Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality David Parrish CIRES University of Colorado NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division Boulder,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Advertisements

Regional Transported Dust To The Las Vegas Valley From Mojave and Sonoran Desert Areas CDAWG November, 2013.
Trends in background ozone in Houston-Galveston, Air Quality Division Mark Estes a, Shaena Berlin b, Andrew Langford c, Melody Dong d, and David.
Investigate possible causes Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation (ITCT) An International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Program.
By David Gray.  Background ozone  ozone present through natural or nonlocal sources  currently ranges from ppb in North America  Rising background.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
AIR POLLUTION IN THE US : Ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) are the two main pollutants 75 ppb (8-h average) 15  g m -3 (1-y av.)
Today’s forecast: Observations 1.D.Jaffe 2.T. VanCuren 3.R. Husar 4.J.Creilson.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Clark County Regional Ozone and Precursor Study (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
Ozone transport network Guoxun Tian CS 790G Fall 2010.
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
Effect of global change on ozone air quality in the United States Shiliang Wu, Loretta Mickley, Daniel Jacob, Eric Leibensperger, David Rind.
Characteristics of Asian Pollution at Mt. Bachelor Observatory during Spring 2004 Peter Weiss-Penzias UWB Data Workshop, Oct. 14, 2004.
ITCT 2K2 Field Study (Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation) ITCT 2K2 Introduction Today (briefly): Examine a major Asian emission transport.
Long-range transport of ozone from the Los Angeles Basin: A case study A.O. Langford 1, C. J. Senff 2, R.J Alvarez 1 II, R. M. Banta 1, R.M. Hardesty 1.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Great Basin Ozone Problem Measurements indicate high ozone concentrations in the Great Basin. Back trajectory analysis and satellite remote sensing will.
More Info: David Parrish Tom Ryerson NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division CalNex 2010: An Ozone & PM Air.
CAPITA CAPITA PM and Ozone Analysis A. PM2.5 National Maps B. Visibility (PM2.5) trends C. Natural (out of EPA jurisdiction) Events D. US-Canada Ozone.
Transboundary influences on US background ozone Huiqun Wang 1 Philippe Le Sager 2 Rokjin Park 3
Trans-Pacific Transport of Ozone and Reactive Nitrogen During Spring Thomas W. Walker 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Aaron van Donkelaar.
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
WESTAR Ozone Transport Analysis Clinton P. MacDonald Dianne S. Miller Sean Raffuse Tim S. Dye Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA WESTAR Fall Business.
Observation and Modeling Evidence of Ozone Transport to and from Asia Hajime Akimoto (Oliver Wild and Pakpong Pochanart) Frontier Research Center for Global.
Estimating local versus regional contributions to tropospheric ozone: An example case study for Las Vegas Mark Green and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
1 Ozone Trends at Cleanest 10% Sites March 2010 Till Stoeckenius, Lan Ma, Lynsey Parker ENVIRON International Corp. & Gregory Stella Alpine Geophysics,
Global Distribution and Transport of Air Pollution Presented at The Haagen-Smit Symposium: From Los Angeles to Global Air Pollution Lake Arrowhead, April.
April 14, 2015 Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council EPA 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference "Air Quality Challenges:
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
Techniques for Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Impact on Ozone for Possible Exceptional Events Daniel Alrick 1, Clinton MacDonald 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, Charles.
A.O. Langford 1, C.J. Senff 2, 1, R. J. Alvarez II 1, R.M. Hardesty 1, R. M. Banta 1, W.A. Brewer 1, S.P. Sandberg 1, R.D. Marchbanks 2,1, A.M. Weickmann.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Year-to-year variability in Western U.S. high-O 3 events tied to climate regimes and stratospheric intrusions: Implications.
Asian and stratospheric influences on western U.S. ozone air quality AQAST4 Sacramento, CA November 29, 2012 Arlene M. Fiore Acknowledgments. Meiyun Lin.
Oil & Natural Gas Partnership. Problem We are having problems meeting NAAQS and regional haze standards in the West Our existing programs are sometimes.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair Telling the OTAG Ozone Story with Data.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Variability in surface ozone background over the United States: Implications for air quality policy Arlene Fiore 1, Daniel J. Jacob, Hongyu Liu 2, Robert.
C. J. Senff, R. J. Alvarez II, R. M. Hardesty, A. O. Langford, R. M. Banta, W. A. Brewer, F. Davies, S. P. Sandberg, R. D. Marchbanks, A. M. Weickmann.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
CCOS TC Kickoff Meeting Cluster Analysis for CCOS Domain Ahmet Palazoglu (P.I.) Scott Beaver Swathi Pakalapati University of California, Davis Department.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
WESTAR Council & the University of Nevada Conference on Western Ozone Transport October 10-12, 2012 Reno, NV.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Western States July 2013.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Long-term measurements of surface ozone at remote and rural sites in China Xiaobin Xu 1, Weili Lin 1,2 1 Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Key.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Science Questions.
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Linking regional air pollution with global chemistry and climate:
Analysis of tropospheric ozone long-term lidar and surface measurements at the JPL-Table Mountain Facility site, California Maria J. Granados-Muñoz and.
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
Ozone pollution (events) in the GFDL AM3 chemistry-climate model
Ozone Trends along U.S. West Coast
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
AIR POLLUTION AND GLOBAL CHANGE: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED POLICY
INTEX-B flight tracks (April-May 2006)
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality David Parrish CIRES University of Colorado NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division Boulder, Colorado USA Consultant with David.D.Parrish, LLC (Background Ozone = that transported into U.S. = Baseline Ozone)

Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality Today: Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Results from Las Vegas Ozone Study

Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality Acknowledgements: Many people have provided O 3 data sets (CARB) 2 modeling studies: Meiyun Lin – Princeton/ NOAA/GFDL Jerome Brioude - CIRES/ NOAA ESRL CSD

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Trends ( ) in ozone design values*. Emission reductions have been remarkably effective throughout most of U.S. Mean eastern US trend: -1.3 ± 0.6 ppb yr-1 (1 standard deviation). significant increase insignificant increase significant decrease insignificant decrease ppb/yr Mean trend: -1.3 ppb/yr (Taken from * Ozone design value = 3 year running mean of annual 4 th highest maximum 8 hr average ozone.

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Trends ( ) in ozone design values. Emission reductions have been remarkably effective throughout most of U.S. Mean eastern US trend: -1.3 ± 0.6 ppb yr-1 (1 standard deviation). Mean western US trends: -1.0 ± 0.6 ppb yr-1all -0.6 ± 0.7 ppb yr-1 > 1km -0.4 ± 0.7 ppb yr-1 rural & > 1km significant increase insignificant increase significant decrease insignificant decrease Mean trend: -1.3 ppb/yr (Taken from

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Compare 5 high altitude rural sites Whiteface Mtn m Big Meadows 1073 m Cove Mtn m Mt. Bachelor 2763 m Lassen NP 1756 m April - May

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Compare 5 high altitude rural sites Ozone (ppb) Small symbols, dashed lines = 95%ile Large symbols, solid lines = median Whiteface Mtn. Big Meadows Cove Mtn. April - May

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Compare 5 high altitude rural sites Ozone (ppb) Small symbols, dashed lines = 95%ile Large symbols, solid lines = median Whiteface Mtn. Big Meadows Cove Mtn. Lassen NP April - May

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Compare 5 high altitude rural sites Ozone (ppb) Small symbols, dashed lines = 95%ile Large symbols, solid lines = median Mt. Bachelor Whiteface Mtn. Big Meadows Cove Mtn. Lassen NP April - May

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Compare 5 high altitude rural sites Ozone (ppb) Small symbols, dashed lines = 95%ile Large symbols, solid lines = median Mt. Bachelor Whiteface Mtn. Big Meadows Cove Mtn. Lassen NP Aircraft – Western North America free troposphere U.S. median trends (April - May): East: ppb/yr West: ppb/yr April - May

Overview of trends in U.S. O 3 concentrations Owen R. Cooper CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Sites: Glacier, Yellowstone, Pinedale, Centennial, RMNP, Gothic, G. Canyon, Chiricahua, Sequoia, Lassen, Great Basin, Yosemite, Mesa Verde, Canyonlands, Walden, Petrified Forest, Escalante, Zion, Dinosaur, Joshua Tree- Black Rock, Joshua Tree-Cottonwood Canyon, Meeker, Craters of the Moon, Grand Teton Ozone design values - high altitude rural sites ≥ 76 ppb ppb ppb ppb ≤ 60 ppb 8 of 24 sites currently exceed 70 ppb NAAQS

Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins * How has O 3 evolved in response to emission controls in these different air basins? O 3 has been measured in nearly all 15 since coastal, 2 in Central Valley, deserts, mountains, etc. South Coast has one of the most populous urban areas in the U.S. Geology and land-use spectrum gives a wide spectrum of ozone precursor emission sources.

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0  = response time of emission controls South Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : South Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins y 0 = 56 ppb A = 180 ppb  = 22 years y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0  = response time of emission controls

South Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins y 0 = 56 ppb 39 ppb A = 180 ppb  = 22 years During the highest 10% of O 3 episodes: In 1980 local contribution (180 ppb) > 3X baseline contribution In 2014 local contribution (39 ppb) only ~70% of baseline contribution Large O 3 reductions have been accomplished, but not much more is possible (90 th percentile approximates design value)

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls South Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 68 ± 14 ppb 90th percentile = 56 ± 6 ppb median = 50 ± 6 ppb 25th percentile = 49 ± 7 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years  = 22 years is 15 year half-life y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0

San Diego:  = 22 years Examine Baseline O 3 in other air basins y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0  = response time of emission controls 90th percentile, South Coast: A = 180 ppb y 0 = 56 ± 6 ppb 90th percentile, San Diego: A = 68 ppb y 0 = 58 ± 4 ppb Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins

y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0  = response time of emission controls North Coast: linear fit 90th percentile, South Coast: A = 180 ppb y 0 = 56 ± 6 ppb 90th percentile, San Diego: A = 68 ppb y 0 = 58 ± 4 ppb 90th percentile, North Coast: y 2000 = 51 ± 3 ppb O 3 coming ashore at sea level along the coast of California is 50 – 60 ppb or higher on 10% of days during ozone season. Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Examine Baseline O 3 in other air basins

South Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins  = 22 years 90th %ile, South Coast: A = 180 ppb y 0 = 56 ± 6 ppb y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 Examine Baseline O 3 in other air basins

Mojave Desert Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins  = 22 years 90th %ile, South Coast: A = 180 ppb y 0 = 56 ± 6 ppb 90th %ile, Mojave Desert: A = 80 ppb y 0 = 74 ± 11 ppb y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 O 3 transported into Mojave Desert from outside the U.S. is > 74 ± 11 ppb on 10% of days during ozone season. Examine Baseline O 3 in other air basins

South Coast AB median and 25 th %ile are now lower than in the Mojave Desert On most days of ozone season, max 8hr O 3 higher in Mojave Desert AB than SoCAB Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Compare two basins

Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Project into future If same trends continue, Mojave Desert AB will soon have higher 90 th %ile than SoCAB. More difficult for Mojave Desert AB to reach new NAAQS than SoCAB. South Coast AB median and 25 th %ile are now lower than in the Mojave Desert On most days of ozone season, max 8hr O 3 higher in Mojave Desert AB than SoCAB

Sponsored by the Clark County Department of Air Quality Andrew O. Langford CIRES/NOAA ESRL CSD Goal: Study Impact of stratospheric intrusions and long-range transport on surface air quality

* Clark County exceedance days ** * Ozone (ppb) Powerhouse Fire

* Clark County exceedance days Powerhouse Fire Las Vegas CO (ppb) ** * Exceedance day with low CO

* Clark County exceedance days ** * Ozone (ppb) Powerhouse Fire Low CO means O 3 not from urban areas or wild fires

High O 3 layers (STT) ppb ** Altitude (m AGL) Altitude (m ASL) * Clark County exceedance days

First measurements following a stratospheric intrusion down to the surface! Ozone (ppb) CO (ppb) High O 3 = low CO, dry air

Surface O 3 anticorrelated with H 2 O and CO : O 3 of stratospheric origin O3- Ozone (ppb) CO (ppb)

May 21 May 25 Ozone (ppb) Angel Peak (NOAA) Jean NV (Clark Co.) Great Basin NP (NPS) Stratospheric air observed at Angel Peak had region-wide influence. Las Vegas Jean NV Great Basin NP

Stratospheric air at start of each exceedance day. Asian pollution also contributed to first exceedance. No significant wildfire contributions to 3 exceedance days. Jerome Brioude (NOAA/CIRES)

Meiyun Lin (NOAA/GFDL/Princeton) Stratospheric contribution to MDA8: ppbv in May-June 2013 Observed AM3 total AM3 stratosphere Las Vegas Jean NV nnn Asian contribution to MDA8: 5-15 ppb Total background: typically ppb U.S. contribution usually quite small! ?

> 30% exceedance rate for 70 ppb NAAQS in this period Baseline O 3 is increasing during this season Maximum Average Angel Peak

70 ppb May-June Jean NV Crestline SoCAB Day of year Max Daily 8-hr O 3 At higher elevations in the western U.S., O 3 from the stratosphere is very important – maximizes in spring As anthropogenic O 3 is further reduced, maximum O 3 concentrations will occur earlier in year. High O 3 in the rural west is not primarily due to transport from Los Angeles.

Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality Summary and Conclusions

Mean trend: -1.3 ppb/yr Mean trend/yr Mean trend: -1.3 ppb/yr Me an tren d: -1.3 pr Me an tren d: -1.3 Over the decades, emission reductions have been remarkably effective in reducing U.S. surface O 3 Processes controlling O 3 are now very different in eastern and western U.S.

In the western U.S., baseline ozone is a very large fraction of the total, and is increasing Finding T1: Transport of baseline O 3 can enhance surface O 3 concentrations to such an extent that the margin for local and regional O 3 production before exceeding the NAAQS is greatly reduced or potentially eliminated, even in California's urban areas. Finding T2: Transport of baseline ozone accounts for a majority of surface ozone concentrations in California at urban as well as rural locations, both on average and during many exceedance events. Only in the most intense exceedance events does local and regional photochemical production contribute the majority.

In California, high O 3 has become a rural, even more than an urban, issue (even more so in the San Joaquin Valley).

Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality Thank you for your attention!

Mojave Desert Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins  = 22 years Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 75 ± 20 ppb 90th percentile = 74 ± 11 ppb median = 67 ± 6 ppb 25th percentile = 64 ± 4 ppb Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Mojave Desert Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins  = 22 years Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 75 ± 20 ppb 90th percentile = 74 ± 11 ppb median = 67 ± 6 ppb 25th percentile = 64 ± 4 ppb Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years National Design Value

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls San Joaquin Valley Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 108 ± 7 ppb 90th percentile = 95 ± 5 ppb median = 82 ± 4 ppb 25th percentile = 73 ± 5 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls Salton Sea Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 83 ± 13 ppb 90th percentile = 74 ± 3 ppb median = 66 ± 2 ppb 25th percentile = 61 ± 3 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls South Central Coast Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 71 ± 8 ppb 90th percentile = 60 ± 5 ppb median = 53 ± 3 ppb 25th percentile = 50 ± 3 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls San Francisco Bay Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 81 ± 10 ppb 90th percentile = 59 ± 5 ppb median = 44 ± 3 ppb 25th percentile = 39 ± 2 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls Sacramento Valley Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 96 ± 9 ppb 90th percentile = 81 ± 5 ppb median = 66 ± 3 ppb 25th percentile = 57 ± 3 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years

Daily Maximum 8-hour average O 3 anywhere in basin May – September O 3 season Calculate maximum, 90 th %, 50 th and 25 th percentiles Plot time evolution Least-squares regression fit to : y 0 = baseline O 3 contribution A = 1980 O 3 enhancement above y 0 t = year; t 0 = 1980  = response time of emission controls Mountain Counties Historical trends of O 3 in California’s air basins Each curve has its own y 0 value: maximum = 98 ± 14 ppb 90th percentile = 82 ± 7 ppb median = 70 ± 5 ppb 25th percentile = 63 ± 5 ppb  = 22 years Each curve also has its own A value, but a common response time: 22 years