1. CHAPTER 3 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE THEORY ERNST EQUATION 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Refraction at plane surface and Prisms Dr. M K Raghavendra BASE, Bangalore.
Advertisements

Philip B. Bedient Civil & Environmental Engineering Rice University
Chapter 2: Steady-State One-Dimensional Heat Conduction
SCOPE & EFFECT EQUATIONS Chapter 7
1 Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone The classic solutions for infiltration and evaporation of Green and Ampt, Bruce and Klute, and Gardner.
INTEGRALS 5. INTEGRALS We saw in Section 5.1 that a limit of the form arises when we compute an area.  We also saw that it arises when we try to find.
Motion Along a Straight Line
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
ESS 454 Hydrogeology Module 2 Properties of Materials Basic Physics Darcy’s Law Characteristics of Aquifers Elasticity and Storage Instructor: Michael.
8. Permeability (Das, chapter 7)
LINTON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CHAPTER 2: Flow through single &combined Pipelines
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering
Cross Section of Unconfined and Confined Aquifers
Subsurface drainage – Investigations
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Presented by: 1. A measure of how easily a fluid (e.g., water) can pass through a porous medium (e.g., soils) 2 Loose soil - easy to flow - high permeability.
Multi-Layered Aquifer Systems Chapter Nine Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data Revised Second Edition.
Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology
Water Supply and Treatment. Average Precipitation.
294-7: Effects of Polyacrylamide (PAM) Treated Soils on Water Seepage in Unlined Water Delivery Canals Jianting (Julian) Zhu 1, Michael H. Young 2 and.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Limit of a Function 1.3.
An easy to remember approximation … but more precisely, the apparent conductivity measured at the surface by the conductivity meter is a composite response.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
CHAPTER SEVEN INTRODUCTORY WELL HYDROLOGY. GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE.
Lecture 20 Ground Water (3) Ground water movement
Principles of Groundwater Flow
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
INTEGRALS We saw in Section 5.1 that a limit of the form arises when we compute an area. We also saw that it arises when we try to find the distance traveled.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
Groundwater Systems D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L3 Water Resources System Modeling.
Soil Stress and Pore Water Pressure
PERMEABILITY PREPARED BY:- PANCHANI DENISHA
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 7
CHAPTER 3 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE THEORY
Soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe subsurface irrigation A. A. Siyal 1 and T. H. Skaggs 2 1 Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan.
Magnetics.
CIVL471 DESIGN OF RC STRUCTURES
Chapter1:Static pressure in soil due to water.
Groundwater Review Aquifers and Groundwater Porosity
EXAMPLE Water flows uniformly in a 2m wide rectangular channel at a depth of 45cm. The channel slope is and n= Find the flow rate in cumecs.
Flow in Aquifers – 1 Confined Aquifer Flow
Darcy’s Law and Richards Equation
Chapter 3: One-Dimensional Steady-State Conduction
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Acceleration and Accelerated Motion
Lecture 20 Ground Water (3) Ground water movement
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Consolidation Theories of Soils
LIMITS AND DERIVATIVES
Coursework guidelines
Chapter 8 : Natural Convection
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone
Acceleration and Accelerated Motion
Motion Along a Straight Line
Lesson 12 CONDUCTION HEAT TRANSFER
Groundwater hydraulics – wells – lectures 7
Anisotropy – Key ideas Effective conductivity that represents aggregate effect of flow through a layered system Effective conductivity is different parallel.
Some Quiz Questions Unit: Subsurface Flow.
Find: hmax [m] L hmax h1 h2 L = 525 [m]
Tachometry.
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
Chapter 15 (2) Slope Stability
THE QUADRATIC FORMULA.
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Water Underground.
Presentation transcript:

1

CHAPTER 3 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE THEORY ERNST EQUATION 2

ERNST EQUATION The drainage equations discussed earlier have limitations that these can be used for two layer soils only when the drain is located precisely at the interface of the two layers. In practice this situation seldom arises as the interface is usually not same depth below ground surface everywhere and that drains are laid at some slope. The Ernst's equation is applicable to two layer soil with interface at any place. It has further favorable point that the head loss during the vertical flow is also included. 3

ERNST EQUATION The total head loss in the system (H) is sum of the head losses due to the vertical flow (H v ), the head loss during horizontal flow (H h ) and head loss during the radial flow (H r ) in different parts of the flow domain. In general the total head loss (H) is given as: The flow of water in porous medium, given by Darcy's law, is comparable to flow of electricity given by Ohm's laws written as: V = I R. Similarly the flow of water can be written as: H = q W, where q is the flow rate and W is the resistance to the flow. 4

ERNST EQUATION The Eq. (3.39) can accordingly be written as: OR  where:  a = geometry factor for radial flow depending upon the flow conditions and is to be determined in relation to soil profile and drain layout.  D v = distance over which vertical flow takes place.  D r = distance over which radial flow takes place. 5

Flow geometry for pipe drain located in lower layer of a two layer soil 6

Geometry for pipe drain located in upper layer of a two layer soil. 7

Nomenclature used in Figures  D 1 =average thickness of upper layer below the water table,  D 2 =thickness of the lower layer,  D 0 =average thickness of the layer in which drain is located below drain level,  y =water depth in ditch drain (for pipe drain y = 0). 8

Vertical Flow  The vertical flow distance, D v, can be taken as y+H or y+H/2 for ditches and as H or H/2 for pipe drainage.  The vertical flow distance and, therefore, head loss in vertical flow, is small in magnitude in comparison with horizontal or radial flow.  Thus use of H or H/2 will not make any significant difference. 9

Horizontal Flow  The horizontal flow takes place over a distance S and through section of thickness D 1 +D 2.  The horizontal conductance is given as:  For a very deep stratum the horizontal conductance will be a very large quantity, and H h can become very small by use of Eq. (3.42), indicating a very large drain spacing.  This is practically not valid, necessitating an upper limit as: D1 < S/4 and D 1 +D 2 ≤ S/4. 10

Radial Flow  The radial flow is assumed to be occurring only in the layer immediately below drain level.  Thus the distance over which radial flow takes place is taken equal To the depth below the drain to the interface (if interface is below drains) or To the lower impermeable layer (if interface is above the drain), thus D r = D 0 with D 0 ≤ S/4 to avoid a very small head loss in radial flow. 11

Geometry factor (a) and application of Ernst's Equation  The geometry factor (a) is determined considering the relative positions of the pipe drain viz-a-viz the soil layers and the conductivity ratios of these layers. Different cases are identified as follows. Case-I: Homogeneous Soil D 2 = 0, D v = y+H/2, K r = K 1, D r = D 0, and a = 1. Case-II: Layered Soil For the case of layered soil the pipe drain may be located in the upper layer or lower layer. Case II a: Pipe drain located in lower layer of a two layer soil  When the pipe drain is located in lower layer of a two layer soils (Fig. 3.10), then two situations can arise. i) K 1 K 2. 12

Geometry factor (a) and application of Ernst's Equation For the first case of K 1 < K 2, the geometry factor is taken as: a = 1, and following explanation will be applicable. a. Vertical resistance is considered only in upper layer of lesser hydraulic conductivity (K1) and D v = H/2. The vertical head loss in lower layer is insignificant and ignored. b. Horizontal conductance is given as: Σ(KD)h = K 1 D 1 + K 2 D 2. But K 1 D 1 may be neglected being of small value (D 1 << H). c. Radial flow is in lower layer and, therefore, D r = D 0 and K r = K 2 with the limitation of D 0 ≤ S/4. 13

Geometry factor (a) and application of Ernst's Equation Case II b: Pipe drain located in upper layer of a two layer soil. The selection of the geometry factor depends upon the ratio of the hydraulic conductivity of the two layers (Fig. 3.11). Three situations are identified as: (i)K 2 > 20 K 1 The geometry factor is taken as : a = 4, D v = H/2, Σ(KD) h = K 1 D 1 + K 2 D 2, D r = D 0, K r = K v = K 1 (ii) 0.1 K 1 < K 2 < 20 K 1 In this case the geometry factor (a) is obtained from nomograph of Fig or Table 3.3 on the basis of ratio of hydraulic conductivity of upper and lower layers (K2/K1) and the ratio of thickness of lower layer to radial flow distance (D2/D0). 14

Nomograph for case (0.1 K 1 < K 2 < 20 K 1 ) 15

Table for case (0.1 K 1 < K 2 < 20 K 1 ) 16

Example 3.3 A soil consists of two layers. The upper layer is 4.5 m (K 1 = 0.6 m/d) and lower layer is 3.5 m thick (K 2 = 2.6 m/d). The pipe drains of 15 cm dia are installed at a depth of 2.5 m below ground surface. The required root zone depth is 1.5 m. The constant recharge rate is 2.5 mm/d. Calculate the drain spacing. 17

Solution of Example

DONAN EQUATION USBR had used Donan Formula for determining pipe drain spacing. The Donan formula is given as (Fig. 3.1): where the variables are as defined earlier. 19

Modified Donan Equation  The modified Donan equation was used to calculate drain spacing in Fourth Drainage Project (Faisalabad) by USBR team (USBR, 1989).  The modified Donan formula is applicable for a two layer soil with hydraulic conductivity and depth of lower layer greater than the upper layer.  It is considered that all recharge flows vertically through top layer of lower hydraulic conductivity to lower layer of higher hydraulic conductivity.  The horizontal flow is considered to be restricted with the lower layer due to smaller flow resistance because of higher hydraulic conductivity. When the flow reaches closer to the pipe drain, it travels back to the drain. 20

Symbols for Modified Donan equation. 21

Modified Donan Equation  Thus the total head loss is determined as: Where H 1 =Head loss for vertical flow from top of water table to the interface of the layers. H 2 =Head loss for horizontal flow in layer 2. H 3 =Head loss for radial flow from layer 2 back to the drain. The head loss for vertical flow (H 1 ) is given as: 22

Modified Donan Equation  The head loss for radial flow (H 3 ) is determined as: Where  The head loss for horizontal flow (H 2 ) is determined from Eq  The drain spacing, S, is computed using H 2 as: 23

Modified Donan Equation Since spacing S is required for determining H 3 and H 2, direct solution is not available. On solving Eq. (3.46) for S, and squaring and then equating it with Eq. (3.48), a quadratic equation results of the form: 24