Www.kriminologie.cz Public and prisoners – views and opinions on sanction policy Miroslav Scheinost Institute of Criminology and Social Prevention Prague.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
Advertisements

MEDIATION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HUNGARY TÜNDE BARABÁS, PH.D – SZANDRA WINDT, PH.D MEREPS MEETING 12 NOVEMBER 2009, LONDON.
ALTERNATIVES TO IMPRISONMENT TAPIO LAPPI-SEPPÄLÄ NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF LEGAL POLICY FINLAND.
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Who’s Who In The Рекомендуется к использованию при изучении темы «Юридическая система Великобритании» Составители: студенты группы П12 под рук. Северинец.
Criminal Law and Procedure LWB 232 Week 13 - Sentencing dispositions.
The Norwegian Correctional Menu With emphasis on minor crimes Director General Marianne Vollan, Norwegian Correctional Service Seminar in Riga, 30 September.
Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (PDVA) No 34 of 2005.
Changing crime rates? Gabrielle Maxwell 27 February 2009 Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
AREA OF STUDY 2 The criminal law PART 2. In this part you will learn about: the principles of criminal liability, crimes and defences the criminal investigation.
Key to the Exercises  Pre-class Work II  the crime problem; serious; crimes; criminals; ine third of; 41 million; 36 to 40 million  soft; crimes and.
Topic 10 Sentencing Topic 10 Sentencing. Topic 10 Sentencing Introduction to sentencing aims of sentencing types of sentences youth sentencing.
Responsibility, Control, and Sexual Assault: The Clery Act’s Legacy Stephanie Hurley, Marshall University MACUHO Annual Conference 2012.
Crime and crime prevention in SA Presentation to the Safety and Security Portfolio Committee Anton du Plessis, Duxita Mistry and Makubetse Sekhonyane Crime.
 Why would the Canadian Justice system have a separate system just for youth?  What age should “youth” be considered?  Is a separate system beneficial?
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Sentencing and Corrections. Repeat offender Serves the following purpose: Retribution (eye for an eye) Deterrence (to discourage defendant from committing.
Survey Research. Asking questions Census probably earliest form of survey Karl Marx Political surveys & polls When to use surveys: for information that.
BY TANYA MARIA GOLASH-BOZA Chapter Eleven: Racism and the Criminal Justice System.
Sentencing. Purpose: To contribute, along with crime prevention initiatives, to respect for the law and the maintenance of a just, peaceful and safe society.
Sentencing in Canada.
a) The power of arrest for a citizen or police b) The rights of the accused c) How the trial will proceed (in which court) and d) What penalty will.
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
What Are We Learning Today? What is the intention of the Youth Criminal Justice Act?
LECTURE 4 Theme: Fundamentals of criminal law.. PLAN 1. Criminal law. 2. Criminal law history. Criminal sanctions. 3. Criminal law in different countries.
The Custodial Detention of Children and the Youth Justice Review Una Convery and Linda Moore Knowledge Exchange Seminar 21 March 2013.
Revisiting ‘A unique punishment’ Professor Jacqueline Tombs Glasgow Caledonian University.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Role of the Courts Court decides what sentence should be imposed on the offender. The Judge or magistrates decide on an appropriate punishment in each.
Elaine Stalker Why families need additional support Edinburgh Corn Exchange 3 October 2012 Family Matters ‘He’s doing the sentence, but I’m paying the.
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Juvenile Delinquency in Latvia Dr. Andrejs Judins, senior researcher of the Centre for Public Policy Providus
An Overview of the Prison System in Lithuania Sandra Stanytė Social worker Vilnius archdiocese CARITAS In Service Training Course "Training Teachers and.
High-Risk Offenders under the Age of 18 The Social Services Perspective Tove Pettersson National Board of Institutional Care (SiS) Sweden
“Restorative Justice and Probation” Restorative Justice in probation practice: strategic steps, making the footprint International conference, Prague 23rd-25th.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
Canada’s Legal System The Judicial Branch. Who is in the Judiciary Branch? Executive and Legislative branches = _________________ Police = _________________.
Vocabulary  Retribution- Theory that includes harsh punishment for criminals, such as long prison sentences and uncomfortable prison conditions.  Rehabilitation-
Chapter 5 Young offenders. In this chapter, you will look at how the law deals with young offenders. You will study the age of criminal responsibility.
START OF COURT PROCEEDINGS. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, OFFENCES AND BAIL  Criminal proceedings start because of an arrest, summons, charge or warrant – the.
Zápatí prezentace The System of Criminal Law Sanctions in the Czech Criminal law.
Children in court & Diversionary Schemes By Maddie.
Chapter 4 The Rule Of law Criminal Justice Presentation BY: Abria Johnson & Gabe Hagwood.
What is the situation in Portugal 14 years after the reformof the drug policy Rita Faria Jorge Quintas School of Criminology – Faculty of Law of the University.
Sentencing This will be fun! I promise?. Purpose: To contribute, along with crime prevention initiatives, to respect for the law and the maintenance of.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Volunteering at Teen Court Chase Hinnant.  I chose my topic because teens are starting to become more violent than ever and I feel that the Juvenile.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Transforming prisons into correctional centres - places of new beginnings Monitoring of offenders placed under Section 62(f) – Criminal Procedure Act (No.
The Young Offenders Act April 1984 National system for dealing with youth.
S UMMARY OF RESEARCH RESULTS AND PROPOSALS FOR SANCTION POLICY Prof. JUDr. Helena Válková, CSc. Department of Social Work.
Criminal Justice Reform Speaker: Otar Kakhidze Date:
PROF. JUDR. PAVEL ŠÁMAL, PH.D. The Supreme Court of the Czech Republic Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, Department of Criminal Law Comenius.
Punishment, Rehabilitation and Reducing Crime
Criminal Justice Unit 4.  Read  Should euthanasia (aka assisted suicide) be legal?
Civil and Criminal Law Chapter 16 (Part 2). Criminal Cases O Criminal Cases are when the state or federal government charges someone with a crime O The.
Where are we going to? WHY & WHAT & HOW Cisca Joldersma 1.
Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Mechanics of the YCJA Mechanics of the YCJA Consequences under YCJA Consequences.
Preventive Detention JUDr. Petr Škvain Institute of the State and Law Academy of Sciences Prague Department of the Criminal Law Faculty of Law University.
CRIMINAL LAW 1. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. PART 2. PENOLOGY.
Sentencing A Criminal Justice Issue Area Primer for the National Foundation for Women Legislators.
The First International Meeting in Budapest
C H A P T E R T H R E.
Lauris Neikens Children and family policy department senior expert
CEP International Conference on “Alternatives to detention”
Restorative group conferences with violent juveniles preparation of young offender, his/her family, and victim for conference, their experience with.
Returns to Prison for Violent (and Non-Violent) Offenders
Presentation transcript:

Public and prisoners – views and opinions on sanction policy Miroslav Scheinost Institute of Criminology and Social Prevention Prague International conference Results of the research on sanction policy in the Czech Republic Prague 13 November 2015

Opinions of the public Three surveys on the public opinion: 2012: 963 respondents 2013: 1001 respondents 2014: 1007 respondents The sample was chosen by quota sampling, age over 15

What kinds of penalties that are possible to impose in the CR except of unconditional sentence you may specify? 2012: most known kinds of penalties: fine (44,7%), conditioned sentence (44,2%), community service (43,3) – about 1/3 respondents knew the sanction of house arrest, 10% ban of specific activities 2013: more respondents were familiar with the conditioned sentence (46,7%), the knowledge of other sanctions declined in comparison with 2012, especially the knowledge on community service 2014: the knowledge on alternative sanctions slightly increased ; most known sanctions have been still conditioned sentence, fine and community service

Number of correctly named alternative measures (six alternatives: fine, conditioned sentence, community service, house arrest, ban of specific activities, forfeiture of property)

Do you mean that penalties that may be imposed by the law to the offenders of serious crimes as murder, robbery, rape are today...? % 2012% 2013% 2014 More strict then ten years ago 6,7 6,6 Roughly equal To those ten years ago 41,350,453,8 Less strict then ten years ago 52,042,939,6 TOTAL100,0100

You probably know that Czech prisons are overcrowded. What measure (see following list) you would prefer to solve this problem? % 2012 % 2013% 2014 Make the régime and living conditions in prisons more tough in order to motivate sentenced people not to return 32,1 34,932,3 Make the penalties more strict in order to prevent possible offenders from committing crimes 30,0 34,831,9 Instead of imprisonment more often use alternative measures 16,9 12,616,7 To try to prevent crime by education, in families, in schools 11,4 9,210,3 Create more space in prisons (to build or to hire new prisons) 7,0 6,86,4 Others 2,0 1,62,3 More often use amnesty 0,6 0,20,1 TOTAL 100,0 100

Opinions of prisoners 201 respondents (10% women), XI-XII/2013, 4 prisons if they may choose between alternative measure and unconditioned imprisonment for 6 months 80% prefer alternative measure (mostly community sanction – 91%)prefer alternative measure 49% see as an appropriate alternative to one year in prison the fine between 25 – 100 thousands of crowns (1 EUR = 27 crowns) 75% - sanctions in the Czech Penal Code are too severe If they are in position of fictitious judge, they are nearly so severe as the public

Do you mean that penalties that may be imposed by the law to the offenders of serious crimes as murder, robbery, rape are today...? number% More strict then ten years ago 8039,8 Roughly equal To those ten years ago 4823,9 Less strict then ten years ago 3416,9 I do not know3919,4 TOTAL201100

What prisoners mostly miss … What they are short: social contacts; especially with the family but also with friends; the need of liberty is only for the second place Fundamental problems to be solved after release from prison: job, accommodation, family ties Opinions of prisoner confirm the urgent need to improve substantially the training before leaving the prison and subsequent postpenitentiary care

Conclusions The opinion of the Czech public with regard to sanction policy has been still rather punitive The information on alternative measures has been not too high; the results from 2013 show even the decrease of knowledge The principles of the new penal code – or more general of sanction policy – are not sufficiently known in the public, not to say accepted Prisoners differ from the common population in preferring the alternative sanctions but being in the position of judge, they are nearly as punitive as „common people“ But they see clearly the problems that they will face after release

Conclusion The result is that – however the intention of legislator was positive – the media did not help too much to present this intention to the public and the attitudes of public persist to be strictly punitive. This punitive attitude is moreover reflected even in opinions of prisoners; nevertheless the prisoners are aware of problems they are confronted to after release.

Thanks a lot for your attention! Contact: