Terry Smith June 28, 2001 Command and Data Handling System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Command & Data Handling October 31 st, 2008 Tyler Tracey Tommy Yuen Karim Barakat.
Advertisements

SECCHI Flight Software Dennis Wang SECCHI Consortium Meeting July RAL CPU Utilization Memory Usage VxWorks H/W.
Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
Automated File Transfer and Storage Management Concepts for Space Gary Meyers - GSFC Ed Criscuolo - CSC Keith Hogie - CSC Ron Parise - CSC Revised 6/14/2004.
GLAST June 8, 2000, P. Roger Williamson, BFP - 1 Balloon Flight Planning Roger Williamson June 8, 2000.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
SNAP ICU ProjectDOE HEP Program Review June 2-4, SLAC Participation in The Supernova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Presentation to the DOE High Energy.
Instrument TrainingIDPU - 1 UCB, Dec 6, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT TRAINING IDPU.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 The Trade Between CCSDS and HDLC Framing on Global Precipitation Measurement David Everett and Jonathan.
Marco Concha Charles Petruzzo June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Flight Dynamics.
5 - 1 June 4, 2002 Earth Observing-1 GSFC Systems Engineering Seminar: EO-1 Results Section 5 Spacecraft Technologies.
Solar-B Mission Preparation Len Culhane – UK EIS Principal Investigator Louise Harra – UK Project Scientist David Williams – UK EIS Chief Observer Mullard.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Reliability & System Safety Dick Bolt David Bogart June 28, 2001.
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
ZTF Server Architecture Roger Smith Caltech
Student Satellite Project Laser Communications Group 2 Laser Communications Group Members Team Mentor: Dr. William Wing Team Leaders:Matthew Johnson (ECE)
Command and Data Handling (C&DH)
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting C&DH Flight Software April 14, 2005.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Earth Atmosphere.
P. Earle p1 November 16, 2001Electrical SNAP Electrical Design Estimates November 16, 2001 C. Paul Earle Super Nova/Acceleration Probe.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
ONE Concept. ONE Work area & lab setup ONE Goals Provide single network interface regardless of physical link Provide reliable, isochronous message transport.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
1Corot Science Week, Berlin, December 2003 Inside the COROT machine Overview of global loop for COROT operations Description of COROT Subsystems.
SNAP Collaboration meeting / Paris 10/20071 SPECTROMETER DETECTORS From science requirements to data storage.
MAXIM Data Systems Command & Data Handling Space - Ground Link Ground System 19 August 1999.
Control & Data Handling, Operator Control, Aircraft Interface to C&DH Steve Musko Space Physics Research Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Flight Software Overview
SDR 7 Jun Associated Electronics Package (AEP) Curtis Ingraham.
SuperNova / Acceleration Probe System Engineering Mike Roberto and Mike Amato November 16, 2001.
Competition Sensitive Gabe Karpati June 28, 2001 SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) System Overview.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
John Martin April 5, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Introduction.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
V3 SLAC DOE Program Review Gunther Haller SLAC June 13, 07 (650) SNAP Electronics.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
GoetzPre-PDR Peer Review October 2013 FIELDS Time Domain Sampler Peer Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR FSW Overview Sergio Maldonado FSW Test Team Lead Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks. PDR 31 August 2000NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks 2 ISUAL Operations Overview.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 FSW & Operations Winter Summary Seyoung Yoon KHU EE Team.
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
Exemplar CFS Architecture
Overview of SOIS Electronic Data Sheets (EDS) & Dictionary of Terms (DoT) SOIS APP WG Fall 2012.
SLS-CS_13-02 High Data Rate (Gbps +) Coding Architecture
ISS Institutional DTN Overview for CCSDS
Solid State Recorder Liu Dahai CSSAR.
ISUAL Associated Electronics Package
S-D analog to digital conversion
DSP Operation Management Center (DOMC)
Metis On-Board SW overview
Digital Sub-System Bob Goeke.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
SLAC DOE Program Review
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
D. Hernández Expósito, J. P. Cobos Carrascosa, J. L. Ramos Mas, M
Systems Engineering (plus Data, Digital, Power)
MDP / DHU - DR Usage vs downlinks -
AMS Summary 16:00 on Tue 14 May 2019 (GMT 134) To
Main information on the «WORLD SPACE OBSERVATORY» project
Multi Chip Module (MCM) The ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD)
Presentation transcript:

Terry Smith June 28, 2001 Command and Data Handling System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)

Command & Data Handling System Page 2 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center  1 Generic C&DH Box with Mission-Unique Upgrades  Buffers/Multiplexers/Compressors Integrated in Readout Electronics  Real-Time Science Data Downlink  Store and Forward Spectrograph Data  Single-String (2 year) or Dual Redundant (5 year) Options Command & Data Handling System Overview

Command & Data Handling System Page 3 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Driving Requirements  Launch:October 2008  Orbit:57 RE x 19 RE, 40 o incl  Life:2 Years Minimum 5 years Goal  Science Data Acquisition Rate:90 Mbps Peak 45 Mbps Average

Command & Data Handling System Page 4 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Derived Requirements  Data Products (Data Reduction):None  Data Compression:Lossless Only  Telecommunication Contact Time:80% of orbit  Telecommunication LOS Period:24 hours  Real-Time Science Data Transmission:All Instrument Data  Science Data Record and Playback:Spectrograph Data Only  Spectrograph Data Storage:74 Gbits  Simultaneous Record and Playback:yes  Downlink Data Rate:55 Mbps

Command & Data Handling System Page 5 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Science Data Reduction Analysis Histogram Data Products Memory Array represents CCD pixel grid 1 Accumulator register for each pixel 1 Gpixel = 16 Gbit array (16 bits per register) Rejected due to complications associated with Cosmic Rays: False data spikes on CCD, data filter not feasible Dithering: Spatial error on CCD Lossy Data Compression also rejected

Command & Data Handling System Page 6 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Science Data Storage Analysis 100 % All Instrument Data Storage Science Data Acquisition Rate45 Mbps Housekeeping Data Acquisition Rate16 kbps Memory Error Detection and Correction Overhead (5%)2 Mbps Total47 Mbps Data Storage Retention (8 hours during LOS)1.4 Terabits

Command & Data Handling System Page 7 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Science Data Storage Analysis 100 % All Instrument Data Storage (continued) 1.4 Terabits SSR 2004 Rad-Hard DRAM Technology Projection: 64 Mbit or 256 Mbit SSR with 64 Mbit DRAM Size: 33 cm x 33 cm x51 cm Mass: 30 kg Power: 103 W Cost: $3.1 M SSR with 256 Mbit DRAM Size: 33 cm x 33 cm x35 cm Mass: 20 kg Power: 70 W Cost: $2.6 M

Command & Data Handling System Page 8 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Science Data Storage Analysis 100 % All Instrument Data Storage (continued) 100 % All Instrument Data Storage rejected due to: SSR mass, size, power, and cost Relatively complicated operations Alternative: Downlink in real-time all science data while telecom is on-line (80%) Store and forward only the Optical and NIR Spectrograph data

Command & Data Handling System Page 9 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Science Data Storage Analysis 100 % Spectrograph Only Data Storage Spectrograph Data Acquisition Rate800 kbps Housekeeping Data Acquisition Rate16 kbps Memory Error Detection and Correction Overhead (5%)41 kbps Total857 kbps Data Storage Retention (24 hours during LOS)74 Gbits 24 hour retention period derived from orbit and ground station location

Command & Data Handling System Page 10 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Downlink Data Rate Analysis Data Acquisition Rate:45.2 Mbps CCSDS Protocol and RS-Coding Overhead (15%):6.78 Mbps Stored Spectrograph Data Playback:3 Mbps Total:55 Mbps 74 Gbit Spectrograph Data Playback 3 Mbps:6.6 hours

Command & Data Handling System Page 11 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Instruments Command & Data Handling System Selected Configuration and Rationale Flight Data System Spacecraft Data Bus and Hard-Lines Science Data 45 Mbps X-Band Communication System Instruments C&DH Unit Spacecraft Systems Instruments Instrument Electronics S-Band Communication System Command Uplink 2 kbps Telemetry Downlink 1 kbps Wideband Downlink 55 Mbps

Command & Data Handling System Page 12 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Selected Configuration and Rationale 8 Mbps TelescopeTelescope NIR Spectrograph Optical Spectrograph NIR Imager GIGACAM Star Guider Readout Electronics Data Rate Buffer Instrument Electronics 8 Mbps 200 Mbps 1 Gbps 8 Mbps Multiplex and Compress RS-422 Driver Data Rate Buffer 400 kbps 8 Mbps 40 Mbps 400 kbps Multiplex and Compress RS-422 Driver Fibre Channel Driver RS-422 Driver Control Bursts Average (double for peak)

Command & Data Handling System Page 13 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Selected Configuration and Rationale C&DH Unit Low Voltage Power Converter S-Band Com Interface Command and Telemetry Lines Backplane Data Bus Spacecraft Data Bus S C&DH & ACS Processor Wide-Band Data Router Memory 74 Gbits S-Band Uplink Downlink C&DH Discrete Inputs and Outputs S Instrument Science Data IQ KA-Band Com Interface

Command & Data Handling System Page 14 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System RSDO Spacecraft Bus Accommodation  1 RSDO spacecraft bus appears to meet the C&DH Requirements: Science Data Acquisition Rate Bulk Memory Size Wide-Band Output Data Rate C&DH Requirements 45 Mbps74 Gbits55 Mbps X Bus576 Mbps200 Gbits320 Mbps

Command & Data Handling System Page 15 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Specifications and Cost Summary  ItemMass kgPowerCost  Single-String C&DH Unit*12 kg25 W  Dual-Redundant C&DH Unit**24 kg30 W * 2 year life ** 5 year life

Command & Data Handling System Page 16 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Command & Data Handling System Issues and Concerns  No Data Retransmission Capability for Real-Time KA-Band Dropouts