Overview of the Project Cycle Phases What’s new. “Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Regional Adviser on Human Rights and the Law, UNDP Regional Center WCA
“Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1). Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects.
High level expert meeting to develop the Near East Regional Action Plan to Implement the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Nutrition STRATEGIC Area 4 Information/Knowledge Management (includes monitoring & assessment) GLOBAL NUTRITION CLUSTER VISION:
Session V: Programme Roles and Responsibilities
Session 1: Context. Group exercise UN common programming principles.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
ETCF is funded by the European Union Project is implemented by Eurochambres & TOBB CONCEPT NOTE ETCF Information Days April 3rd 2008 Ankara.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
“Act” Delivering through projects. Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects What is important for effective delivery of FAO’s projects?
“UNDG Toolkit” - Improved Functioning of the UN Development System at country level - – An overview of the “UNDG Toolkit” - UNDG Meeting, 30 January 2009.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategically Mobilizing Resources. Day 2: Session 4 Overview.
Day 3: Session 2. Strategically Mobilizing Resources.
Mariangela Bagnardi, OSD
Project Cycle Management presentation
SESSION1. INTRODUCTION. Session 1 “Objectives of the ECP workshop” Richard Moon.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Accelerating Change Management Response and Key Actions.
Presentation 1 – Overview Mr Han. Programming Resource Mobilization Delivery/Impact RM – an essential component RM is KEY to delivering on the CPF.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Mozambique The United Nations At Work THE UN REFORM In Mozambique DaO Evaluability Study, Report and Recommendations May 2009.
CPF – QA and R&R. CPF Cycle UNDAF Road Map UNDAF Country Analysis UNDAF Strategic prioritization UNDAF M&E UNDAF results matrix CPF CYCLECPF CYCLE.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Strategically Mobilizing Resources. What is Resource Mobilization?
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Evolution to date: where the clusters have come from, where have we reached and where should we be heading? GNC Annual Meeting 13 th -15 th October, Nairobi,
Session 1: ACT – Project cycle
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
CPF and RM - Getting support. An overview Quality assurance and support mechanism Available guidelines and tools Communication tools and database.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
FAO Turkey Partnership Programme (FTPP) FAO Final Evaluation of the FTPP Summary for FTPP Programming Meeting, 14 December
“Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1). Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects Delivery.
Harnessing the data revolution for sustainable development in the global statistical system Meeting of Directors of National Statistics Offices on the.
ORIENTATION WORKSHOP. Session 1 “CP Rationale and ECP course”
1 ISWGNA and AEG: Mandate and governance 7 th meeting of the Advisory Expert Group on national accounts Apr 2012, New York.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Implementation of FAO Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines in the new FAO project cycle Alemneh Dejene Climate Impact, Adaptation and Environmental.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions How the ILO works at a national level.
National Quality Standards Framework
Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
National Quality Standards Framework
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Software Configuration Management
WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) 16-RA VI Side Event Helsinki, Finland, 11 September 2013 Dr Miroslav Ondráš, Dr Wenjian Zhang (WMO) Dr.
Guidance notes for Project Manager
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Project Cycle Phases What’s new

“Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1)

What is important for effective delivery of FAO’s projects? Effective Country Programme = Effective Project Delivery

Purpose of the New Project Cycle (PC): Effective Project Delivery New Project Cycle aims to: Improve strategic alignment of projects and their contribution to country results Improve accountability Support decentralization Support Results Based Management of projects Mainstreaming quality standards throughout the project cycle including the application of the UN common programming principles

Overview of the new PC Upgrade of PC management based on best practices Applies to all projects, including emergency and UNJP Supersedes previous Field Programme Circulars and TC procedures concerning the Project Cycle PC composed of guidelines, practical guidance, FPMIS web-based tools & workflows and user manual Support available: TCDM advice, training sessions, FPMIS help desk

FAO Project Cycle - Steps Identification Formulation Appraisal and Approval Implementation and Monitoring Evaluation Closure Project document Terminal reportConcept Note Progress reports

Five Steps: 1.Identification of a project  to address specific problem/need of members and/or exploit opportunities to advance agenda of FAO  to support the achievement of agreed CPF outcomes 2.Establishment of a Project Task force 3.Preparation of a Concept Note (CN) 4.Appraisal and endorsement of the CN 5.Formalization of relation with Resource Partners Identification Phase: the Steps

Project Task Force and use of the Concept Note

More holistic and reinforced Project Task Force (PTF) Roles and responsibilities of the PTF members clarified The PTF operational at the identification stage PTF under the authority of a Chair according to the new rules on responsibilities and relationships The PTF evolves at subsequent stages into a fully-fledged structure with appropriate skill mix Composition of the PTF Type of ProjectChairperson Members NationalFAO Representative Project formulator, LTO, Funding Liaison Officer, other relevant technical officers. SubregionalSubregional Representative/Coordinator RegionalRegional Representative Interregional/GlobalHead of technical division Identification: establishment of the Project Task Force (PTF) - 1

The designation of Lead Technical Officer (LTO) and Lead Technical Unit (LTU) Follows FAO Circular on Responsibilities and Relationships The LTO is identified by the PTF chair as far as possible based on geographic proximity (from the nearest decentralized offices) - LTU always consulted Application of the subsidiarity principle Functional relationship is always maintained between LTO and technical divisions Identification: establishment of the Project Task Force (PTF) - 2

Identification Step - Concept Note The Concept Note is necessary for all types of projects (*) Ensures strategic fit between a project idea and CPF or strategic framework Identifies preliminary stakeholders and structures problem analysis in terms of relevance, feasibility and potential sustainability including application of the UN core programming principles Should be downloaded/completed/uploaded in FPMIS (*) with the exception of TCP, flash appeals and some Global Funds (e.g. GEF) Identification: the Concept Note

Concept Note Work Flow __ Applies to regional, sub-regional and national projects Steps __ Applies to global and interregional projects Responsible officer __ Applies both Endorsement of the CN MDT officers and other representatives of technical divisions not represented in the MDT for all substantive issues which are relevant for the project; NR officer validates the environmental category (EIA) Technical divisions’ officers as well as DOs officers relevant for the project ; NR validates the environmental category (EIA) Project formulator PTF chairperson: RR/SRC/FAOR or a delegated officer Head of the technical division/service or delegated officer Funding Liaison Officer Project formulator Peer Review of the CN (FPMIS Checklist) The CN is finalized + uploaded into FPMIS Review of resource mobilization opportunities Preparation of the CN (FPMIS Template)

Group exercise Use CPF Turkey Identify a project which will contribute to one of the 3 CPF outcomes Propose a project title, an outcome statement and some expected outputs for the project (summary CN) Include a preliminary assessment of the Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines (refer page 5)