Status report Els de Wolf Annual Meeting 2011, Nikhef.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDR Feb 2006Mar 2008Dec 2009 Mar Design Study Preparatory Phase TDR tendering construction data taking governance legal entity pre-production.
Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Jan 2009 U. Katz: Astroparticle Physics 1 What is KM3NeT – the Vision  Future cubic-kilometre sized neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Exceeds.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
ANTARES and KM3NeT John Carr Centre de Physique de Particules de Marseille IN2P3 / MICINN meeting Madrid, 12 Jan 2009.
R. Coniglione INFN-LNS TEV PA Paris July 2010 KM3NeT: a project for an underwater cubic kilometre neutrino telescope R. Coniglione INFN-LNS for KM3NeT.
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT  The KM3NeT physics case  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards.
A. BELIAS, NESTOR Institute, Pylos, Greece TeVPA 2009, July 13-17, SLAC1 KM3NeT, a deep sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea KM3NeT objectives.
ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.
Status of the KM3NeT Project  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards Implementation 3rd Workshop.
P. Sapienza, NOW 2010 The KM3NeT project  Introduction & Main objectives  The KM3NeT Technical Design Report  Telescope physics performance  New developments.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
By E. Anassontzis, A. Belias, E. Kappos, K. Manolopoulos, P. Rapidis on behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration.
Antares/KM3NeT M. de Jong. neutrinos  p Scientific motivation: – origin cosmic rays – birth & composition relativistic jets – mechanism of cosmic particle.
KM3NeT ESFRI/PSE-WG meeting, 3 December 2013, Brussels Maarten de Jong & Paschal Coyle on behalf of KM3NeT 1 The next generation neutrino telescope in.
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes Prof. dr. Maarten de Jong Nikhef / Leiden University.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Alexander Kappes Forschungsseminar Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 11. February 2011 Fishing for Neutrinos in the Mediterranean Sea –
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
KM3NeT The Birth of a Giant V. Popa, KM3NeT Collaboration Institute for Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.
Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic  -Ray Sources Alexander Kappes, Christian Stegmann University Erlangen-Nuremberg Felix Aharonian, Jim Hinton.
Exploring the Cosmos with Neutrinos Aart Heijboer …all of them. nm
Status of KM3NeT (Detector Design Optimisations) Christopher Naumann, CEA Saclay – IRFU / SPP for the KM3NeT consortium 44 th Reconcontres de Moriond,
KM3NET 24 September 2004 Gerard van der Steenhoven (NIKHEF)
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
Neutrinos as Cosmic Messengers in the Era of IceCube, ANTARES and KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Vulcano Workshop 2012 Frontier Objects.
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Susan Cartwright IDM2000 ANTARES : vStatus u site evaluation u demonstrator u detector design vProspects u physics aims u neutralino detection status and.
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
Physics results and perspectives of the Baikal neutrino project B. Shoibonov (JINR, Dubna) for the Baikal collaboration February 2009.
Antares Neutrino Telescope Jean-Pierre Ernenwein Université de Haute Alsace (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration) Rencontres de Moriond, 13/03/2005.
Agustín Sánchez-Losa IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) Transient sources, like AGNs or Gamma Ray Bursters, are among.
ANTARES  Physics motivation  Recent results  Outlook 4 senior physicists, ~5 PhD students, ~5 technicians M. de Jong RECFA 23 September 2005.
KM3NeT International Solvay Institutes 27  29 May 2015, Brussels, Belgium. Maarten de Jong Astro-particle and Oscillations Research with Cosmics in the.
KM3NeT ‑ The Next Generation Neutrino Telescope Alexander Kappes IceCube Particle Astrophysics Symposium Union South, Madison, May 13, 2013.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
News from KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen MANTS Meeting, Garching, October 2013.
Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics for the ANTARES collaboration IAU GA, SpS 10, Rio de Janeiro, Aug Status of Neutrino.
The ANTARES Project Sino-French workshop on the Dark Universe Stephanie Escoffier Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille On behalf of the ANTARES.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope and its Dark Matter Capabilities
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
Status report on the Antares project Luciano Moscoso (DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay F Gif-sur-Yvette) (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration)
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
Neutrinos and the sea Els de Wolf NIKHEF Ilias Meeting, Prague, February 8 th 2005.
KM 3 Neutrino Telescope European deep-sea research infrastructure DANS – symposium Maarten de Jong.
Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic  -Ray Sources Alexander Kappes, Christian Stegmann University Erlangen-Nuremberg Felix Aharonian, Jim Hinton.
Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.
Evaluation of the discovery potential of an underwater Mediterranean neutrino telescope taking into account the estimated directional resolution and energy.
The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory LHAASO.
STATUS AND PHYSICS GOALS OF KM3NET Paolo Piattelli P. Piattelli, ICHEP14 Valencia INFN – LNS, Catania (Italy)
Antares status and plans  Reminder  Project status  Plans M. de Jong.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Neutrino telescopes: ANTARES and KM3NeT Maarten de Jong Programme: Group composition (current): 6+2 staff, 4 post-doc, 4 PhD. Vidi 1, Veni 1+1.
KM3NeT – Stautus and Future Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen th International Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Detectors.
Antares/KM3NeT M. de Jong. Antares  2000NL joined collaboration (3.3 M€)  2006 ‒ 2008construction  2006 ‒ todaydata taking 24h/day  2012MoU signed.
Alexander Kappes ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the KM3NeT Consortium 2009 EPS HEP, Krakow, 16. July 2009 The KM3NeT project: Towards a km 3 -scale.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
Pre-Production Models for KM3NeT
KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes
KM3NeT multi-km3 neutrino telescope: perspectives
P.Kooijman, UVA-GRAPPA, UU, Nikhef
Concluding remarks E. Migneco
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
Els de Wolf 20 February 2012, Catania
M.Bou-Cabo, J.A. Martínez.-Mora on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration
KM3NeT: where are we and where do we go
discovery potential of Galactic sources
Presentation transcript:

Status report Els de Wolf Annual Meeting 2011, Nikhef

180m - 130m 860m 320 towers 20 storeys/tower DOMs 2 Artist’s impression Volume: 6 – 4 km 3

Cosmic neutrino sources Galactic sources – SuperNova Remnants – Pulsar Wind Nebulae – Micro Quasars Extra Galactic Sources – Active Galactic Nuclei – Gamma Ray Bursts Cosmogenic (GZK) neutrinos Dark Matter annihillation 3

KM3NeT sensitivity to E -2 flux Sensitivity (90% C.L.) for E -2 point sources after 1 year. (declination) 308 towers; 180 m distance; instrumented volume ~ 6 km 3 4

Optimization of sensitivity For fixed number of € one can optimize sensitivity for different sources This depends on photocathode density eV 5

KM3NeT Science Focus Geographical location in Northern Hemisphere – Field of view includes Galactic centre Optical properties of deep-sea water – Excellent angular resolution Envisaged budget 220 ‒ 250 M€ – Large effective neutrino area Observe Supernova remnants in our Galaxy 6

Example source RXJ1713 Q.Yuan et al, Astrop. Phys. 35(2011)33, arXiv v2 Using hadronic model 7 Gamma ray flux can be interpreted with leptonic models (IC) or with hadronic models Detection of neutrinos: smoking gun of identifying acceleration sources of the Galactic CRs

RXJ1713 in KM3NeT E [GeV] events /year Triggered events *) Neutrinos from RXJ1713 *) TDR detector: 2 blocks of 157 towers; 180 m between towers 8 Optimization background reduction  towers closer together and/or longer bar length Atmospheric neutrinos [deg -2 ] About 1 event/month from RXJ1713

Discovery potential factor 1.5 ‒ 2 improvement compared to TDR design 9 *) 5σ discovery: probability that an upward fluctuation of background is larger than the expectation value of the signal, is < 2.8 x ; typical error +/- 1 year *)

Include other sources Un-binned likelihood method (~20%) – morphology of source – inclusion of energy estimate Reconstruction – use of directionality of DOMs – looking few degrees above horizon (upto ~20%) Anticipated improvements 10 Good prospects for a 5 σ discovery in 5 year

KM3NeT Digital Optical Module 31 x 3” PMTs Light concentrator ring → “free” larger tube Calibration instrumentation inside compass, tiltmeter acoustic piezo Nano (led) beacon All electronics inside Radius [mm] 11

PMTs for KM3NeT 4 manufacturers – ETEL (delivered 50; plus 50 within 2 weeks) – Hamamatsu (delivered 50) – MELZ (prototype expected soon) – Zhan Chuang Photonics (prototype expected mid 2012) All 4 consider production rate for KM3NeT feasible High Q.E. ETEL tubes tested at Nikhef/KVI ETEL 12

Heat conductor Read Out Electronics Nanobeacon Foam core Octopus board Inside the DOM 13 Central Logic board with FPGA and TDCs DC/DC convertor

Communication network 14 Shore station Primary Junction Box Secondary Junction Boxes Detection Units Optical Fanout Module Single optical channel between shore and each DOM Complex electronics on-shore

Mechanical structure 15 6m Rope Spiralized e/o cable Cable connection to DOM

In-situ validations in 2012 Multi-PMT module in ANTARES instrumentation line – Measurements of singles and coincidence rates using ANTARES readout KM3NeT DOM in ANTARES instrumentation line – Long term bench mark of KM3NeT DOM readout via ANTARES backbone Prototype KM3NeT tower at Capo Passero site (Possibly) Mechanical KM3NeT tower at Pylos site Planning dependent on availability of vessels and ROVs 16

Smaller building blocks Better strategy for deployment Does not compromise sensitivity flux Allows for a networked detector Sensitivity flux for RXJ

Reviews NWO roadmap proposal – KM3NeT headquarters in Amsterdam – Temperature array inside neutrino telescope (NIOZ) – Referees positive – Site visit in January 2012 KM3NeT external Scientific Standing Committee – Review of scientific priorities and technology choices – Meeting in March and November 2011 at Nikhef – Report expected February

After the preparatory phase FP7 Preparatory Phase will end March 2012 Current total funding for construction ~60 M€ – Need to spend before 2015 Coordination of orders/tendering starting 2012 – Need legal structure  ERIC (no VAT) – MoU is in preparation – Management team to be formed Aim for production: first DOM assembly line in

Summary Galactic sources are within reach Good prospects for a 5σ discovery in 5 years Technical solutions are (near to being) verified Networked remotely operated detector Legal framework is imminent Funds allow for start of construction 20

21

Fermi-LAT 22 Mixed spectrum need neutrinos??

Example source RXJ1713 Assumed neutrino spectrum Radius=0.65  E -2 23

24

25

Performance E [GeV] PP Angle [degrees] Effective area [m 2 ] Trigger *) Angular resolution *) muon neutrino ABCABC )* TDR detector: 2x 157 towers; distance 180 m 26

Other physics Other galactic sources Extra-galactic sources Gamma-ray bursts Fermi bubbles Diffuse fluxes Cosmic rays Magnetic monopoles Nuclearites Dark matter...