Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko 1, Glen C. Rains 2, and O. Wen Carter 1 1 Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences 2 Dept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Advertisements

Calibrating Sprayers for Droplet Size…. ….according to the label Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural.
Drift-Reducing Nozzles Rich Affeldt Extension Crop Scientist Jefferson County Acknowledgment: Dr. Tom Wolf, Agri-Food Canada Dr. Bob Wolf, Kansas State.
ON TARGET STEWARDSHIP, APPLICATION AND EDUCATION Bob Wolf, Ph.D., Application Technology Specialist, Owner, Wolf Consulting & Research.
Drift Reduction And Nozzle Selection Drift Reduction And Nozzle Selection Jim Wilson South Dakota State University Jim Wilson South Dakota State University.
Calibration using the Test Strip Method (Long Hand) Cecil Tharp Pesticide Education Program Montana State University Extension.
Robert Wolf Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept. Dallas Peterson Department of Agronomy.
 Spotty Pest Control  Wasted chemicals  Off-target damage  Higher costs - $$$  Environmental impact  Water and Air Quality  Public more aware of.
Sprayer calibration Maury Craig, IR-4 Program Coordinator Extension Plant Sciences Dept. New Mexico State University.
SPRAYER ACCURACY July 2003.
Flying Fast and Under Pressure Brad Fritz Scott Bretthauer.
Spray Tip Update. Nozzle Technology Nozzles designed to reduce drift Improved drop size control Emphasis on ‘Spray Quality’
Pesticide Application Equipment Page 78 General Manual
Using Pulse Width Modulation to Control Spray Droplet Size Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
New Application Technologies u Bobby Grisso 4 Biological Systems Engineering.
Equipment Methods The Basic Function of a Sprayer: Distribution & Metering Apply a dilute amount of herbicide (Rate) in a determined volume of water.
Insect Control Field Days Sponsored by the Kansas Fruit Growers Association.
Application Decisions for the New Millennium? Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Agrichemical Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept.
Spray Droplet Size Standard S-572 Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Equipment II Nozzles Nozzles Selection Low Drift Nozzles.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Scott Bretthauer,
Pesticide Drift Management
Pesticide Drift Management
Equipment, Calibration, and Tip Selection Considerations for the Application of Herbicides Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological.
Droplet Size, Pressure, Nozzles, Equipment and Drift Aaron Brown WSDA.
Comparison of Drift for Four Drift-Reducing Flat-fan Nozzle Types Measured in a Wind Tunnel and Evaluated using DropletScan  Software Robert E. Wolf &
Agricultural Aviation Technology
Calibration of Sugarcane Sprayers Curtis Rainbolt, Ron Rice, and Les Baucum University of Florida/IFAS.
Spray Spectrum of Spray Droplets Concerning Fungicide Control in Dense Canopy.
U NDERSTANDING S PRAY D EPOSITION AND M INIMIZING D RIFT Dan Heider University of Wisconsin - IPM.
Application Concerns for Control of Invasive Species ‘A focus on Equipment & Calibration’
Practical Field Demonstrations for Drift Mitigation Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 36 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy Hotel and Casino.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Spray Droplet Size on Paraquat and Glyphosate Efficacy Robert Wolf.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Spray Droplet Analysis of Air Induction/Venturi Nozzles Using WRK’s DropletScan.
Pesticide Drift Management Dr. Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist University of Georgia.
Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Off-Target Deposits for Conventional Spray Nozzles and Venturi.
Pesticides in the Environment Environmental Fate of.
Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology, Bio & Ag Engineering, Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural.
Calibrating Your Field Sprayer
Application Equipment for ASR Bobby Grisso Biological Systems Engineering.
Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas.
The Affect of Application Volume and Deposition Aids on Droplet Spectrum and Deposition for Aerial Applications Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session.
Spray Tanks Large Openings Strainer For Filling Agitation Devise
Understanding Spray Drift Reeves Petroff Pesticide Education Specialist Montana State University Extension
Sprayers, Calibration, Nozzle Selection, Efficacy, & Drift Considerations for the No-Till Farmer Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology.
The Affect of Flat-fan Nozzle Angle on Aerial Spray Droplet Spectra Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 39 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Nozzle Type and Spray Pressure on Droplet Size Robert Wolf Biological.
Precision Ag Solutions Scott Strehle
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Drift Potential for Venturi, Extended Range, and Turbo Flat-fan.
Herbicide Application Update Herbicide Application Update New Nozzle Design for Reduced Drift but….What About Control? Robert E. Wolf Biological and Agricultural.
Peanut Response to Foliar Applied Pyroxasulfone Tank-Mixtures P.M. Eure*, E.P. Prostko, and R.M. Merchant Department of Crop & Soil Sciences.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Dennis.
Water Volume, Tractor Speed, and Nozzle Type Effects on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko, Extension Weed Specialist Paul E. Sumner, Extension Ag-Engineer.
New Traits for Weed Management in Cotton.
Considerations for Selecting Turf Spray Tips Maximizing control while minimizing spray drift!
Spray Nozzle Selection and Calibration
WELCOME! 2016 Southeastern Hay Convention Brian Mathis
Renée Allen Area Blueberry Agent Extension, Alma, GA
Unraveling the Mysteries
Selecting the Right Nozzle SIC KNOWLEDGE--
Influence of Nozzle Type on Peanut Weed Control Systems
Height and Pressure Test for Improving Spray Application
Sprayers Ride-On-Sprayers Tank Sprayers
Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage
R.M. Merchant*, E.P. Prostko, P.M. Eure, and T.M. Webster
Application Strategies Calibration….Calibration….
Influence of Adjuvants on Leafspot Disease Management
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Presentation transcript:

Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko 1, Glen C. Rains 2, and O. Wen Carter 1 1 Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences 2 Dept. of Entomology UGA - Tifton

The New Norm????

Is this a bad combination???? 6 ft

Farm vs. Research? Concerns Tractor Speed Boom Height Coverage Quality vs. Quantity?

Herbicide Efficacy Coverage Nozzle Type GPA Pressure Boom Height Tractor Speed

Objective Evaluate the effects of tractor speed and boom height on spray quality –Coverage –VMD 50

Materials and Methods Melroe 3430 Spra-Coupe Tractor Speeds –4.4, 6.5, and 9.5 MPH Boom Heights –30, 45, 60 in –Wind ≤ 3.0 MPH 15 GPA (water + dye) DG TeeJet Drift Guard Nozzle Tips (20” spacing) –8002DG (50 PSI) –8003DG (40 PSI) –8004DG (53 PSI) Medium Droplet Sizes 2 locations in sprayer path –8’ from tractor center (L1) –30” parallel from L1 (L0) 5 Kromekote cards (2” X 3”) –10’ apart Dropletscan (WRK of Arkansas, LLC)

Droplet Size - TeeJet

10’ 30” 8’

Results Analyzed data as 2 X 3 X 3 factorial –2 card locations 5 cards –3 speeds –3 boom heights 90 total data points Speed X Boom Height interaction for Coverage and VMD 50

Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage (%) LSD 0.10 = 1 CV =

Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) – 30” Boom Height N = 30

Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) – 45” Boom Height N = 30

Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) – 60” Boom Height N = 30

Spray Coverage - 60” Boom Height 4.4 MPH 6.5 MPH 9.5 MPH

Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Droplet Size (VMD 50 ) LSD 0.10 = 5 CV = 1.83 Medium = VMD 50

Summary – Tractor Sprayer Lowest coverage at all boom heights was at 9.5 MPH tractor speed (6-8%) For 30” and 60” boom heights, negative linear relationship between tractor speed and coverage (R 2 > 0.68) –~ 1.2% loss in coverage for each MPH Boom height influenced spray coverage as follows: –4.4 MPH: 30” = 60” > 45” –6.5 MPH: 30” = 45” = 60” –9.5 MPH: 45” > 30” = 60” Generally, VMD 50 increased with tractor speed –30” boom: 4.4 MPH < 6.5 MPH < 9.5 MPH –45” boom: 4.4 MPH < 6.5 MPH = 9.5 MPH –60” boom: 4.4 MPH < 9.5 MPH < 6.5 MPH –306 to 345 microns (coarse droplet size)

BackPack Sprayer Coverage Evaluation Generally, same MM as tractor study September 1, GPA 3 nozzle boom, 20” spacing 20” Boom Height 3.5 MPH (walking) Wind (<1 MPH) PSI 3 nozzle types –11002DG –AIXR –TTI02

The Influence of Nozzle Type on Spray Coverage (%) and VMD 50 (microns) 3.5 MPH - Walking 20” nozzle spacing 20” boom height PSI 15 GPA LSD 0.10 = 1.8 CV = 18.3 LSD 0.10 = 19 CV = 6

11002DG VMD 50 = 322 (C AIXR VMD 50 = 402 (VC) TTI 02 VMD 50 = 524 (XC)

Final Thoughts If a grower would drive MPH, not much difference between backpack and tractor. If grower drives 9.5 MPH or greater (?), ~50% less spray coverage. Could this partially explain observed differences between research and on-farm results??? Farmer Resistance? –Too big/late, too fast, too high?????

Acknowledgements Technical Support provided by –Tim Richards –Charlie Hilton –Maryssa Davis