Chapter 7 Homework: 2 (a, b, c, e), 4, 6, 10 (a, b), 20 (a, b), 25, 33, 36, 41 (a, b, c)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives Lecture slides to accompany
Advertisements

Engineering Economy Practice Problems
Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 21 Professor C. S. Park
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 28 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
Copyright Oxford University Press 2009 Chapter 8 Choosing the Best Alternative.
Chapter 8 Choosing the Best Alternative
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
Comparison Methods Part 2. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Introduction Chapter 4 introduced the Present Worth and Annual Worth.
Rate of Return Analysis
Rate of Return. Definition The Rate of Return (ROR) is: A percentage (or interest rate) that describes the merit of an investment. (Return on investment.
Multiple Investment Alternatives Sensitivity Analysis.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 9 Rate of Return Analysis Rate of Return Methods for Finding ROR Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Criterion.
CTC 475 Review Bonds Bonds Not straightforward because bonds can be bought and/or sold between the date of issuance and the date of maturity Not straightforward.
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Spring Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present.
Comparing Alternatives with Rate of Return
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Fall Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present Worth.
Chapter 7 Rate of Return Analysis
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
IEN255 Chapter 6 - Rate of Return Analysis
1 Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The interest rate i* at which NPW = 0 Note: This is the same as finding the roots of a polynomial.
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives Consider the following: You have $20,000 to invest in either alternative A or alternative B. Your MARR is.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 RATE OF RETURN ANALYSIS Course Outline 7.
Comparing Projects Using Time Value of Money
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives & Capital Budgetting Ref: Chapter 5 & section 10.4.
Present Worth Analysis Chapter 5 Types of Economic Alternatives Mutually Exclusive Alternatives: –Only one of the viable projects can be selected. –The.
Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
1 Chapter 7 Rate of Return Analysis. 2 Recall the $5,000 debt example in chapter 3. Each of the four plans were used to repay the amount of $5000. At.
Evaluating a Single Project
MIE Class #5 Manufacturing & Engineering Economics Concerns and Questions Concerns and Questions Quick Recap of Previous ClassQuick Recap of Previous.
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
Chapter 7 Annual Worth Analysis.
1 Word Problems Organize the Data Given: Determine the objective and your strategy. Draw the Cash Flow Diagram. Write Equations and Solve. Reflect Back.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Incremental Analysis Lecture No.
Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 5th edition Chapter 8 Rate of Return Analysis.
12/17/2015rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 15  Selection of a MARR.
L:21 Incremental Analysis ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer Sciences.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. CHAPTER V PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS McMc Graw Hill ENGINEERING.
2/20/2016rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 8  Incremental Analysis.
2/22/2016rd Multiple Rates of Return nCash FlowCumulativeAdjusted 10% 20% 0-$500-$500 -$500 -$ (quadratic
Construction Accounting & Financial Management, 3/e Steven Peterson © 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights.
12-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 12 Independent Projects with Budget Limitation ©
Comparing Economic Alternatives Using time value of money to choose between two or more options.
8-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 8 Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives © 2012 by.
1 Incremental Analysis A technique or approach that can be used with NPW, EAW, and later with IRR and Cost/Benefit to determine if an incremental expenditure.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 9 Rate of Return Analysis
Comparison of Alternatives
Engineering Economy [8] Rate of Return Analysis Multiple Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Construction Engineering 221 Economic Analysis
Rate of Return Analysis
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives
Different Life Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
RATE OF RETURN ANALYSIS CHAPTER 7
Engineering Economic Analysis
Engineering Economic Analysis
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
Incremental Analysis Examples
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 7 Homework: 2 (a, b, c, e), 4, 6, 10 (a, b), 20 (a, b), 25, 33, 36, 41 (a, b, c)

# = 16 Alternatives 1234abce1234abce 0000yyyy0000yyyy 0001yyny0001yyny 0010yyyy0010yyyy 0011yyyn0011yyyn 0100yyyy0100yyyy 0101yynn0101yynn 0110yyyn0110yyyn 0111yyyn0111yyyn 1000yyyy1000yyyy 1001yyny1001yyny 1010yyyy1010yyyy A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A yyyn1011yyyn 1100ynyy1100ynyy 1101ynyn1101ynyn 1110ynyn1110ynyn 1111ynyn1111ynyn

# 2--continued (a) No Dependencies (b) 1 & 2 are M.E. (c) 4 contingent on 3 (e) 2, 3, & 4 are M.E.

# 4 P A A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7    2 3 = 8 Alternatives  ok  R2  ok  Budget  ok  (B), (R2)  (B), (R1) R1 1 & 2 are M.E. R2 3 is contingent on 2 B = $10,000 P2P3P1

# 4--c Cash Flow: YR0 YR1-5 YR A0 A2 A4

# 6--a $400  $102 = $40,800/yr. =A 0 or P = -100,000 A = 5,500 + $400  $31 = $17,900 = A 1 F = 25,000 Incremental Benefit=40,800-17,900 =$22,900 F = 25,000 22,900 = A -100,000 = P 100,000 = 22,900 ( ) + 25,000 ( ) n = 10, i = ? 100,000 = 100,000  (4.1925)(.1615) P/A, i, 10P/F, i, 10 IRR- 20%:

# 6--b V = 250: A 0 = 250  102 = 25,500 A 1 = 250  31 = 13,250 12,250Increment: 100,000 = 12,250 ( ) + 25,000 ( ) P/A, i, 10P/F, i, 10 6%: 104,120 = 7%: 98,749 = (7.3601) (7.0236) (.5584) (.5084) 104, ,000 i = 6% + 104, , ,120-98,749 =6.76% = IRR

# 10 i = 8%, n = 10 Option B: P = 2500 A = 2860(= 5200 .55) Option A: P = 3000 A = 3120(= 5200 .6) Opt. (A-B): P = 500 A = 260 a) ( ) = $1245 = PW b) (.1490 ) = $185 = AE Inc Inv of option A is desirable P/A, 8%, 10 A/P, 8%, 10

# 20--a Inc Inv A-  : -1M + 407,180 (6.8109) = $1.7 m B-A: -120K + 37,614 ( ) = 136,185 C-B: -140K + 37,583 ( ) = 115,974 D-C: -160K + 36,042 ( ) = 85,478 E-D: -200K + 29,352 ( ) = -86 F-D: -480K + 44,057 ( ) = -179,932 Reject E  Reject F  Dischosen (Last Inc PW > 0)

# 20--b A: -1M + 406,180 ( ) = 1.7M B: -1.12M + 444,794 ( ) = 1.9M C: -1.26M + 482,377 ( ) = 2.025M D: -1.42M + 518,419 ( ) = 2.111M E: -1.62M + 547,771 ( ) = M F: -1.9M + 562,476 ( ) = 1.931M Dischosen (Largest Total PW)

# 20--c Total ROR A = 40.46% ROR B = 39.44% ROR C = 38%if accept all ROR>MARR, do all ROR D = 36% ROR E = 33% ROR F = 29% if MAX ROR, choose A NEITHER is correct

# 25 1) Consider: E1, E2, E3 (in this order) 2) ALL have total ROR>12% (none can be excluded) 3) E2-E1  25%, accept E2 4) E3-E2  10%, reject E3 <MARR = 12% Accept E2, (Here all methods lead to E2!)

# 33 Devise M.E. Alternatives: 2 4 = 16 Alts But, due to A1  A2; B1  B2: (2+1)(2+1)=9 A1A2B1B2 A  Not do nothing  TC = $10K  TC = $8K  Not B1+B2  TC = $12K  TC = 22K>20K  TC = $20K  Not B1+B2  TC = 9K  TC = 19K  TC = 17K  Not B1+B2  Not A1+A2  Not “ “ “

# 33--continued Budget = $20,000 (Not Alt 5) 7 Left: Sort by increasing Inc Inv: 2, 8, 1, 4, 10, 9, 6 B1 in A1 in (40%) B2 in (30%) Rej A2 (8%) Rej (A1+B1) (9%) (A1+B2) in (17%) Rej (A2+B1) MARR = 15%: Cur best: Choose A1 + B2 B1 A1 B2 (A1+B2) Alt’s:

# 36 for n= 40, Can solve for each project life individually! (or for salvage = 0) Basically; implied salvage = 0 when salvage = 0, or when study period = even multiple of live of projects (least common multiple) 40 years of lcm of 5+8, and SV = 0 AEC A = ,000 (.2943 ) A/P, 15%, 5 AEC A = $12,475 AEC B = ,000 (.2229 ) A/P, 15%, 8 AEC B = $12,072

# 36--continued Choose B at 15% MARR a) b) For what i* are A+B Equivalent? (also the incremental ROR of B over A) ,000 ( ) = ,000 ( ) Try:20% A/P, i, 5A/P, i,  13,016 = 13,015 i* = 20% ROR B-A = 20%

Using n*= 6; AEC AEC C1 (20%) = 76, ,000 (.3007 ) (A/P, 20%, 6) Using n* = 9; FW for n = 6, (C1, C3, X1) FW(C1) = [-200,000 ( ) + 76,000 ( )] F/P, 20%, 6F/A, 20%, 6  F/P, 20%, 3 # 41 For n = 9

#41--continued ( ) a) Opt   AEC(C1) = $15,860 (C2) = 15,494 (C3) = 15,804 (X1) = 19,930 (X2) = 17,823 b) FW(C1) = 272,140 (C2) = 322,320 (C3) = 271,158 (X1) = 341,970 (X2) = 370,740 *for n=9, (C2,X2) FW (C2) = -260,000 ( ) + 80K ( ) F/P, 20%F/A, 20%   

# 41--continued !  for n* = 6, choose (C1,X1); for n* = 9, (C2,X2) Why? All Inv return >20%, but for n* = 9, assume C1, C3, X1 get “only” 20% for last 3 years. c) (a) (C1,X1) meets B (Same Sol’n) AE = $35,790 (b) (C2,X1) meets B FW = $664,290