Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: 2016-05-16 Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressEmail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0881r1 July 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL- OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 January 2016 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Congestion control for UL MU random access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Trigger Frame Format for az
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
WUR MAC issues follow-up
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Channel Access Efficiency
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Issues related to OCW management
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
WUR MAC issues follow-up
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Default UORA Parameters
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Discussion on CR for CID 5066
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Channel Access Efficiency
Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL-OFDMA
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
Channel Access Efficiency
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
Clarification on Beacon Transmission Rules
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Reception Status of Frames Transmitted in Random Access RUs
Congestion control for UL MU random access
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Patrice NEZOU Canon Cesson-Sevigné, France Stéphane BARON Romain GUIGNARD Pascal VIGER

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Introduction Slide 2 The TGax SFD [1] includes specifications for the random access Trigger Frame (TF-R) allocating a set of random resource units (RUs) for UL MU OFDMA: The RU allocation procedure is not clearly described. The settings and management of parameters associated (OCW, OCW min, OBO …) to the RU allocation procedure are not specified. This contribution aims to provide clarification and clear mechanisms to optimize the efficiency of the UL MU OFDMA transmission using random trigger frames. This contribution addresses the following 14 CIDs: 49, 179, 442, 600, 773, 1084, 1085, 1199, 1201, 2177, 2178, 2291, 2384, 2385.

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Random RU allocation procedure [1,2] Slide 3 When a STA has a frame to send, it initializes an OBO counter (OFDMA backoff) to a random value in a range [0,OCW] (OCW: OFDMA Contention Window) OCW is in a range [OCW min, OCW max ] where OCW min is provided by the AP Upon the reception of a random trigger frame (TF-R), each STA decrements its OBO by the number of RUs specified in the TF-R. When OBO reaches 0, the STA randomly selects any one of the RUs assigned in the TF-R and initiates a transmission (UL MU OFDMA transmission)

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon As commonly known for the EDCA protocol, a good solution is to double OCW upon each collision detection and to set OCW to OCW min upon the successful transmission. Slide 4 STA side: Effect of OCW « Doubling » policy Results: OCW Doubling policy guarantees an efficiency greater than 35% for a high number of STAs. Remaining Issues: When the number of STAs is low, the efficiency hardly decreases.

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon AP is the best place to compute OCWmin. –OCW min should take into account: the number of STA waiting an UL MU OFDMA transmission. The number of available RUs inside each random trigger frame –But it is impossible to determine OCW min precisely (mainly due to evaluation of number of STAs). Multiple algorithms could be applied to compute OCWmin by the AP. But simulation results show that a simple OCW min value could be the mean number of available RUs. Slide 5 AP side: OCW min Determination

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 6 AP side: OCW min and TBD parameter Transmission OCW min is transmitted in the beacon frame. –It can be decoded by all STAs. –Dedicated field is already available. –A rough value is enough to define a global behavior of the network (Nbr of STAs willing to participate to MU UL OFDMA transmission and nbr of available random RUs for trigger frames) TBD parameter (clause ) transmitted in the trigger frame = Contention Policy (CP) parameter –Define a bit in the trigger frame named “Contention policy” (CP) parameter and indicating an information about the collision rate (For instance: set to 1 if the collision rate is greater than 20%) –This CP parameter is inserted in “Trigger-dependent Common Info” field of the trigger frame –Thanks to the CP parameter, each STA can drive its OCW to reach the best efficiency. –The default value of the CP parameter is 1.

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 7 STA side: OCW update proposed mechanism Upon Beacon frame reception: Update OCW min with beacon frame information Upon Trigger Frame reception: If Contention Policy (CP) parameter = 0, –OCW min = Nbr RUs of the current trigger frame –OCW = OCW min (no doubling upon transmission failure) If Contention Policy (CP) parameter = 1, –OCW min unchanged –If previous MU UL transmission failed, OCW= OCW x 2 –If previous MU UL transmission succeeded, OCW = OCWmin

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 8 Conclusion We propose a OCW mechanism allowing to obtain the best efficiency for the MU UL OFDMA transmission. AP is the best candidate to define a rough value of OCW min transmitted in the beacon frame. STA must refine the OCW/OCW min values to react as soon as possible to the channel conditions: –Double the OCW upon collision detection –Adapt the OCW min value according to the number of available RUs and to the collision rate The Contention Policy (CP) parameter is a key parameter to get the best efficiency.

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 9 References [1] 11-15/0132r15 “Tgax Specification Framework” [2] 11-16/0024r1 “Proposed TGax draft specification” [3] 11-15/1105r0 “UL OFDMA-based Random Access Procedure”

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 10 Straw Poll 1 (AP) Do you agree to add the following text in the SFD: X.y.z An AP indicates the value of OCW min used by all STAs for the random RU allocation process for the next UL MU OFDMA transmissions. The value of OCW min is transmitted through a dedicated field in the beacon frame. Y/N/A: 11/0/13

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 11 Straw Poll 2 (AP) Do you agree to amend the following sentence in 11ax SFD: The HE AP indicates a TBDContention Policy parameter in the Trigger frame for HE STAs to initiate random access following the Trigger frame transmission. (replaced text in clause : “The HE AP indicates a TBD parameter in the Trigger frame for HE STAs to initiate random access following the Trigger frame transmission.”) Y/N/A

doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Slide 12 Straw Poll 3 (STA) Do you agree to add the following text in the SFD: An HE STA that uses the random access procedure maintains an internal counter termed as OBO counter. The OFDMA contention window (OCW) management is based on the following: Upon Beacon frame reception: –Update OCW min with beacon frame information Upon Trigger Frame reception: –If Contention Policy parameter = 0, OCW min = Nbr RUs of the current trigger frame OCW = OCW min (no doubling upon transmission failure) –If Contention Policy parameter = 1, OCW min unchanged If previous MU UL transmission failed, –OCW= OCW x 2 If previous MU UL transmission succeeded, –OCW = OCWmin Y/N/A