Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.
Advertisements

K-12 Obesity Prevention Grants Quarter 2 Grantee Webinar December 12, – 3:30 pm Lauren Kelsey School Grants Manager Alaska Obesity Prevention &
Independent schools inspection annual conferences 2014 Bradley Simmons, National Director, Independent schools John Seal HMI, Special Advisor to Independent.
Louisiana Cancer Control Partnership Evaluation of State Partners Donna L. Williams, MS, MPH And Melody M. Robinson, MPH.
Creating an Evaluation Plan Freya Bradford, Senior Consultant NorthSky Nonprofit Network May 23, 2013.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
School Improvement Service in Partnership with National and local approaches from England that raise the capacity of organisations to deliver careers advice.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Managing Projects and Clients Senior Consultant Training 23 September 2005.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.
Safe Harbors Quarterly Partner’s Meeting August 22, 2013 New Holly Gathering Hall.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
1 Final Version© Ipsos MORI Final Version Evaluation of Adult Cancer Aftercare Services Quantitative and Qualitative Service Evaluation for NHS Improvement.
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
Measuring the effectiveness of your volunteer program Meals On Wheels Association of America 2011 Annual Conference August 30, 2011 Stacey McKeever, MPH,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Introduction to Evaluation January 26, Slide 2 Innovation Network, Inc. Who We Are: Innovation Network National nonprofit organization Committed.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE JANUARY 31, ) All participants are in listen-in mode. 2) To ask a question, please type it into the Question box to the.
HIV/AIDS Interface Technology Systems (HITS): A Program Update SPNS IT Grantees Meeting March 17, 2004 County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services.
10/22/2015 5:20:08 PM EEC IT Strategic Plan June Board Meeting June 12, 2007 Quinsigamond Community College Harrington Learning Center 670 West Boylston.
Partnership Analysis & Enhancement Tool Kit Cindy S. Soloe Research Triangle Institute (RTI) April Y. Vance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
NATIONAL YOUTH IN TRANSITION DATABASE (NYTD) A Guide for Implementation.
FER Q & A Answers to last minute questions you may have about writing Final Evaluation Reports (FER) for your project.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Evaluating Educational Technology Brian McNurlen & Chris Migotsky University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
November 15, 2007 The “ABC” of Effective Field Monitoring & Supervision November 15, 2007.
Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
CCCB Evaluation Toolkit: Overview and Update on Progress Angela Moore, MPH 2009 NCCCP & NPCR Collaborative Meeting April 16, 2009.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOODS FUND LEARNING COLLABORATIVE MEETING NYU School of Medicine Evaluation Team November 11-12, 2015.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Aretha George A lasting difference for heritage and people Heritage Lottery Fund Strategic Framework
NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance.
Improving Technology Infrastructure and Web-based Information and Services Northeast Iowa Community College PRP031A Christine Woodson, Project Director.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health.
Y1 SBT Workshop EYFS Input Please ensure you have registered your name before you take a seat.
IMPLEMENTATION AND PROCESS EVALUATION PBAF 526. Today: Recap last week Next week: Bring in picture with program theory and evaluation questions Partners?
1 Reading at 6 Lessons learned from the CLLD Programme © Crown Copyright 2006.
BUILDING BRIDGES AND BONDS (B3) A rigorous, multi-site study of innovative services offered by Responsible Fatherhood/ReFORM (RF) programs Unique opportunity.
1 First Nations Economic Development Readiness Questionnaire Presented By: Ontario First Nations Economic Developers Association and Ministry Of Economic.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
Developing Community Assessments
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local evaluators
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Continuous Quality Improvement Process
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Why are we here? The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires that each Title I School hold an Annual Meeting of Title I parents for the purpose of… Informing.
[Region name] Region Conference 2016
PATSCH Presented by: Jacci Lake –PATSCH Certified Parent Educator
‘BOAT CHART’ PROJECT WORKPLAN
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to W.P. Davidson High School Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to Murphy High School’s Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health and health care. A nonprofit, Altarum serves clients in both the public and private sectors. For more information, visit Evaluation Overview State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs Michigan Health Endowment Fund Project Kara Wise Altarum Institute August 25, 2015

2 Objective  Provide an overview of evaluation plans and timeline for the MHEF project.  Discuss the Progress Report Survey

3 Data Collection and Analysis Methods  Mixed-methods approach using a combination of instruments to gather the best mix of quantitative data and qualitative data for context  Surveys  Interviews  Site Visits  Document Review  Analysis using SPSS and Nvivo (qualitative analysis software to analyze by theme)

4 Evaluation Reporting Timeline  September st Progress Report Survey  September 24, 2015 – Training for HEPA Mobile app  December 2015/January nd Progress Report Survey  February 28, Interim Report  If additional information is needed to complete the Interim Report, there is potential for select YMCAs to complete key informant interviews, site visits and/or document reviews.  Year 2 Evaluation Timeline- TBD  Evaluation will include: Progress report surveys Key informant interviews Site visits Document review  January 5, Final MHEF Project Report

5 Progress Report Survey In Depth  Who- All Y grantees must complete the progress report survey.  What- A web-based survey we will use to assess progress made for your project. The survey addresses all areas- HOST, Michigan Swims, and Healthy Living Capacity Building.  When- You will be ed a link to complete the survey in September. You will have 2 weeks to complete the survey.  Where- The survey must be completed online.  How- Work with partners and staff to gather information and assess site practices as necessary to provide the most accurate information possible.

6 Progress Report Survey In Depth- Why?  To collect data in a systematic manner so that we can have the same types of information about your activities despite variability in programming.  To measure the progress made throughout your programming from baseline reporting (Work Plan Survey).  Have all sites started conducting proposed programming/activities? If no, why not?  To assess programming processes such as:  Enrollment numbers  Successes and barriers to program implementation  Lessons learned

7 Progress Report Survey- HOST  2 Sections: Summer programming and school year programming  Topic areas (most data to be collected at site-level):  Program operational characteristic updates  Student Reach/Enrollment  Curriculum being implemented and number of lessons taught  Compliance implementing HEPA standards  Successes, challenges to date

8 Progress Report Survey- Michigan Swims  Topic areas:  Program operational characteristic updates  Student reach/enrollment  Current partnerships  Successes, challenges to date

9 Progress Report Survey- Healthy Living Capacity Building  3 Sections: EnhanceFitness, Moving For Better Balance, YDPP  Topic areas:  Program operational characteristic updates  Project Enrollment  Staff training  Status of planning and/or implementation efforts  Successes, challenges to date

10 Progress Report Survey FAQ  What will you do with this information?  We will use this information to compare your progress against baseline reporting from the Work Plan Survey completed in May  Will I receive my results?  Yes, you will receive a copy of the data you inputted. Additionally, the results from this progress report and the 2 nd progress report conducted in December 2015/January 2016 will be combined and presented in the MHEF Project Interim Report- February 28,  What if I have not conducted proposed program activities yet?  There will be an opportunity for you to report on program processes such as a delay in programming as well as barriers to implementation.

11 Progress Report Survey Tips  Do not leave answers blank or provide incomplete information. If you don’t complete all of the information, we will still have to get it from you and this delays the process.  Do not tell us what you think we want to hear- Be truthful about progress made to date. This information is vital to accurately reporting and evaluating your site’s programs.  If you don’t know how to answer a question because you don’t understand it or it doesn’t seem to fit with your Y’s activities, seek guidance on how to respond instead of guessing.  If you don’t have all of the details being asked, do your best to work with partners and staff to figure details out ahead of time as best you can.

12 HEPA Mobile Plans for the MHEF Project  Michigan will be piloting the use of HEPA Mobile app:  September - December 2015  We will encourage each site to complete each checklist 1x/week or more  Single site and multi-site versions available  Training on app scheduled for September 24  Sites can begin entering data after training

13 Questions?

14 Kara Wise, MPH Senior Policy Associate Center for Healthy Child and Youth Development Altarum Institute 3520 Green Court, #300 Ann Arbor, MI (734)