Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction region design and construction for BEPCII C. H. Yu IHEP Feb.4, 2007.
Advertisements

PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department The PEP-II B-Factory Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director Particle and Particle-Astrophysics Division.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
MAC Review December 13-15, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee meeting December 13-15,
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
PEP-II Status and Outlook John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team SLAC EPAC Meeting June 12, 2003.
PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department The PEP-II Overview John Seeman SLAC Particle and Particle-Astrophysics Directorate PEP-II MAC Review January.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator Status and General Plans John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator.
SLAC Accelerator Department PEP-II Future Plans and Parameters John T. Seeman PEP-II MAC Meeting December 13, 2004.
1 IR NEG heating M. Sullivan MAC Review Dec , 2004 M. Sullivan Machine Advisory Committee Review December 13-15, 2004 IR NEG Heating and Upgrade.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Detector Backgrounds in the HERA ep-Colldider F. Willeke, BNL October 9, 2012.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
PEP-II Machine Advisory Committee Meeting SLAC, April 15-17, 2004 HOM Issues in LER Ring and IR. Recent measurements and calculations. Sasha Novokhatski.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Interaction Region Vacuum Chamber Upgrades Presented by: Scott DeBarger Contributors: D. Arnett, B. Bigornia, C. Carr, J. Langton, S. Metcalfe, D. Kharahk,
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II in Run 7 and Transition Planning John T. Seeman Assistant Director PPA/LCLS.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
August 4-5, 2004 PEP-II Post Run 4 Review 1 M. Sullivan PEP-II Post Run 4 Review August 4-5, 2004 IR Summary and Issues.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
9 October 2003S. DeBarger PEP-II Vacuum Status PEP-II Machine Advisory Committee.
Vacuum System Requirements for a Higgs Factory e + e - Accelerator R. Kersevan CERN, Technology Department Vacuum, Surfaces and Coatings Group R. Kersevan,
November 16-18, 2004 Belle High Luminosity Workshop 1 M. Sullivan High Luminosity workshop (HL6) November 16-18, 2004 IR Vacuum Summary and Issues.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department Status and Plans for PEP-II John Seeman SLAC Particle and Particle-Astrophysics DOE HEPAP P5 Review April.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
HF2014 WG4 Summary “Synchrotron Radiation and Shielding”
Top-Up Injection Schemes
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
CEPC Vacuum System Dong Haiyi 2017/11/5.
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
The design of interaction region
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Design of Interaction Region
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing

2 Abstract: Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR The beams in a circular e+e- collider emit synchrotron radiation photons in the dipoles and quadrupoles in the interaction region and deposit them in the nearby vacuum chambers. These photons must be absorbed in the vacuum chambers with the deposited power taken away and the emitted gasses pumped away not to cause beam-gas backgrounds. A discussion of how this was done in the PEP-II IR will be presented and implications for a Higgs Factory will be shown.

3 Topics PEP-II /BaBar Interaction Region HF Parameters Absorption Pumping

PEP-II Parameters for 3.1 GeV x 9.0 GeV ParameterUnitsDesign April 2008 Best 2008 Potential I+mA I-mA Number bunches y*y* mm Bunch length mm yy Luminosityx Int lumi / day pb times design4 times design

5 PEP-II Horizontal Beam Line Offsets near IR

6 PEP-II Vertical Offsets near IR

7 Most PEP-II LER Dipoles and Quadrupoles made at IHEP

8 PEP-II HER and LER Trajectories through IR

9 HER and LER beam sizes versus Longitudinal Position

10 PEP-II IR LER X-ray Fans (M. Sullivan)

11 PEP-II IR HER X-ray Fans (M. Sullivan)

12 Synchrotron Radiation Deposition in the IR Region: HER

13 HER High Power Dump Power Loading

14 Outgassing Rate versus Integrated Amp-Hrs

Vacuum Calculations (N. Kurita) m “best guess” parameters:  Gas temperature  Tgas = 303  Pump speed multiplier  pumpm = 0.5  TSP speed  TSP = 750  Thermal outgas rate  ogas = 2e-12  PSD rate factor  eta = 1e-6  Beam energy & current  ebeam = 3, ibeam = 500 m PSD rates have been shown to be approaching 1e-6.

16 IR Vacuum Pumps NEG Distributed Ion Pump LER TSP PumpsLumped ion pump

17 LER Vacuum Pressure Upstream IR Conductance, pumping, outgassing Resulting Pressure Longitudinal Distance

18 Vacuum Conditions Near the IP Conductance, Pumping, Outgassing Pressure Longitudinal position

19 LER Photon Stops

20 PEP-II Support Tube and Permanent Magnet Schematic

21 IR Be Chamber and Permanent Magnets

22 B1 Vacuum Chamber

23 LER B1 Chamber with X-ray masks

24 Q2 Chamber Back Mask 1: Three dimensional

25 HER Incoming Beam Chamber

26 Back End Q2 A-Chamber Mask

27 Q4-Q5 IR Vacuum System

28 Q4 Magnet and Vacuum chamber

29 Q2 Septum Chamber (Y)

30 IR looking at HOM Modes

31 HOM Spectrum and Power Calculations HOM power: IR Be chamber has 3 KW IR Y chamber (at 3 m) 16 KW

32 Circular Higgs Factory Ring Parameters for Injection (TLEP-H) Energy = 120 x 120 GeV Circumference = 54 km Two collision points (IR) Full energy injection Number of bunches = 50 / ring Particles = 4.1 x / beam Particles = 5.1 x / bunch Lifetimes: Vacuum = ~10 hours Touschek = ~5 hours Luminosity = 0.5 hour Lost particles per second = 2.1 x / second per ring Injection efficiency = ~ 80%.  Needed for injection: e+ and e- at ~2.6 x10 10 / second at full energy. CEPC

33 HF: CEPC Horizontal Trajectory near the IR

34 HF: CEPC IR Beta Functions

Synchrotron Radiation Comparison (N. Kurita) PEPIISPEAR3LEP3TLEP-ZTLEP-HTLEP-t E (GeV) I (A) rho (m) Linear Power (W/cm) CEPC has 2 beams so SR = 61 W/cm Thermal stresses from the SR striking the vacuum chamber should be manageable (lower than PEP-II and SPEAR3) Critical photon energy = MeV Radiological risk, activation (see Zimmerman’s talk) Use discrete masks to minimize the radiation shielding and materials activated.

36 Conclusions Minimize the SR power lost in the Interaction Region Find any way possible to provide pumping near the IR Find a way to add pumping inside the detector Shield carefully the detector from x-rays and lost particles.