Observations of Electron Cloud Phenomena at PETRA III Presentation at the ECLOUD 2012 workshop Rainer Wanzenberg ECLOUD 2012 June 5-8, 2012 Hotel Hermitage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Advertisements

Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Latest ILC DR wiggler simulations M. Pivi, T. Raubenheimer, L. Wang (SLAC) July, 2005.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
R. Cimino COULOMB’05, Senigallia, Sept 15, Surface related properties as an essential ingredient to e-cloud simulations. The problem of input parameters:
First approach to the SuperB Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN April 26th, 2006 UK SuperB Meeting, Daresbury.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
M. Bieler, M. Ebert, L. Fröhlich, J. Keil, J. Klute, G. Kube, G. K. Sahoo, R. Wanzenberg, DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract Acknowledgment Commissioning.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
ILC damping ring options and their critical issues 12th July th ACFA MDI/POL/ACC Pohang Accelerator Lab. Eun-San Kim.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Improved electron cloud build-up simulations with PyECLOUD G. Iadarola (1),(2), G. Rumolo (1) (1) CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, (2) Università di Napoli “Federico.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Electron Cloud Studies Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Electron cloud beam dynamics G. Dugan, Cornell University CesrTA Advisory Committee 9/11/12.
PETRA III, A New High Brilliant Light Source At DESY
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Low Emittance Rings 2014 Workshop INFN-LNF, 18. September 2014 Low Emittance Studies at 3 GeV at PETRA III Joachim Keil DESY.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XXIII (24-25/ ), ASTRID2 facility 1.
Juan F. Esteban Müller P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, E. Shaposhnikova, D. Valuch IPAC’14 – Acknowledgements: T. Bohl, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo,
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Operation Status of the RF Systems and Taiwan Photon Source
PETRA III, Status and Upgrade
Experiments on Fast Ion Instability at PLS
PETRA IV accelerator overview.
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
PETRA III. Machine development Satellite bunch clearing
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
Recent Studies of Injection System at
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Recent Electron Cloud Studies at CESR and Future Plans
PETRA IV Lattice Studies
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Collective effects in CEPC
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
Positron vs. Electron Beam Behavior
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CesrTA Experimental Schedule and Priorities
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Observations of Electron Cloud Phenomena at PETRA III Presentation at the ECLOUD 2012 workshop Rainer Wanzenberg ECLOUD 2012 June 5-8, 2012 Hotel Hermitage La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 2 PETRA III - Overview Damping wigglers 10 wigglers RF section 12 cavities Insertion Devices 1 x 10 m 8+1 DBA 3 x 5 m cells 10 x 2 m Damping wigglers 10 wigglers Arc 14 FODO cells Injection FB cavities 8 cavities Wigglers Arc: FODO Lattice Undulators Experimental Hall “Old Octants”

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 3 PETRA III - Parameters Design ParameterPETRA III Energy / GeV6 Circumference /m2304 RF Frequency / MHz500 RF harmonic number3840 RF Voltage / MV20 Momentum compaction 1.22  Synchrotron tune0.049 Total current / mA100 Number of bunches96040 Bunch population / Bunch separation / ns8192 Emittance (horz. / vert.) /nm 1 / 0.01 Bunch length / mm12 Damping time H/V/L / ms16 / 16 / 8 Damping wigglers Number 20 L wiggler = 4 m B = 1.5 T  = 0.2 m  x : 4.5  1 nm rad 80 m PETRA III is running with positrons ! User runs in 2011 and 2012

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 4 Instability threshold – coasting beam model *) K. Ohmi: Electron Cloud Effect in Damping Rings of Linear Colliders 31st ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on Electron-Cloud Effects "ECLOUD'04" Broad band resonator model + coasting beam model *) < 1 threshold density: (L = circumference of the ring) Q ~ 5 < K PETRA III:~ 1.4 x m -3 + = beam line density in the e+ bunch (PETRA III, 960 bunches, 100 mA)

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 5 PETRA III Vacuum chamber Arc: Al, 80 mm x 40 mm Wiggler: Al, 96 mm x 17.9 mm NEG coated Undulator: Al, 57 mm x 7 mm (a) (b) (c) IPAC 2011 Secondary Electron Yield of Al Samples from the Dipole chamber of PETRA III D.R. Grosso, M. Commisso, and R. Cimino, LNF-INFN, Frascati Italy R. Flammini, CNR-IMIP, Monterotondo, Italy R. Larciprete, CNR-ISC, Rome, Italy R. W., DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 6 PETRA III – Commissioning and User Runs > Commissioning:  First stored beam (April 13)  Operation with all (2 x 10) wigglers from Aug 12, 2009 > First user runs (friendly user) (Feb, 2010) > Ecloud studies May/June 2010 > Aug 2 – Aug 7, 2010  Machine studies without wigglers > User runs (Aug 2010) > About 9 month of user runs  3 bunch patterns 2011 > Scrubbing Run (March) > User runs, bunch pattern as recently 320 bunches 2012 > Ecloud Studies Oct, Nov.

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 7 PETRA III Emittance Diagnostics synchrotron light from bending magnet NL 50 visible light beampipe Reference: PETRA III G. Kube, DIPAC’07, EPAC‘08 ATF - KEK H.Hanyo et al., Proc. of PAC99 (1999), 2143 T. Naito and T. Mitsuhashi, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9 (2006) Diagnostic Beam Line (Exp. Hall) Interferometric beam size measurements (North) 60 x 4 bunches, 100 mA Vert. Emittance ~ 5 pm rad (March 8, 2012)

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 8 Conditioning Integrated beam current May 2009Jan 2012 Now more than 1000 Ah Average Vacuum pressure (2012): 5.0 x mb (without beam) 1.4 x mb (100 mA, 240 bunches) The vacuum pressure does NOT depend on the filling pattern. Photons per length and bunch population 100 mA beam current Total beam population 4.8 x positrons 3.1 x photons per meter Photoelectron dose: (Y ~ 0.1, C ch = 194 mm) = 1.2 C/mm 2 (1000 Ah)

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 9 Scrubbing runs (March 2012) Run 1: March 3 / 4, 2012 Vert. Emittance ~140 pm rad ( for 20 h) Than dropping to 97 pm rad Horz. Emittance Starting at 1.0 nm rad Increasing to 1.8 nm rad Run 2: March 10 / 11, 2012 Vert. Emittance Starting at 104 pm rad Decreasing to 33 pm But Horz. Emittance increase from 2 nm rad to 4 nm rad Green: total current (100 mA) Red: vertical emittance (scale 0 … 150 pm rad) Blue: Number of bunches (480) Black: horizontal emittance (scale 0 … 6 nm rad) Time scale: 4 days ~10 Ah, 1.2 x C/mm bunches

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 10 Conditioning + Scrubbing: Benefits 100 mA in 320 bunches Without any significant emittance increase ! 100 mA in 60 x 5 bunches Without any significant emittance increase! Emittances increase: 60 x 6 bunches 480 bunches (used for scrubbing)

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 11 Tune shifts (bunch train) after the scrubbing runs 240 bunches (8 ns bunch spacing) Oct 12, 2011, 36 mA Mar 8, 2012, 31 mA Horz. Vert. Bunch # f / kHz Mar 14, 2012, 37 mA

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 12 Simulations with ECLOUD 4.0 PETRA III, 100 mA, different filling patterns, SEY: 1.5, 2.0, 2.5

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 13 Simulations with ECLOUD 4.0 (cont.) PETRA III, 100 mA, different filling patterns, center density Emittance growth 100 mA 60 x 6 not ok 100 mA 60 x 4 ok (threshold density ~ 1.4e 12 m -3 ) Simulation studies indicate an instability for the 60 x 6 pattern if the SEY is about 2.0

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 14 Summary > A vertical emittance growth has been observed for bunch trains with 8 ns and 16 ns bunch to bunch spacing. > There a “upper-sidebands” in the vert. tune spectra with a clear build-up along a bunch train. > A clear conditioning effect has been observed. For user runs filling patterns with 40 x 4 and 60 x 4 bunches were used in In 2011 it was possible to fill 240 bunches with a 32 ns bunch spacing. > In 2012 two dedicated scrubbing runs have improved the situation. It is possible to use 320 bunches with 24 ns bunch spacing and no significant emittance growth. > This “proves” that the observed emittance growth is really due to electron clouds. > The tune shift along a bunch train are not changed after the scrubbing runs. > Simulations for diffenrent filling patterns indicate that the SEY < 2.0 after conditioning and scrubbing. > Recently (May 16, 2012) 320 bunches with 24 ns bunch spacing have been used for user runs.

Rainer Wanzenberg | PETRA III | June 2012 | Page 15 Thank you for your attention ! Acknowledgment: I would like to thank my colleagues from DESY Klaus Balewski, Michael Bieler, Joachim Keil, Alexander Kling, Gajendar Kumar Sahoo