Methods for Dummies M/EEG Analysis: Contrasts, Inferences and Source Localisation Diana Omigie Stjepana Kovac.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Advertisements

EEG/MEG Source Localisation
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION
1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation and correlated regressors. 1 st of February 2012 Sylvia Kreutzer Max-Philipp Stenner Methods.
EEG / MEG: Experimental Design & Preprocessing Denisa Jamecna Sofie Meyer (Archy de Berker(
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Outi Tuomainen & Rimona Weil mfd.
Electrophysiology. Electroencephalography Electrical potential is usually measured at many sites on the head surface More is sometimes better.
SPM5 Tutorial, Part 1 fMRI preprocessing Tiffany Elliott May
Overview Contrast in fMRI v contrast in MEG 2D interpolation 1 st level 2 nd level Which buttons? Other clever things with SPM for MEG Things to bear in.
MEG/EEG Module Trainees Kai Hwang Tina Rasmussen TA Gus Sudre Bronwyn Woods Instructor Bill Eddy, Ph.D. Anna Haridis Thanks to:
LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15.
Analog Data Processing with BioProc3 Part Two EMG Analysis Techniques.
Subdural Grid Intracranial electrodes typically cannot be used in human studies It is possible to record from the cortical surface Subdural grid on surface.
Electroencephalography The field generated by a patch of cortex can be modeled as a single equivalent dipolar current source with some orientation (assumed.
Electroencephalography and the Event-Related Potential
Brain Electrical Source Analysis This is most likely location of dipole Project “Forward Solution” Compare to actual data.
EEG/MEG: Experimental Design & Preprocessing Methods for Dummies 28 January 2009 Matthias Gruber Nick Abreu.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
General Linear Model & Classical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM M/EEGCourse London, May.
2nd Level Analysis Jennifer Marchant & Tessa Dekker
LFPs Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15. Local field potentials Slow component of intracranial electrical signal Physical basis for scalp EEG.
ERP DATA ACQUISITION & PREPROCESSING EEG Acquisition: 256 scalp sites; vertex recording reference (Geodesic Sensor Net)..01 Hz to 100 Hz analogue filter;
1. 2 Abstract - Two experimental paradigms : - EEG-based system that is able to detect high mental workload in drivers operating under real traffic condition.
Source localization for EEG and MEG Methods for Dummies 2006 FIL Bahador Bahrami.
Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2014 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium
Analysis of fMRI data with linear models Typical fMRI processing steps Image reconstruction Slice time correction Motion correction Temporal filtering.
SPM5 Tutorial Part 2 Tiffany Elliott May 10, 2007.
1 Hands-On Data Analysis Kate Pirog Revill and Chris Rorden Data from safety training –9 subjects –Finger-tapping task (12s tapping, 12s rest) –188 scans.
2004 All Hands Meeting Analysis of a Multi-Site fMRI Study Using Parametric Response Surface Models Seyoung Kim Padhraic Smyth Hal Stern (University of.
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
1 Experimental Design, Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Joseph Brooks (ICN) Maria Joao (FIL) Methods for Dummies 2007 Wellcome Department For Neuroimaging.
Methods for Dummies Overview and Introduction
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
Multiple comparisons problem and solutions James M. Kilner
Signal Processing: EEG to ERP A Darren Parker Presentation.
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping II: GLM for fMRI Alexa Morcom and Stefan Kiebel, Rik Henson, Andrew Holmes & J-B Poline.
Methods for Dummies: Study Design and Pre-processing Tim West & Vanessa Meitanis Hans Berger- Inventor of EEG.
Electrophysiology. Neurons are Electrical Remember that Neurons have electrically charged membranes they also rapidly discharge and recharge those membranes.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2016 Sven Bestmann, Sobell Department, Institute of Neurology, UCL
General Linear Model & Classical Inference Short course on SPM for MEG/EEG Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London May 2010 C.
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
[Ran Manor and Amir B.Geva] Yehu Sapir Outlines Review
Topological Inference
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
The General Linear Model
2nd Level Analysis Methods for Dummies 2010/11 - 2nd Feb 2011
and Stefan Kiebel, Rik Henson, Andrew Holmes & J-B Poline
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Convolution modelling
Convolution modelling
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Topological Inference
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Machine Learning for Visual Scene Classification with EEG Data
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
Probabilistic Modelling of Brain Imaging Data
Convolution modelling
Feature Selection in BCIs (section 5 and 6 of Review paper)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Methods for Dummies M/EEG Analysis: Contrasts, Inferences and Source Localisation Diana Omigie Stjepana Kovac

Last week revisited What do we measure with EEG and MEG? Why use these techniques? What do we do we do with the raw data we record? Downsampling Montage Mapping Epoching Filtering Artefact Removal Averaging

What Next? Event related potentials (ERPs) are signal-averaged epochs of EEG that are time-locked to the onset of a stimulus A waveform is a time series that plots scalp voltage (µV, T) over time (ms) However, We might also want to carry out statistics comparing between conditions, subjects.. to localise the generators of the electrical activity timetime

This week Contrast and InferencesSource Reconstruction

Contrasts and Inferences using SPM 8 ……Which buttons do we need to press?

EEG data acquired on 128 channel ActiveTwo system sampled at 2048Hz Randomised presentation of 86 faces and 86 scrambled faces Experimental Paradigm

Aim: Identify at what point in time and over what sensor area the greatest difference lies in the responses to faces and non faces. Steps 1 st level Create a sensor map image for each trial 2 nd Level Take images into an unpaired t-test across trials to compare faces to scrambled faces Use classical SPM to identify locations in space and time

2D Interpolation Transformation of discreet channels into a continuous 2D interpolated image of M/EEG signals Sensor SpaceScalp Space

MULTI DIMENSIONAL SCALP SPACE create a 2D space by flattening the sensor locations and interpolating between them to create an image of M*M pixels ( where M=number of channels) or Create a 3 D space with time as added dimension. M*M*S (where S= number of samples)

MULTI DIMENSIONAL SCALP SPACE 2D create a 2D space by flattening the sensor locations and interpolating between them to create an image of M*M pixels ( where M=number of channels) or 3D Create a 3 D space with time as added dimension. M*M*S (where S= number of samples)

MULTI DIMENSIONAL SCALP SPACE 2D create a 2D space by flattening the sensor locations and interpolating between them to create an image of M*M pixels ( where M=number of channels) or 3D Create a 3 D space with time as added dimension. M*M*S (where S= number of samples)

MULTI DIMENSIONAL SCALP SPACE 2D create a 2D space by flattening the sensor locations and interpolating between them to create an image of M*M pixels ( where M=number of channels) or 3D Create a 3 D space with time as added dimension. M*M*S where S= number of samples

MULTI DIMENSIONAL SCALP SPACE 2D create a 2D space by flattening the sensor locations and interpolating between them to create an image of M*M pixels ( where M=number of channels) or 3D Create a 3 D space with time as added dimension. M*M*S where S= number of samples Time

Background Random Field theory allows us to: make N dimensional spaces from sensor locations. take into account the spatial correlation across pixels. correct for multiple statistical comparisons.

SPM 8 Steps Select preprocessed EEG data file Keep default of 32 to obtain 32 by 32 pixel space. Result 1st L E V E L

New directory Faces & Scrambled faces 3D image file for each trial with dimension 32x 32x 161 1st L E V E L

Sections through X and Y expressed over time 2D x-y space interpolated from the flattened electrode locations at one point in time 1st L E V E L 3D IMAGE

1 st level analysis of EEG data is not about modeling the data ( as in fMRI) the transformation of data from filename.mat and filename.dat format to image files (N1fT1 format) a necessary step to create the images which we carry out 2 nd level analysis on 1st L E V E L

1 st level analysis button Used only when you know in advance the time window that you are interested in. The Specify 1 st level button results in a 2D image with just spatial dimensions.

2 nd L E V E L

Smoothing Important step to take before 2nd level analysis (In SPM, use smooth images function in the drop down other menu) Used to adjust images so that they better conform to the assumptions of random field theory Necessary for taking into consideration spatial and temporal variability between subjects General guiding principle: Let smoothing kernel match the data feature you need to enhance. Try to smooth the images with different kernels and see what looks best.

2 nd L E V E L Which Buttons Do we Need to Press?

2 nd L E V E L Create a new directory Then To produce a batch window Select directory created Select two sample t test as design Make group 1 contain 1 st type of trials Make group 2 contain other type. Save batch description Run batch window

2 sample t-test Design Matrix click 2 nd L E V E L

Define F contrast Define threshold at p<.05FWE Select “Data type’’ as Scalp- time

Result showing regions within epochs where faces and non faces differ reliably Maxima [ ] & [ ] Coordinates correspond to the left and right posterior sites at 180ms

Time-frequency analysis Transform data into frequency spectrum Ideal for induced responses i.e. responses not phase locked to the stimulus onset Different methods but SPM uses the Morlet Waveform Transform ( mathematical functions which breaks a signal into different components) Trade off between time resolution and frequency resolution