Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator. E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
Advertisements

Distributive Property
Integrals over Operators
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Wavepacket1 Reading: QM Course packet FREE PARTICLE GAUSSIAN WAVEPACKET.
Wavefunction Quantum mechanics acknowledges the wave-particle duality of matter by supposing that, rather than traveling along a definite path, a particle.
Review Three Pictures of Quantum Mechanics Simple Case: Hamiltonian is independent of time 1. Schrödinger Picture: Operators are independent of time; state.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
P460 - angular momentum1 Orbital Angular Momentum In classical mechanics, conservation of angular momentum L is sometimes treated by an effective (repulsive)
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Gavin Smith Nuclear Physics Group These slides at:
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
101 Outline I.The infinite square well II. A comment on wavefunctions at boundaries III.Parity IV.How to solve the Schroedinger Equation in momentum space.
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Quantum mechanics review. Reading for week of 1/28-2/1 – Chapters 1, 2, and 3.1,3.2 Reading for week of 2/4-2/8 – Chapter 4.
Properties of Equality, Identity, and Operations.
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Algebra Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Question 1.
Ch 3 Quantum Mechanics of Electrons EE 315/ECE 451 N ANOELECTRONICS I.
Solving Quadratic Equations – Square Root Method The square root method can be used to solve a quadratic equation that can be set up into the following.
Solving Polynomial Equations – Factoring Method A special property is needed to solve polynomial equations by the method of factoring. If a ∙ b = 0 then.
Review of Definitions.
(1) Experimental evidence shows the particles of microscopic systems moves according to the laws of wave motion, and not according to the Newton laws of.
Review : Quantum mechanics Jae-hoon Ji Nano Electro-Mechanical Device Lab.
Lecture 15 Solving the time dependent Schrödinger equation
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Solving Quadratic Equations Quadratic Equations: Think of other examples?
Section 4.5 Direct Variation. What happens to Y as X goes up by 1?
Table of Contents Solving Polynomial Equations – Factoring Method A special property is needed to solve polynomial equations by the method of factoring.
[A, B] = 0 If A and B commute there exist eigenfunctions that are simultaneously eigenfunctions of both operators A and B and one can determine simultaneously.
2. Time Independent Schrodinger Equation
1 Reading: QM Course packet – Ch 5 BASICS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS.
Using Variables Algebraic Expressions
MODULE 5 HERMITICITY, ORTHOGONALITY, AND THE SPECIFICATION OF STATES we have stated that we need Hermitian operators because their eigenvalues are real.
5. The Harmonic Oscillator Consider a general problem in 1D Particles tend to be near their minimum Taylor expand V(x) near its minimum Recall V’(x 0 )
Group theory and intrinsic spin; specifically, s=1/2
Schrodinger wave equation
Properties of Hermitian Operators
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Quantum Mechanics of Angular Momentum
Quantum One.
QM1 Concept Test 9.1 Consider the following statements for the product space of two spin systems:
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum Two.
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Central Potential Another important problem in quantum mechanics is the central potential problem This means V = V(r) only This means angular momentum.
Chapter II Klein Gordan Field Lecture 2 Books Recommended:
Quantum mechanics I Fall 2012
QM1 Concept test 8.1 If the total spin quantum number for the system is
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
Quantum Mechanics Postulate 4 Describes expansion
Properties of Real Numbers
Physical Chemistry Week 12
QM1 Concept Test 9.1 Consider the following statements for the product space of a two spin-1/2 system:
Chapter 5 1D Harmonic Oscillator.
Name:______________________________ Date:________________
 .
Solution of the differential equation Operator formalism
16. Angular Momentum Angular Momentum Operator
Objective Find special products of binomials..
Last hour: Raising & Lowering Operators
QM2 Concept Test 11.1 In a 3D Hilbert space,
Expressions & Equations Jeopardy
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
Lecture 10 Angular Momentum
QM2 Concept Test 10.1 Consider the Hamiltonian
Using the Distributive Property to Simplify Algebraic Expressions
Presentation transcript:

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator

E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )

Let’s now consider this set of commutators

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie operators that follow the form

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie operators that follow the form AB – BA = kB

[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p]

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq)

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF +

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF +

AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –

[H, F + ] = – ωF +

HF + – F + H = – ωF +

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n 

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n 

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n 

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  – E n F +  E n  = – ωF +  E n 

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  – E n F +  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  = (E n – ω) F +  E n 

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  – E n F +  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  = (E n – ω) F +  E n  So F + has operated on  E n  to produce a new eigenfunction with eigenvalue E n – ω

EnEn EnEn

EnEn E n – ω EnEn

EnEn E n – 2ω EnEn

EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω EnEn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and so F + must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F +  E ↓  = 0

EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω E↓E↓ EnEn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and so F + must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F +  E ↓  = 0 Aaaaghhhhh…… F+F+ E↓E↓

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip)

= q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p 2 + 1

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 )

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1)

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H  E ↓  = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)  E ↓ 

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H  E ↓  = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)  E ↓  F +  E ↓  = 0

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H  E ↓  = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)  E ↓  F +  E ↓  = 0 H  E ↓  = ½ ω  E ↓  Zero Point Energy

F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H  E ↓  = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)  E ↓  F +  E ↓  = 0 H  E ↓  = ½ ω  E ↓  Zero Point Energy E (v) = ω (v + ½)

They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

Now H can be factorised as H F +  E n  = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F +  E n  H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

A  A’  = A’  A’  AB  A’  – BA  A’  = kB  A’  AB  A’  – BA’  A’  = kB  A’  A{B  A’  } = (A’ + k){B  A’  }

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½m 2 + ½kx 2 H = p 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )

Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½m 2 + ½kx 2 H = p 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )

Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB

[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(–ip) [H,p] = ω(iq) From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Operate on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  with both sides H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  – E n F +  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  = (E n – ω) F +  E n 

They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

Now H can be factorised as H F +  E n  = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F +  E n  H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

A  A’  = A’  A’  AB  A’  – BA  A’  = kB  A’  AB  A’  – BA’  A’  = kB  A’  A{B  A’  } = (A’ + k){B  A’  }

H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB

[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(–ip) [H,p] = ω(iq) From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –

[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Operate on a particular eigenfunction  E n  ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H  E n  = E n  E n  with both sides H F +  E n  – F + H  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  – E n F +  E n  = – ωF +  E n  H F +  E n  = (E n – ω) F +  E n 

EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω E↓E↓ EnEn nn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and that must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F +  E ↓  = 0 Aaaaghhhhh…… F+F+

They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)

Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

Now H can be factorised as H F +  E n  = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F +  E n  H{F +  E n  } = (E n – ω){F +  E n  } H{F –  E n  } = (E n – ω){F –  E n  }

A  A’  = A’  A’  AB  A’  – BA  A’  = kB  A’  AB  A’  – BA’  A’  = kB  A’  A{B  A’  } = (A’ + k){B  A’  }

[A, B] = 0 If A and B commute there exist eigenfunctions that are simultaneously eigenfunctions of both operators A and B and one can determine simultaneously the values of the quantities represented by the two operators but if they do not commute one cannot determine the values of the quantities simultaneously

[A, B] = 0 [A, B] = k B A I A ’ › = A ’ I A ’ › A { B I A ’ › } = (A ’ + k ) { B I A ’ › }

[q, p] = i [H, q] = ω (-ip) [H, p] = ω (-iq)

F + = q + i p F − = q − i p [ H, F + ] = − ω F + [ H, F − ] = + ω F − H = − ½ ω ( F + F − − 1 ) H = + ½ ω ( F − F )

H { F + I E n › } = ( E n − ω ){ F + I E n › } H { F − I E n › } = ( E n − ω ){ F − I E n › }

F + I E ↓ › = 0 H I E ↓ › = ½ ω I E ↓ › E (v) = ω (v + ½ )

F + = q + i p [H, q] = ω (-ip) F ± = q ± i p F − = q − i p [ H,F ± ] = q ± i p