State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What does REMI say? sm Tools for Evaluating Climate Change Policies with REMI PI+
Advertisements

CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005.
Planning for a Low-Carbon Future at San Diego Gas & Electric Rob Anderson Director of Resource Planning San Diego Gas & Electric Western Resource Planners.
Illinois Governor Rod R. Blagojevich Climate Change Advisory Group (ICCAG) Modeling of Policy Proposals July 10, 2007 DRAFT – Numbers subject to revision.
AB32: CAs Global Warming Solutions Act of first ever statewide cap of GHG pollution -CA is 12 th largest source of GHG pollution in world -law designed.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
4 good reasons why Energy Efficiency is Important.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Session 3: The Federal Question: Setting a Good Precedent & Positioning California for Competitive Advantage California Public Utilities Commission Greenhouse.
The Cap-and-trade program of the Western Climate Initiative ITU SYMPOSIUM ON ICTs THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE Montréal 29 May 2012 Robert Noël de.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) Ray Hammarlund, Director of KCC Energy Programs Division.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
Summer Committee Meetings. Yoram Bauman Sightline Institute.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
What is cap and trade? What do legislative proposals currently in Congress say about it? Brent Sohngen Department of Agricultural, Environmental & Development.
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives Bill Hamlin.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
Overview of Carbon Markets and US Federal Proposals to Regulate GHGs American College of Construction Lawyers and Princeton University Joint Symposium.
C2es.org. 2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory,
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
Point of Regulation, Permit Allocation, Uses of Revenue, and Offsets in S (Lieberman-Warner) Presentation to the Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
1 RGGI’s Source-Based Cap-and-Trade Program MassDEP April 19, 2007 Nancy L. Seidman Division Director, MassDEP Presentation to CA PUC Symposium.
Cap and Trade and the Western Climate Initiative December 10,
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
Deregulation and Cap/Trade Gary Flomenhoft, Energy Policy Week 2.
Lessons from implementing the EU Emission Trading System DG Environment European Commission Side event 2009 Climate Change.
Political Factors Affecting the Renewables and Energy Efficiency Remarks of Ron Binz, Chairman Colorado Public Utilities Commission October 15, 2010 IPPAI.
Climate Change John Sherwell PPRP. Two major initiatives 1 – RGGI All NE states except PA Component of the HAA.
Federal Policy Impacts on California Energy Policy California Conference of Public Utility Commission Attorneys Monterey, California October 5, 2009 Commissioner.
Session 4: Managing Allowance Price Volatility Different Policy Mechanisms and their Emissions and Price Impact California Public Utilities Commission.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
Carbon Finance North America Workshop NYC Catherine A. Lee, Esq. Consultant to Maine DEP June 15, 2007 The Nation’s First GHG Cap and Trade Program
What do you think best characterizes Dr. Curry’s opinion on what has caused the majority of planetary warming in the late 20th century? a) CO 2 b) solar.
Federal Climate Change Legislation – Charlotte Chamber September 22, 2009 Mike Stroben Director, EHS Policy.
Federal Climate Change Legislation Update on Senate and House Legislation Discussion of Strategy Next Steps… COG Climate Change Steering Committee November.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
1 The Sustainability Network of Washington County January 27, 2010 Jason Eisdorfer Bonneville Power Administration.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
1 Monitoring Potential Emissions Leakage under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI): Possible Lessons for Load-Based Cap-and-Trade Programs Christopher.
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Comments on Northeast Regional Electric Sector Carbon Cap (RGGI) Model Rule Rob Sargent, Senior Energy Policy Analyst May 2 nd, 2006 Hartford, CT.
Sometimes externality problems can’t be solved by private bargaining (transaction costs are too big). Public policy toward externalities. “Command-and-control”
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Charlotte Chamber U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Mike Stroben November 11, 2009.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Overview of Carbon Markets SIO Fall 2007 Environmental Science and Policy Forum Mitigation and Adaption in a High CO2 World 1 Melanie McCutchan MPIA Candidate.
The Debate about Carbon taxing vs. Cap and Trade I.Cap and Trade: What is it and how does it work? II.Carbon tax: How does this work and what is the intended.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
Harry Klodowski, Esq. Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC.
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
S A L T L A K E C I T Y | L A S V E G A S | R E N O | P A R S O N S B E H L E L A W. C O M Update on Western Climate Initiative Options for Reducing GHG.
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2010 Iowa Turkey Federation Meetings.
Policy Options The basic climate change policy approaches under consideration for the United States are: 1) Cap and Trade: A market based system where.
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION
The Failure of Cap and Trade in GHG Emissions Controls
Recent Cap and Trade Programs: EU ETS and RGGI
State GHG.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: First auction results & the future
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture
Clean Energy Options for GRC Communities
Kansas Corporation Commission
Presentation transcript:

State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences? How does the first multi-state cap and trade program (RGGI) work? What implications do these non-federal programs have for pending federal legislation?

Categories of State GHG activities 1)Vehicle Emissions Standards 2)Renewable Portfolio Standards 3)Efficiency Standards/Programs 4)Cap and Trade programs

vs

Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards – It’s all about California 2002: CA passes law requiring 30% emissions reductions by : EPA stalls on granting CA waiver to step outside federal emissions standards in response to industry complaints 2007: CA files lawsuit against EPA for stalling 2009: EPA grants CA waiver to set standards *if* changes to 2016 timelines to be consistent with Obama CAFÉ standards

Renewable Portfolio Standards Ranges from: CA: 33% by 2020 TX: 5% by 2015 NY: 25% by 2013 CO: 20% by 2020 NC: 12.5% by 2021

through electricity bills and/or utility charges allows costumers to sell electricity back to grid

through electricity bills and/or utility charges allows costumers to sell electricity back to grid in GA, $4.50/kwhr; pure green power ~ $40/month additional cost

Appliance Efficiency Standards

State Building Efficiency Requirements

2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting full implementation by mid Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008

Nov 15, 2007, in devt Dec 20, 2005, eff. 1/1/09 Feb 26, 2007, eff. 1/1/12 June 25, 2008, not eff. yet Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2010

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) -set regional limits on GHG emissions from electric power plants & transportation -based on “Model Rule”, but each state can design their own strategy for implementation (state targets set for 2009 emissions) -comes into force in power plant emissions remain constant through 2014, fall by 10% by “cap & trade” mechanism: each state will set GHG limits and then issue permits equal to the tons of CO2 allowed by the cap

Basic elements of Model Rule: 1)applicability: applies to fossil fuel-fired electric generating units >25MW (covers 25% of regional GHG emissions) 2) size & structure of cap: a) states must stabilize power sector CO2 emissions at 2009 emissions during implementation ( ) b) then reduce emissions by 2.5%/yr for (total reductions of 10% below 2009 levels by 2018) 3) permitting: each CO2 source must have approved CO2 budget emission monitoring plan (EMP); developed by state energy regulators 4) allowance allocation: most CO2 allowances auctioned off (vs. ETS) 25% allowances to support consumer benefit programs 5) temporal flexibility mechanisms: facilities can “bank” or “rollover” CO2 allowances early reduction allowances granted for early demonstrated reductions extended compliance period 6) price triggers: stage 1: if CO2 allowance cost >$7, CO2 offsets can increase stage 2: if CO2 allowance cost >$10, CO2 offsets increase more, compliance period extended, international CO2 credits allowed

Basic elements of Model Rule: (cont) 7) emissions monitoring: CO2 unit must install and certify monitoring system, report quality-controlled data (borrows from EPA acid rain program) 8) offsets: awards CO2 offset allowances to projects outside capped sector that sequester/reduce CO2 emissions (limited to 3.3% of unit’s total compliance obligation - must prove “additionality” Who stands to gain here? Who stands to lose? Or is it that simple? What would you do as a power company in a RGGI state? What is leakage? and how does it impact RGGI?

LEAKAGE There could be a shift of electricity generation from capped sources subject to RGGI to higher-emitting sources not subject to RGGI. -impossible to predict ahead of time (market and political forces unknown) -RGGI proposes to: 1) track load vs. generation 2) monitor C-intensive nature of non-RGGI power policy options: 1) reduce electricity demand (efficiency), so indirectly reduce leakage 2) limit the amount of CO2 (<xx lbs CO2/MWh) that could be “emitted” through long-term purchasing agreements between RGGI utilities and regional power plants 3) emissions portfolio standard