Network Assigned Upstream Label draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label- 00 1 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00 Vishnu Pavan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
Advertisements

Optical networks: Basics of WDM
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
Inter-Domain Path Computation in MPLS Authors: Faisal Aslam, Zartash Afzal Uzmi, Adrian Farrel, and Michal Pioro Zartash Afzal Uzmi Department of Computer.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks IETF 69, MPLS WG,
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Loa Andersson Mach Chen Shaleen Saxena IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks George SwallowCisco.
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 2 Module 8 TCP/IP Suite Error and Control Messages.
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
WG Document Status 192nd IETF TEAS Working Group.
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-signaling-02.txt Greg BernsteinGrotto Networking Young LeeHuawei.
IETF-69th Chicago1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-00 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki Harai,
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
Page 1 RSVP-TE based evidence signaling protocol Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco Systems) Marco Anisetti, Valerio Bellandi, Ernesto Damiani, Francesco.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-lmp-discovery-02.txt LMP extensions for G.709 Optical Transport Networks Fatai Zhang.
WSON Summary Young Lee Document Relationships Information Gen-constraints Encode WSON Encode Signal Compatibility OSPF Gen-constraints.
draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo
IETF-70th Vancouver1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-01 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki.
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
1 Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-01 Andrew G. Malis Ronald A. Skoog Haim Kobrinski George Clapp John E. Drake.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Presented by Sundar P Subramani UMBC.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Upstream mapping in Echo Request draft-ankur-mpls-upstream-mapping-00 Ankur.
Mutually Exclusive Link Group (MELG) draft-beeram-ccamp-melg-01.txt Vishnu Pavan Beeram (Ed), John Drake, Gert Grammel [Juniper Networks] Igor Bryskin.
Mutually Exclusive Link Group (MELG) draft-beeram-ccamp-melg-00.txt Vishnu Pavan Beeram (Ed), John Drake, Gert Grammel [Juniper Networks] Igor Bryskin.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-00 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTT Communication) IETF 83, Paris, France.
PC-S(P)C Requirements and Solution Status CCAMP WG, IETF 71 th Philadelphia Diego Caviglia, Dino Bramanti, Dan Li.
Analysis on Two Methods in Ingress Local Protection.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
Booting up on the Home Link
Shared Resource Link Group [SRcLG] draft-beeram-ccamp-srclg-00
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
21-2 ICMP(Internet control message protocol)
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
PCEP Extensions For Transporting Traffic Engineering (TE) Data
Applicability of GMPLS and PCE to Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-01
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
IETF 96 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh Kireeti Kompella (presenting)
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF
RFC 3036 FECs RFC 3036 defines FECs used to bind labels to address prefixes in routing table Two FECs defined: Address Prefix FEC Host Address FEC Not.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
Iftekhar Hussain (Presenter),
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in ISIS
WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
IETF 98 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
YANG Data Models MPLS Base and Static LSPs draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-04 draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-04 Tarek.
Network Assigned Upstream-label
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-19 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-10 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-05 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-01.
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

Network Assigned Upstream Label draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00 Vishnu Pavan Beeram (Ed), John Drake, Gert Grammel (Juniper Networks) Igor Bryskin (Ed), Pawel Brzozowski (ADVA Optical Networking) Daniele Ceccarelli (Ericsson)

Motivation Requirement: Need a mechanism to let the network assign an upstream-label for a given LSP. A given node may not have sufficient information to assign the correct upstream-label on its own. Picking an incorrect upstream-label may be highly undesirable (use-case discussed later) in certain cases. If labels are assumed to be symmetric (as is the case with most practical scenarios), the above requirement gets addressed easily using existing extensions. But “Label Symmetricity” cannot be assumed by default; Need a mechanism to explicitly request “Label Symmetricity”. 2 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00

Label Symmetricity Downstream Upstream Path LSP Req Attr (Label Symmetricity) Label-Set (L) Resv Label (Assigned – L) Path LSP Req Attr (Label Symmetricity) Upstream Label (Assigned - L) Applicable in a label-symmetric Scenario New Flag [Label-Symmetricity-Required] defined in the Attributes Flags TLV (Position TBA). Ingress sets the above flag in the Attributes Flags TLV of the LSP_REQUIRED_ATTRIBUTES object. Label returned in the LABEL object of the RESV is deemed symmetric and is used for both directions. 3 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00

Unassigned Upstream Label Downstream Upstream Path Upstream Label (Unassigned) Resv Upstream Label (Assigned – L1) Label (Assigned – L2) Path Upstream Label (Assigned – L1) Applicable in a non label-symmetric scenario Special Label Value - “0xFFFFFFFF” - defined to indicate an Unassigned Label Used by a given node when it has no input on what upstream-label needs to get picked; the special value is filled in the UPSTREAM_LABEL object of the PATH that is sent downstream Network responds by filling in a valid label in the UPSTREAM_LABEL object of the corresponding RESV. 4 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00

Upstream Label Set Downstream Upstream Path Upstream Label Set (L1, L2 … Ln) Resv Upstream Label (Assigned – L2) Label (Assigned – Lx) Path Upstream Label (Assigned – L2) Applicable in a non label-symmetric scenario UPSTREAM_LABEL_SET is the upstream equivalent of the LABEL_SET Used by a given node when there is a desire to give the network some choices. Network responds by picking a valid label from the given list and signals it back in the UPSTREAM_LABEL object of the corresponding RESV. 5 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00

Use-Case : Alien Wavelength Setup Optical signal originating on Router R1 tuned to a particular wavelength; It gets multiplexed on WDM- Node W1 with optical signals at other wavelengths via an optical filter. It may not be acceptable to have the router send signal into the optical network unless it is at the correct wavelength. Having the router send signal with wrong wavelength may adversely impact existing optical trails. If the clients do not have full visibility into the optical network, they are not in a position to pick the correct wavelength up-front. 7 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00 R1 R2 W1 W2

Alien Wavelength Setup – Signaling Sequence Path Admin Status (Admin down, Reflect) Upstream Label (Unassigned) Path Admin Status (Admin down, Reflect) Resv Admin Status (Admin down) Resv Admin Status (Admin down) Upstream Label (Assigned) Path Admin Status (Reflect) Upstream Label (Assigned) Path Admin Status (Reflect) Resv Admin Status Resv Admin Status Upstream Label (Assigned) 8 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00 R1 W1 W2 R2

Next Steps Initiate discussion. Get consensus on solutions for both “label symmetric” and “label non-symmetric” scenarios. 9 draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00