Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Team Approach to AT/TSE Assessment
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY An overview of AT services to support the teachers and students in Cobb County.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
Legal Terminology: DEVICE: An Assistive Technology device is any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf,
SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
Implementing Assistive Technology in School and Beyond 1.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assistive Technology Competencies for Educational Personnel.
What IEP Teams Need to Know About Assistive Technology Adapted from the Texas Assistive Technology Network Considering Assistive Technology in the IEP.
Assistive Technology in the Educational Setting Ed Computers and Technology in Special Education.
Assistive Technology Legislation By Trudie Hughes, UMD Education Department (2005)
1 Assistive Technology? What Does It Have to Do with Me? Joy Zabala,, M.Ed., ATP Assistive Technology and Leadership Lake Jackson, Texas
Assistive Technology Works: Legislation, Definitions and Benefits
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Coweta County In-Service Training for Assistive Technology.
Assistive Technology in the Classroom George Gober Assistive Technology Associate Research Department Methodist Rehabilitation Center.
Assistive Technology Getting There Another Way. “The Power of A.T. to improve and enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities is virtually.
Special Education 547 Unit Two Educational Considerations Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Assistive Technology Assistive technology is a valuable tool to assist students with learning disabilities in gaining the knowledge, skills, and abilities.
Assistive Technology in the Classroom Family Center on Technology and Disability.
Technology for Learning Elizabeth Pearce Lewis University.
Assessment Callie Cothern and Heather Vaughn. A Change in the view of assistive technology assessment: From a one shot, separate event to an ongoing,
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT)
Technology for Learning Elizabeth Pearce Lewis University.
Lorinda Tait Parents What you need to know about assistive technology.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
Assistive Technology Factors in Assessment Equal Access The primary purpose of AT is enhancing of capabilities and lowering barriers to achievement. AT.
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist and Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT) Florida Diagnostic.
Joy Zabala, AT & LEADERSHIP Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed.D, ATP SETTing the Stage for Technology-Supported Achievement.
Assistive Technology Overview AT Hardware and Software AT Team Scope AT Request Process AT in the IEP.
Student Support Services Overview. The mission of the South Burlington School District, a community committed to excellence in education, is to ensure.
From SETT to TEST: Evaluating Assistive Technology Presenter: Nadiya Destiny
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LEGAL ISSUES that influence decision making.
Technology for Learning Rob Culp Lewis University.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
+ ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (AT) ROUND ROBIN PART 2: AT ASSESSMENT Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
Have You Considered AT Lately? Answers to your questions about Assistive Technology as members of the IEP team Michigan's Integrated Technology Supports.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Supporting Student Success USE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN DERRY TOWNSHIP January 2016.
Slide 1 Assistive Technology Guidelines for Kentucky Schools AT Training Team.
Teachers and Assistive Technology: What Teachers Should Know Brought to you by: Family Center on Technology and Disability.
Utah Assistive Technology Teams
Considering ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY in the IEP Process
American Institutes for Research
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
INGHAM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY: MEETING THE NEEDS OF ALL
Assistive Technology.
Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
SETT FRAMEWORK Collaborative Decision Making Process
Purpose Introduction to Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Assistive Technology Implementation
The Transition Planning Process
Writing Assistive Technology (AT) in the IEP: A brief guide
Assistive Technology Legal Requirements and Implications
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
AT ASSESSMENT 7 elements to include Teresa Pinder MLS/AT, OTL/R, ATP
Assistive Technology: What Every Parent Needs to Know
Assistive Technology Devices & Assistive Technology Services
Presentation transcript:

Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21

What is Assistive Technology? A system of tools which match a person’s needs, abilities, and tasks

Legal Definition of AT Assistive Technology Device Any item, piece of equipment or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified or customized, that is used to increase, maintain or improve the functional capabilities of children with disabilities. Assistive Technology Service Any service that directly assists a child with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device.

When used by students with disabilities, AT  facilitates the use of classroom materials and technology so that all students (both identified and non-identified) can better access the general curriculum.  offers alternate ways to participate in activities for all students, to move throughout the environment and to access and communicate information.  provides the means to modify classroom tasks for students with varying abilities,  can change a child's life by increasing learning opportunities and making it possible to demonstrate knowledge and skills

The BIG Questions Which students need assistive technology? –Those for whom AT is necessary to receive FAPE and to make progress in their educational program What kind of technology is needed? –Determined on a case by case basis –Related directly to what is needed for a student to receive FAPE

IEP and Consideration Every IEP Team is now required to "consider" the child's need for Assistive Technology for every child in special education, as part of the Special Factors requirement in IDEA '97. IDEA '97 states: (3) DEVELOPMENT OF IEP- B) CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS- (v) consider whether the child requires assistive technology devices and services.

1). Current interventions (whatever they may be) are working and nothing new is needed, including AT. 2). AT is already being used (or there has been a trial with AT) so that we know that it does work. In that case the IEP Team should write the specific AT into the IEP to insure that it continues to be available for the child. Conclusion Options - Consideration

3). New AT should be tried. In that case, the IEP Team will need to describe in the IEP the type of AT to be tried, including the features they think may help, such as "having the computer speak the text as the student writes". 4). Team will find that they simply do not know enough to make a decision. In this case, they will need to gather more information. That could be a simple process of calling someone for help, or going to get some print, disk, or online resources to help them better "consider" what AT might be useful. It could also be an indication that they need to schedule (or refer for) an assessment of the child's need for assistive technology.

Consideration: Primary Questions What do we want the child to do that he cannot do because of his/her disability? What has been tried to meet the need? YES Is it working? Documentation/ Evidence to support NO What was tried? How long? How was it tried? NOYES What will be tried? Conditions? Environments? Criteria ? Ongoing process Influence – change in environment, needs, skills, technology Does the team have knowledge/resources re: technology, interventions, Strategies, modifications? Seek additional assistance

Common Errors in Consideration AT is considered for students with severe disabilities only. No one on the IEP is knowledgeable regarding assistive technology. Team does not use a consistent process based on the student, environments, and tasks in order to make decisions.

Common Errors… Consideration of technology is limited to those items which are familiar to team members or are available in the district. Team members fail to consider access to the curriculum and IEP goals in determining whether AT is needed in order for a student to receive FAPE. If AT is not needed, team fails to document the basis for its decision.

A student with a disability that does not require special education would not be protected under IDEA. However, he or she would be protected by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. This act prohibits discrimination in providing educational services to students with disabilities, whether they are in regular or special education. Students without IEPs

Assistive vs. Instructional Tech Difference in GOALS Assistive technology –Goal is to provide ACCESS to the curriculum (NOT necessarily to teach or instruct) Instructional Technology –Goal is to develop specific academic skills (reading development, math skills, etc.)

Component Areas of AT Communication Computer Access Mobility Vision Hearing Access to the Curriculum Environmental Control Recreation and Leisure

Definition of Assessment “Assistive Technology assessment is a flexible, collaborative decision-making process in which families, professionals, and friends repeatedly revise their decisions and reach consensus about the ever-changing abilities, needs and expectations of the person with a disability.” adapted from S. Bagnato, Children’s Team Work

AT Assessment: Effective Practices Uses team approach Fosters family partnerships Considers ongoing life planning Occurs in a local setting (“customary environment”) Is a continual process Targets the student’s natural environments Is vested in team competency Allows for practical follow through

Getting Started Identify individual’s local support team –Should include: parent, teacher(s), LEA –MAY include: student, SLP, OT, psychologist, guidance counselor, etc. Discuss desired outcomes Seek administrative support Explore A. T. Assessment Process Investigate resources Develop on-going action plans

Purpose of local teams: Identify individual’s desired outcomes Identify individual’s needs and abilities Share information and decision-making Design and coordinate training plans Design and coordinate implementation plans Document and monitor implementation

Guidelines for Assessment of Assistive Technology Needs Identification of Daily Needs Gather Background Information Student Observation and Interview Motor Assessment Cognitive/Sensory Assessment Language Assessment Feature Match Process Trial Runs/Mock-ups Acquisition Planning Dynamic Re-evals/Implementation Planning The “10 Step” Process

The Student What does the student need to do? What are the student’s special needs? What are the student’s current abilities? Curriculum issues Equal access issues

The Environment What materials and equipment are currently available in the environment? What is the physical arrangement? Does it impact the student? What are the special concerns? What is the instructional situation? What supports are available to the student? What resources are available to the people supporting the student?

The Tasks What naturally occurring activities take place in the environment? What activities support the student’s curricular goals? What are the critical elements of the activities? “Learning opportunities” How might the activities be modified? How might technology support the student’s active participation?

The Tools What no tech, low tech, and high tech options should be considered when developing a system for a student with these needs, and abilities doing these tasks, in these environments? What strategies might be used to invite increased student performance? How might these tools be tried out in the customary environments in they will be used?

Feature Match Need to consider: –Abilities -Needs -Expectations Additional Considerations: –Input –Processing –Output Trials

Feature Match Examples Student A – 8 th grade –Understands content at grade level –Decodes at 3 rd grade level Needs to access grade level curricular material independently Expectations – achieve and demonstrate knowledge and skills based on ability vs. reading level Features – scanned material, auditory feed- back, screen reader for research

Action Plans For assessment For short term loan trials For implementation For follow-up For evaluation

Assessment Tools - It’s NOT a Test! Circuit ( FEAT (Functional Evaluation for Assistive Technology) ( SETT ( WATI Assessment Format (

Assistive Technology? Universal Design? (UDL)