HE Trigger Frame Format

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Multi-STA Block ACK Protection
Preamble Structure in ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0127r0 July 2016 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 IEEE ax Overview Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Trigger Frame Format for az
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
MAC Calibration results
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Regarding UL MU protection
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Regarding HE fragmentation
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
UL MU Random Access Analysis
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Regarding HE fragmentation
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
Presentation transcript:

HE Trigger Frame Format July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 HE Trigger Frame Format Date: 2015-07-13 Authors: John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Introduction TGax adopted UL MU sequence as follows [1] July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Introduction TGax adopted UL MU sequence as follows [1] An UL MU PPDU (MU-MIMO or OFDMA) is sent as an immediate response (IFS TBD) to a Trigger frame (format TBD) sent by the AP. [MAC Motion #3, March 2015] Trigger frame format should be chosen under the following criteria Signaling Overhead (amount of airtime it consumes) Robust Decoding of Trigger frame (under OBSS interferences or Outdoor environment) Protection of UL MU Data reception (against AP-side hidden nodes) Protection of DL M-STA BA reception (against STA-side hidden nodes) John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Protection of UL MU Data reception July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Introduction Signaling Overhead M-STA BA Max duration DL Trigger (format TBD) xIFS UL MU Data SIFS DL M-STA BA 20/40/80/160 MHz OBSS Interferences Protection of UL MU Data reception Protection of DL M-STA BA reception (upto possible max duration) Possible HE Trigger Frame Formats NDP(Null Data Packet) format: DL MU related signaling design (SIG-A/B) is reused for UL MU signaling (Trigger) as well MAC frame format: define a new control frame type called Trigger, can be sent with any PPDU format Assumptions in this slide Additional RTS-CTS negotiations before Trigger frame may be defined in 11ax, but not considered in this slide. Legacy(11a/n/ac) STAs will treat HE PPDU as non-HT PPDU. L-SIG’s L_LENGTH/L_RATE fields is used to indicate HE PPDU length. (similar to 11ac design) HE PPDU can be decoded by STAs in outdoor environments. John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Option 1. NDP Trigger frame July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Option 1. NDP Trigger frame M-STA BA Max duration L-Preamble HE- Preamble (64FFT) (Trigger Info) XIFS L-Preamble HE- Preamble (64&256FFT) UL MU Data SIFS DL M-STA BA 40MHz Dup. L-Preamble Dup. L-Preamble OBSS Interferences AP-side hidden nodes H1 HE STA HE Preamble Duration ? (Trigger) L1 Leg STA L-SIG (Trigger) EIFS collision NAV setting H2 HE STA STA-side hidden nodes HE Preamble Duration ? (UL MU Data) L2 Leg STA L-SIG Length (UL MU Data) EIFS Trigger frame is sent as HE NDP format HE-SIG-A/B contains UL MU resource allocation information for UL STAs If TXOP duration info is contained in SIG-A/B, it can secure TXOP of further sequences from HE STAs Signaling Overhead Very low with L-Preamble & HE-SIG-A/B only Robust Decoding of Trigger Frame Robust decoding from outdoor STAs Decoding under secondary channels’ OBSS interferences depends on SIG-B design [2] Protection of UL MU Data reception If TXOP duration is in SIG-A/B, AP-side HE hidden node(H1) can set NAV AP-side Legacy hidden node(L1) may interfere to UL MU Data reception at AP Protection of DL M-STA BA reception If TXOP duration is in SIG-A/B, STA-side HE hidden node(H2) can set NAV STA-side Legacy hidden node(L2) may interfere to DL M-STA BA reception at UL STA STA Legacy AP STA L2 STA-side hidden nodes H2 HE L1 H1 Legacy HE AP-side hidden nodes John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Option 2. MAC Trigger frame (11ax PPDU) July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Option 2. MAC Trigger frame (11ax PPDU) M-STA BA Max duration L-Preamble HE- Preamble (64&256FFT) MPDU (Trigger Info) XIFS L-Preamble HE- Preamble (64&256FFT) UL MU Data SIFS DL M-STA BA 40MHz L-Preamble L-Preamble OBSS Interferences AP-side hidden nodes H1 HE STA MAC Duration (Trigger) L1 Leg STA L-SIG Length (Trigger) EIFS collision NAV setting H2 HE STA STA-side hidden nodes L-SIG Length (UL OFDMA) DIFS (EIFS?) L2 Leg STA L-SIG Length (UL OFDMA) EIFS Trigger frame is sent as MAC frame in 11ax PPDU format MPDU contains UL MU information (field details are TBD) Signaling Overhead Low, can be sent using wide channels and/or high MCS Robust Decoding of Trigger Frame Robust decoding from outdoor STAs May not be decodable under secondary channels’ OBSS interferences (dependent on Trigger’s MPDU design) Protection of UL MU Data reception AP-side HE hidden node(H1) can set NAV using MAC Duration field in Trigger AP-side Legacy hidden node(L1) may interfere to UL MU Data reception at AP Protection of DL M-STA BA reception STA-side HE hidden node(H2) may not decode MAC Duration field in UL MU Data, thus may interfere to DL M-STA BA reception STA-side Legacy hidden node(L2) may interfere to DL M-STA BA reception at UL STA John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Option 2. MAC Trigger frame (11a PPDU) July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Option 2. MAC Trigger frame (11a PPDU) M-STA BA Max duration L-Preamble MPDU (Trigger Info) XIFS L-Preamble HE- Preamble UL MU Data SIFS M-STA BA 40MHz Dup. L-Preamble Dup. MPDU (Trigger Info) Dup. L-Preamble OBSS Interferences AP-side hidden nodes H1 HE STA MAC Duration (Trigger) L1 Leg STA MAC Duration (Trigger) NAV setting H2 HE STA STA-side hidden nodes L-SIG Length (UL OFDMA) DIFS (EIFS?) L2 Leg STA L-SIG Length (UL OFDMA) EIFS Trigger frame is sent as MAC frame in 11a PPDU format (non-HT duplicate) MPDU contains UL MU information (field details are TBD) Signaling Overhead Low to Middle, no HE-Preamble but MPDU is duplicated per 20MHz Robust Decoding of Trigger Frame May not be decodable from outdoor STAs Robust decoding under secondary channels’ OBSS interferences Protection of UL OFDMA Data reception AP-side HE hidden node(H1) & legacy hidden node(L1) can set NAV using MAC Duration field in Trigger Protection of DL M-STA BA reception STA-side HE hidden node(H2) may not decode MAC Duration field in UL MU Data, thus may interfere to DL M-STA BA reception STA-side Legacy hidden node(L2) may interfere to DL M-STA BA reception at UL STA John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Trigger Frame Type Comparisons July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Trigger Frame Type Comparisons Performance Index \ Trigger Format Opt. 1. NDP format Opt. 2. MAC format sent as 11ax PPDU sent as 11a PPDU Trigger Frame Overhead (airtime) Very Low Low Low~Mid Robust Decoding of Trigger Frame under OBSS interferences @2nd CHs (dep. on SIG-B design) X O under outdoor environments UL MU Data Protection at AP against HE hidden nodes (dep. on SIG-A/B design) against legacy hidden nodes DL M-STA BA Protection at UL STAs NDP Trigger frame Very low overhead, Robust decoding in outdoor Robustness under secondary channels’ interferences and NAV protection for HE/Legacy STAs are very much dependent on SIG-A/B design Thus may act as the limiting factors for designing SIG-A/B MAC Trigger frame Has flexibility to choose PPDU format 11ax PPDU: Low overhead, Robust decoding in outdoor 11a PPDU: Robust decoding under secondary channels’ interferences, NAV protection for HE/Legacy STAs John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 Summary We propose to choose MAC frame format as the HE Trigger frame format. Flexibility to choose PPDU types for different purposes Pursue independent & optimal design for SIG-A/B(DL MU) and Trigger(UL MU) respectively Among three MAC frame types (Data, Management, and Control), Trigger can be assigned as a new control frame type. Remaining DL M-STA BA Protection Issues Legacy hidden nodes: If DL M-STA BA’s duration exceeds EIFS, it cannot be protected [3] HE hidden nodes: UL MU Data’s MPDU may not be decodable by overhearing HE STAs, therefore MAC duration-based protection is not feasible John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute

Straw poll - 1 Do you agree to add the following text into 11ax SFD ? July 2015 Straw poll - 1 Do you agree to add the following text into 11ax SFD ? 3.2.z HE Trigger frame shall be defined as a new MAC control frame. Y N A John Son, WILUS Institute

References July 2015 [1] 15/0132r4 Spec framework doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0851r0 July 2015 References [1] 15/0132r4 Spec framework [2] 15/0621r2 Design Principles for HE Preamble [3] 15/0626r1 Further Considerations on Multi-STA Block Ack John Son, WILUS Institute John Son, WILUS Institute