L3 PLB May 2008. L2 Pre-ProcessedL3 Pre processedL3 (collated)Analysed SST AcronymL2PL3PL3L4 DescriptionNative SST data streams reformatted into netCDF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New L2P and L3 at MF/CMS P.LeBorgne, F.Orain, A.Marsouin, H.Roquet MF/DP/CMS, Lannion.
Advertisements

Page 1GlobColour CDR Meeting – July 10-11, 2006, ESRIN All rights reserved © 2006, ACRI-ST Resulting Technical Specification.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
Assimilating SST and Ocean Colour into ocean forecasting models Rosa Barciela, NCOF, Met Office
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF SST MEASUREMENTS Validation and evaluation of derived SST products 1.To develop systematic approaches to L4 product intercomparison.
CS April 2007 Models in Potato Pest Management (LateBlight) Client: Professor William Fry Sharmin Azam Christopher Brickley Nathan Cormier Ledet.
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
Climate quality data and datasets from VOS and VOSClim Elizabeth Kent and David Berry National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
Biostatistics Analysis Center Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Minimum Documentation Requirements.
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
LMD/IPSL 1 Ahmedabad Megha-Tropique Meeting October 2005 Combination of MSG and TRMM for precipitation estimation over Africa (AMMA project experience)
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Introduction to ArcToolbox and Geoprocessing.
Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) Kuolin Hsu, Yang Hong, Dan Braithwaite, Xiaogang.
1 Agenda Review Issues Melbourne, May 2007 Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center May 2007 Gary Wick, Rapporteur GHRSST-8 Session-8 Reanalysis.
Application of in situ Observations to Current Satellite-Derived Sea Surface Temperature Products Gary A. Wick NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory With.
Analyses using SPSS version 19
AMSR-E Ocean Rainfall Algorithm Status AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Huntsville, AL 2-3 June, 2010 C. Kummerow Colorado State University.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Ambiguity of Quality in Remote Sensing Data Christopher Lynnes, NASA/GSFC Greg Leptoukh, NASA/GSFC Funded by : NASA’s Advancing Collaborative Connections.
The HR-DDS for NCOF David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK Ian S. Robinson, National Oceanography Centre, UK Craig Donlon, ESA/ESTEC, The.
Finalizing the AMSR-E Rainfall Algorithm GPROF2010 AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Oxnard, CA 4-5 September, 2013 Dave Randel Colorado State University.
General Objective: Conduct R&D activities to improve the quality of SST products used by MERSEA modeling and assimilation centers and produce global, Atlantic.
AMSR-E Ocean Rainfall Algorithm Status AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Asheville, NC June, 2011 C. Kummerow Colorado State University.
10 th Argo data management 2009 Toulouse What is new at GDACs ?
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
General Objective: to improve the quality of SST products used by EU-MERSEA modeling and assimilation centres and produce Mediterranean Sea analyzed SST.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
General Objective: Conduct R&D activities to improve the quality of SST products used by MERSEA modeling and assimilation centers and produce global, Atlantic.
DP/CMS/R&D Medspiration Villefranche Nov Use of L2P data in the MERSEA analyses WP2.2 partners: H. Heiberg and S. Eastwood (Met.no), L.Santoleri(CNR),
BLUElink> Regional High-Resolution SST Analysis System – Verification and Inter-Comparison Helen Beggs Ocean & Marine Forecasting Group, BMRC, Bureau of.
The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.
Report from the Australian Regional Data Assembly Centre Helen Beggs 1, Leon Majewski 2 and Justin Freeman 1 1 Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
Update on the GHRSST Users Manual GDS2.0 rev04.4 Book Captains: Chris Jeffery 1 and Jorge Vazquez Content Brief overview of the GHRSST project Background.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
GDS-2.0 Breakout Session Craig Donlon GHRSST-PO Presented at the GHRSST IX Workshop, Perros Guirrec, France, 9-13 th June 2008.
METOP/AVHRR processing chain at MF/CMS G. Legendre, A. Marsouin, P. Le Borgne,
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
GDS-2.0 Breakout C Donlon & C. Gentemann GHRSST-X, Santa Rosa, Ca. USA, 1-5 th June 2009.
New Australian High Resolution AVHRR SST Products from the Integrated Marine Observing System Presented at the GHRSST Users Symposium, Santa Rosa, USA,
Report from breakout session in the High Latitude Working group Prepared by Jacob L. Høyer, Bob Grumbine and Steinar Eastwood.
Introduction to ST-VAL Gary Corlett. ST-VAL The ST_VAL TAG objectives are to – Establish and promote guidelines for satellite SST validation Coordinate.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Systematic biases in satellite SST observations.
Diurnal Variability Analysis for GHRSST products Chris Merchant and DVWG.
GHRSST-9 Perros-Guirec, France 9-13 June Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, USA.
High Resolution Gauge – Satellite Merged Analyses of Precipitation: A 15-Year Record Pingping Xie, Soo-Hyun Yoo, Robert Joyce, Yelena Yarosh, Shaorong.
May 28-29, 2009GHRSST 2009 International Users Symposium National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature.
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
L2P and L3 SST data produced by EUMETSAT/OSI SAF and EC/MyOcean
Impacts of GSICS inter-calibration on JAXA’s HIMAWARI-8 SST
CMA Working Papers for CGMS-42
Spreadsheet Engineering
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Soo-Hyun Yoo and Pingping Xie
Comparison of AATSR SST with other sensors
ODYSSEA In Arctic Emmanuelle Autret, Jean-François Piollé
The SST CCI: Scientific Approaches
AMSR-E Ocean Rainfall Algorithm Status
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Defining the Products: ‘GSICS Correction’
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Comeaux and Worley, NSF/NCAR/SCD
ECMWF usage, governance and perspectives
Presentation transcript:

L3 PLB May 2008

L2 Pre-ProcessedL3 Pre processedL3 (collated)Analysed SST AcronymL2PL3PL3L4 DescriptionNative SST data streams reformatted into netCDF Native SST data streams reformatted into netCDF, remapped over a geographical grid, auxiliary data as in L2P Native SST data streams reformatted into netCDF, remapped over a geographical grid, synthesized over a period of time and adjusted against a reference, no auxiliary data. L4 analysed data provide an estimate of either the SSTfnd that is free of diurnal variability, SSTskin, SSTsubskin, SSTdepth at a specified depth or SSTdepth_blended from a blended analysis. Grid specificationNative to SST data format Geographical: stereopolar, regular,… Sections and Temporal resolutionNative to SST data stream Native or synthesis over a period of time Synthesis over a period of time Analysed product processing window See section 2.3 Delivery timescaleAs availablePredefined Within 12 hours of an APPW (T+12) - see section 2.3 Target accuracyNative to data stream Bias reduced by adjustment against the reference < 0.4 K absolute) 0.1 K relative Error statisticsNative to data stream if available, Sensor Specific error statistics otherwise SSES, bias adjustment, standard deviation of the adjustment and overall standard deviation attributable to the adjusted SST Standard Deviation for each output grid point (no input data statistics are retained) CoverageNative to data streamGlobal or regional Data ContentTable A1.4.2 and A1.4.3 Table A1.5.3 Nominal data formatnetCDF see Section A1.2

Summary flow diagram of the processing chain Remapping A11 L2P Format L2P data extended gridded L2P L2P data Synthesis over the time window A12 Calculation of differences with respect to reference sensor A14 Validate L4 product A16 Reference sensor L3 data Calculation of an error term A13 Production of “corrected collated” files A15 Collated files Buoy data Collated files With error estimates Collated files with difference compared to reference Rolling data archive Ancillary data Validation Reference Sensor.L3 Format Spec.

- -L3_GHRSST- - -adjusted[- ]- - File Version> NameDefinitionDescription Refer to Appendix A2 Table A2.1Processing centre code See Table A1.3.2 for area names The dataset concerned and the area covered by the L3 product YYYYMMDD Refers to the date for which this particular data set is valid Skin, subskin, fundationType of SST data vnn (where nn is the GDS version number, e.g., 01 Version number of the GDS system used to process the data file Fvxx.x (where xx.x is the release number of this filee.g.fv11.3[h1][h1] Release version for this L3 file string Free field to distinguish ambiguous cases (such as the same data centre producing two L3 files over the same region at spatial resolutions of 1/10  and 1/20  or producing more than one analysis per day) ncGeneric file format (nc=netCDF) For example: IFREMER-L3_GHRSST-SSTsubskin-MERGED_GLOBAL-adjusted-0000-v02-fv01.nc [h1] What does “11.3” mean here? Do we have to use a period (“.”) here?[h1]

Reference time latitude Original latitude Original longitude Number of original pixels SST_dtime SST Proximity confidence SSES bias error SSES standard deviation Reference bias error Reference error SD Satellite zenith angle Solar zenith angle Adjusted SST Adjusted standard deviation error Sources of SST Experimental field Content

issues  When merging different sensors onto the same collated : –Some sensors may have a lower resolution than the collated grid (ex : AMSRE, TMI) –Should we spread such pixels over several collated grid cells  Sources of sst –Number identifying product => should we use unique numbering? Easier to intercompare, difficult to maintain rigorously