Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 1 Simplified DLS Action Frame Transmission in 11Z Date: 2007-12-07 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /0365r1 March 2012 Z. Quan, Qualcomm Inc MAC Header Compression Slide 1 Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2010 Ashish Shukla, MarvellSlide 1 TDLS TPK Handshake Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1323r0 November 2012 Submission Relays for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1015r1 September 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide 1 Proxy ARP in ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0110r8 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /2797r00 Submission Oct 2007 Jiyoung et al. Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission October 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide s Power Saving Issues Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0110r3 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r6 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r7 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: April, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r1 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1299r0 Submission Dec 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 BSS Transition Improvements Date: xx Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /465r0 Submission Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems July 2002 Slide 1 WiSP Wireless Sidelink Protocol Wim Diepstraten Gerrit Hiddink Agere.
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Authentication and Upper-Layer Messaging
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Mike Moreton
Extended Usage of STKSA
Demand of Being Woken Up While Moving Follow-up
TDLS Setup Date: Authors: Mar 2008 September 2007
TDLS TPK Handshake Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> May, 2008
BSS Transition Improvements
Mesh Frame Formats Date: Authors: June 2007 March 2007
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
Limiting Degrees of Freedom for Measurement Requests
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
Mesh Frame Formats Date: Authors: July 2007 March 2007
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> May, 2008
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Mesh Frame Formats Date: Authors: May 2007 March 2007
September 2007 doc.: IEEE /2376r0 November 2007
Proposed DLS Teardown Date: Ovadia, Ginzburg, Intel
CID#89-Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
Group Block Acknowledgements for Multicast Traffic
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Mesh Frame Formats Date: Authors: June 2007 March 2007
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
TGz Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2007 Month Year
TGz Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2007 Month Year
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Simplified DLS Action Frame Transmission in 11Z
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: July2008 November 2007
AP Connection Period in TDLS
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: November 2008
Method for geting Link RCPI
Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
Mesh Frame Formats Date: Authors: July 2007 March 2007
Revisiting Path Switch
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Extended Usage of STKSA
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Encrypting Management Frames
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 1 Simplified DLS Action Frame Transmission in 11Z Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 2 Simplified direct link setup frame transmission Solution to frame reordering Backup Slides

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 3 Tunneled Direct Link Setup (TDLS) in [1] TDLS action frames are encapsulated in data frames as data frame payload. Encapsulated TDLS action frames go through an AP path from STA1 to STA2 –An AP transparently forwards encapsulated TDLS management action frames. –An AP is unaware of TDLS management frames that it forwards! AP Path STA1 AP STA2 1a 2a Direct Link 1b 2b MAC Data Header LLC/SNAP Remote Frame Type TDLS Packet Type TDLS Information FCS Data Frame Payload Octets:24/ Variable4

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 4 Problems with TDLS MAC layer entity in a STA has to analyze the ethertype octet at the link layer in each data frame that it accepts. –It violates IEEE 802 architecture. –It puts much overhead on the MAC layer entity. Some overhead is put in AP. –An AP has to forward TDLS action frames. AP Path STA1 AP STA2 1a 2a Direct Link 1b 2b

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 5 Simplified Direct Link Setup Frame Transmission New DLS action frames are defined with new action type. New DLS action frames are sent between two STAs directly –New DLS action frames are not encapsulated in MAC data frames. –An AP does not forward the proposed DLS action frames. AP Path STA1 AP STA2 Direct Link Path 1 2 New DLS action frame path. Management Frame Header Category Action Value TDLS Information FCS Management Frame Payload Octets: Variable 4

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 6 PROs of Simplified DLS Frame Transmission PROs –This method does not violate the 802 architecture. –This method does not need a new ethertype octet. –The MAC entity does not need to analyze ethertype in each data frame! –An AP does not forward the proposed DLS action frames. AP Path STA1 AP STA2 Direct Link Path 1 2 SDLS action frame path.

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 7 Simplified direct link setup frame transmission Solution to frame reordering Backup Slides

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 8 Solution to Frame Reorder When STA1 sends a Tx Path Switch Request with the direct path indication, it shall stop transmitting frames to STA2 through the AP. STA1 shall buffer the frames to STA2. When STA1 receives a Tx Path Switch Response with the direct path indication, it starts a delay timer. When the delay timer times out, STA1 starts to transmit frames to STA2 through direct link path. AP Path STA1 AP STA2 Direct Link Path

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 9 Reference [1] 11-07/2515r8, Tunneled Direct Link Setup (TDLS), Menzo Wentink etc.

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 10 Simplified direct link setup frame transmission Solution to frame reordering Backup Slides

doc.: IEEE /2952r2 Submission Dec 2007 L.Chu Etc.Slide 11 [Comment] A station normally receives only frames from the AP, but in your case it also needs to receive frames from any other TA. This does not seem right. It appears like you assume that a direct link is already in place before setting one up? [Answer] This is a very good point. Actually I asked this question to myself many times when I prepared this presentation. You are right, a station normally receives only frames from the AP in a infrastructure BSS. My assumption is that if a station implements 11z DLS, it will receive only new DLS management frames from another non-AP station directly before DLS connection is set up. No data frames are allowed being transmitted between two non-AP stations before the DLS is set up. So this does not means that a direct link is already in place before setting one up. This is what will be defined in 11z standard. This is similar to the security association between two stations. Unprotected data frames are not allowed between two stations before security association is set up. But security management frames are allowed before this security association is set up. [Comment] How do you know whether the intended peer station is in power save or not? [Answer] The initiator does not need to know if the intended peer is in power save or not. If the intended peer station is in power save state, the initiator can not set up a direct link any way. So in this case, the initiator will fail to set up a direct link with the destination after being timing out. It can try again later if it wants. [Comment] How do you propose to setup a secure direct link without the secure connection via the AP? [Answer] To my understanding, it is the master session key that authenticates the peer station. If peer stations have master session key of another station, they can authenticate each other and set up DLS security association. The master session key may be got through the pre-installed key or the security connection with AP to the AAA server. Comments And Replies