© Johan Løje, 2009 1 Introduction to the legal framework and relief channels regarding the prohibition of commercial bribery in EU and Denmark Advokat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Law Enforcement : Lessons for Investigators & Prosecutors by Ahmer Bilal Soofi Consultant National Accountability Bureau Government of Pakistan.
Advertisements

Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
1. Asset Recovery Rules in Jordan 5 th Pan-European High Level Conference on asset Recovery Offices Cyprus Oct Prof. Fayyad Alqudah (LL.B,
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
Bribery Jon Taylor 24 June What is bribery? Transparency International (a non-governmental anti-corruption organisation) defines bribery as "the.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION November 2008.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
EU Criminal Law Introduction, Lisbon Treaty. EU criminal legislation EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal code EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
European Commission Justice March 2012 Cooperazione Giudiziaria UE Corporate Liability for committing corruption Kiev, 8 February 2013 Workshop on the.
Regional Conference Intellectual Property Crime Bahrain April 2008.
CHILEAN SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES BASIC ELEMENTS OF CRIME PREVENTION (LAW Nº20.393) Pablo Gómez Niada Valparaíso’s Regional Prosecutor.
Compliance and Corporate Social Responsibility 6th CIS LOCAL COUNSEL FORUM Mr. Alexander Bolkvadze, Partner, BLC Law Office - Tbilisi.
GLOBAL FORUM V ON FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND SAFEGUARDING INTEGRITY INTER-RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE VARIOUS FRAMEWORKS.
Chapter III. Criminalization and law enforcement.
Anti-Corruption Conference – Corruption: Impact & Monitoring Anti-korupcijska konferencija – Korupcija: uticaj & monitoring 19. oktobar 2005, Podgorica.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
ANTI-CORRUPTION INSTITUTIONS AND MEDIA IN ALBANIA.
Anti-Corruption, the Swedish way Gunnar Stetler Head of the Swedish Anti-Corruption Unit
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG Internal Market 1 "Reviewing the Review: The European Commission's Third Review of the Product Liability Directive"
The Bribery Act 2010 Bribery – no longer a ‘conventional’ way of doing business TELFA CONFERENCE AND GLOBAL LAW FORUM IN CONJUNCTION WITH USLAW MOSCOW.
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
Prospects for criminal law at EU level and protection of the EU financial interests Dublin 21 March 2014 Irish Centre for European Law The importance of.
IFC Participation in IFI Harmonization on Fraud & Corruption Alpita Shah IFC Legal Department October 2009.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
European Private International Law JUDr. Tereza Kyselovská.
HOSTING, ENTERTAINING AND PROVIDING GIFTS TO OFFICIALS: WHAT IS AND ISN’T ACCEPTABLE? ACI Conference, Moscow, March 2011.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
Problems and challenges in the implementation of anti-corruption activities Drago KOS President of the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, Slovenia.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Treaty Affairs (Updated: 5 July 2004)
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea.
1 The role of the private sector in preventing corruption Arne Røed Simonsen Senior Adviser The Norwegian Business and Industry Security Council.
Cross-border Cooperation of Judges Andrej Kmecl. Cross-border Cooperation of Judges Different aspects of judicial cooperation in environmental cases:
Stability Reliability. UK BRIBARY ACT 2010 Surveyor’s Day 24th October 2014.
Cje Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław Lecture Harmonisation.
Contents What does the law say about bribery and corruption?
ACCESSION TO COUNTER- TERRORISM CONVENTIONS PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY
GRECO evaluations on political financing and recommendations follow-up Zurab Sanikidze Head of the Analytical Department of the Ministry of Justice of.
Copyright All rights reserved. Copyright All rights reserved. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – value added for business or competitive.
Case 105/03 Pupino. Maastrich Treaty Amsterdam Treaty 1999.
1 Introduction to the legal framework and relief channels regarding the prohibition of commercial bribery in Italy Presentation by Raffaele Caldarone.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial Services Bilateral.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 17 – Economic and Monetary Policy.
© Johan Løje, Experiences, challenges and future developments regarding the fight against commercial bribery in Europe and Denmark Advokat Johan.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
IBA Conference Buenos Aires Anti-Corruption Committee Recovery of looted assets 15 October 2008 Switzerland Yves Klein Monfrini Crettol & Associés, Geneva.
Ethical and legal aspects of organ donation; the Santiago Convention
EU Legislative Powers: Principles and Procedures
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Bribery Act 2010.
Functional immunity (only for official acts)
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
A fundamental principle of UNCAC
Presentation transcript:

© Johan Løje, Introduction to the legal framework and relief channels regarding the prohibition of commercial bribery in EU and Denmark Advokat Johan Løje Sandel, Løje & Wallberg

© Johan Løje, Facts European Union –Union based on a treaty Council of Ministers European Parliament Memberstates –27 countries –494 mill people –GDP 15 trillion US $ –Great diversity among memberstates

© Johan Løje, Facts Denmark –Kingdom Parliament –5,5 mill people – km 2 –GDP 196 billion US $ –Homogeneous country

© Johan Løje, Facts ChinaEUDenmark GDP (bill. US $) Inhabitants (mill.) GDP pr. capita

© Johan Løje, Corruption in OECD Source: Transparency International (2008)

© Johan Løje, Legal framework of EU EU-treaty EU legislation –Regulations –directives National laws

© Johan Løje, Legal framework of EU re. corruption JOINT ACTION of 22 December 1998 adopted by the Council of EU Criminal law convention on Corruption (1999) Group of states against corruption (GRECO) convention National laws

© Johan Løje, Issues “Corruption threatens the rule of law, democracy and human rights, undermines good governance, fairness and social justice, distorts competition and hinders economic development” (source : Criminal law convention) corruption distorts fair competition and undermines the principles of openness and freedom of markets, and in particular the smooth functioning of the internal market, and also militates against transparency and openness in international trade (source : JOINT ACTION of 22 December 1998 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on corruption in the private sector )

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – active corruption Active corruption in the private sector is a –Deliberate action –of whosoever –promises, offers or gives, –directly or through an intermediary, –an undue advantage of any kind whatsoever –to a person, –for himself or for a third party, –In the course of the business activities of that person –In order that the person should perform or refrain from performing –an act, in breach of his duties,

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – passive corruption passive corruption in the private sector is a –deliberate action –of a person who, in the course of his business activities, –directly or through an intermediary, –requests or receives –an undue advantage of any kind whatsoever, or –accepts the promise of such an advantage, –for himself or for a third party, –for him to perform or refrain from performing an act, in breach of his duties,

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – measures Measures are to be taken –Cover conduct which involves, or could involve, the distortion of competition, as a minimum –within the common market, and –which results, or might result, in economic damage to others –by the improper award or improper execution of a contract

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – liability of legal persons Legal persons must be held liable, if an act is committed for its benefit by: –any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, who has a leading position within the legal person, based on: a power of representation of the legal person, or an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person, or an authority to exercise control within the legal person, –as well as for involvement as accessories or instigators in the commission of such an offence

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – liability of legal persons Legal persons must also be held liable, if an act is committed for its benefit as a result of: –lack of supervision or control by any employee or other person –when directing or working in any capacity for or on behalf of a natural or legal person operating in the private sector –making it possible to commission active corruption for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – liability of legal persons Liability of a legal person shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are involved as –perpetrators, –instigators or –accessories in the active corruption

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – penalties Laws must be passed to secure that active and passive corruption is punishable –To cover both the actual person involved and –the acting as an accessory in or instigator Criminal punishment must be –Effectively –Proportionately –Dissuasively Criminal punishment must at least include –deprivation of liberty which can give rise to extradition

© Johan Løje, JOINT ACTION – sanctions against legal persons Must be –effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions Shall include –Criminal and non criminal fines may include other sanctions such as: –(a) exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; –(b) temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; –(c) placing under judicial supervision; –(d) a judicial winding-up order.

© Johan Løje, Criminal law Convention (CLC) Acts covered by the convention –Bribery of officials and private individuals Passive Active –Trading in influence –Account offences Jurisdiction Corporate liability Sanctions and measures –Specialized authorities –Co-opreation –Protection of collaborators and witnesses –Gathering of evidence –International cooperation

© Johan Løje, CLC - Bribery Covers both –domestic public officials, –Foreign public officials –Any person, who direct or work for a private sector entity –Officials of international organizations –Members of international parliamentary assemblies –National or international judges –anyone who asserts or confirms that he or she is able to exert an improper influence over the decision-making of any of the above persons the promising, offering or giving by any person, directly or indirectly, of any undue advantage to any of its public officials, for himself or herself or for anyone else, for him or her to act or refrain from acting in the exercise of his or her functions

© Johan Løje, Account offences An account offence is creating or using an invoice or any other accounting document or record containing false or incomplete information; unlawfully omitting to make a record of a payment. In order to commit, conceal or diguise the offences mentioned above

© Johan Løje, Jurisdiction A Party has jurisdiction when an –offence is committed in whole or in part in its territory; –offender is one of its nationals, one of its public officials, or a member of one of its domestic public assemblies; –offence involves one of its public officials or members of its domestic public assemblies or any person referred to in Articles 9 to 11 who is at the same time one of its nationals.

© Johan Løje, Corporate liability legal persons can be held liable for the criminal offences of active bribery, trading in influence and money laundering established in accordance with this Convention, committed for their benefit by –any natural person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, who has a leading position within the legal person, based on: a power of representation of the legal person; or an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; or an authority to exercise control within the legal person; –as well as for involvement of such a natural person as accessory or instigator in the above-mentioned offences.

© Johan Løje, Sanctions The sanctions imposed must be –Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions and measures, including, when committed by natural persons, penalties involving deprivation of liberty which can give rise to extradition The sanctions for legal persons must also be –criminal or non-criminal sanctions, including monetary sanctions

© Johan Løje, Sanctions – 2 Sanctions must involve the right to –confiscate or otherwise deprive the instrumentalities and proceeds of criminal offences established in accordance with this Convention, or property the value of which corresponds to such proceeds

© Johan Løje, Authorities The authorities available to fight corruption must be –persons or entities specialized in the fight against corruption with –necessary independence in accordance with the fundamental principles of the legal system of the Party –effectively and free from any undue pressure –adequately trained and with financial resources

© Johan Løje, Witness protection effective and appropriate protection must be available for those –who report the criminal offences –otherwise co-operate with the investigating or prosecuting authorities –witnesses who give testimony concerning these offences

© Johan Løje, Facilitate the gathering of evidence Measures must facilitate the gathering of evidence related to criminal offences –identify, trace, freeze and seize instrumentalities and proceeds of corruption, or property the value of which corresponds to such proceeds liable to measures –empower its courts or other competent authorities to order that bank, financial or commercial records be made available or be seized Bank secrecy shall not be an obstacle

© Johan Løje, Implementation The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) shall monitor the implementation of the convention

© Johan Løje, GRECO Organization to monitor fight against corruption –Located in Strassbourg –The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) shall monitor the implementation of the convention

© Johan Løje, International Cooperation The parties must cooperate according to available international instruments

© Johan Løje, International Cooperation International cooperation shall include –Prompt processing requests from authorities that, in conformity with their domestic laws, have the power to investigate or prosecute criminal offences –Mutual legal assistance under paragraph 1 of this article may be refused if the requested Party believes that compliance with the request would undermine its fundamental interests, national sovereignty, national security or ordre public Parties shall not invoke bank secrecy as a ground to refuse any co-operation

© Johan Løje, Bribery of officials in Denmark Active –Criminal Act art. 122 Those who unauthorized renders, promises, or offers someone, who act in Danish, Foreign or international official duty or assignments, gifts or other advantage in order to induce the person in question, is punishable with a fine, or imprisonment up until 3- years

© Johan Løje, Bribery of officials in Denmark Passive –Criminal Act art. 144 He who in exercise of his Danish, Foreign and international public affairs or assignments unlawfully receives, requires og let himself accept a gift or other advantages is punishable by law by imprisonment unto 6 years or in minor instances a fine

© Johan Løje, Bribery in private affaires Art. 299 –Covers both active and passive bribery –Covers also administration of public property by a private individual –Any contribution Against a fine or imprisonment up until 1 ½ years those are punished, who In connection with the administration of another persons property for himself or others unlawfully receives, requests or let himself obtains a gift or other advantage, as well as he, who gives, promises or offers such gift or other advantage

© Johan Løje, Bribery in private affairs - contribution Contribution to bribery is penalised according to art. 23 No matter –whether the contributor recieves any advantage himself –The criminal act is in fact perfected

© Johan Løje, Bribery in private affairs - Attempt Attempt to bribery is penalised according to art. 19 Does not apply if the perpetrator voluntarily withdraws from the action –Unles he does that because he is forced to do so

© Johan Løje, Bribery – liability of legal entities Art. 306 –Legal entities are liable for committing criminal offences Art. 27 –Criminal liability for a legal entity requires that within its boundaries a criminal offence is committed, which may be blamed on one or more people connected to the legal entity or to the legal entity as such.