USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

Driver Accelerator Physics and Design D. Douglas, S. Benson, G. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, B. Yunn.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.
Driver Accelerator Design D. Douglas, G. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, B. Yunn.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Ivan Bazarov, New Tool for Beam Break-up Simulations, SRF mtg, 9 April CHESS / LEPP New tool for beam break-up analysis y z y x EB injected beam.
Ivan Bazarov, New Tool for Longitudinal BBU Simulations, SRF mtg, 7 October CHESS / LEPP New tool for longitudinal BBU simulations injected beam.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 of 20 Distribution State A “Direct” Injection D. Douglas, C. Tennant, P. Evtushenko JLab.
Ivan Bazarov, Single HOM two-pass analysis, SRF mtg, 4 June CHESS / LEPP Single HOM, two-pass analysis Motivation: explain the plot produced by.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design Requirements/Issues Source/Injector Performance -successful run of 135 pC -DC photocathode gun: cathode lifetime >600 C; GaAs wafer > 2 kC Delivery.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz EIC14 Workshop, Jefferson Lab, March 20,
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Crossing transition at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, N.Abreu, M. Brennan, M.Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, R. Lee, S.Tepikian.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Svb[General files ‘01/Presentations]PAC 10 kW laser input.ppt Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Objectives for experimental proposal (from Francois):
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Multiturn extraction for PS2
William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter
12 GeV CEBAF.
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Statistical Comparison to ERL-06-01
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
RF Issues in Energy Recovery Linacs
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
USPAS Course on 4th Generation Light Sources II
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University D.R. Douglas, G. A. Krafft, and L. Merminga Jefferson Lab Computer Class: Linear Optics in JLAB IRFEL, Longitudinal gymnastics, and Beam Break-up modeling

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs2 CHESS / LEPP JLAB IRFEL Spreadsheet model of JLAB IRFEL includes: -full first-order optics -longitudinal phase space visualization -beam break-up simulations

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs3 CHESS / LEPP Obtaining the lesson Download the spreadsheet and bbu code to a single write- enabled directory from Make sure macros are enabled. Start the spreadsheet (note: it may take a while to initialize all formulas).

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs4 CHESS / LEPP Spreadsheet organization The spreadsheet is organized into three main parts ---> elements matrices products twiss ---> bbu bbu_latfile bbu_homs bbu_param ---> long_phase_space R56 z pz layout and lattice control beam breakup simulation longitudinal phase space

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs5 CHESS / LEPP Organization: layout and lattice ---> elements sheet contains optics controls

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs6 CHESS / LEPP Spreadsheet: beam break-up ---> bbu controls execution of beam break-up code

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs7 CHESS / LEPP Spreadsheet: longitudinal phase space ---> long_phase_space tracks a bunch in the long. p.s.

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs8 CHESS / LEPP Longitudinal Phase Space Manipulations

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs9 CHESS / LEPP A brief overview of longitudinal dynamics first- and second-order correlation in longitudinal phase space second-order momentum compaction requirements for energy recovery

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs10 CHESS / LEPP First- and second-order correlations l

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs11 CHESS / LEPP After acceleration after the main linac: assuming large E final /E injection and small energy spread energy spread:longitudinal emittance: for

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs12 CHESS / LEPP Longitudinal transform  momentum compaction (times the path length): second-order momentum compaction:  l

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs13 CHESS / LEPP Compression for maximum compression need  l actual (absolute) value of can be smaller no is needed beyond a certain off-crest phase angle

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs14 CHESS / LEPP Achieving the right values of R 56 trim quads Q1 Q2 Adjustable R 56

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs15 CHESS / LEPP Bunch length in the Arcs: For off-crest of several deg: R 56 = 14.4 cm (trim quads off) eta x R56 2nd term phi = 10° phi = -10° on crest Bunch length in the Bates’

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs16 CHESS / LEPP Achieving the right values of T 566 changing sextupoles strength in the Arc… sextupoles

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs17 CHESS / LEPP Energy recovery l  General rule of thumb for successful energy recovery is having the full recirculating arc isochronous to first and second order (R 56 = T 566 = 0). In IRFEL, the main difficulty is an additional energy spread generated at the wiggler due to FEL interaction.

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs18 CHESS / LEPP Controlling Bates’ quads ---> elements sheet, yellow region 1st Bates’2nd Bates

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs19 CHESS / LEPP Off-crest phase, FEL energy spread and T > long_phase_space sheet 1st Bates’ 2nd Bates FEL energy spread Off-crest angle

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs20 CHESS / LEPP 1) Set the off-crest phase angle in the main linac to 0 and ‘turn-off’ laser interaction. Observe how the longitudinal phase space looks throughout the accelerator and at the beam dump. 2) Set the off-crest phase angle in the main linac to –10 . Achieve the shortest bunch possible at the wiggler location using linear optics only (T 566 should be 0). Compare calculated R 56 with the value in the model. 3) Use T 566 to maximally compress the bunch at the wiggler. Compare calculated T 566 with the value in the spreadsheet. How much shorter is the bunch length when both second- and first-order compaction is used, as opposed to only the first-order compression? Achieve less than 150 fs rms bunch duration. 4) ‘Turn-on’ the laser interaction (actual max. energy spread of 5 %). Observe the longitudinal phase space at the dump. Is the beam being successfully recovered? Exercises

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs21 CHESS / LEPP 5) Adjust R 56 in the second Bates’ section to minimize energy spread at the dump. Note the smallest energy spread you were able to achieve. 6) Use T 566 to minimize energy spread at the dump. Note the values of R 56 and T 566 of the whole recirculating arc that allowed the result. What is the smallest energy spread you were able to achieve? Achieve less than 15 % max energy spread at the dump. Exercises (contd.)

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs22 CHESS / LEPP Beam break-up analysis

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs23 CHESS / LEPP Higher order modes Two basic concerns: monopole (m = 0) TM 01 -like y z EB x y high energy losses, no kick y z EB x y TM 11 -like dipole (m = 1) kick and losses when beam is not centered y z EB x y TM 21 -like quadrupole (m = 2) kick, coupling and losses when beam is not centered Multipass beam breakup (dipoles) Resonant excitation of a higher order mode (monopoles)

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs24 CHESS / LEPP BBU threshold for a single dipole mode  , is independent of YES NO YES NO use code!

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs25 CHESS / LEPP Controlling BBU code ---> bbu controls execution of beam break-up code output voltage and coordinate at a given cavity (must have a HOM!) controls length (time) of code execution

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs26 CHESS / LEPP Controlling BBU code: HOMs bbu_homs spreadsheet comments are denoted by ‘!’ and are ignored; use it to ‘disable’ HOMs HOM data that goes into BBU code

USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs27 CHESS / LEPP 1) By commenting out modes in bbu_homs sheet, determine the worst mode (the one with highest threshold). How does the threshold due to the single worst mode compares to the situation when all modes are present? 2) Work with the worst offending mode (for faster computing speed). Slightly change the frequency of the mode and obtain dependence of threshold vs. the mode frequency. Plot the dependency. What is the ratio of max over min threshold that you found in this manner? What is the frequency difference between the two adjacent maxima? 3) Add ‘fake’ 1000 m to the recirculation length ( ---> bbu sheet) and repeat the steps from 2). What is the ratio of max over min threshold in this case? What is the frequency difference between the two adjacent maxima? Try to explain the result. 4) Enable all modes. By changing quads in the arc (in a FODO-like section, sheet ---> elements ) try to increase the threshold as much as possible. Compare your highest threshold with others in the group. The winner gets a prize! Exercises