1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Targets & Improvement Activities State Improvement Planning Carol Massanari, MPRRC Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Local Contributing Factor Tool for SPP/APR Compliance Indicators C-1, C-7, C-8, C-9/B-15, B-11 and B-12: Collecting and Using Valid and Reliable Data to.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
Road blocks & remedies for linking & using data Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Part C to part B 619 Mary Peters, DaSy, ECTA Center Debbie Cate, ECTA Center.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Transitioning Children from Part C to Part B Toby Long, PhD, PT, FAPTA Rachel Brady, PT, DPT, MS January 14, 2011 Office of State Superintendent of Education,
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Integrated Data to Support the Transitions in Special Education Wednesday, July 13, :00 –
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Part C Data Managers — Review, Resources, and Relationship Building
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Guam Department of Education
Regional Meetings for Teachers of the Deaf Spring 2014
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
ARC Chairperson Training
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Target Setting for Child Outcomes
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2. To hear state experiences 3. To identify resources and assistance 4. To enable participant discussion

2 Session Presenters Kathy Whaley, NECTAC Beth Rous, NECTC Phyllis Mondak, Section 619, VA Ron Dughman, MPRRC on behalf of NM Karen Mikkelsen, NERRC

3 Indicator C8: Early Childhood Transition Summary of APR

4 C8: Early Childhood Transition Percent of all children exiting Part C who received timely transition planning to support the child’s transition to preschool and other appropriate community services by their third birthday including: – (A) IFSPs with transition steps and services – (B) Notification to LEA, if child potentially eligible for Part B; and – (C) Transition conference, if child potentially eligible for Part B.

5 Overall Trends Across Sub indicators More states report higher rates of compliance in notifying LEAs of potentially eligible children (8B) and documenting transition steps within the IFSP (8A) than for holding transition conferences (8C) More states report full compliance regarding Notification to LEA (8B)and report substantial compliance. All states reported data on all sub indicators.

7 Progress IFSP Steps (8A) – 30 states made progress (8 maintained 100%) Notification (8B) – 22 states made progress (8 maintained 100%) Conference (8C)– 32 states made progress (4 maintained 100%)

8 Progress attributed to: 8A Clarification of policies, specific training/TA Improved monitoring/data processes to include sub indicator requirements Revised IFSP forms 8B Improved data sharing procedures and data entry accuracy; Systematized notification protocols; increased frequency of reports Improving local collaboration Targeted training of Service Coordinator/Data Managers 8C Utilization of focused monitoring/improved data collection Training/TA and policy clarification

9 Slippage IFSPs with Transition Steps/Services (N=11) Notification to LEA (N=13) Transition Conference (N=17) Reasons given: – Inaccurate or changing data systems/sources – Issues of data entry and reporting – IFSPs needed elements and instructions for documenting transition – Unclear policies – Staff shortages

10 Themes Improving data collection, record keeping, data analysis and data sharing Clarifying policies and aligning the consistency of policies across C and 619 Improving communication and collaboration across Part C and 619 Training and TA linked to monitoring and correction of non-compliance. Collaborative and joint training efforts with Part B, Section 619

11 Indicator B12: Early Childhood Transition Summary of APR

12 B12: Early Childhood Transition Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

13 Overall Trends Across Indicator States show steady progress by national average of reported data (from baseline 72% to FFY %) Changes to data systems decreased performance for some states but considered more accurate

14 Progress and Slippage 37 states reported progress 11 states reported slippage 3 states maintained 100%

15 Progress Attributed To: Changes in Data Collection Procedures and Systems Changes in Monitoring Processes and Linkage to Improved Data Capacity Improved Collaboration with Part C Clearer Policies and Guidance Intensive Targeted TA

16 Slippage Attributed to: FFY Data considered inflated or incomplete for purposes of analysis Selection of monitoring sites in cycle Staffing and personnel issues

17 Themes Better data! Better monitoring of compliance requirements MOUs and improved collaboration with Part C Clarified policies and guidance Collaborative training and TA Inconsistencies across states in policies regarding reasons for delay

18 Additional Resources National Early Childhood Transition Initiative National Early Childhood Transition Center NECTAC Resource Collection on Transition from Part C to Preschool SPP/APR Calendar: Technical Assistance Related to SPP Indicators and Determinations calendar.rrfcnetwork.org/techassistance.html calendar.rrfcnetwork.org/techassistance.html