Design of Transfer Line-2 (TL-2) for CLIC Test Facility – 3 (CTF-3) Amalendu Sharma, A.Rahim, A.D.Ghodke and Gurnam Singh IOAPDD Raja Ramanna Centre for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Lecture 7 Lattice design with MAD-X Dr. Suzie ASTeC Intense Beams Group STFC Rutherford Appleton Lab.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
CTF3 Coll meeting 22 Jan 08 Purushottam Shrivastava 1 Summary Status of Indian Contributions to CTF 3 Project * *Presented by Purushottam Shrivastava On.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Lecture 8 Lattice design with MAD-X Dr. Suzie Sheehy ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Lab.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
CLIC 09 Workshop - C. Biscari C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, F. Stulle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
Optics considerations for PS2
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
CLEX Building Layout, Conventional Facilities, TL2, TL2’,
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Steering algorithm experience at CTF3
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
CLEX* Status and Plans CTF3 complex CLEX
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Progress of SPPC lattice design
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Design of Transfer Line-2 (TL-2) for CLIC Test Facility – 3 (CTF-3) Amalendu Sharma, A.Rahim, A.D.Ghodke and Gurnam Singh IOAPDD Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology Indore – India CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN.

Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Indian participation CTF-3 and Indian participation

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Progress so far First communication for design requirementJuly 15, 2005 Design information received from CERNJuly 22, 2005 Clarification of building geometry and parametersSeptember 22, 2005 First design draft (version-1) communicatedOctober 07, 2005 Comments on first design receivedNovember 10, 2005 Revised design (version-2) communicatedMarch 17, 2006 Comments on revised design receivedApril 17, 2006 Meeting with CERN team in RRCATJune 13-14, 2006 Final specifications receivedJuly 14, 2006 Design draft (version-3) communicatedSeptember 21, 2006 Feedback on implementation of line in buildingNovember 28, 2006 Revised design (version-4) communicatedDecember 20, 2006

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Main requirements of design R 56 from -0.35m to +0.35m. T 566 = 0 in entire range of tuning.  = 4-5m and  = 0 at exit in both planes. Emittance dilution < 10%. 4m dispersion free region for the tail clippers (collimators). Available magnets to be used. Line implementation in the existing building.

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Output Nominal energy150 MeV Maximum energy300 MeV  x,  y (m) 8.1,  x,  y 0.12, , 0.0  0.0 ’’ dp/p (%)1%  z (rms) 8.3 ps1.3 ps Height above ground1.35 m0.85 m Beam parameters

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Magnets available Dipole – Type-1 Dipole – Type-2 Stnd. Quadrup ole Slim Quadrup ole TSL Quadrup ole Sextupole Mech. length (m) Mech. width (m) Effective length (m) Aperture (mm) 100  Strength1.3 T 5.4 T/m8 T/m10.6 T/m44 T/m 2 Number

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Geometrical constraints Length of final matching doublet 6.37m  17  4m M 1.21m 3.2m Minimum distance from the edge of element to wall > 50mm

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Design approach Module-1 From extraction point of CR to first bend magnet. An achromat Module-2 Straight section for collimator. vertical achromat, matching section for Module-3 Module-3 Tunable R 56 achromatic arc, Final matching doublet Beam direction. The design studies are carried out using MAD-8 program.

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Design details: Module-1 Module-1 is an achromat with opposite bends from extraction septa of CR to first bend.  Very low flexibility in achromat. Quadrupoles close to its highest strength. High  at exit of module-1 => Rapid rise in . A Beam direction

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Design details: Module-2 Beam direction Vertical Achromat Space for tail clipper

Design details: Module-3 Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. The linear matrix element for controlling the bunch length Change in Path Length Momentum deviation =  p/p Second order relation between path length and momentum deviation

Design details: Module-3 Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Bunch length manipulation (linear) Where chirp Energy-time correlation with RF-field

Design details: Module-3 Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Bunch length manipulation (including second order terms)

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Layout of Module-3 Mirror plane of R 56 arc Beam Direction

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Approach Find out dispersion and its derivative for required R 56 and to form an achromat. Find a solution, such that 1. High sextupoles to control T Decoupled  sextupole locations. 3. I – transformer between sextupoles. Required Twiss parameters at Matching point

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Twiss parameters and Dispersion R 56 = (MAD sign convention)

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Twiss parameters and Dispersion Continued… R 56 = 0.00

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Twiss parameters and Dispersion Continued… R 56 = +0.35

Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Vertical dispersion

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. T 566 correction and phase space distortion T 566 Correction with sextupolesPhase space distortion X-PlaneY-Plane R 56 = -0.35m R 56 = 0.00

Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Available Magnets and Power Supplies Needed Dipole magnets Module-1Module-2Module-3 Magnets1 [type-2] 2 [sector type for vertical bend] 4 [2 of type-1 and 2 of type-2] Power supplies112 Quadrupole magnets Module-1Module-2Module-3 Magnets3 [2 slim and 1 TSL] 11 [8 standard and 3 TSL] 12 [TSL-type] Power supplies3107

Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Sextupole magnets Module-1Module-2Module-3 Magnets Power supplies Available Magnets and Power Supplies Needed…

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. A Better Alternative R 56 = For lowering  -functions in module-2, one more quadrupole is added in the module-1. Preliminary results are… R 56 = 0.00

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. R 56 = -0.35

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. Complete layout of line with building

Summary Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India. CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Optics design in linear zone done for the R 56 from m to +0.35m. T 566 correction studies in progress and preliminary results of R 56 = 0.00 and obtained.  -functions higher in module-2 beginning and can be lowered with one more quadrupole in Module-1. Acknowledgements We are thankful to Dr. Hans Braun, Dr. Frank Tecker for the valuable review and feedback during this work.

CTF-3 collaboration meeting, January 2007, CERN. Design of TL-2 for CTF-3, RRCAT, India.