LIGO-G070268-00-d April 24, 2007 Auxiliary Optics System (AOS) Technical Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Mike Smith, Phil Willems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Thermal Compensation System – TCS Technical Presentation aLIGO NSF Review LIGO Livingston Observatory April LIGO-G v5.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 LIGO-G v3 Transmission Monitoring Telescope and Suspension – TMS Eric Gustafson aLIGO NSF Review LIGO Livingston Observatory April 25-27, 2011.
LIGO-G M Photon Calibrator DRR & CDR: Response to Reviewers’ Report Phil Willems, Mike Smith.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Thermal Compensation Review David Ottaway LIGO Laboratory MIT.
LIGO-G W 2005 CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection 1 High-Power Stabilized Lasers and Optics of GW Detectors Rick Savage.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems Design & Interferometer Sensing & Optics Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 13 Meeting, 5 June 2003.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
1 G Mike Smith Gravitational Waves & Precision Measurements.
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Status of LIGO Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala LIGO-G D Commissioning and detector improvements for S4.
LIGO-G D LIGO R&D1 Thermal Compensation System Design Requirement and Conceptual Design Review Presentation Phil Willems and Mike Smith August.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Thermal Compensation: The GEO and LIGO experience and requirements for advanced detectors Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO Laboratory1 Enhanced and Advanced LIGO TCS Aidan Brooks - Caltech Hannover LSC-VIRGO Meeting, October 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G D LIGO II1 AUX OPTICS SUPPORT Michael Smith, 6/11/03 STRAY LIGHT CONTROL ACTIVE OPTICS COMPENSATION OUTPUT MODE CLEANER PO MIRROR AND PO.
LSC August G Z Gingin High Optical Power Test Facility (AIGO) 1 High Optical Power Test Facility - Status First lock, auto-alignment and.
40m AOS DRD, G R1 40m Auxiliary Optics Support Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01 Stray Light Control Initial.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
AdV Thermal Compensation System Viviana Fafone AdV/aLIGO joint technical meeting, February 4, 2004.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Baton Rouge LSC Meeting, March 2007 LIGO-G Z.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Cascina, Nov. 4 th, 2008 AdV review 1 AdV Injection system E. Genin European Gravitational Observatory.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, March 16, 2004 Peter Fritschel.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
40m Optical Systems & Sensing DRD, G R 1 40m Optical Systems and Sensing Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01.
Thermal compensation issues: sensing and actuation V. Fafone University of Rome Tor Vergata and INFN ASPERA Technological Forum – EGO October, 2011.
Auxiliary Optical Systems - AOS
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
First Lessons from the Advanced LIGO Integration Testing
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G d April 24, 2007 Auxiliary Optics System (AOS) Technical Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Mike Smith, Phil Willems CIT

LIGO-G d April 24, AOS Functions- a Grab Bag of Optics NO CHANGE Stray Light Control (SLC)- baffles and beam dumps to prevent scattered light and ghost beams from interfering with interferometer performance Thermal Compensation System (TCS)- senses thermal lensing of core optics due to absorbed laser power and compensates using tailored heaters Pickoff Mirrors and Telescopes- collects a sample of the interferometer beam and reduces its size for transmission out of vacuum to the optical tables Initial Alignment System (IAS)- surveying and metrology used to install the in-vacuum optics in the correct positions with the correct orientations Optical Lever System (OpLev)- sensors to monitor the orientation of the optics as they swing in their suspensions Photon Calibrator- applies a known radiation pressure force to the End Test Masses for interferometer calibration Output Mode-Matching Telescope (OMMT)- reduces the dark port beam size and couples it into the Output Mode Cleaner Viewports- gets light into and out of the vacuum

LIGO-G d April 24, What Ties AOS All Together NO CHANGE AOS, broadly defined, is concerned with how light is maneuvered around the interferometer and into and out of vacuum: » scattered light » ghost beams » pickoff beams » output beams » optical levers » thermal compensators and compensator probes » photon calibrator beams The bulk of the optical layout inside the vacuum is defined by AOS

LIGO-G d April 24, Stray Light Control UPDATE COST Stray Light Control uses baffles and beam dumps to safely discard scattered light and ghost beams before they can interfere with IFO operation. Requirement: the phase noise resulting from stray light scattered back into the IFO from moving surfaces must not exceed 1/10 th the Advanced LIGO sensitivity. Estimates of the coupling paths and sensitivity of the interferometer to scattered light are underway. Technical challenges under control. cost: $533k (before contingency)

LIGO-G d April 24, SLC—Suspended Beam Dumps, Baffles, & Faraday Isolator Suspended Cryopump Baffle Suspended Arm Cavity baffle Suspended Faraday Isolator

LIGO-G d April 24, Thermal Compensation System (TCS) NO CHANGE TCS was developed for Advanced LIGO, but retrofit to initial LIGO and has proven itself essential. Requirements: TCS must… » prevent RF sideband power buildup in the recycling cavities from saturating due to aberration losses » keep GW sideband amplitude loss through the signal cavity below 5% » keep dark port contrast defect light below 1 mW level TCS could also adjust static curvature errors and control acoustic parametric instability by tuning the arm cavity mode spectrum. TCS will employ two types of actuator: » Incandescent ring heaters for homogeneous absorption » Carbon dioxide laser heaters for inhomogeneous absorption TCS will employ two types of sensor: » Dedicated probes for individual optic phase profiles » Phase cameras for IFO beam structure $1,499k

LIGO-G d April 24, Pickoff Mirrors and Telescopes UPDATE COST Pickoff mirrors reflect a small fraction of IFO beam out of the main beam to be sensed for IFO control; telescopes reduce the beam size to fit through viewports to sensing tables. Requirements: TBD, but conservative estimate is to scale up proportional to the increase in beam size from LIGO to Advanced LIGO. All basic optics and not technically demanding. $2,223k

LIGO-G d April 24, Initial Alignment System NO CHANGE Surveying and metrological equipment for positioning and orienting core optics during initial installation. Requirements: same as those for initial LIGO- » mrad pitch and yaw » +- 1mm transverse positioning Essentially no difference from initial LIGO. $110k

LIGO-G d April 24, Optical Lever System NO CHANGE Monitors orientation of suspended optics by sensing reflected laser beam with quadrant photodetectors. Requirements: angular noise, Hz- <10 -8 rad RMS These are used in initial LIGO and work well, but would work a little better with position-insensitive receiver lenses. Prototype lenses have been tested. Only small changes to existing hardware here. $812k

LIGO-G d April 24, Photon Calibrator Status, Development NO CHANGE Basic design for initial LIGO works, but Nd:YLF lasers used are not quite as reliable as we’d like. Requirements: 1W pk-pk sinusoidal power output to 2 kHz, noise injection <1/10 th Advanced LIGO sensitivity New design will use Nd:YAG lasers, offset locked from main IFO beam to prevent scattered light injection. New laser and offset locking are well-known technologies- technical challenges are modest. If electrostatic actuators in SUS are insufficiently quiet, the Photon Calibrator will be upgraded to Photon Drive- same basic design, but with more powerful laser. $948k

LIGO-G d April 24, Output Mode-Matching Telescope NO CHANGE Main interferometer beam of 6 cm spot size is reduced for input to output mode cleaner and detection. If stable signal recycling cavity is adopted, this telescope will be incorporated into signal recycling cavity and have more stringent displacement noise requirements (comparable to signal recycling mirror). Requirements: TBD In initial LIGO, this was another Pickoff Telescope. For Advanced LIGO it will be a long suspended telescope similar to the Input Mode-Matching Telescope. Technical challenges under control. $668k

LIGO-G d April 24, Viewports NO CHANGE All light enters and exits the vacuum through viewports » BK7 and fused silica for visible and Nd:YAG light » Zinc selenide for carbon dioxide laser light Viewports need good but not spectacular flatness, AR coatings Requirements (for Nd:YAG viewports): » clear aperture >2.75” » wavefront distortion 633nm » transmittance >99.9% Basic optics, similar to initial LIGO, no difficulties expected. $327k

LIGO-G d April 24, Why We Think We Can Build All This CHANGE SLC- similar to initial LIGO, suspended beam dumps and baffles using existing technology TCS- » Carbon dioxide laser projector used on initial LIGO » Ring heaters tested/used at MIT, GEO600 and Gingin » Sensors developed and tested at Gingin and IAP (Nizhny Novgorod) Pickoff Mirrors &Telescopes- new suspensions using existing technology, telescopes similar to initial LIGO IAS- same as initial LIGO OpLev- same as initial LIGO, with position-insensitive receiver tested at Caltech. Photon Calibrator- same as initial LIGO, but with same laser we use in all our tabletop experiments OMMT- same as input mode-matching telescope, except potentially with AdLIGO triple suspensions Viewports- same as initial LIGO

LIGO-G d April 24, AOS Safety Considerations NO CHANGE AOS includes lasers » Class IV: TCS carbon dioxide projector, Photon Calibrator Nd:YAG » Class IIIb: IAS autocollimator, TCS sensors, OptLevs Fixed installations (TCS, OptLev, Photon Calibrator) employ beam tubes, enclosures, keyed entry interlocks, safety protocols Temporary installations (IAS) employ strict safety protocols Lock loss involves release of ≤22J of light per arm in 30 μs- Stray Light Control includes baffles to keep this light from damaging in-vacuum equipment or escaping vacuum. ‘Standard’ safety issues: ergonomics, electrical, weight, pressure