Seismic interferometry, the optical theorem and a non-linear point scatterer Kees Wapenaar Evert Slob Roel Snieder Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relations between reflection and transmission responses of 3-D inhomogeneous media Kees Wapenaar Department of Applied Earth Sciences Centre for Technical.
Advertisements

Time-reversal acoustics, virtual source imaging, and seismic interferometry Haijiang Zhang University of Science and Technology of China.
Elastodynamic reciprocity theorems for time-lapse seismic methods Kees Wapenaar Menno Dillen Jacob Fokkema Centre for Technical Geoscience Delft University.
Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.
Seismic Interferometry
Ray theory and scattering theory Ray concept is simple: energy travels between sources and receivers only along a “pencil-thin” path (perpendicular to.
Seismic interferometry: Who needs a seismic source? Roel Snieder Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines
One-way acoustic reciprocity and its application in time-lapse seismic By Kees Wapenaar Jacob Fokkema Menno Dillen Pieter Scherpenhuijsen Delft University.
Center for Wave Phenomena Department of Geophysics Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado.
Neustadt July 8, 2009 Seismic Interferometry by cross-correlation (CC) and by multi-dimensional deconvolution (MDD) using ambient seismic noise Deyan Draganov,
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Center for Wave Phenomena Department of Geophysics Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado.
Theory of acoustic daylight imaging revisited
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation or deconvolution?
Seismic interferometry for passive and exploration data:
August, 1999A.J. Devaney Stanford Lectures-- Lecture I 1 Introduction to Inverse Scattering Theory Anthony J. Devaney Department of Electrical and Computer.
Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg.
Bending the wrong way and imaging the right way, Ilana Erez and Luc T. Ikelle (Texas A&M University) ABSTRACT An analysis of scattering diagrams (i.e.,
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
6 months at CWP: Done a lot, but not done yet Or: how to deal with black magic by Dr. Ernst Niederleithinger Senior Scientist and Deputy Division Leader.
Dynamics of Anderson localization
Subwavelength Imaging using Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Field Data Example G. Dutta, A. AlTheyab, S. Hanafy, G. Schuster King Abdullah University.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar with many contributions from: Deyan Draganov, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Evert Slob, Juerg Hunzicker, Jan.
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New.
Green’s function retrieval by iterative substitution or inversion (
A Blind Test of Traveltime and Waveform Inversion Colin A. Zelt 1, R. Gerhard Pratt 2, Andrew Brenders 2, Sara Hanson-Hedgecock 1 and John A. Hole 3 1.
Turning noise into signal: a paradox? Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology Roel Snieder, Colorado School of Mines Presented at: Making Waves about.
Wave-Equation Migration in Anisotropic Media Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Green’s theorem requires the wavefield P and its normal derivative P n on the measurement surface as the input. In marine exploration, an over/under cable.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
PROCESSING FOR SUBSALT IMAGING: A NEW AND FIRST TWO WAY MIGRATION METHOD THAT AVOIDS ALL HIGH FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTIC ASSUMPTIONS AND IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
Including headwaves in imaging and internal multiple attenuation theory Bogdan G. Nita Research Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physics University of Houston.
AGENDA Wednesday, May 28, :30 AM Welcome, program goals, objectives and overall strategy: Tutorial on the inverse scattering series and Green’s theorem.
examining the problem and its resolution
Making Marchenko imaging work with field data and the bumpy road to 3D
Velocity Analysis Using Surface-Seismic Primaries-Only Data Obtained Without Removing Multiples
Reciprocity and power balance for partially coupled interfaces
Arthur B. Weglein M-OSRP, University of Houston Oct 22nd, 2015
Yanglei Zou* and Arthur B. Weglein
Introduction to Diffraction Tomography
Accommodating the source (and receiver) array in the ISS free-surface multiple elimination algorithm: impact on interfering or proximal primaries and multiples.
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Review of the Green’s Theorem deghosting method
Kristopher Innanen and Arthur Weglein University of Houston
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
M-OSRP 2006 Annual Meeting, June 5 ~ June 7, 2007
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Jing Wu* and Arthur B. Weglein
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
Adriana C. Ramírez and Arthur B. Weglein
Jingfeng Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
SKS SPLITTING: Using Seismic Waves to Understand Mantle Structure
Adriana Citlali Ramírez
Data modeling using Cagniard-de Hoop method
Remarks on Green’s Theorem for seismic interferometry
Codas in reflection and transmission responses
Radiodiagnostic imaging
Prerequisites for all inverse seismic processing
The general output of the leading-order attenuator
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Seismic interferometry, the optical theorem and a non-linear point scatterer Kees Wapenaar Evert Slob Roel Snieder Society of Exploration Geophysicists Houston, October 26, 2009

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox Modeling Inversion Interferometry Migration

Snieder, R., K.van Wijk, M.Haney, and R.Calvert, 2008, Cancellation of spurious arrivals in Green's function extraction and the generalized optical theorem: Physical Review E, 78, Halliday, D. and A.Curtis, 2009, Generalized optical theorem for surface waves and layered media: Physical Review E, 79, van Rossum, M. C. W. and T.M. Nieuwenhuizen, 1999, Multiple scattering of classical waves: microscopy, mesoscopy, and diffusion: Reviews of Modern Physics, 71,

a b Term 1:

c d Term 2:

ef Term 3:

a b c d ef Terms :

Terms , compared with modeled G:

Term 4: g g h h i i

Terms , compared with modeled G:

Terms , compared with modeled G:

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Paradox

Substitute into representation for interferometry (Snieder et al., 2008, Halliday and Curtis, 2009)…..

This gives: Generalized optical theorem (Heisenberg, 1943)

This gives: For comparison:

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox

Isotropic point scatterer:

(van Rossum et al, 1999) =+++ (Snieder, 1999)

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox

a b c d ef Terms :

Terms , compared with modeled G:

Point scatterer Interferometry Optical theorem Non-linear Paradox Modeling Inversion Interferometry Migration

Modeling, inversion and interferometry in scatterering media Groenenboom and Snieder, 1995; Weglein et al., 2003; Van Manen et al., 2006

Modeling, inversion and interferometry in scatterering media Groenenboom and Snieder, 1995; Weglein et al., 2003; Van Manen et al., 2006 Limiting case: Point scatterer

Resolution function for seismic migration Miller et al., 1987; Schuster and Hu, 2000; Gelius et al., 2002; Lecomte, 2008 Migration deconvolution Yu, Hu, Schuster and Estill, 2006

Born approximation is incompatible with seismic interferometry Conclusions

Born approximation is incompatible with seismic interferometry Seismic interferometry optical theorem non-linear scatterer seismic interferometry Consequences for modeling, inversion, interferometry and migration Conclusions

Born approximation is incompatible with seismic interferometry Seismic interferometry optical theorem non-linear scatterer seismic interferometry Consequences for modeling, inversion, interferometry and migration Conclusions