Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director.
Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING, MONITORING, AND RECLAIMING OPERATIONS MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING,
Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions
BUILDING STRONG ® Mitigation in a Modern World or 33 CFR 332 and You Presented by Jayson M Hudson To the Texas Association of Environmental Professionals.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Regulatory Context Natural Environment Chapter Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Modified Charleston Method (MCM)
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Jay Norvell, Chief Environmental Planner California Department of Transportation M E AND M Y CDFG.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines Field Exercise
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Northern California Conservation Planning Partners Eleventh Annual Habitat Conservation Planning From Tahoe to the Bay Workshop John Kopchik East Contra.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Planning and Permitting Part II: Permitting Overview S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 636 Hedburg Way, Suite 22 Oakdale, CA
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
New Technologies: Fish & Wildlife Permitting Issues Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP NWHA Annual Conference – February 20, 2008.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Steve Martin Environmental Planner Permanence of Compensatory Mitigation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
Advance Mitigation: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Collaborative Advance Mitigation planning contributes to the fulfillment of regional conservation.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Role in Timber Harvest Review.
October 16, 2013 Mira Monte Marina PERMITTING MITIGATION UPDATE MIRA MONTE MARINA.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
Environmental Mitigation and ePM Project Commitment Database.
Mitigation Transactions Rebecca Payne Gregoria Ponce.
Russian River Estuary Management.
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Construction Management & Inspection
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Planning Mitigation February 24, 2016
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Proposed Mitigation Rule Amendment Rulemaking Pre-Proposal State and Local Government Outreach June 20, 2019.
National Waterways Conference
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation

Mitigation is defined as everything from avoiding the impact to compensating for losses. Lead agencies (like Caltrans) implement measures to avoid, lessen or compensate for the adverse effects and environmental impacts

Mitigation (CEQ and CEQA Guideline 15370) 1.Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. 2.Minimize the impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. 3.Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. 4.Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preserving and maintaining operations during the life of the action. 5.Compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

Biological Mitigation is implemented by Caltrans using the following sequencing process Mitigation Sequence – Avoid – Minimize – Mitigate (i.e. Compensate) Compensatory Mitigation is defined as replacing or providing substitute resources. *Focus on Avoidance & Minimization measures to reduce the amount of impacts and mitigation required for a project.

Who Requires Mitigation? – Federal Agencies – State Agencies – CEQA Lead Agencies

Federal Laws, Regulations and Policies National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Clean Water Act o Sections 401 and 404 o Mitigation Rule 2008 (Avoid, Minimize, Compensate) (Credit Purchase, In-lieu fee, Permittee responsible) Rivers and Harbors Act o Sections 9 and 10 Endangered Species Act of 1973

Federal Laws cont’d Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act o Essential Fish Habitat Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act Migratory Bird Treaty Act Executive Orders o o o 13112

State Laws, Regulations and Policies California Environmental Quality Act California Endangered Species Act Native Plant Protection Act Sections 1600 et seq. of Fish and Game Code

What are your options? Advance Mitigation Mitigation Credits Mitigation Banks (wetlands/waters) Conservation Banks (species) In-lieu Fee Mitigation Programs Project Specific Mitigation (also known as permittee responsible mitigation)

Mitigation Proposal

Consider the Impact And Regulation What type of habitat/resource will the project impact? What regulation will you be mitigating under? What mitigation requirements do the regulations have? What guidance does the agency provide?

Mitigation Alternatives-Preferred by FHWA and Caltrans Mitigation Bank Credits In-lieu Fee Program Credits Other Programmatic Options Permittee Responsible

Mitigation/Conservation Bank Credits Fulfill compensatory mitigation requirements Mitigation is often in the ground in advance of the Project Impacts, which can lower mitigation ratios Liability for compensatory mitigation success transfers from permit applicant to mitigation provider

In-lieu Fee Program Credits Fulfill compensatory mitigation requirements Program agreement is in place and agency approved prior to project, which can allow for lower mitigation ratios Liability for compensatory mitigation success transfers from permit applicant to mitigation provider

Mitigation Credits

Other Programmatic Options HCPs – Habitat Conservation Plans (FESA) NCCPs – Natural Community Conservation Plans (CDFG Code §2800) SAMPs – Special Area Management Plans (CWA)

Advance Mitigation Options? Does your area have an implemented advance mitigation option?

Permittee Responsible Mitigation

Types of Mitigation Wetland Riparian Stream Special status species Rare plants Rare or special status vegetation communities Preservation Restoration Enhancement Creation

Caltrans is responsible in Perpetuity (this is a very long time) Mitigation plan Find land Restoration, enhancement, creation/establishment Maintenance and Management Activities Monitoring Who is going to manage the land? Funding Endowments Programming

Land and Protections What will you do on the land? Restoration/rehabilitation Creation/establishment Preservation Success Criteria and monitoring Management- prior to and after meeting success criteria What? Who? Funding- Work with your PM and PDT

Wetland Creation

Riparian Enhancement

The Mitigation Plan Also Known As: Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP), Habitat Development Plan (HDP), etc.

What Should a Mitigation Plan Include? Objective(s) Site selection information (suitability analysis) Site protection instrument to be used (Conservation Easement) Baseline information (impact site and mitigation project site) How the project will mitigate for lost functions and values Work plan (restoration specifications and work descriptions)

What Should a Mitigation Plan Include? Maintenance plan (ensuring continued viability) Performance standards (ecologically-based criteria for replacing lost functions and values) Monitoring requirements (Interim and long-term) Long-term management plan (post-restoration management) Adaptive management plan (addresses unforeseen changes) Financial assurances (funding commitment, long-term funding)

Additional Species Considerations Applicable for FESA/CESA impacts regulated by USFWS CDFW NOAA Fisheries Species and/or appropriate habitat must be found on the site in sufficient density and regularity Requires a permit for sampling (NOAA, FWS and/or CDFW) Habitat is viable for sustained species utilization in existing condition

General Requirements Technical Studies – Resource specific Restoration Plan – grading, planting, etc. Management Plan – Required activities, frequency, and who will complete them. Title Assessment & Assurances – existing easements (utility, etc.) Conservation Easement – California Civil Code §815 Financial Assurances – What CAN we provide?

Technical Studies and Plans The Project Delivery Team (PDT) works collaboratively to produce the following: Biological Survey Reports Wetlands Delineation Engineering/Hydrologic Studies Phase I Environmental Assessment Cultural Survey Restoration Plan Interim/Long-term Management Plans

Purpose Of Mitigation What are the Mitigation Goals? – Must be tied to project impacts – Relation to adjacent resources (wetlands or species) What is the landscape alteration? – Enhancement, Restoration, or Creation – Proposed features fit the landscape – Viability for success Hydrology Soils

Site Selection Considerations Adjacent land uses Connection to other habitats Landscape location Watershed/regional needs Comparability to impact site

Functions and Values Analysis Base Ecological Values Base Flood Attenuation Base Water Quality Etc. Low High

Reference Sites Use Reference Sites if Possible Attainable condition Similar landscape position Access to site or data from site Use to develop performance standards Reference Standard Represents the least disturbed condition

Restoration Plan Construction Measures Construction schedule Grading Plan Planting Plan Construction Methods Adjacency to sensitive resources Construction permit requirements Construction Oversight Biology and Engineering

Permitting the Mitigation Plan MUST have CEQA and NEPA Compliance Documents Permitting-required if wetlands will be disturbed or special-status species may be present: 1) US Army Corps Permit (generally use NWP 27) a) Regional Water Quality Control Board - Requires CEQA (Cat. Ex. Or M.N.D.) b) Biological Opinion from FWS and Consistency - Determination from CDFW c) Cultural Resources Determination 2) CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (CEQA) 3) Flood Protection Board Permit/Review (CEQA)

Performance Standards Quantifiable and Objective Based on Mitigation Goals Reference Sites Vegetation (Flora) Wildlife (Fauna) Hydrology Soils Natural Dynamic Equilibrium

Site Management Interim Management Plan Interim Management Security Analysis and Schedule Long-Term Management Plan Endowment Fund Analysis and Schedule

Keep in Mind: You can’t plan for everything Keep the organization easy – someone else will need to understand it 50 years from now Focus on Adaptive Management Remember your Mitigation Objectives