Marianna Testa University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN for the KLOE collaboration “XLIst Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories”,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
20 May 2006E. Blucher Kaons and the CKM Matrix Ed Blucher University of Chicago Kaons and the Unitarity Triangle V us and related measurements Conclusions.
Advertisements

KLOE GM Capri May 2003 K charged status report DE/Dx development vs PiD (next talk by E.De Lucia) →K e3 studies: initial design of efficiency measurement.
Update on a 0 (980) P.Gauzzi. 2 Main problem From event counting: Br(  0  ) = (6.70  0.26)  with  Br(  0  ) = (7.22  0.52)  10.
Phi Radiative decays at KLOE Camilla Di Donato* for the KLOE Collaboration *Sezione I.N.F.N. Napoli.
Salvatore Fiore University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN Roma1 for the KLOE collaboration LNF Spring School “Bruno Touscheck”, Frascati, May 2006 CP/CPT.
Recent results of the KLOE-2 Experiment Paweł Moskal Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland On behalf and for the KLOE and KLOE-2 Collaborations - Xth.
Claudio Gatti (KLOE Collaboration) LNF INFN K decay measurements with the KLOE detector XXII Rencontres de Physique de La Vallée d’Aoste Feb
1 Outline: Published papers Neutral kaons Charged kaons  decays Hadronic cross section Conclusions Outline: Published papers Neutral kaons Charged kaons.
Measurement of the absolute BR(K  +  -  + ) : an update Patrizia de Simone KLOE Kaon meeting – 21 May 2009.
The CP-violation experiments NA48 at CERN Manfred Jeitler Institute of High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of Sciences RECFA meeting Innsbruck,
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
BR = ( (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.
XLIId RENCONTRES DE MORIOND ELECTROWEAK INTERACTIONS AND UNIFIED THEORIES CLEO-c Results Basit Athar March , 2007 University of Florida CLEO Collaboration.
1 La Fisica dei K a DA  NE-2 F. Bossi CSN1, Frascati Ottobre 2005.
Phi meson physics Marianna Testa University of Roma La Sapienza & INFN for the KLOE collaboration “e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi”, Novosibirsk 27.
M. Primavera 2 nd KLOE Physics Workshop, 10 th -12 th june 2002 Otranto (LE) 1 Perspectives on charged K physics in KLOE 2 nd KLOE Physics Workshop, 10.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
DPG - Dortmund Dominant K L Branching Ratios, K L Lifetime and V us at KLOE  Introduction - CKM and V us - DA  NE and KLOE  K L physics.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
Latest results on kaon physics A.Antonelli LNF-INFN - Conversano June 2005 Latest results on kaon physics V us K S rare and “semi” rare decays.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
July 19th, 2003EPS HEP Aachen R. Fantechi Tests of Chiral Perturbation Theory in K S rare decays at NA48 Riccardo Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa.
V.Patera CERN seminar 28 March  [nb]  s [MeV] Recent results of KLOE at DA  NE V.Patera Rome I University & Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati.
Hadronic results from KLOE E. Santovetti (INFN – Roma II) for the KLOE Collaboration European Physical Society International Europhysics Conference on.
August 11, 2003LP2003, Augusto Ceccucci1 Rare Kaon Decay Physics Lepton Photon Symposium Augusto Ceccucci*/CERN Fermilab, August 11, 2003 *Member of the.
FPCP 2003, Paris June 5 th, 2003M. Sozzi - Kaon physics Kaon Physics: Experimental Status and Perspectives Marco S. Sozzi CERN and Scuola Normale Superiore,
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Recent Results on  (3770) Physics at BES Ming-gang Zhao (For BES Collaboration) The 44 th Rencontres de Moriond, QCD and High Energy Interactions March.
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
Experimental setup Data taking Vus CPT a  had f 0 KLOE - May 20, The KLOE experiment at the Frascati  -factory.
Recent results from KLOE Cesare Bini Universita’ “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma 1.The KLOE physics program 2.The KLOE detector 3.Status of the experiment.
|Vus| and K S decays from KLOE Gaia Lanfranchi, LNF/ INFN On behalf the KLOE Collaboration XL Rencontres de Moriond 5-12 March, 2005.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
European Physical Society International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics EPS July 17th-23rd 2003 Aachen, Germany Camilla Di Donato INFN Napoli.
Status report on analysis of BR(K S  p + p - p 0 ) A. Antonelli, M. Moulson, Second KLOE Physics Workshop, Otranto, June 2002.
ChPT tests at NA62 Mauro Raggi, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf of the NA62 collaboration X Th quark confinement and hadron spectrum Tum campus,
EXPERIMENTS INR/IHEP Protvino-Moscow, Russia Viacheslav Duk INR RAS BEACH 2006 Highlights on Rare Charged Kaon Decays ISTRA+ & KEK.
KLOE results on light mesons properties Cesare Bini Sapienza Universita’ and INFN Roma on behalf of the KLOE collaboration ICHEP08, Philadelphia 30/07/2008.
Recent KLOE results on rare K S K L processes M. Martini INFN, laboratori di Frascati on behalf of the KLOE collaboration Manchester, 19/07/2007.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Roberto Versaci e + e - collisions from  to  – Novosibirsk /26 1 Charged kaons at KLOE Roberto Versaci on behalf of the KLOE collaboration.
Roberto Versaci Heavy Quarks and Leptons '06 – München / 26 1 New results from KLOE Roberto Versaci on behalf of the KLOE collaboration.
Status of K± p±p0 E. De Lucia.
A. Scordo on behalf of the AMADEUS collaboration
The η Rare Decays in Hall D
the charged kaon lifetime
Physics at a high luminosity -factory
Semileptonic and Leptonic D0, D+, and Ds+ Decays at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO Collaboration XLIVth Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
M. Palutan, T. Spadaro, P. Valente Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati
Analysis of KSe decays
New Results from NA48/1 KS  p0e+e- KS  p0m+m- Richard Batley
KLOE General Meeting - LNF March,
Scalar mesons and d0-d2 at KLOE
 Results from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
The Impact of BaBar ISR data on the SM Muon Anomaly Prediction
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
A direct search for Ks  3  0 decay at KLOE
Experimental Measurement
Protvino-Moscow, Russia
University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Physics with KLOE at DAFNE phase 2
The Measurement of sin2β(eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays with BABAR
Recent Results of J/ and (2S) at BESII
Recent BESII Hot Topics
Presentation transcript:

Marianna Testa University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN for the KLOE collaboration “XLIst Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories”, La Thuile March 2006 CP/CPT tests at KLOE

2 13 e + e     b W = m  = MeV BR(  K 0 K 0 ) ~ 34% ~10 6 neutral kaon pairs per pb -1 produced in an antisymmetric quantum state with J PC = 1  Neutral kaons at a  -factory p K = 110 MeV/c S = 6 mm L = 3.5 m The detection of a kaon at large (small) times tags a K S (K L )  possibility to select a pure K S beam (unique at a  -factory, not possible at fixed target experiments) K L,S K S,L t1t1 t2t2  t=t 1 - t 2 f2f2 f1f1 

3 Kaon interferometry:   K S K L         no simultaneous decays (  t=0) in the same final state due to the destructive quantum interference I(  t) (a.u)  m  from here      t2t2 t1t1  t=t 1 -t 2

4 KLOE preliminary 380 pb -1 ’01+’02 data Fit with PDG values for  S,  L :  m = (5.34  0.34) × 10 9 hs -1 PDG `04: (5.301  0.016) × 10 9 (h/2  )s -1 Fix  m to PDG `04 value, obtain : K S(L)      at t 1  K L(S)      at t 2  S,L =   0,0 =(0.24  0.010) × Cf. Bertlmann `99(CPLEAR)  0,0 = 0.4  0.7  S,L = No simultaneous decays K L regeneration on the beam pipe K S K L interference: QM test K L,S K S,L t1t1 t2t2  t=t 1 - t 2 f2f2 f1f1   Data: 7366 evts Fit:  2 /dof = 15.1/22 ζ decoherence parameter basis dependent: K S K L, K 0 K 0 I ( Δt,  )  e −ΓL|Δt| + e −ΓS|Δt| − 2(1 − ζ S,L ) e −(ΓS + ΓL)|Δτ|/ 2 cos( ΔmΔt )      t2t2 t1t1  t=t 1 -t 2

5 BR K L      CP Violation Decay CP violating Related to  K BR mmt to 1% using K L beam tagged by K S →     328 pb -1 ’01+’02 data Selection K L vertex reconstructed in DC PID using decays kinematics Fit with MC spectra including radiative processes Normalization using K L   events in the same data set

6 Preliminary result BR(K L      )= (1.963   0.017)  in agreement with KTeV [PRD70 (2004),092006] BR=(1.975  0.012)   confirm the discrepancy (4 standard deviations) with PDG04 BR=(2.090  0.025)   PDG2004 KTeV KLOE preliminary BR(K L      )   with respect to prediction from Unitarity Triangle, using CP conserving variables  UTfit = (2.88  0.43)  Using BR(K S   ) and  L from KLOE and  S from PDG04  | = (2.216  0.013)  |  | PDG04 = (2.280  0.013)  BR K L      CP Violation (II) 1.5  with respect to prediction from Unitarity Triangle

7 Measurements of K S K L observables can be used for the CPT test from unitarity : ff (1 + i tan  SW ) [Re  i Im  ]  A*(K S  f ) A(K L  f ) SS 1   f  f      K S       00    K S            K S       kl3  S  L B(K L l3)  Re  Re y  i( Im  Im x  )   S  L B(K L l3)  (A S +A L )/4  i( Im  Im x  )     S  L     K L           S  L     K L        CPT test: the Bell-Steinberger relation

8  K S      K S       K S        K L        K L  l   K S          K L         K S          SW  = (0.759±0.001)         CPT test: inputs to the Bell-Steinberger relation  S  ± ns  L = ± 0.23ns A L   A S    K L        K L         =0.757 ±   = ± Im x + = (0.8 ± 0.7)  KLOE measurements Im x  from a combined fit of KLOE + CPLEAR data

9 We get the following results (error contours) on each term of the sum      K S       00    K S            K S       S  L B(K L l3)  A S +A L )/4  i  Im x      S  L     K L           S  L     K L        Im Re CPT test: accuracy on  i

10 Re    Im   CPLEAR: Re    Im   CPT test: KLOE result KLOE preliminary: Re  Im 