New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doug Solomon, U.S. EPA OAQPS 2014 National Air Quality Conference Durham, NC February 12, 2014.
Advertisements

Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Front Range Ozone Early Action Compact Presentation to WESTAR Regional Ozone Conference Steven Arnold Air Pollution Control Division March 9th, 2004.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
1 Air Planning Section EPA Region 6. ActionTarget Date EPA Letter to Governors on Designations (120-day letters) December 21, 2011 Designations and.
Meeting of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission 4/16/2015.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Designations for the 2006 PM2.5 Standards: Evaluating the Nine Factors in Setting Nonattainment Area Boundaries Part 1 – Overview Rich Damberg, Tom Rosendahl.
Planning for the 2008/2010 Ozone Air Quality Standards WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Portland, Oregon ~ September 29, 2010 Corky Martinkovic, Planning Supervisor.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Ozone NAAQS Implementation WESTAR Fall Meeting September 29, 2010 Scott Mathias, Associate Director Air Quality Policy Division.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
1 National Standards Set for Criteria Pollutants  Particulate Matter  Sulfur Dioxide  Nitrogen Dioxide  Carbon Monoxide  Lead  Ozone.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
Update on the 2015 Ozone Standard Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair May 3, 2016.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Revised EPA Ozone Standard – Effects in the West May 15, 2008.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Daily Screening for Wildfire Impacts on Ozone using a Photochemical Model A Proposal to the Texas Near-Nonattainment Areas Greg Yarwood
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Impact of NOx Emissions in Georgia on Annual PM2.5
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Designations for Indian Country
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Ozone in the Tri Cities August 2018.
Uinta Basin General Conformity
DOGM Collaborative Meeting
Presentation transcript:

New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate Presented by: Thomas I Sullivan, P.E. Zephyr Environmental Corporation Presented to: IEEE-IAS/PCA Cement Industry Technical Conference May 18, 2016

Topics Summary of new 2015 O 3 NAAQS Potential consequences of 2015 O 3 NAAQS on cement plants Timeline for designation of new non- attainment areas and SIP changes Evaluation process for the potential designation of individual counties Techniques for developing arguments against nonattainment designation

2015 Ozone NAAQS Previous (2008) O 3 NAAQS: ppm (75 ppb) New (2015) Primary and Secondary O 3 NAAQS: ppm (70 ppb) – Published in Federal Register on 10/26/2015 – Effective on 12/28/2015 – Codified at 40 CFR 50.19

Interpretation of O 3 Standards Ozone Data Conventions – Hourly O 3 concentration data reported in ppm to the 3rd decimal place, with additional digits truncated – Moving 8-hr averages are computed from the hourly data – 8-hr averages are reported in ppm to the 3rd decimal place, with additional digits truncated – A daily maximum 8-hr average is determined for each day Design Value – The design value is the 3-year average of the 4th highest daily maximum 8-hr concentration (same as previous standard) – Design values are reported in ppm to the 3rd decimal place, with additional digits truncated – Because of the truncation, the design value has to be ppm (71 ppb) or higher to exceed the NAAQS

Potential Consequences of New 2015 O 3 NAAQS Nonattainment Designation and Classification based on monitor data Nonattainment Designation triggers: – Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) – Emission Offsets (depends on classification) From 1.1:1 up to 1.5:1 Nonattainment Classification determines the scope of additional requirements – SIP requirements may put potential limitations on future growth 2015 Ozone NAAQS Designations and Classification as early as 2017

Impacts Before Nonattainment Designation For counties where regulatory monitor data design value is currently above the 2015 standard: – No impact to Minor NSR projects – Ozone analysis potentially required for PSD projects – Additional exposure to Public Comments

PSD Ozone Analysis Requirement For air permit applications which trigger PSD for NO x and/or VOC, 40 CFR 52.21(m) requires: – Background ozone monitoring data; and – Air quality analysis as to whether NO x and/or VOC project emissions would cause or contribute to a violation of the ozone NAAQS 40 CFR 52.21(i)(5) provides exemption from ozone analysis for projects with net emissions increase of less than 100 tons/yr of both VOC and NO x – There were no changes by EPA to the 100 ton/yr NO x and VOC exemption level in the 10/26/2015 final rules – The final rule stated that the EPA is currently considering development of a SIL for O 3 through either guidance or a rulemaking process

Estimated Timeline for Designation of Nonattainment Areas and SIP Changes October 1, 2015Consent decree deadline for final NAAQS October 1, 2016State designation recommendations due to the EPA June 2017EPA sends letter to states with proposed nonattainment area designations (120 days prior to final) October 2017EPA to sign (finalize) designations and classifications October 2017EPA to finalize implementation rule October State Implementation Plans (SIP) due

Evaluation Process for the Potential Designation of Individual Counties In determining the ozone nonattainment designations, a county will be designated nonattainment if it is either: – Violating the 2015 NAAQS based on data from the regulatory ozone monitor in that county; or – Contributing to a violation of the 2015 NAAQS in a nearby county with a monitored violation of the NAAQS. Violation of the 2015 ozone NAAQS is based on ozone monitoring data, which is based on a three-year average of the 4th highest daily peak 8-hr ozone measurements for at least one monitor that exceeds 70 ppb. This value is referred to as the “design value” and will likely be based on the 2016 design value ( ). The default geographic boundaries for a nonattainment area designation are typically those counties within the Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) or Combined Statistical Area (which includes two or more adjacent CBSAs).

Evaluation Process for the Potential Designation of Nearby Counties According to 2015 ozone area designation guidance from the EPA, the following factors are considered (using a “weight-of- evidence approach”) in whether to add or remove counties from the default geographic boundaries of the nonattainment areas: –Air Quality Data; –Emissions and Emissions-Related Data –Meteorology; –Geography/topography; and –Jurisdictional boundaries;

Evaluation Process for the Potential Designation of Nearby Counties Air Quality Data; –Current and historical measured ozone concentrations and design values; –NOx and VOC emissions and emissions-related data (NOx and VOC are considered “ozone precursors”, as ground level ozone is formed from photochemical reactions involving NOx and VOC emissions); Emissions and Emissions-Related Data; –Level of control of emission sources; –Correct estimations of NOx & VOC (ozone precursor) emissions; –Contributions of emissions by source type (mobile and stationary sources); –Population density and degree of urbanization; –Traffic and commuting patterns, and growth rates and patterns; Meteorology; –Assess potential source-receptor relationships on high ozone days using wind speed and direction (HYSPLIT Model); Geography/topography; –Such as mountain ranges and valleys which affects long-range transport; Jurisdictional boundaries –Counties, air districts, areas of Indian country, metropolitan planning organizations

Techniques for Developing Arguments Against County Inclusion Work with strategic partners such as other interested parties and potentially regional councils of government Review historical monitoring data and emissions inventories for trends Review meteorological data during the ozone NAAQS exceedances Document enforceable emission reductions for sources in your county (NSPS, NESHAP, state regs, permit conditions) Review other county designations for similarities

Determine if you are in a county that may be affected Look for strategic partners or other groups already working on the issue Determine what your state designation recommendations to the EPA will be (due October 2016) and see if you can participate in the discussion prior to submittal Be ready to potentially respond to EPA proposed nonattainment area designations in June 2017 Summary