three materials available, whereas there are 20 in ENDF-VII.0, 9 in JEFF-3.1, 15 in JENDL-4.0, … 2- The “inelastic” problem: cross sections should include the QI value for the calculation of the energy secondary particle, instead of using the Inelastic/Gamma folders.  include Breakup reactions? 3- Self shielding treatment: some procedure to treat the URR could be implemented. It should be based in cross section evaluated data for the URR: statistical parameters such as the main distance between resonances, size, … 4- Fission???

Non-neutron validation results - No validation for particle production (different) than neutrons have been performed by CIEMAT. - Gamma production: 1- Gamma production in ENDF files is usually UNCORRELATED data. 2- Gamma production in ENDF files can be incomplete or missing. Possibilities to manage the photon production in GEANT4: 1- Use ENDF data (only). 2- Use models. 3- Use both ??? Mixing models with ENDF data has to be done with extremely care.

Non-neutron validation results Possible solution: include a flag which specifies how to manage the photon production data. - PFlag=0: use ENDF data. - PFlag=1: use models. - PFlag=2: use ENDF data, if there is no data, use models. -PFlag=3: …  adjust_final_state method of the G4NeutronHPFinalState class.

General comments 1- Lack of data: ENDF format libraries have some amount of isotopes. However, there are: A- Some isotopes are missing. B- The information for each isotope has to be, in principle, complete (exception: ROSFOND library). However, this doesn’t mean that all reactions are 100% perfectly described, specially for secondary particles different than neutrons. What to do? A- By default, if one isotope is missing, take the natural component (Warning in the output), if there is no natural component, exit. (export G4NEUTRONHP_SKIP_MISSING_ISOTOPES=1) B- Several options can be taken: 1- Perform the simulation with the available data (do not generate secondary particles if there is no data). 2- Use models. 3- Distribute only isotopes with some minimal information. 4- Use some flags to determine what to do. 5- …

General comments - One idea is to implement the possibility of writing into a file information concerning the G4NDL data which has been read, the data which is going to be used in the simulation. 2. Additional ENDF data: There is some information in the ENDF-6 format files which are not used (?) by GEANT4. Some source code can be developed in order to use this information. In particular: 1- File MF=8: Radioactive decay and fission product yield data. 2 – File MF=9: Multiplicities for production of radioactive nuclides. 3 – File MF=10: Cross sections for production of radioactive nuclides. 4- Files MF=30-40: Covariance data. 3. Reaction MT=5: this is an special reaction. It is an undefined reaction, it can be every mix of reactions. The residual nucleus is not well determined. 4. Residual nucleus: sometimes there are residual nuclei information in the ENDF data files, as an outgoing particle. This information is not used by GEANT4.

Additional comments - Some classes should be revised: + G4NeutronHPContAngularPar: there are some ENDF data which is not well interpreted. + G4NeutronHPDiscreteTwoBody: some errors in the code. +G4NeutronGPInelasticComp: the two_body_reaction method should be revised.