Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May 20071 LHC On-Line Modeling The LHC On-line Model: what it is NOT! What is it then? The Team and the Tasks SDDS MAD-X Version.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC TeamMAD-X Day, September 4, 2003 MAD-X for CLIC H. Braun, R. Corsini, T.d’Amico, A. Faus-Golfe, M. Korostelev, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, D. Schulte,
Advertisements

RHIC Experience: Optics Measurements, Corrections, and Modeling M. Bai C-A Dept., BNL.
Mad-X Status Purpose of the Second MAD-X Day Program of the Workshop MAD-X Code Facts MAD-X History and Future Services MAD-X Collaborators Manpower Needs.
Mad-X AB/ABP Meeting Agenda: 1.Latest MAD-X developments &Plan 2.Module Keeper Crises –My Tasks –Module Keeper Tasks –Uncovered Modules 3.A.O.B.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
MIA optics knobs and IP knobs for PEP-II optics (+ dispersion) improvement and IP matching, and its fast iteration during MD for accommodating orbit drift.
28/09/2006MG – ABP General meeting1 HIGHLIGHTS OF LOC ACTIVITIES IN 2006 M. Giovannozzi on behalf of LOC members Ralph Assmann Chiara Bracco Helmut Burkhardt.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
PTC ½ day – Experience in PS2 and SPS H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Tools for loss analysis and studies PS2/PS2+ Meeting 23 rd of May of 2007 Javier Barranco AB/ABP.
PTC Integration into MAD-X What is PTC? (Etienne’s words) Some Facts about PTC What are the advantages for MAD-X? Magnet Treatment in PTC How will we use.
Status of LHC AC Dipole Task M. Bai, R. Calaga, R. Miyamoto, P. Oddo, G. Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory M. Syphers, A. Jansson Fermi National Accelerator.
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
LHC Technical Committee, 23/05/20071 LHC Commissioning Phases Squeeze presented by Massimo Giovannozzi on behalf of the LHCCWG Particular thanks to S.
Friday to Saturday 02:00: Machine closed. 09:00: Cryogenics all OK. Preparing pre-cycle. 10:00: Pre-cycle started. 11:30: Pre-cycle finished. 14:00: Beam.
SPS re-commissioning with beam K. Cornelis PS-SPS days.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Beam based modelling Beam based modelling Tobias Persson Jonne Moeskops Mattias Fjellstrom Jaime Coello de Portugal Ghislain Roy Agnieszka Szczotka Piotr.
LHC online modeling Mark IV LHC online modeling Mark IV Piotr Skowroński Tobias Persson Agnieszka Szczotka Jaime Coello de Portugal Lukas Malina Mattias.
Brainstorming on the field model: MAS activities P. Hagen, E. Todesco, J.P. Koutchouk CERN, 24 h March 2006 Field quality Working Group.
Frank SchmidtSpace Charge # 31 Style of the Meeting I have agreed with Elias that we want meetings without fear to ask any crazy question! Fancy presentations.
OMC – Online Model - G. Roy 1 Online Model Ghislain Roy Work very much in progress building upon the efforts and realisations of many people.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
PTC-ORBIT code for CERN machines (PSB, PS, SPS) Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) Group meeting, CERN June 1, 2011 current status …
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
“WISE” Simulation of optical imperfections in LHC P. Hagen AT/MCS Acknowledgements: Colleagues in AT/MAS, AT/MEL, AT/MTM, AB/ABP CERN, October 2006.
MD Wed – Sat DayTimeMD Wed06:00UPS repair, ATS optics checks w/o beam 12:00Cycle, test ATS optics w/o beam 16: TeV: BPM offset determination for.
Panel Discussion on Single Particle Codes 1.Catalogue of existing codes 2.Transparency of input and output between different codes: what is the status.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
HIGHLIGHTS OF LAST MONTHS OF HSS ACTIVITIES AN EXCITING AND HECTIC PERIOD WITH THE LHC BACK IN OPERATION… ABP General Group meeting - HSS1.
Status of LHC AC Dipole Task M. Bai, R. Calaga, R. Miyamoto, P. Oddo, G. Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory M. Syphers, A. Jansson Fermi National Accelerator.
Beta* leverage during RHIC AuAu Run14 G. Robert-Demolaize, M. Bai, C. Harper, A. Marusic, X. Shen, S. White Work supported, in parts, by the European Commission.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Beam Plans for Accelerator Physics Systems eLTC Summary February Session 5: Beam Plans for Accelerator Physics Systems 1 Main goals for this session:
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
BEAM INSTRUMENTATION GROUP DEPENDABILITY APPROACH CERN, Chamonix 26th January 2016 William Viganò
STABILITY STUDIES OF THE PSB-TO-PS TRANSFER W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira With many inputs from: O. Berrig, J. Borburgh, S. Gilardoni, GP di Giovanni, B. Goddard,
Linear optics - I Low beta* at injection –Reduction of injection could potentially reduce time to collisions and allow for a more relaxed ramp&squeeze,
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
LSA Core overview 6 / 11 / 2007 Wojciech Śliwiński (AB-CO-AP) on behalf of LSA team.
LEIR re-commissioning and other operational aspects First ideas for new tools and organization First draft re-commisisoning plan H. Bartosik, A. Huschauer,
H2LC The Hitchhiker's guide to LSA Core Rule #1 Don’t panic.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
ICE SECTION The coolest place to be! Elias Métral
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Emittance growth AT PS injection
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Multiturn extraction for PS2
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
450 GeV Preliminary Commissioning: Measurement Programme
Monday :20 beta beat corrections during squeeze for flat machine finished Afterwards fixing issues at injection: BPM rephrasing for B2 solved.
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
Quadrupole error localization using Response Fits
System Reengineering Restructuring or rewriting part or all of a system without changing its functionality Applicable when some (but not all) subsystems.
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Non-linear (Effective) Modeling of Accelerators
Presentation transcript:

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May LHC On-Line Modeling The LHC On-line Model: what it is NOT! What is it then? The Team and the Tasks SDDS MAD-X Version Status of MAD-X Scheme of the LHC On-line Model Knob Applications and Tests Milestones

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May The LHC On-Line Modeling: what it is NOT! Real-time control Interference with the LHC operation “Re-invention” of established tools Lengthy Off-line Analysis

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Then what is the LHC On-Line Modeling? The LHC machine will be a very demanding accelerator with large non-linearities to control. Particle loss in the LHC must be actively controlled to avoid damage to the machine. Therefore any critical adjustment to the machine must be checked beforehand with a proper MAD-X model of the LHC. ABP is convinced that this machine will require a powerful on-line modeling tool that is tested and ready for use in the control room before the LHC will be commissioned. Main design features: The SDDS MAD-X version is the principle engine of the LHC on-line model. A complete and trustworthy (non-)linear model of the LHC will be composed with the databases of the measured magnet errors and beam-based measurements. Access of knobs to and fro the control system for testing with MAD-X before send- to-hardware. Experimenters and operators should profit from a fully functional on-line tool! Speed-up the off-line analysis time such that it can be done within minutes directly in the control room. Reference: L. Bottura & L. Deniau; Wise: P. Hagen, JP. Koutchouk, E. Todesco

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May The Team and Tasks Frank Schmidt - Overall Responsibility, MAD-X General Support, SDDS Interfaces, (Non-)linear LHC Model from Fidel/Wise Werner Herr – SDDS MAD-X Version, Closed Orbit Correction Ilya Agapov – Interface to Control System, Application Development, Co-Responsibility for MAD-X Core & PTC_TWISS, Beam-Based Model Adjustments Thys Risselada – General Optics Support, MAD-X Error Routines Rogelio Tomás, Masamitsu Aiba & Akio Morita (KEK), Rama Calaga (BNL) – Beta-Beating Yiton Yan (SLAC) – MIA (  2 nd half 2009) In Collaboration with: Jörg Wenninger, V. Kain – SPS Operation, 1000 turn BPM system, Standardization of SDDS LSA Team (Mike Lamont, Greg Kruk, Sandeep Bharade) – General control system, SDDS issues Alastair Bland – TECHNET Support

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Special SDDS MAD-X Version Werner Herr has prepared this special version of MAD-X. The idea is to read and write SDDS files from MAD-X and to transform the back and forth between TFS Tables. Only 1-dimensional SDDS arrays will be considered. Input example: select,flag=sdds,clear; select,flag=sdds,pattern="^b.*"; select,flag=sdds,pattern="^d.*"; ! convert: read SDDS and write TFS files sddsin,file="cngs-test.sdds",table="sdds_tfs"; write, table="sdds_tfs",file="tfs1"; Reference: W.Herr and F. Schmidt, “Using SDDS data sets with MAD-X”, AB-Note (ABP)

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Status of MAD-X Is MAD-X ready for the LHC commissioning?   Is MAD-X properly maintained? ABP no longer provide several exclusive FTEs for program development and maintenance, instead there is one code custodian and a large group of MAD-X Module Keepers.MAD-X Module Keepers Is MAD-X still further developed? ABP has stopped the full blast develop- ment of MAD-X since the code fulfills the minimum LHC requirements. However, work is going on for CLIC from which LHC will profit.   Is MAD-X reliable? MAD-X has made use of the well debugged MAD8. Moreover, the independent programs SixTrack and PTC provide a continuous check such that any inconsistency could be eliminated. Is MAD-X fast? Indeed there are speed issues due to the mixture of Fortran and C code, dynamic memory allocation and the heavy access of tables  a speed- up will be investigated.

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Scheme of the On-Line Model Camif Strength Sequence DB Aperture ModelClosed Orbit Corrected Model Trim Values Beam Hardware 1 2 Fidel/Wise Errors Misalignment Feed-back Off-line Model

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Knob Applications & Test Closed Orbit (Target) Orbit Bumps (Verifying Aperture) Tunes Linear Coupling   Chromaticity Crossing Angles Beta* Matching Non-Linear CorrectorsCorrectors Linear Model: phases, beta-beating, dispersion  RogelioRogelio Non-Linear Model and in particular the set of Errors . We need a correct model all around the machine. Special tools and Gui required .  The corrected MAD-X model will be archived often for later off-line analysis. Corrections to model will be fed back to the Fidel database in larger time intervals. Feed-down

Frank SchmidtLHCCWG - 8 May Milestones Consolidation of the SDDS tools (end of 2006). Definition of Structure of the SDDS for SPS, LHC and Transfer Lines (~May 2007). Provide mechanism to exchange knob settings to and fro the control system in collaboration with the LSA team (~May 2007). Development of the Applications needed for the On-Line Modeling (~June 2007). (Non-)linear model of the LHC via Fidel/Wise (~June 2007). Testing at SPS (knobs & lattice checks) (SPS start-up & dedicated MD). Be ready for the LHC Commissioning Start-Up in 2007/2008!