Morgan Stanley becomes Morgan Stainly Ruining the image of Morgan Stanley through unnecessary sanctions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
Advertisements

The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit.
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
Coleman (Parent) Holdings v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc. Florida Circuit Court – March 1, 2005 Cite as: 2005 WL (Fla.Cir.Ct.)
4 th November 2013 EFFECTIVE PROSECUTIONS. Interviews and PACE – Code E Code E 4.5 CAUTION THE SUSPECT REMIND THEM OF THEIR ENTITLEMENT TO [FREE] LEGAL.
What is so special about ediscovery? By Jennifer Tomlin Sanchez.
MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY ABA Center for Professional Responsibility 40th Annual National Conference on Professional Responsibility May 30, 2014 Robert G.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Ronald J. Shaffer, Esq. Beth L. Weisser, Esq. Lorraine K. Koc, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel, Deb Shops, Inc. © 2010 Fox Rothschild DELVACCA.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
Establishing a Defensible and Efficient Legal Hold Policy September 2013 Connie Hall, J.D., Manager, New Product Development, Thomson Reuters.
E-Discovery in Government Investigations and Criminal Law JOLT Symposium February 22,
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
L.A. 310 – DISCOVERY PART II. Depositions C.C.P section 2025 Defined: Oral testimony taken (usually prior to trial) which is: –Under oath –Before a certified.
5 Vital Components of Every Custodian Interview David Meadows, PMP, Managing Director – Discovery Consulting, Kroll Ontrack Dave Canfield, EJD, Managing.
E-Discovery LIMITS ON E-DISCOVERY. No New Preservation Rule When does duty to preserve attach? Reasonably anticipated litigation. Audio sanctions.
A [Drunk] Wolfe at the Door (handling covered combined with uncovered claims) Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP Peter J. Speaker, Esquire Joshua J. Bovender,
With Special Celebrity Guest Host: Pharrell’s Hat.
Is Records Management Still Relevant? Sean Regan E-Discovery Product Marketing Manager Symantec Enterprise Vault.
Defensible Client File Collections 6 Common Roadblocks and Obstacles.
E -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping s From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell.
1 Structuring your Information Management to Ensure Litigation Readiness Julian Ackert, Principal Washington DC John Forsyth, HBOS Edinburgh Andrew Haslam,
Educause 2009 Data Administration Constituent Group November 5th, /5/20091Educause DASIG Constituent Group.
Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds” Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006.
©2011 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley E-DISCOVERY Hélène Kazanjian Anne Sterman Trial Division.
Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc. 239 F.R.D. 81 District of New Jersey
Perspectives on Discovery from an Attorney / Records Manager 3/15/2007 ©The Cadence Group, Inc Confidential & Proprietary Information is our Forté.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc. v. Local 100, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union 212 F.R.D. 178 S.D.N.Y
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
Digital Forensics & eDiscovery Overview prepared for Charlotte ARMA Chapter September 20, 2007 Copyright © 2007 Document Technologies, Inc.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint John Isaza, Esq., FAI Partner Legal Developments & Rules Affecting SharePoint.
Defensible Records Retention and Preservation Linda Starek-McKinley Director, Records and Information Management Edward Jones
Digital Government Summit
Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh.
L ITIGATION UNDER THE P UBLIC I NFORMATION A CT Kimberly Fuchs, Chief, PIA Litigation Section Rosalind Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, PIA Litigation.
Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. Not Reported in So.2d, 2005 WL (Fla.Cir.Ct.) Ediscovery, Fall 2010 Francis Eiden.
Emerging Case Law and Recent eDiscovery Decisions.
Zubulake IV [Trigger Date]
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
RULES. After five years of discussion and public comment the proposed amendments took effect on December 1, 2006…specifically changing language in six.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc 2007 WL (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007)
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
Morgan Stanley Team 2. Background Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 2005 LEXIS 94 (Fla. Cir. Ct. March 23, 2005.) The jury returned.
Particularities of Enforcement ALASTAIR WILSON QC.
Information Technology & The Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Sonya Naar - DLA Piper US LLP Doug Herman - UHY Advisors FLVS, Inc.
THE CASE OF THE MISSING SHOES
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Effective Formal and Informal Discovery
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING
Discovery Discovered.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Chapter 6-3 Lesson Objectives
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Civil Pretrial Practice
Electronic Discovery Sabrina Jones 4/14/2011.
Presentation by Seung Woo Ben Hur September 2019
Presentation transcript:

Morgan Stanley becomes Morgan Stainly Ruining the image of Morgan Stanley through unnecessary sanctions

Adverse inference instruction for “thwarting” discovery leads to $1.45 billion jury award In Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 2005 WL (Fla. Cir. Ct. Mar. 1, 2005), a Florida court issued an adverse inference instruction against Morgan Stanley for overwriting s, failing to timely process hundreds of backup tapes, and failing to produce relevant s with their attachments. Relying on that instruction, a jury awarded a total of $1.45 billion in damages against Morgan Stanley. In Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 2005 WL (Fla. Cir. Ct. Mar. 1, 2005), a Florida court issued an adverse inference instruction against Morgan Stanley for overwriting s, failing to timely process hundreds of backup tapes, and failing to produce relevant s with their attachments. Relying on that instruction, a jury awarded a total of $1.45 billion in damages against Morgan Stanley.

Excessive amounts of unnecessary data No other investment banking company is asked to perform such a great task No other investment banking company is asked to perform such a great task To produce all documents would be an impossible task To produce all documents would be an impossible task Produced documents the company felt was relevant Produced documents the company felt was relevant It is possible to miss data and make mistakes, regardless of how thorough a search is It is possible to miss data and make mistakes, regardless of how thorough a search is

Software Errors Software errors caused the searches of e- mails to be hyper case-sensitive, resulting in a failure to capture all s. Software errors caused the searches of e- mails to be hyper case-sensitive, resulting in a failure to capture all s. A script error prevented the insertion of some s into the archive. A script error prevented the insertion of some s into the archive.

Who Conducts Retrieval? Requesting party usually prohibited direct access Requesting party usually prohibited direct access Confidentiality & privilege barriers to examination of irrelevant matters Confidentiality & privilege barriers to examination of irrelevant matters Requesting party representative sometimes present & may help design search method Requesting party representative sometimes present & may help design search method Increasingly, Neutral Third Party service provider used if production is complex or extensive Increasingly, Neutral Third Party service provider used if production is complex or extensive (Bagby class slides Unit 8)

Third Party Help Court should have ordered a third party come in and assist with the discovery requests because of the enormous amount of data being searched. Court should have ordered a third party come in and assist with the discovery requests because of the enormous amount of data being searched.

From WestLaw Morgan Stanley continued throughout the trial to state how the searches could only be conducted at an enormous cost and would be fruitless because there were not backup tapes with from 1997 to Morgan Stanley continued throughout the trial to state how the searches could only be conducted at an enormous cost and would be fruitless because there were not backup tapes with from 1997 to 1998.

Dilbert and EDD Destruction