Savannah River Site Watch Columbia, South Carolina

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Advertisements

DOE’s Plutonium Disposition Infrastructure with a Focus on the Savannah River Site Tom Clements Adviser to the South Carolina Chapter of the Sierra Club.
Implementation of the Record of Decision for Low-Level and Mixed Low-Level Waste Presentation to the National Governors’ Association Federal Facility Task.
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
Presented to: National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference Presented by: Corinne Macaluso, Transportation Specialist Office of National Transportation.
Disposal of Non-hazardous, Hazardous and Nuclear Waste.
1 Extension of Construction Authorization for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility David Tiktinsky Senior Project Manager Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
Augustus Merwin Presented to the National Security Forum
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Long Term Storage, The Failure of the Federal Government, and NIMBY.
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste April 23, 2007 Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
Safety  performance  cleanup  closure M E Environmental Management National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Role in DOE’s Transformation Barb Beller, Project.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
Near Term Planning for Storage and Transportation of Used Nuclear Fuel Jeff Williams Project Director Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Timothy Pairitz. Nuclear Power 101 Uranium-235 is enriched from 0.7% to 3-5%. Enriched fuel is converted to a uranium oxide powder.
Storage and disposal of mercury and mercury waste in Asia - Conclusions Sven Hagemann GRS.
Welcome to… Hosted by Pull the Plutonium Pork – End MOX Monday, June 24, :00 PM EDT.
1 Electronic Waste Recycling Act DTSC Final Regulations Workshop Presented by Charles Corcoran and Valetti Lang Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
GTRI’s Nuclear Removal Programs Kelly Cummins Director of Former Soviet Union and Asian Threat Reduction National Nuclear Security Administration Presented.
Recycling Nuclear Waste: Potentials and Global Perspectives Mikael Nilsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of California,
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9j – slide 1 of 18 Session I.4.9j Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9jFuel Cycle – High Level Waste Disposal.
Fuel Cycle – High Level Waste Disposal
Thorium for Use in Plutonium Disposition, Proliferation Resistant Fuels, and Future Reactors Brian Johnson WISE 2006
Sustainable Cycle Solutions World Nuclear Association London, Sep 12 th, 2013 Caroline Drevon SVP Strategy, Sales & Innovation Back-End Business Group.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Management of Unneeded Materials and Chemicals (UMC) Arnold Edelman Office of Science May 2006.
EM-1 Office of Environmental Management Building the FY 2003 Budget u Transition budget to begin implementing the top-to-bottom review u Budget consists.
U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Legacy Cleanup Completion Project DOE National Cleanup Workshop September 29,
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9j – slide 1 of 18 Session I.4.9j Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9jFuel Cycle – High Level Waste Disposal.
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E LashCIE Presentation 1/98 1 Recent Accomplishments and Future Directions Dan Giessing U.S. Department.
Environmental Management Review of Corporate Projects.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Program Status National Governors’ Association Meeting May 17, 2002 Alton D. Harris, III.
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1 ISMS/EMS Lessons Learned on Plutonium Disposition Projects at SRS Presented by: Joan S. Bozzone NNSA Environmental Manager NNSA Site Engineering and.
A (Very Basic) Introduction to the Kansas City Plant Jay Coghlan, Executive Director, Nuclear Watch New Mexico October 2007.
U.S. HEU Disposition Program Robert M. George HEU Disposition Program Manager Office of Fissile Materials Disposition.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. Yongbyon Spent Fuel Experience Presented by Mark Mohr
 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste June Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
Briefing M&E Parliamentary Portfolio Committee: Radioactive Waste Management Policy and Strategy.
1 Energy Communities Alliance Meeting WIPP Recovery and Greater-than-Class C Disposal Update February 17, 2016.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
South Carolina Nuclear Advisory Council SRS Update and FY 2017 Budget Service ● Safety ● Security ● Stewardship ● SRNL ● Sustainability April 14, 2016.
Savannah River Downblending Program for Surplus, Non-Pit Plutonium Unclassified Kenneth S. Fuller K-Area Complex Operations Support Manager 2016 INMM Annual.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposition at the
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
NRC Update of Low Level Waste Emerging Issues
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS)
Updating the NRC’s Alternative Disposal Request Guidance Document
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
NDA Draft Strategy.
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
Overview of NRC Low-Level Radioactive Waste Activities and Initiatives
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
Lesson from Savannah River
The National Environmental Policy Act and the SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant
Office of Waste Disposal Office of Environmental Management
Challenges at DOE’s Savannah River Site CPRC’s “Power to the Peaceful” February 4, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Savannah River Site Watch Columbia, South Carolina IPFM Meeting, March 14, 2016 Failure of the Plutonium Disposition Program at the Savannah River Site & Alternatives to MOX Tom Clements Savannah River Site Watch www.srswatch.org https://www.facebook.com/SavannahRiverSiteWatch Columbia, South Carolina

US Department of Energy complex

DOE’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina, facilities for surplus plutonium disposition: MOX plant at “F” and plutonium storage, processing at “K”

US surplus plutonium amounts - in Supplemental EIS, April 2015 – 61 US surplus plutonium amounts - in Supplemental EIS, April 2015 – 61.5 MT

Amounts of plutonium at DOE’s two main storage sites ~15,000 “excess” weapons pits at Pantex (in Texas), plus ~4000 “strategic” pits ~13 metric tons at Savannah River Site (in South Carolina) – site for consolidation of non-pit plutonium

at SRS, 13 MT plutonium stored in old K-Reactor; only a few tonnes under IAEA safeguards

2000 Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement (PMDA) as amended by the 2010 Protocol – addresses 34 MT in both Russia and the U.S. Article IX 6. The activities of each party under this Agreement shall be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

“Dual Track” approach – MOX and immobilization in HLW at SRS - discarded when immobilization terminated in April 2002

Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement “Preferred Alternative,” December 24, 2015 – for 6 metric tons, to Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico – still awaiting issuance of official “Record of Decision” (ROD); WIPP closed since February 2014 and schedule for renewed operation unclear (MOX use in TVA reactors, considered in same document, still not the “preferred alternative”) The U.S. Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) is announcing its Preferred Alternative for the disposition of certain quantities of surplus plutonium evaluated in the Final Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Final SPD Supplemental EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283-S2, April 2015).  Among the potential actions considered in the Final SPD Supplemental EIS, DOE/NNSA analyzed the potential environmental impacts for the disposition of 13.1 metric tons (14.4 tons) of surplus plutonium for which a disposition path is not assigned, including 7.1 metric tons (7.8 tons) of plutonium from pits that were declared excess to national defense needs and 6 metric tons (6.6 tons) of surplus non-pit plutonium. With regard to the 6 metric tons (6.6 tons) of surplus non-pit plutonium, DOE/NNSA’s Preferred Alternative is to prepare this plutonium for eventual disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico. DOE/NNSA may issue a Record of Decision, containing its decision(s) for disposition of this quantity of material, no sooner than 30 days from the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. DOE/NNSA has no Preferred Alternative, at this time, for other potential actions considered in the Final SPD Supplemental EIS.  Specifically, DOE/NNSA has no Preferred Alternative for the disposition of the remaining 7.1 MT of surplus plutonium from pits, nor does it have a Preferred Alternative among the pathways analyzed for providing the capability to disassemble surplus pits and convert the plutonium from pits to a form suitable for disposition.  Consistent with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, once a Preferred Alternative is identified, DOE will announce its preference in a Federal Register notice.  DOE would publish a Record of Decision no sooner than 30 days after its announcement of a Preferred Alternative.

MOX plant at Savannah River Site under construction since August 2007; cost has skyrocketed and there are persistent rumors and hints of design and construction problems & no customers; $345 million/year funding places the project on a shut-down track

HB-Line has packaged ~90 kg of “non-MOXable” plutonium for WIPP

Packages into which downblended plutonium is mixed at SRS – “Pipe Overpack Containers” and “Criticality Control Overpacks”

About 90 kg of plutonium have been packaged at SRS for shipment to WIPP – some POCs still at SRS (260), some in surface storage at WIPP (97) and some already in WIPP (125)

HB-Line also producing up to 3 HB-Line also producing up to 3.7 MT of plutonium oxide “feedstock” for MOX, but only 9.6 kg produced in 2 years

Single glovebox in K-Area used for DE of “3013” cans, could also be used to downblend plutonium; more gloveboxes could be added but no plan or funding yet

“Can-in-canister” immobilization canceled, but about 100 kg of plutonium have been added directly to HLW tanks and vitrified in DWPF. So, immobilization & downblending have been deployed but not MOX.

MOX cost prohibitive, not financially viable; only “downblendng” now being actively pursued; protecting 1500 MOX jobs and annual $400 million funding or paramount importance of politicians

SRS MOX plant in F-Area and Plant Vogtle – April 21, 2015; ©High Flyer, special to SRS Watch

SRS MOX plant - Sunday March 6, 2016; ©High Flyer, special to SRS Watch

As the MOX Projects is in Shambles and Given General Chaos with Plutonium Disposition – Options to Consider:   Terminate MOX plant construction, as proposed by DOE, consider alternative uses for the building. Implement formal policy of no further plutonium shipments to SRS. (900 kg of “gap” plutonium proposed to be imported for non-proliferation reasons – some should go to the UK and France.) Maintain secure storage of 13 MT of plutonium at SRS and pits at Pantex. Construct necessary facilities at SRS to package 6 MT of plutonium for WIPP, if reviews deem this viable. Reconsider direct loading of HLW canisters with plutonium, with aim to immobilize 7 MT. Review “can-in-canister” option for more plutonium. Cap amount to WIPP at 13 MT of plutonium now at SRS (and possibly oxide now at Los Alamos National Lab) – if environmental and safety review, WIPP volume limit and other conditions allow. Formally change PMDA with Russia, let it drift, or exercise Article IX 6. (on inadequate funding). Postpone decisions on disposal of remaining plutonium until MOX situation, WIPP status and funding situation are much clearer.

Tom Clements Savannah River Site Watch (SRS Watch) www. srswatch Tom Clements Savannah River Site Watch (SRS Watch) www.srswatch.org https://www.facebook.com/SavannahRiverSiteWatch Columbia, South Carolina tel. 1-803-834-3084 cell 1-803-240-7268