22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison NWP Bias Monitoring Double-Differencing as inter-calibration technique.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison SEVIRI-IASI Inter-calibration Uncertainty Evaluation.
Advertisements

Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
Recent activities on utilization of microwave imager data in the JMA NWP system - Preparation for AMSR2 data assimilation - Masahiro Kazumori Japan Meteorological.
JMA’s GSICS and SCOPE-CM Activities (CGMS-41-JMA-WP-04) CGMS-41, Jul , 2013, Tsukuba, Japan 1 JMA / Meteorological Satellite Center.
The vertical resolution of the IASI assimilation system – how sensitive is the analysis to the misspecification of background errors? Fiona Hilton and.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R platform. The sensor.
GSICS Bias Monitoring Routine comparisons of satellite radiances against reference GSICS Correction Function to correct issued radiances For consistent.
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating cloud affected infrared radiances at the Met Office Ed Pavelin and Roger Saunders, Met Office, Exeter.
Incrementing moisture fields with satellite observations
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS JMA’s Cal/Val activities Presented to CGMS-44 Working Group.
JMA Report 24 Mar 2009 Yoshihiko Tahara Incorrect RMA equation reported in the January meeting GSICS correction for MTSAT –Don’t we need standard GSICS.
GRWG Agenda Item Towards Operational GSICS Corrections for Meteosat/SEVIRI IR Channels Tim Hewison EUMETSAT 1.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
1EUM/RSP/VWG/16/ Tim Hewison Tom Stone Manik Bali Selecting and Migrating GSICS Inter-Calibration Reference Instruments.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Introduction to GSICS Presented.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating infra-red sounder data over land John Eyre for Ed Pavelin Met Office, UK Acknowledgements: Brett Candy DAOS-WG,
Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu.
A Rising Expectation for ISCCP to produce Long-Term Climate Data Records on Satellite Cloud Climatology over 30 years prepared by Toshiyuki KURINO, JMA.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
1.Bob Iacovazzi (NOAA) - Road to Pre-operational Phase Presentation 2.All – Discussion & Feedback 3.Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) – Reminders: Korea, Conference,
GRWG ON THIN ICE? Presentation by Tim Hewison CONTAMINATION EFFECTS ON METEOSAT/SEVIRI CALIBRATION TIM HEWISON, JOHANNES MÜLLER, REBECA GUTIERREZ.
Marianne König, Tim Hewison, Peter Miu
Summary Outcome of the First GSICS Users’ Workshop
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Minimising Uncertainty in SBAF - Using AIRS to bridge gap HIRS/2-IASI GSICS meeting, March 2014, Darmstadt, Germany - Change title to more general one.
Review of EUMETSAT’s GEO-LEO Correction
Contents GSICS activities Visible channel calibration
Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
Second GSICS Users’Workshop:
DCC method implementation in FY3/MERSI and FY2
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
GSICS SEVIRI-IASI Inter-Calibration Uncertainty Evaluation Tim Hewison1 The regression propagates these variances to estimate the uncertainty on the corrected.
Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center,
Japan Meteorological Agency / Meteorological Satellite Center
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
Building-in a Validation cycle for GSICS Products
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
Combining Multiple References
Use of NWP+RTM as inter-calibration tool
Challenge: High resolution models need high resolution observations
AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Infrared Inter-Calibration Product Announcements
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
Developing Spectral Corrections / SRF Retrievals Tim Hewison
Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency
Development of inter-comparison method for 3.7µm channel of SLSTR-IASI
Intercalibration of AMSU-A,MHS and Update on mitigating loss of AATSR
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Developing GSICS products for IR channels of GEO imagers Tim Hewison
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report Tim Hewison
GSICS Products’ Improvements and Developments
Jörg Schulz (EUMETSAT) - Re-calibration of Meteosat archive using HIRS
Formation of IR Sub-Group and Reference Selection
Presentation of GSICS Inter-Calibration Results - Web Displays
Why use NWP for GSICS? It is crucial for climate and very desirable for NWP that we understand the characteristics of satellite radiance biases Simultaneous.
Variogram Stability Analysis
IASI / AIRS / CRIS cross-calibrations 5a 0:20
Defining the Products: ‘GSICS Correction’
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
Fabien Carminati, Stefano Migliorini, & Bruce Ingleby
Aid to Users Selection of GSICS Products Thoughts on need for RAC/ARC products Tim Hewison EUMETSAT.
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
Presentation transcript:

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison NWP Bias Monitoring Double-Differencing as inter-calibration technique

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Background Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models Routinely compare Observations with ‘Background’ (short-range forecast model fields) In Observation space – after applying radiative transfer model to model fields extracted to coordinates of observations 1 st step of assimilation cycle To monitor and correct relative biases Observations-Model Potential method to monitor instruments’ relative biases By Double Differencing against NWP model fields Hypothesis: Background error terms tend to cancel out –Bullet

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea UK Met Office Datasets UK Met Office process satellite data from : Meteosat/SEVIRI – IR channels only – in clear sky only Metop/IASI – only 35/8741 channels - in clear sky only Aqua/AIRS – only 35/ channels – in clear sky only Metop/HIRS – IR channels only – in clear sky only Envisat/AATSR – IR channels only – in clear sky only NOAA/Metop/AMSUA/AMSUB/MHS – microwave – all sky …and many more! UK Met Office supplied EUMETSAT with Bias Monitoring data –For above instruments –Over 1 or 2 year period

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office Calculation of radiance biases For channel n Sensor 1: DBT(n) = mean{y n - H n (x i )} i= 1 to k obs For channel m Sensor 2: DBT(m) = mean{y m - H m (x i )} i= 1 to k obs Assume same bias? x i atmospheric state vector for observation i Compare DBT(n) with DBT(m) (double difference)

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office Binning of data ParameterSEVIRIHIRSIASIAIRS TemporalHourly4 hrs12 hrs Spatial1 in 4All1 in 41 in 9 Latitude30 o bands Longitude30 o bands Channels8 IR19 IRTable 2 Incidence angles10 o bins Surface typesea/land/ice CloudClear/cloudy Day/night Clear/cloudy Day/night Clear/cloudy Day/night Clear/cloudy Day/night Scene radiance10 bins channel specific 10 bins channel specific 10 bins channel specific 10 bins channel specific

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office SEVIRI vs HIRS/IASI 13.4um bias HIRS SEVIRI IASI

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office SEVIRI vs HIRS/IASI 13.4um bias IASI-NWP SEVIRI-NWP (SEVIRI-NWP) -(IASI-NWP)

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office EUMETSAT Inter-Calibration of Met9/SEVIRI-Metop/IASI IR13.4 SEVIRI-IASI

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea © Crown copyright Met Office SEVIRI vs HIRS/IASI 13.4um bias (SEVIRI-NWP) -(IASI-NWP) SEVIRI-IASI Same Slopes Different Offsets

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea SEVIRI & IASI have Different Background Errors Because different channels see different things, Background error terms don’t fully cancel! B 1 ≠B 2 We want to obtain radiance difference:(O 1 -O 2 )= (L M -L M|R ) From NWP Bias Monitoring statistics:(O-B) 1 = (L M -L M|N ) and (O-B) 2 = (L R’ -L R’|N ) M = Monitored Instrument (SEVIRI), N = NWP Model Fields R = Reference Instrument (IASI), R’ = Subset of Reference Instrument A priori we can use IASI obs to synthesis L M & L R & L R’ and use these to establish relationships: L M|R = ƒ( L R ) & L R’|R = ƒ( L R ) However, we cannot establish L R’|N or L M|N without L R|N

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea SEVIRI & HIRS have Different Background Errors Because different channels see different things, Background error terms don’t fully cancel! B 1 ≠B 2 We want to obtain radiance difference:(O 1 -O 2 )= (L M -L M|R ) From NWP Bias Monitoring statistics:(O-B) 1 = (L M -L M|N ) and (O-B) 2 = (L R -L R|N ) M = Monitored Instrument (SEVIRI), N = NWP Model Fields R = Reference Instrument (HIRS) A priori we can use IASI obs to synthesis L M & L R and use these to establish the relationship: L M|R = ƒ( L R ) However, we cannot establish L R|N or L M|N without L R|N

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Hybrid Method So: Use Inter-Calibration of Collocated Observations –within mstats bins –|Lat|<30°, |Lon-Lon SS |<30°, | θ |<30°, |Tb-Tb STD |<10K, … To ‘calibrate’ NWP Double-Difference Stats –in the same bins –at same time/dates –to account for different background errors Allows NWP bias statistics to be used to study dependencies –SEVIRI-IASI as (L M -L M|R )= ƒ(λ, φ, θ, T b, …)

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Double Difference Analysis Procedure Read selection of IASI data for training dataset, L R Convolve IASI data with SEVIRI SRS, L M|R Extract IASI channels present in mstats data, L R’|R Multiple regression of L M|R and L R’|R to define coefficients w i,j Clear sky only? Select different date – make it a weekend Read mstats data for SEVIRI-NWP, ( L M -L M|N ) i over 4wk period Read mstats data for IASI-NWP, (L R’ -L R’|N ) j over 4wk period Double-Difference (SEVIRI-NWP)-(IASI-NWP): ( L M -L M|N ) i – ∑ j w i,j (L R’ -L R’|N ) j Read all SEVIRI-IASI collocation data: L M, L R over 4wk period Apply a cloud mask and land/sea mask to SEVIRI-IASI data Bin SEVIRI-IASI data into same bins as mstats Compare mean and SD of ( L M -L M|N ) i – ∑ j w i,j (L R’ -L R’|N ) j and L M -L R in bins

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Calibrating Model Biases Statistics give similar trends NWP Double Differences Radiance synthesized from IASI observations for: –Clear Sky –Over Sea –At Night –in the same bins: |Lat|<30°, |Lon-Lon SS |<30° Slopes of (L M -L M|N )-(L R’ -L R’|N ) similar to L M|R -L R’|R for –Incidence Angle, θ –Tb (limited range) + Black: double differences (O-B) SEVIRI -(O-B) IASI : (L M -L M|N )-(L R’ -L R’|N ) X Red: direct radiance differences O SEVIRI -O IASI : (L M -L M|R ) For all observed radiances Subtract these for a given bin to estimate magnitude of model contributions First Rough Results

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Results To be continued…

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Interesting Irrelevancies Statistics give similar trends NWP Double Differences Radiance synthesized from IASI observations for: –Clear Sky –Over Sea –At Night –in the same bins: |Lat|<30°, |Lon-Lon SS |<30° Slopes of (L M -L M|N )-(L R’ -L R’|N ) similar to L M|R -L R’|R for –Incidence Angle, θ –Tb (limited range) + Black: radiance difference between SEVIRI channels and IASI subsets, L M|R -L R’|R : X Red: double differences (O-B) SEVIRI -(O-B) IASI : (L M -L M|N )-(L R’ -L R’|N ) But B SEVIRI ≠ B IASI, so calculating O SEVIRI -O IASI doesn't really help!